Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.
SRI EXPERIENCE AKRSPI By:-    Rajib Kumar Roul
OUTREACH -SRI  <ul><li>In two states - Gujrat(since 2005) and Bihar(since 2008). </li></ul><ul><li>Gujrat-  Bharuch, Surat...
GUJRAT-SRI  <ul><li>Farmers doing 1 st  time-3365 </li></ul><ul><li>Farmers doing 2 nd  time-724 </li></ul><ul><li>Farmers...
PLAN-SRI  <ul><li>Bihar-1900 </li></ul><ul><li>Gujrat-8000* </li></ul>
BIHAR-SAMASTIPUR(PUSA SHT)-OUTREACH <ul><li>Started with 24 families in 2008 . </li></ul><ul><li>405 families in 2009. </l...
BIHAR MUZAFFARPUR(MURAUL SHT)-OUTREACH   <ul><li>Started in 2009 Kharif season </li></ul><ul><li>Total  with 82 families. ...
PROCESS TO BE FOLLOWED IN IMPLEMENTATION -BIHAR <ul><li>Sharing Experience of last year  . </li></ul><ul><li>Presenting th...
PROCESS  contd… -BIHAR <ul><li>POP as per the segmentation approach. </li></ul><ul><li>Spacing reduced from 12 inch to 10 ...
VARIETY IDENTIFIED(2010) -BIHAR <ul><li>High Yielding Variety- Bhagwati(PAU). </li></ul><ul><li>Research variety-(PAN seed...
VARIETY  WISE TARGET -BIHAR <ul><li>High Yielding Variety- Bhagwati(PAU)-30. </li></ul><ul><li>Research variety-(PAN seeds...
VILLAGE LEVEL MEETING
TRAINING
PADDY FIELD LAST YEAR
PADDY FIELD
PADDY FIELD
LEARNING <ul><li>Tried SRI with some hybrid varieties along with the high yielding varieties. </li></ul><ul><li>While sele...
LEARNING  <ul><li>As this is a new activity in some part we faced problem in doing transplantation. </li></ul><ul><li>Avai...
LEARNING  <ul><li>For input cost point of view it is better to go for high yielding variety. </li></ul><ul><li>Result of h...
YIELD DATA  4.13 22 11 Sonalika 2.75 13.2 8.8 Pravat 3.01 12.1 9 PP-71 3.03 13.2 11 6444 Average-(t/ha) Maximum (q/acre) M...
PRODUCTION ATTRIBUTING CHARACTERS 52 26 Total no of tillers 12 4 Non productive tillers 48 20 Productive tillers 31 24 Pan...
THIS YEAR PLAN <ul><li>Farmers  and AVs(Agr volunteer) are more confident to adopt this technique in this  year. </li></ul...
SWI <ul><li>Piloted SWI(system for wheat Intensification) with 76 farmers. </li></ul><ul><li>Two varieties used-PBW343,PBW...
SWI SEED TREATMENT <ul><li>. </li></ul>
Variety Used <ul><li>PBW-373 </li></ul><ul><li>PBW-343 </li></ul>
Process adopted <ul><li>Identification of farmers with help of KVS(Kisan Vikas Samity) </li></ul><ul><li>Involved AVs(Agr ...
Cont.. <ul><li>Controlled plot with 13 kg seed. </li></ul><ul><li>SWI plot with 2 kg seed. </li></ul><ul><li>SWI plot seed...
Production Attributing factor <ul><li>Tillers-6 vs 24 </li></ul><ul><li>Panicle size </li></ul><ul><li>No of grain per pan...
SWI SEED SOWING
SWI SOWING
SWI & CONTROL PLOT
TRADITIONAL AND SWI PLOT
TILLERS COUNTING IN SWI PLOT
AV(Agriculture Volunteers) IN SWI PLOT
THANK YOU
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in …5
×

