Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

Last day (in thailand)


Published on

Published in: Education, Business
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

Last day (in thailand)

  1. 1. Last day (together in Thailand)
  2. 2. Title of the Innovation Plan
  3. 3. Key criteria for the self-assessment of an Innovation Plan Items to be evaluated Criteria 1. Innovation: it will be observed. Max: 13 points 2. Relation between the ability to complement, “add value” and be sustainable Max: 5 points 3. Clearness and general quality of the innovation plan. (a) Is the proposal referred to experiences that can be considered innovative in relation to its strategies, approaches, concepts, methods or other aspects? (a) Does the Innovation Plan have the potential to contribute with conclusions, recommendations and lessons learned that could be used by a meaningful number of agents involved in other similar experiences? (a) Is it feasible to implement the plan with the economic resources considered in the budget (both the allocated by PROCASUR, as well as the contributed by the partnership)? (a) Is it feasible to execute the defined activities in the periods of time planned? (a) Will the execution of the plan allow achieving/observing outcomes and/or results at the end of the execution? Are these impacts measurable? (a) Alignment with the organization’s strategy: analysis if the plan is congruent and reinforces the strategy that the organization is developing at medium and long term. (a) Sustainability: Review of the degree in which the innovation proposal can be kept in time and included to the organization own management capacities. (a) (a) Max: 8 points (a) (a) That the plan has to be well justified, that is to say, clearly presenting, and with direct language, the problem or topic that is going to be addressed. That: i) direct and potential users of the plan have to be clearly and directly identified in the proposal, and ii) it has to be possible to identify diverse stakeholders among users. That specific objectives and products and results of the Plan have to be clear, real and verifiable. That the methodology of the Plan is:
  4. 4. Targetting • Scope of the Plan: • Geographic coverage • Target Groups
  5. 5. Assets and ongoing activities • Social capital and network of partners. • Who is involved in this plan (private and public, people sector)? What is the good and the bad in engaging them? • Cultural (knowledge) assets taking advantage from • Natural resources availables
  6. 6. Opportunities • • • • • Business Opportunities Public Private and NGO support Farmer organization
  7. 7. Lessons Learned that apply • Hosts at the local, provincial and central level • LR teams members
  8. 8. Why is this Innovation needed? • Vision – Expected changes (outcomes) – Target groups – Partners for innovation
  9. 9. Objectives • General • Specific objectives
  10. 10. Strategies activities • Activity, resources, repsonsibles and outcomes
  11. 11. Resources • Human • Financial • Material – WHO IS PAYING FOR WHAT
  12. 12. Sustainability • Ownership • Scaling up • Monitoring, evaluation,learning and changing system • Knowledge management for improving performance.