Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

Nassm 2001

660 views

Published on

Published in: Sports, Education, Business
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

Nassm 2001

  1. 1. INTERNSHIP PROGRAMS: Evaluation, Supervision & Institutional Support Jo Williams Nichols College
  2. 2. ROLE OF INTERNSHIPS <ul><li>Wide recognition of value of internships (Cuneen & Sidwell, 1994; NASPE-NASSM, 2000; Scott, 1992; Tooley, 1997; Verner, 1993) </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Application of knowledge learned in the classroom </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Professional growth </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Networking </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Build resume/recruitment </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Included in NASPE/NASSM program standards. </li></ul>
  3. 3. MANAGEMENT OF INTERNSHIP PROGRAMS <ul><li>Challenge for administrators </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Competition for quality experiences </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Requirements of multiple internships </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Department standards & expectations </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Appropriate supervision by faculty and on-site personnel (Tooley, 1997) </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Evaluation methods </li></ul></ul>
  4. 4. MANAGEMENT OF INTERNSHIP PROGRAMS (Cont’d) <ul><li>Institutional endorsement and support (Chouinard, 1993) </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Financial - budget </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Technology and equipment </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Human resources </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Recognition of time demands for coordinators </li></ul></ul>
  5. 5. PURPOSE <ul><li>Hired to develop new sport management program </li></ul><ul><li>Researched other programs through personal contacts </li></ul><ul><li>Raised many questions </li></ul><ul><li>Key area - Institutional support </li></ul>
  6. 6. METHODOLOGY <ul><li>22 item questionnaire developed </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Demographics </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>General program characteristics </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Evaluation of internships </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Supervision of internships </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Mailed to Sport Management Program Directors at all colleges and universities listed on NASSM’s Website & SBJ (134). </li></ul>
  7. 7. DEMOGRAPHIC INFORMATION <ul><li>Public Institutions - 65% Private Institutions - 33% </li></ul><ul><li>Program size ranged from 10 - 450 students Mean - 102 students </li></ul><ul><li>Number of years program offered ranged 1.5 - 34 years </li></ul><ul><li>Number of full-time faculty teaching within the sport management department ranged from 1 - 12 faculty </li></ul>
  8. 8. GENERAL PROGRAM CHARACTERISTICS <ul><li>76% of programs required an internship </li></ul><ul><li>Variety factors required prior to securing internships </li></ul><ul><ul><li>More than 80% required : </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Specific GPA (2.0 - 3.0) </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Percentage of coursework to be completed (25% - 100%) </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><li>Credits received for internship (3 - 16) </li></ul><ul><li>16 - 900 hours required for completion </li></ul>
  9. 9. CRITERIA REQUIRED PRIOR TO INTERNSHIP
  10. 10. INTERNSHIP EVALUATION & GRADING <ul><li>Final grade based on academic and practical components </li></ul><ul><li>Variety of policies reported </li></ul><ul><ul><li>29% - Awarded 50% of grade to academic component & 50% to practical component. </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>6% - Entire grade based on job performance </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Grade awarded to academic component ranged from 0-80% </li></ul>
  11. 11. EVALUATION OF INTERNSHIPS
  12. 12. RESPONSIBILITY FOR AWARDING GRADE
  13. 13. INTERNSHIP COORDINATION <ul><li>87% of respondents reported having a faculty member designated as the Internship Coordinator </li></ul><ul><li>Release time provided to 70% </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Variety of scenarios </li></ul></ul>
  14. 14. SUPERVISION ISSUES <ul><li>2/3 of programs do not conduct on-site visits for all interns </li></ul><ul><li>Variety of criteria used to determine if visit will occur </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Distance from campus - 64% </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Range 50-500miles </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Cost/budget - 44% </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Relationship building with agency - 37% </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Other criteria - 17% </li></ul></ul>
  15. 15. SUPERVISOR COMPENSATION (SUMMER) <ul><li>58% of institutions offered compensation for supervising interns during the summer </li></ul><ul><li>Compensation policies include; </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Per student fee - 17% </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>$75 - $475 </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Flat fee - 24% </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>$1700 - $3000 </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Percentage of tuition - 17% </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>33% - 75% </li></ul></ul></ul>
  16. 16. KEY FACTORS OF A QUALITY INTERNSHIP PROGRAM <ul><li>Ranking of factors </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Student preparation </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Strong relationship with sites </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Faculty expertise </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Institutional reputation </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Institutional support </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Alumni leaders in the field/Alumni network </li></ul></ul>
  17. 17. STRENGTHS & WEAKNESSES <ul><li>Strengths </li></ul><ul><ul><li># of opportunities/contacts/relationships </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Student quality/enthusiasm/preparation </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Faculty expertise & commitment </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Alumni network </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Weaknesses </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Lack of institutional support/funds/release time </li></ul></ul>
  18. 18. Overall Program Status <ul><li>No “one size fits all” approach to a quality program </li></ul><ul><li>Individual institutions very different </li></ul><ul><li>Many quality programs exist </li></ul><ul><li>Can learn from each other - “Best practices” - modified </li></ul>

×