Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

Higher Education and Research: Mission and Interaction

515 views

Published on

Published in: Education
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

Higher Education and Research: Mission and Interaction

  1. 1. Higher Education and Research: Mission and Interaction David Crosier CONFERENCE TO LAUNCH WORK ON A MASTER PLAN FOR HIGHER EDUCATION IN ALBANIA Tirana, March 22 - 23, 2006
  2. 2. European University Association (EUA): Mission and Interaction <ul><li>EUA : main representative organisation of universities (c750) and their national Rectors’ Conferences (34) in 45 countries across Europe </li></ul><ul><li>Mission : to promote coherence in European higher education and research </li></ul><ul><li>Interaction: through </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Policy development </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Support to members (projects & services) </li></ul></ul>
  3. 3. Increasing demands on higher education institutions <ul><li>- Increase participation & widen access but cut costs </li></ul><ul><li>- be more competitive / be more socially inclusive </li></ul><ul><li>- be more local, more regional, more European, more global </li></ul><ul><li>- increase mobility within Europe / attract more students and scholars from outside Europe </li></ul><ul><li>- improve academic quality / be more responsive to labour market providing graduates with more employable skills </li></ul><ul><li>- provide compatible curricula across Europe / maintain cultural diversity & be more learner-centred </li></ul><ul><li>- be more autonomous / conform to set framework </li></ul><ul><li>- concentrate research / respond to regional needs </li></ul><ul><li>- do it all with decreasing public funding... </li></ul>
  4. 4. Bologna and Lisbon <ul><li>The Bologna Process : Governmental push for convergence in 1999  legislative reform and implementation in universities across Europe. </li></ul><ul><li>EHEA by 2010. 45 countries </li></ul><ul><li>The Lisbon strategy : -> to make Europe the most competitive knowledge based society also by 2010: shared expertise, knowledge and resources with priority on research training, through FP7 - including ERC & now EIT. EU 25 countries </li></ul><ul><li>HEIs increasingly recognised as central actors if the Lisbon & EHEA goals are to be reached </li></ul>
  5. 5. A changing higher education landscape <ul><li>Every institution cannot do everything </li></ul><ul><li>Need for re-thinking and refocusing HEI missions around societal needs and institutional strengths </li></ul><ul><li>Maintain commitment to research-based higher education, but... </li></ul><ul><li>Recognise and value excellence in all aspects of institutional missions – teaching, services to society, as well as research </li></ul><ul><li>How to do it? </li></ul>
  6. 6. Reforming higher education and research at the same time <ul><ul><li>Step 1: Societal / stakeholder debate about higher education system: recognise the need for multiple institutional missions </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Step 2: Encourage institutions to differentiate their profile and missions: </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Some competitive output-based funding incentives can help </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Step 3: Rethink governance: To whom are higher education institutions accountable? How? What kind of governance structures best support institutions? Role of leadership & effective management… </li></ul></ul>
  7. 7. Doctoral studies – at the crossroads of higher education and research <ul><li>Berlin Communiqué: Doctoral Programmes as the third cycle </li></ul><ul><li>EUA Doctoral Programmes Project 2004-2005: aim to link its activities to policy debate and to feed into the preparation of recommendations for Bergen 2005 </li></ul><ul><li>- Maastricht conference on research training </li></ul><ul><li>- Salzburg Bologna Seminar and the Salzburg priniciples </li></ul><ul><li>- Final project report </li></ul><ul><li>Bergen Communiqué: BFUG asked to invite EUA and its partners to prepare a report on the further development of the Salzburg principles, to be presented to Ministers in London 2007. </li></ul>
  8. 8. EUA Project on doctoral studies (2004/5) <ul><li>MAIN CONCLUSION: </li></ul><ul><li>Need for stronger institutional involvement in organisation of doctoral programmes built on closer collaboration with partners (education and research, industry/ employers, students, governments) </li></ul>
  9. 9. Other cross-cutting issues <ul><li>Mobility as a part of doctoral programmes and a recognised added value (important for career development) </li></ul><ul><li>European dimension in doctoral programmes – more joint programmes needed built on high quality standards and mutual trust </li></ul><ul><li>Funding – diversity of financial sources, new ways of collaboration with other partners (e.g. industry), employment contracts etc. </li></ul>
  10. 10. Some open questions <ul><li>How to make doctoral education a part of institutional policies and strategies? </li></ul><ul><li>How to support new structures of doctoral programmes offering wider generic skills training or cross-disciplinary training linked to further career prospects in all sectors? </li></ul><ul><li>What should graduate (postgraduate) education cover? </li></ul><ul><li>What is the role and link with Masters in this context? </li></ul><ul><li>Supervision: how to persuade universities (and supervisors) about the importance of further training of supervisors or new models of supervision? </li></ul>
  11. 11. New EUA-BFUG Doctoral Programmes Project <ul><li>Objective: to prepare the report and recommendations on doctoral programmes for the ministerial meeting in London 2007 </li></ul><ul><li>Activities: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>2 workshops focused on specific aspects of doctoral programmes (23-24 March and 12-13 October 2006) </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>WG on doctoral programmes at the conference « A Researchers’ Labour Market – a Pole of Attarction », Vienna, </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>1-2 June 2006 </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Final Bologna Seminar, December 2006, France </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Final report – beginning of 2007 </li></ul></ul>
  12. 12. Some issues to consider in addressing reform <ul><li>Reform doesn’t begin at point zero: need to take account of current environment, socio-economic situation, culture etc </li></ul><ul><li>Much to learn from the experience of others: all countries/institutions are in a process of (permanent) reform and innovation, and there is no need for everyone to make the same mistakes... </li></ul><ul><li>Body of European experience to draw upon – through CoE/EUA/ESIB/EURASHE/ENQA etc </li></ul><ul><li>Some clear evidence in Europe: quality and effectiveness of reforms enhanced when institutions are empowered (effective autonomy), and when all who should be involved are properly consulted (cf Trends IV) </li></ul>

×