1.
Dealing with the
Internet of Insecure Things
Arosha K. Bandara – The Open University
arosha.bandara@open.ac.uk / @arosha

2.
Dealing with the Internet of Insecure Things
Overview
3
Security
Internet of
Things
IoT Security &
Privacy
Human-centric
Engineering
Future
Directions

3.
Background: Internet of Things
4
aka Cyber Physical Systems: co-engineered interacting
networks of physical and computational components …
Food &
Agriculture
Transport
Policing
Health &
Wellbeing
+ …
Heterogeneous
IoT Cloud
IoT Intranet
Hybrid IoT

4.
Background: Internet of Things
5
operate at different scales, from individuals
to cities and nations …
Large-scale

5.
Background: Internet of Things
6
Data
Actions
Learn
Adapt
Analyse
Interact
driven by data collected from the world …
Data-driven

6.
Background: Internet of Things
7
Data
Actions
Learn
Adapt
Analyse
Interact
depend on software to weave
together different technologies …
Software-intensive
Data-driven

7.
Dealing with the Internet of Insecure Things
Overview
10
Security
Internet of
Things
IoT Security &
Privacy
Human-centric
Engineering
Future
Directions

8.
Background: Security
11

9.
Background: Security
12
Risk Countermeasures
Security goals/
requirements
Policies
Assets
Threats
Vulnerabilities
Attacks
Problem Space Solution Space
Undiscovered
vulnerabilities
Unexpected
attacks
Variable
risk
Violated/changing
policies
Unknown
threats
Variable assets or
asset values
Failure (hidden
bug/cascading
failure)
Failed/changing goals/reqs
Conflict with other goals/reqs

10.
Dealing with the Internet of Insecure Things
Research Challenge
13
Engineering adaptive systems that continue
to satisfy their security and privacy
requirements and that are forensics ready.
Autonomous, Reactive,
Automated, Dynamic, Runtime
Cyber-physical, Socio-technicalSystematic
Goals, Assets, Threats, Context
Validation & Verification, Argumentation, Proof
Design-time

11.
Dealing with the Internet of Insecure Things
Overview
15
Security
Internet of
Things
IoT Security &
Privacy
Human-centric
Engineering
Future
Directions

12.
Internet of Insecure Things
16
Coding Practices Software Updates Configuration

13.
Internet of Insecure Things
●New attack surfaces through the physical environment
●For example, acoustic attacks can target gyroscopic
sensors in autonomous vehicles to cause shutdowns.
New Challenges: Physical Channel Attacks
17
Sound Wave @
Resonant Frequency of Gyroscope
Attacker
Drone

14.
Dealing with the Internet of Insecure Things
Opportunities: Collaborative Cyber-Physical Security
21
Component 1 Component 2
Component 3 Component 4
Operational Environment E
Component 1
Component 2
Component 4
Secure Operational Environment
Mediator
Requirements analysis1
Feature
Selection
Features-driven
Mediator Synthesis
2
3
Security control
Selected features
Requirements R
Capabilities
Objective
1
2
3
Selecting and configuring components
Making components collaborate
Identify adequate security control
Technique
Mediator synthesis
Feature modelling +
Constraint programming
Goal modelling1
2
3
Bennaceur, A.; Tun, T.T.; Bandara, A. K.; et al. (2017). Feature-driven Mediator Synthesis: Supporting Collaborative Security
in the Internet of Things. ACM Transactions on Cyber-Physical Systems

15.
Dealing with the Internet of Insecure Things
Overview
23
Security
Internet of
Things
IoT Security &
Privacy
Human-centric
Engineering
Future
Directions

16.
People in the Machine
24
IoT systems involve many different
types of people …
IoT Systems
Users
Software
Engineers
Policy Makers /
Regulators
Administrators
+ others

17.
People in the Machine
25
Engineer - Stakeholder
Smart Systems
Users
Software
Engineers
Policy Makers /
Regulators
Administrators
+ others

18.
Gathering Requirements
Smart System Exemplars
26Bennaceur, Amel; Mccormick, Ciaran; et al (2016). Feed me, Feed me: An Exemplar for Engineering Adaptive Software.
In: 11th International Symposium on Software Engineering for Adaptive and Self-Managing Systems, May 2016.
Requirements

19.
Gathering Requirements
Contravision Technique
27Mancini, Clara; Rogers, Yvonne; et al (2010). Contravision: Exploring users' reactions to futuristic technology.
In: Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Human factors in computing systems, April 2010.
Requirements

20.
People in the Machine
28
Engineer – Smart System
Smart Systems
Users
Software
Engineers
Policy Makers /
Regulators
Administrators
+ others

21.
Supporting System Design
IoT Privacy Guidelines
29Perera, C.; Mccormick, C.; et al (2016). Privacy-by-Design Framework for Assessing IoT Applications and Platforms.
In: International Conference on the Internet of Things (IOT 2016), November 2016.
Process/Techniques

22.
Supporting Software Design
IoT Privacy Guidelines
30Perera, C.; Mccormick, C.; et al (2016). Privacy-by-Design Framework for Assessing IoT Applications and Platforms.
In: International Conference on the Internet of Things (IOT 2016), November 2016.
Process/Techniques

23.
People in the Machine
31
User – Smart System
Smart Systems
Users
Software
Engineers
Policy Makers /
Regulators
Administrators
+ others

24.
User - System Interactions
Privacy Itch & Scratch
32Mehta, V.; Bandara, A. K.; et al (2016). Privacy Itch and Scratch: On Body Privacy Warnings and Controls.
In: ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, May 2016.
UserInterfaces

25.
User - System Interactions
Privacy Band
33
Arduino(
Nano(
Bluetooth(
LE(
3.7V(LiPo(
Ba7ery(
Power(Booster(
Vero(
Board(
On<Off(Switch(
(a)(
7.5cm&7.5cm&
Vibe&Boards&
Fabric&
Patch&1&
Fabric&
Patch&2&
(b)&
UserInterfaces
Mehta, V.; Bandara, A. K.; et al (2016). Privacy Itch and Scratch: On Body Privacy Warnings and Controls.
In: ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, May 2016.

26.
People in the Machine
34
IoT systems involve many different
types of people …
Smart Systems
Users
Software
Engineers
Policy Makers
Administrators
+ others
Human-centric Security & Privacy

27.
Dealing with the Internet of Insecure Things
Overview
36
Security
Internet of
Things
IoT Security &
Privacy
Human-centric
Engineering
Future
Directions

28.
Dealing with the Internet of Insecure Things
Future Directions
37
Effective
Security
Collaborative
Composition
Forensic
readiness
Transparency
Socio-technical
resilience

29.
Dealing with Internet of Insecure Things
●People are an integral part of the Internet of Things.
●Engineering security and privacy needs to encompass the
cyber-physical-social dimensions of the Internet of Things.
●Human-centric approaches are a critical addressing the
future challenges of securing the Internet of Things.
Key Messages
38

30.
Dealing with the Internet of Insecure Things
39
Thank You