While the role of radiation therapy in carcinoma cervix management is undauntable for all stages. Recurrent carcinoma cervix need a lot of personalisation
Ajeet GandhiAssistant Professor, Department of Radiation Oncology, Dr RMLIMS, Lucknow
Role of radiotherapy in recurrent carcinoma cervix
1. Is there a role of radiation in
management of recurrent cervical
cancer??
Dr Ajeet Kumar Gandhi
MD (AIIMS), DNB, UICCF (MSKCC,USA)
Assistant professor, Radiation oncology
Dr RMLIMS, Lucknow
2. Recurrent cervical cancer
Pelvic relapse rates* in definitively treated
patients: 20-40%
Approximately 60-80% are pelvic failures
Approximately 80% are in the irradiated field
and 20% outside this
Treatment is very challenging, limited
options
Limited literature and ultimate outcome of is
poor.
*Andreu Martinez FJ et al. Clin Transl Oncol 2005;7:323-331
3. Treatment options
Surgery, radiotherapy, systemic therapy,
Palliative care
Patient`s suitability
Performance status
Symptomatolgy
Previous treatment
Toxicities of previous therapy
Present disease extent
Patient selection remains the key
6. Recurrence after surgery with no
prior RT
Explore surgery for very limited disease
Usually a combination of EBRT and Brachytherapy
Brachytherapy (Interstitial) recommended for
patients with >5 mm thickness of recurrence
Concurrent chemotherapy should be combined in
suitable patients
7. Recurrence after prior RT
Surgery
Central limited
volume disease
Reirradiation
Systemic therapy
9. Reirradiation: Which patients??
Central recurrences* (inoperable/unwilling for
surgery)
Volume of disease**: <2-4 cm, <100 cc
Disease free interval**
Longer the better
At least > 6-12 month; >2 years
Squamous histology
Non-para-aortic location
Good KPS with limited toxicities from prior RT
*Mahantshetty U. Brachytherapy 2014
**Zolciak Sivinska. Gynec Oncol 2014
13. 52 patients treated with HDR-
ISBT based Reirradiation
Local control rate: 76%
Grade ¾ toxicities: 25%
Tumour size (>4 cm) and DFI (<6
months) important prognostic
factors
14. Image guided HDR ISBT in PIRCC
AIIMS experience of 23 recurrent patients
N=33; recurrent=23 and residual=10
1 or 2 session of ISBT was done with a dose of 8 Gy/# followed by
EBRT depending upon the interval of recurrence,
total 52 procedures
2 year pelvic disease control rate 63%
Grade ¾ complication rates: 6%
Sharma DN; RSNA 2008; Oral abstract
15. Indiana university experience of 19
patients (6 cervix patients)
Median RT dose=50 Gray
Median tumour volume=3.3 cm3
2 year local control rates=52.6%
16. N=50
3 year OS and loco-regional
control: 56% and 59%
Median RT dose=50 Gray (45-64
Gray)
No Grade 3 or greater acute
GI/GU
Grade 3 late toxicity <10%
Poorer OS for DFI <2 years and
non-squamous histology (p<0.05)
17. Patients Rectum-4, Anal canal-6,
Cervix-4, Endometrium-
1, UB-1
All patients previously
treated with RT
Median previous RT
dose- 45 Gy
36 Gy/ 6 fractions in 3
weeks
Median FU- 11 months
LR- 51 %, Median DFS-
8 months
One year OS- 46%
No grade 3 acute
toxicity
21. Re-irradiation: What Technique??
Minimize volume of irradiation: Conformal
Avoid OARs
Brachytherapy preferred for central, accessible site
EBRT for very lateralized disease/para-aortic
IORT for patients suitable for surgical salvage
22. Radiation: What doses??
Without prior RT
EBRT 45-50 Gray + Brachytherapy (total EQD2
65-75 Gray)
For ReRT
EBRT
IMRT/3DCRT: 40-50 Gray (20-25#)
SBRT: 20-36 Gray in 3-6 fractions
Brachytherapy alone
20-25 Gray HDR in 4-5 fractions BID
IORT: 10-30 Gray
For palliative RT
20-30 Gray in 5-10 fractions
23. Clinical outcome after RT
Local control
Interstitial Brachytherapy= 25-80%
EBRT + Brachytherapy =40-80%
IORT + Surgery=20-70%
EBRT=50-60%
3-5 year Overall survival: 30-70%
25. Take home message!!
Radiation therapy yields descent outcomes in
recurrent cervical cancer patients naïve to RT
Reirradiation has become less morbid with better
outcomes owing to technological advancement in RT
Conformal techniques like brachytherapy with or
without EBRT should be used
IMRT/SBRT should be used when using EBRT alone
Role of concurrent chemotherapy is not well defined
Patient selection remains the key for optimizing the
best outcomes