Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

Methodology, results, discussion general comments

1,871 views

Published on

  • ⇒⇒⇒WRITE-MY-PAPER.net ⇐⇐⇐ I love this site. It always finds me the best tutors in accordance with my needs. I have been using it since last year. The prices are not expensive compared to other sites. I am glad I discored this site:)
       Reply 
    Are you sure you want to  Yes  No
    Your message goes here
  • ⇒ www.WritePaper.info ⇐ This service will write as best as they can. So you do not need to waste the time on rewritings.
       Reply 
    Are you sure you want to  Yes  No
    Your message goes here
  • Did u try to use external powers for studying? Like HelpWriting.net ? They helped me a lot once.
       Reply 
    Are you sure you want to  Yes  No
    Your message goes here
  • To get professional research papers you must go for experts like HelpWriting.net
       Reply 
    Are you sure you want to  Yes  No
    Your message goes here
  • Be the first to like this

Methodology, results, discussion general comments

  1. 1. Methodology, Results, Discussion General Comments AIDEN YEH Wenzao Ursuline University of Languages
  2. 2. Methodology: Missing Research Questions
  3. 3. Misplaced Research Questions X Placed under Instrumentation section
  4. 4. Participants: Giving a run-down of results
  5. 5. Instrumentation
  6. 6. Measurements
  7. 7. Reporting Results
  8. 8. Oh, Statistics!
  9. 9. What’s the Cronbach again for?
  10. 10. Correlations and Chi-Square Chi-square with p<0.05 indicates a significant relationship between variables
  11. 11. p<0.05 indicates a significant relationship
  12. 12. No relationship when p>0.05
  13. 13. Deleting an item in a category
  14. 14. Reporting ANOVA • Example: A factorial ANOVA found a significant difference in income based on both race and gender, F(5, 27157) = 573.72, p < .001. Specifically, males were found to have significantly higher incomes than females, F(1, 27157) = 383.95, p < .001. Also, income was found to vary significantly based on race, F(2, 27157) = 117.93, p < .001. Finally, a significant interaction between race and gender was found, F(2, 27157) = 55.09, p < .001. • • in other words, you need to identify which one is the independent variable and what are the two dependent variables
  15. 15. Support general claims
  16. 16. The Value of inferential statistics • You have a lot of interesting variables where you can do a crosstab analysis. Failure to do so limits the data to descriptive analysis and you won’t be able to justify any relationships whatsoever.
  17. 17. Tables or Figures
  18. 18. Discussion: Rephrase, don’t simply repeat sentences
  19. 19. Over-generalization of results
  20. 20. Word Choice: Avoid Sensationalism
  21. 21. Discussion: Too short
  22. 22. Discussion: Say more
  23. 23. Discussion: Explain
  24. 24. Synthesize interpretations
  25. 25. Revisions, again! Image source: http://blog.patrickrothfuss.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/csg_writing- the-revision-process-tone.jpg

×