AKRSP Bihar

1,351 views

Published on

Published in: Business, Technology
  • Be the first to comment

AKRSP Bihar

  1. 1. SRI EXPERIENCE AKRSPI By:- Rajib Kumar Roul
  2. 2. OUTREACH -SRI <ul><li>In two states - Gujrat(since 2005) and Bihar(since 2008). </li></ul><ul><li>Gujrat- Bharuch, Surat, Narmada, Junagarh, Surendranagar district . </li></ul><ul><li>Bihar-(Samastipur district) Pusa and (Muzaffarpur)Muraul clusters . </li></ul>
  3. 3. GUJRAT-SRI <ul><li>Farmers doing 1 st time-3365 </li></ul><ul><li>Farmers doing 2 nd time-724 </li></ul><ul><li>Farmers doing 3 rd time-112 </li></ul><ul><li>Farmers doing without our support-600 </li></ul><ul><li>Total farmers doing SRI-6149 </li></ul>
  4. 4. PLAN-SRI <ul><li>Bihar-1900 </li></ul><ul><li>Gujrat-8000* </li></ul>
  5. 5. BIHAR-SAMASTIPUR(PUSA SHT)-OUTREACH <ul><li>Started with 24 families in 2008 . </li></ul><ul><li>405 families in 2009. </li></ul><ul><li>11 villages and 21 hamlets. </li></ul><ul><li>10 Panchayats . </li></ul>
  6. 6. BIHAR MUZAFFARPUR(MURAUL SHT)-OUTREACH <ul><li>Started in 2009 Kharif season </li></ul><ul><li>Total with 82 families. </li></ul><ul><li>9 Villages and 11 hamlets. </li></ul><ul><li>3 Panchayats . </li></ul>
  7. 7. PROCESS TO BE FOLLOWED IN IMPLEMENTATION -BIHAR <ul><li>Sharing Experience of last year . </li></ul><ul><li>Presenting the data after analysing area wise. </li></ul><ul><li>Selection of AV(Agriculture Volunteer) and involved them in farmer finalisation after a class room training. </li></ul><ul><li>Village level meeting for farmers selection. </li></ul><ul><li>Showing the video show in the new area. </li></ul><ul><li>Major decision to shift farmer from hybrid to research seeds. </li></ul>
  8. 8. PROCESS contd… -BIHAR <ul><li>POP as per the segmentation approach. </li></ul><ul><li>Spacing reduced from 12 inch to 10 inch considering last year experience. </li></ul><ul><li>Planned to build some trained transplanter in each areas identified by KVS(Kisan Vikas Samity). </li></ul><ul><li>More focus on small and medium farmers. </li></ul>
  9. 9. VARIETY IDENTIFIED(2010) -BIHAR <ul><li>High Yielding Variety- Bhagwati(PAU). </li></ul><ul><li>Research variety-(PAN seeds) </li></ul><ul><li>95-100 days-Mallika </li></ul><ul><li>120-125 days-Godavari </li></ul><ul><li>140-145 days-Ranjana </li></ul><ul><li>Hybrid Variety-Arize-6444 </li></ul>
  10. 10. VARIETY WISE TARGET -BIHAR <ul><li>High Yielding Variety- Bhagwati(PAU)-30. </li></ul><ul><li>Research variety-(PAN seeds)-1720 </li></ul><ul><li>Hybrid Variety-Arize-6444-150 </li></ul><ul><li>Total farmers doing SRI-1900 </li></ul>
  11. 11. VILLAGE LEVEL MEETING
  12. 12. TRAINING
  13. 13. PADDY FIELD LAST YEAR
  14. 14. PADDY FIELD
  15. 15. PADDY FIELD
  16. 16. LEARNING <ul><li>Tried SRI with some hybrid varieties along with the high yielding varieties. </li></ul><ul><li>While selecting the varieties farmers choice had taken into account. </li></ul><ul><li>Use of marker in Bihar context is difficult to use due to this clay soil. </li></ul><ul><li>Faced problem in transplantation as some farmers having nursery bed in distant field. </li></ul>
  17. 17. LEARNING <ul><li>As this is a new activity in some part we faced problem in doing transplantation. </li></ul><ul><li>Availability of trained labour. </li></ul><ul><li>Due to erratic rainfall some farmers didn’t able to transplant within 12 days. </li></ul><ul><li>There is increase yield ranging from (25%-50%). </li></ul>
  18. 18. LEARNING <ul><li>For input cost point of view it is better to go for high yielding variety. </li></ul><ul><li>Result of high yielding variety is at par with hybrid. </li></ul>
  19. 19. YIELD DATA 4.13 22 11 Sonalika 2.75 13.2 8.8 Pravat 3.01 12.1 9 PP-71 3.03 13.2 11 6444 Average-(t/ha) Maximum (q/acre) Minimum (q/acre) Variety
  20. 20. PRODUCTION ATTRIBUTING CHARACTERS 52 26 Total no of tillers 12 4 Non productive tillers 48 20 Productive tillers 31 24 Panicle length(cm) Maximum Minimum Characters
  21. 21. THIS YEAR PLAN <ul><li>Farmers and AVs(Agr volunteer) are more confident to adopt this technique in this year. </li></ul><ul><li>Make Cono weeder available to farmers by making from a local fabricator. </li></ul><ul><li>Train some labours to do transplanting. </li></ul><ul><li>More focus on the technique rather seed variety. </li></ul>
  22. 22. SWI <ul><li>Piloted SWI(system for wheat Intensification) with 76 farmers. </li></ul><ul><li>Two varieties used-PBW343,PBW373 </li></ul><ul><li>Adopted SWI direct sowing method. </li></ul>
  23. 23. SWI SEED TREATMENT <ul><li>. </li></ul>
  24. 24. Variety Used <ul><li>PBW-373 </li></ul><ul><li>PBW-343 </li></ul>
  25. 25. Process adopted <ul><li>Identification of farmers with help of KVS(Kisan Vikas Samity) </li></ul><ul><li>Involved AVs(Agr Volunteer). </li></ul><ul><li>Information sharing with individual family focus. </li></ul><ul><li>76 farmers with two subplot of each farmers(25dm total plot size). </li></ul>
  26. 26. Cont.. <ul><li>Controlled plot with 13 kg seed. </li></ul><ul><li>SWI plot with 2 kg seed. </li></ul><ul><li>SWI plot seed treated with cow urine, vermicompost, jaggery. </li></ul><ul><li>Direct seeded method adopted. </li></ul><ul><li>10 inch both the ways spacing maintained. </li></ul><ul><li>Two seeds sown. </li></ul>
  27. 27. Production Attributing factor <ul><li>Tillers-6 vs 24 </li></ul><ul><li>Panicle size </li></ul><ul><li>No of grain per panicle. </li></ul><ul><li>Disease infestation. </li></ul><ul><li>Rodent infestation </li></ul><ul><li>Yield data 650g vs 825g /sq m area. </li></ul>
  28. 28. SWI SEED SOWING
  29. 29. SWI SOWING
  30. 30. SWI & CONTROL PLOT
  31. 31. TRADITIONAL AND SWI PLOT
  32. 32. TILLERS COUNTING IN SWI PLOT
  33. 33. AV(Agriculture Volunteers) IN SWI PLOT
  34. 34. THANK YOU

×