Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

General Education Assessment Challenge


Published on

Published in: Education
  • Be the first to comment

General Education Assessment Challenge

  1. 1. GENERAL EDUCATIONDEPARTMENTPrepared by: Maria Boada, Assistant DeanGeneral Education and Foundations Departments
  2. 2. Mission and StructureGeneral Education CurriculumProvides knowledge and skills required to become a well-rounded graduate and citizen.Facilitates artistic and aesthetic appreciation, develop knowledge, and enhance the skills and critical thinking abilities needed for professional success.Constitutes 30% of all degree programs Individual Programs Curriculum General Education Curriculum
  3. 3. General EducationStudent Learning Outcomes Behavioral and Arts and Humanities Social Sciences Oran Math and Natural Communication Sciences Develop students professionally and Written Information Fluency Communication personally: well rounded academic experience
  4. 4. FY2012 Process and FacultyEngagement Use of Results and revision of future plans Faculty Review •Data• Means of and Planning collection assessment takes place •Recommendations and criteria •Faculty in each throughout are implemented in for success discipline the curriculum and provided by review and academic pedagogy Ai System plan year •Changes to implementatio •Analysis of assessment plan are Assessment n of assessment data takes recommended for Office instrument(s) in place during next cycle Assessment Model provided by Ai their courses in-service System •Data collection faculty planned Data Collection meeting and Analysis
  5. 5. Learning Outcomes:Written Communication Courses Assessed: Written Means of Assessment: ENG095 (Transitional Communication English), ENG1010 a. Writing Portfolio is Graduates will (English Composition I) evaluated according todemonstrate effective and ENG1020 (English a set five point rubric written Composition II) communication by Means of Assessment: providing their audience sufficient b. ETS (Educational Testing Service)information on a topic Proficiency Profile that is organized andemploys the generally Success Criteria:accepted conventions a. 80% of students will of English Language score a 3 or higher b. 75% of graduates will score at or above the national ETS average on the ETS writing component
  6. 6. Written Communication:FY12 ResultsAssessment Cycle: ENG courses Quarter of Artifact (s) Additional Data Collected Data Collection CollectedENG095 FA2011 25% random FY2012 sample of all cumulative Writing Portfolios passing rates. Passing rates in ENG1010ENG1010 WI12 30% random Qualitative sample of all focus on writing portfolios. reflective ETS Proficiency essay Profile DataENG1020 Collected NA NA during FY2011. Next data collection: WI2013
  7. 7. Written Communication..cont. ENG095: Transitional English Criteria: 80% of students will earn 96% of students achieved an a 3 or higher overall score of 3.0 or better (5 point rubric) – Far exceeded set criteria 74% of all student who Criteria: 70% of took ENG095 in students will SU11, FA11, WI12 and earn a C or SP12 earned a C or better better – Exceeded set criteria Additional Data will be presented in the Transitional Curriculum Assessment report
  8. 8. Written Communication..cont. ENG095 Results: results by CompetenciesCompetency Average scoreWriting process—prewriting, drafting, revising,proofreading and editing 3.6Structure 3.4Use of detail 3.8Use of standard rules of English grammar, mechanics 3.3and sentence constructionUnderstanding of reading and writing as interconnected 3.4processesUse of critical thinking through argument or narrative 3.4 •Results exceeded set criteria •Students did particularly well in the competency related to understanding the writing process. •Future assessment will focus on reading and writing as interconnected processes.
  9. 9. Written Communication..cont. ENG1010: Composition and Language Criteria: 80% of students will 70% of students earned a 3 or better – did not meet criteria earn a 3 or higher (5 point (see analysis) rubric) Writing Level 1: 55% Proficient (National Average is 69%) Criteria: 75% of Writing Level 2: 15% graduates will score at Proficient (National Average is 41 %) or above national Writing Level 3: 6 % average in ETS Proficient (National Average is 8%) Proficiency Profile Average Scores were writing component below the ETS National Averages for College Seniors
