Successfully reported this slideshow.
Upcoming SlideShare
×

# Methodology, results, discussion general comments

1,871 views

Published on

• Full Name
Comment goes here.

Are you sure you want to Yes No
• ⇒⇒⇒WRITE-MY-PAPER.net ⇐⇐⇐ I love this site. It always finds me the best tutors in accordance with my needs. I have been using it since last year. The prices are not expensive compared to other sites. I am glad I discored this site:)

Are you sure you want to  Yes  No
• ⇒ www.WritePaper.info ⇐ This service will write as best as they can. So you do not need to waste the time on rewritings.

Are you sure you want to  Yes  No
• Did u try to use external powers for studying? Like HelpWriting.net ? They helped me a lot once.

Are you sure you want to  Yes  No
• To get professional research papers you must go for experts like HelpWriting.net

Are you sure you want to  Yes  No
• Be the first to like this

### Methodology, results, discussion general comments

1. 1. Methodology, Results, Discussion General Comments AIDEN YEH Wenzao Ursuline University of Languages
2. 2. Methodology: Missing Research Questions
3. 3. Misplaced Research Questions X Placed under Instrumentation section
4. 4. Participants: Giving a run-down of results
5. 5. Instrumentation
6. 6. Measurements
7. 7. Reporting Results
8. 8. Oh, Statistics!
9. 9. What’s the Cronbach again for?
10. 10. Correlations and Chi-Square Chi-square with p<0.05 indicates a significant relationship between variables
11. 11. p<0.05 indicates a significant relationship
12. 12. No relationship when p>0.05
13. 13. Deleting an item in a category
14. 14. Reporting ANOVA • Example: A factorial ANOVA found a significant difference in income based on both race and gender, F(5, 27157) = 573.72, p < .001. Specifically, males were found to have significantly higher incomes than females, F(1, 27157) = 383.95, p < .001. Also, income was found to vary significantly based on race, F(2, 27157) = 117.93, p < .001. Finally, a significant interaction between race and gender was found, F(2, 27157) = 55.09, p < .001. • • in other words, you need to identify which one is the independent variable and what are the two dependent variables
15. 15. Support general claims
16. 16. The Value of inferential statistics • You have a lot of interesting variables where you can do a crosstab analysis. Failure to do so limits the data to descriptive analysis and you won’t be able to justify any relationships whatsoever.
17. 17. Tables or Figures
18. 18. Discussion: Rephrase, don’t simply repeat sentences
19. 19. Over-generalization of results
20. 20. Word Choice: Avoid Sensationalism
21. 21. Discussion: Too short
22. 22. Discussion: Say more
23. 23. Discussion: Explain
24. 24. Synthesize interpretations
25. 25. Revisions, again! Image source: http://blog.patrickrothfuss.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/csg_writing- the-revision-process-tone.jpg