M.podgóski um


Published on

Published in: Business, Technology
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Total views
On SlideShare
From Embeds
Number of Embeds
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide
  • 10/14/10
  • 10/14/10
  • 10/14/10
  • M.podgóski um

    1. 1. Regional Office of the Lodz Voivodship in Brussels Mr. Marcin Podgórski - Director
    2. 2. EURIS
    3. 3. PARTNERSTWO w projekcie EURIS Dirección General de Empresa. Gobierno de Navarra Nawarra , Hiszpania Wirtschaftsfoerderung Region Stuttgart GmbH Stuttgart, Niemcy Brainport Development NV Eindhoven, Holandia Nyugat-dunántúli Regionális fejlesztési Ügynökség Kft West Transdanubian, Węgry Wojew ództwo Łódzkie Łódź , Polska
    4. 4. INFORMATION ABOUT THE PROJECT <ul><li>Acronym: EURIS </li></ul><ul><li>Title: European Collaborative and Regional Open Innovation Strategies </li></ul><ul><li>Programme: INTERREG IV C </li></ul><ul><li>Type of intervention: Mini-programme </li></ul><ul><li>Website: www.euris-programme.eu </li></ul><ul><li>Duration: January 2010 – December 2013 </li></ul><ul><li>Overall budget: 4.130.511,30 € </li></ul><ul><li>EC’s contribution ( ERDF ): 3.240.460,80 € </li></ul>
    5. 5. THE AIMS OF EURIS PROJECT <ul><li>General aim: Support of the process of the regional innovative ecosystems ’ creation in EU through adoption of a n Open Innovation model , intensifying the cooperation between the innovative actions’ participants. </li></ul><ul><li>Particular aims: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Working out of more effective RSI by common education, exchange and transfer of best practice and other common actions leading to creation of Open Innovation environment. </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Diffusion and transfer of best practice to other EU regions. </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Working out the recommendations for the participants of the innovative processes in regions so that they contain the Open Innovation elements. </li></ul></ul>
    6. 6. Polish Presidency of the European Council
    7. 7. Focus on 3 blocks priorities during PL Presidency <ul><li>Strategic programming </li></ul><ul><li>Thematic concentration and pre-conditions (ex-ante conditionalities) </li></ul><ul><li>Effectiveness (evaluation, monitoring , performance framework ) </li></ul><ul><li>Exact scope – to be determined after regulations published (expected – 5 October) </li></ul>
    8. 8. cohesion policy which is … <ul><li>more focused and aligned with 2020 strategy, but designed bottom-up, appropriate for specificity of a given territory – no earmarking </li></ul><ul><li>integrated and not sectoral, with possibility for multi-fund programmes and ESF being an integral part, embedded in national and regional policies </li></ul><ul><li>results-driven with clear ex-ante defined conditions </li></ul><ul><li>SIMPLER – which would result in less regularities, </li></ul><ul><li>stable where it works </li></ul>
    9. 9. Smart Specialistaion Strategies (S3)
    10. 10. smart specialisation strategies (S3) <ul><li>The European Commission’s Communications on smart and sustainable growth call on regions to help attain the smart, sustainable and inclusive objectives of Europe 2020 by developing smart specialisation strategies (S3). </li></ul>
    11. 11. smart specialisation strategies (S3) <ul><li>Yet there is still a need to discuss what should a S3 look like, and how do we do it? Where are we now, how do we get there? What happens to current strategies such as Regional Innovation Strategies and where is the decision making power on S3 – the region, Member State? </li></ul>
    12. 12. smart specialisation strategies (S3) According to DG Regio, the aim of a smart specialisation strategy is to concentrate resources on the most promising areas of comparative advantage, e.g. on clusters, existing sectors and cross-sectoral activities, eco-innovation, high value-added markets or specific research areas.
    13. 13. smart specialisation strategies (S3) <ul><li>One simple idea </li></ul><ul><li>It should be understood at the outset that the idea of smart specialisation does not call for imposing specialisation through some form of top-down industrial policy that is directed in accord with a pre-conceived “grand plan”. Nor should the search for smart specialisation involve a foresight exercise, ordered from a consulting firm. It is suggest ed an entrepreneurial process of discovery that can reveal what a country or region does best in terms of science and technology . </li></ul>
    14. 14. Open Innovation
    15. 15. Open Innovation is not… … but it is <ul><li>Open access to own </li></ul><ul><li>Outsourcing R&D </li></ul><ul><li>Model based only on technology </li></ul><ul><li>Technical inventions </li></ul><ul><li>One-sided benefits </li></ul><ul><li>Creation of new </li></ul><ul><li>Only partnerships’ creation </li></ul><ul><li>Reducing of research costs </li></ul><ul><li>strategic managing of technology rights to intellectual property </li></ul><ul><li>strategy in the framework of R&D </li></ul><ul><li>technology-business model </li></ul><ul><li>commercial innovativeness </li></ul><ul><li>„ win-win” partnership </li></ul><ul><li>development of key undertakings’ products </li></ul><ul><li>creation of innovations’ ecosystem </li></ul><ul><li>improvement in using of R&D effects in investments </li></ul>
    16. 16. Thank you for your attention!