Agc 2012

531 views

Published on

  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

Agc 2012

  1. 1. PRELIMINARY COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OFGIS EDUCATION: LINKING PRACTITIONERS AND EDUCATORS Michael N. DeMers October 12, 2012
  2. 2. I AM AGIS INSTUCTOR To save time let’sjust assume I never make mistakes
  3. 3. Top Performers
  4. 4. Bottom Performers
  5. 5. Concept Average Ranks (Max = 7)76543 Practitioners Educators210
  6. 6. Problem Solving70.00%60.00%50.00%40.00% Practitioners Educators30.00%20.00%10.00% 0.00% Not at all Important Very Unimportant Somewhat Neither Important Somewhat Very Important Extremely Unimportant nor Unimportant Important Important
  7. 7. Spatial Thinking80.00%70.00%60.00%50.00%40.00% Practitioners Educators30.00%20.00%10.00% 0.00% Not at all Important Very Unimportant Somewhat Neither Important Somewhat Very Important Extremely Unimportant nor Unimportant Important Important
  8. 8. Communicating Results50.00%45.00%40.00%35.00%30.00%25.00% Practitioners Educators20.00%15.00%10.00% 5.00% 0.00% Not at all Important Very Unimportant Somewhat Neither Important Somewhat Very Important Extremely Unimportant nor Unimportant Important Important
  9. 9. Workforce Culture45.00%40.00%35.00%30.00%25.00% Practitioners20.00% Educators15.00%10.00% 5.00% 0.00% Not at all Important Very Unimportant Somewhat Neither Important Somewhat Very Important Extremely Unimportant nor Unimportant Important Important
  10. 10. Learning the Software60.00%50.00%40.00%30.00% Practitioner Educator20.00%10.00% 0.00% Not at all Important Very Unimportant Somewhat Neither Important Somewhat Very Important Extremely Unimportant nor Unimportant Important Important

×