Apple vs Samsung


Published on

who copied the phones?
did Samsung copied from Apple?
Apple copied from Samsung?
let's see the truth....

Published in: Technology
  • Be the first to comment

Apple vs Samsung

  1. 1. Amila Dayarathne
  2. 2. Apple is more innovative than SAMSUNG
  3. 3. Let’s see the truth…
  4. 4. In 2001
  5. 5. Apple introduced the i-pod
  6. 6. SAMSUNG Introduced SGH-T100
  7. 7. In 2007
  8. 8. Apple introduced the i-phone
  9. 9. SAMSUNG Introduced SGH-J700
  10. 10. Before introducing I-phone, SAMSUNG phones were like this…
  11. 11. After the revolution of I-phone, SAMSUNG phones are like this…
  12. 12. In 2010
  13. 13. Apple introduced the i-pad
  14. 14. SAMSUNG Introduced Galaxy Tab
  15. 15. Before introducing I-pad, SAMSUNG tab is like this…
  16. 16. SAMSUNG Q1
  17. 17. Because of these reasons Apple field a suit in a US court against SAMSUNG, Claiming that they copied Apple’s design for its Galaxy Phones.
  18. 18. Let’s see what SAMSUNG copies from Apple…
  19. 19. A rectangular product shape with all four corners uniformly rounded
  20. 20. The front surface of the product dominated by a screen surface with black borders
  21. 21. Substantial black borders above and below the screen having roughly equal width and narrower black borders on either side of the screen having roughly equal width
  22. 22. A metallic surround framing the perimeter of the top surface
  23. 23. A display of a grid of colorful square icons with uniformly rounded corners.
  24. 24. A bottom row of icons set off from the other icons and that do not change as the pages of the user interface are viewed.
  25. 25. Apple claimed that SAMSUNG also imitated Apple’s product packaging trade dress
  26. 26. Apple claimed that in addition to copying Apple’s product trade dress, SAMSUNG has also copied numerous application icons in which apple had valid trademark rights as shown below.
  27. 27. Apple claimed that SAMSUNG’s infringement of the Apple utility patents provided SAMSUNG with unique functionality for its product that was the result of Apple’s innovation, and not SAMSUNG’s.
  28. 28. Apple claimed that SAMSUNG’s USB cables are a clear knock-off of Apple’s designs.
  29. 29. Apple claimed that power adapters used for SAMSUNG’s smartphones, which are almost an exact replica of Apple’s USB power adapters
  30. 30. And….
  31. 31. Finally The jury ordered Samsung to pay Apple $1.05 billion
  32. 32. According to my opinion…
  33. 33. Apple is more innovative than SAMSUNG
  34. 34. Amila Dayarathne e-mail:- Facebook:-