  10. 10. Written Communication..cont. ENG1010: Breakdown of Average Scores by CompetencyWriting process—prewriting, drafting, revising, proofreading and 3.0editingStructure 3.4Use of detail 3.0Use of standard rules of English grammar,mechanics and sentence construction 3.5Understanding of reading and writing asinterconnected processes 3.1Use of critical thinking through argument ornarrative 3.4
  11. 11. Written Communication..cont. Analysis and Use of Results While the 80% criteria was not met, the total average scores was 3.25.= and no average for each competency was below 3.0. Further analysis showed two sections of ENG1010 with a high percentage of left-outliers. The discussions centered on emphasizing data- generating exercises and a higher focus on intertextuality. The ETS data showed writing proficiency levels below the national average. We recommend additional data collection and comparison with institutions that have programs similar to AiP.
  12. 12. Learning Outcomes:Oral Communication Means of Assessment: a. Capstone assignment Graduates will Course evaluated: in COM3010: Analyticaldemonstrate effective COM3010 oral presentation with oral communication Advanced visual aids. by providing their Communication audience sufficientinformation on a topic Means of Assessment: that is organized and b. Graduate Surveys that employed the generally acceptedconventions of English Success Criteria: Language. a. 80% of students will score a 3 or higher b. 90% of students agree that they have good communication skills
  13. 13. Oral Communication:FY12 ResultsAssessment Cycle: Communications Quarter of Data Artifact (s) Collected Additional Data Collection CollectedCOM3010 FA2011, SP2012 A random 30% sample Results fromAdvanced of all final oral graduate surveysCommunications presentations, related to centered around the communication SWOT analysis) were skills evaluated by a in- class panel of faculty
  14. 14. Oral Communication…cont. COM3010 Advanced Communication - Results Criteria: 80% of 90% of students students will earn a scored a 3 or higher score of 3 or higher in in the oral the oral presentation presentation – Far exceeded set criteria (5 point rubric) Criteria: 90% of graduate students Data no yet received agree/strongly agree from corporate office that they have good communication skills
  15. 15. Oral Communication…cont. Average Scores: Overall and breakdown by Competency Overall Average Average Average Average % of 3 Score: Score: Score: Score: and Structure Non- Visual Support above verbal Aids Skills FA11 90% FA11: FA11: SP12: FA11: and 3.19 3.54 2.59 3.47 SP122 SP12: 2.35
  16. 16. Oral Communication…cont.Analysis and Use of Results The overall results met the stated criteria but some of the competencies highlighted areas of improvement. Scores for the “Support” category were lower in SP12 than in the FA11 cycle. Oral communication instructors recommend a higher emphasis in research-based information and will collaborate with Writers’ Center to incorporate MLA workshops and other information literacy initiatives. Average scores for the “Visual Aids” were also lower than expected. Added emphasis will be placed on visual aids requirements for final oral presentations. Support and Visual Aids will be evaluated in the next assessment cycle.
  17. 17. Learning Outcomes:Arts and Humanities Means of Assessment: Course Assessed: Graduates will a. Comparative Analysis essay demonstrate the ART3010 holistically scored with ability to interpret American Art a five-point rubric and analyze artistic History work, historical Means of Assessment: events, or b. ETS (Educational philosophical thought Testing Service) and describe the Proficiency Profile relevance of the work to themselves, society Success Criteria: and cultures. a. 70% of students will score a 3 or higher b. 75% of graduates will score at or above the national ETS average subscore for humanities
  18. 18. Assessment: Sustainable and Uninterrupted The results present a sample of the holistic assessment picture in our general education department Additional results for all outcomes can be found in the FY12 Assessment Report Assessment also takes place in the online modality and results are compared to the outcomes from campus students Results from assessments continuously feed into curriculum modifications and improvements in pedagogy
  19. 19. Questions or Comments?