Advertisement
Advertisement

More Related Content

Similar to Mechanized rice production in Bangladesh: Utilization of the SI Assessment Framework for system analyses (20)

Advertisement
Advertisement

Mechanized rice production in Bangladesh: Utilization of the SI Assessment Framework for system analyses

  1. Transplanting Machinery • ACI Transplanter is the only transplanter that functions in zero tilled system. • Both ACI Transplanter and Metal Transplanter have similar technical specifications. Harvesting Equipment • Mini-combine harvesters are preferred to reapers, however, both technologies greatly reduce labor requirements and costs of harvesting compared to conventional harvest. • Mini-combine harvesters have larger fuel consumption and GHG Emission compared to reapers. • Conventional harvest and reapers have greater post-harvest losses compared to mini-combine harvesters. Effective Field Capacity Ha/Hr min=0 max=0.205 Field Efficiency min=0 max=77.55 Labor Requirements Taka/Ha min=0 max=16573 Fuel consumption L/Ha min=0 max=4.11 GHG Emissions Kg C02/ha min=0 max=16.086 ACI Transplanter -Tilled Metal Transplanter-Tilled ACI-Transplanter- Zero Tillage ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This poster is made possible by the support of the American People provided to the Feed the Future Innovation Lab for Sustainable Intensification through the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). The contents are the sole responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of USAID or the United States Government. Program activities are funded by USAID under Cooperative Agreement No.AID-OAA-L-14-00006. Mechanized Rice Production in Bangladesh: Utilization of SI Assessment Framework for Systems Analyses Appropriate Scale Mechanization Consortium Tim Rendalla; Chayan Sahab, Md Monjurul Alamb, Prasanta Kalitaa, Alan Hansena a Depart. of Agricultural and Biological Engineering University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign b Depart. Of Farm Power and Machinery, Bangladesh Agricultural University INTRODUCTION CONCLUSIONS Intervention 1:Transplanting Equipment Intervention 2: Harvesting Equipment SYNERGIES ANDTRADEOFFS The ASMC is encouraging appropriate scale machinery for the mechanization of rice production in Bangladesh. Baseline survey results indicate mechanization levels for seedling/transplanting and harvesting are extremely low (<2%). The Appropriate Scale Mechanization Innovation Hub-Bangladesh interventions are: 1. Transplanting Machinery 2. Harvesting Machinery 3. Conservation Agriculture Seeding Machinery. Agricultural activities Traditional (%) Mechanical (%) Tillage 4 96 Seedling/ Transplanting 99 1 Weeding 100 - Irrigation 15 85 Plant protection - 100 Harvesting 97 2 to 3 Threshing 31 69 Winnowing 94 6 Drying 98 2 Milling 79 21 Storage 96 4 RICETRANSPLANTING EQUIPMENT RICE HARVESTING EQUIPMENT ACI Reaper Metal Reaper KYM Mini-Combine Metal Asia –ARP 4UM ACI Daedong KIOTI DP 488 BASELINE SURVEY RESULTS Work Rate hr/ha min=0 max=184 Post harvest Losses % Loss min=0 max=6.36 Labor Requirements Taka/Ha min=0 max=20847 Fuel consumption L/Ha min=0 max=17.67 GHG Emissions Kg C02/ha min=0 max=67.146 Conventional Harvest ACI Reaper Metal Reaper Mini Combine Harvester The ASMC has partnered with two machinery suppliers [Metal (Pvt. Ltd.) and ACI Motor] to promote machinery for transplanting and harvesting. Productivity Work rate* Effective field capacity* Field efficiency* Crop productivity/Yield* Input use efficiency Crop residue productivity Animal productivity Variability in production Yield gap Cropping intensity Economic Labor requirement* Weekly consumption expenditure* Fuel consumption* Average maximum willingness to pay for transplanting (Hand)* Average maximum willingness to pay for transplanting (Machine)* Value of agricultural implements* Profitability Variability of profitability Income diversification Input use intensity Returns to land, labor and capital Poverty rates Market participation Market orientation Environmental Pesticide use* Water availability* Greenhouse gas emission* Plant biodiversity Vegetative cover Fuel security Pest level Insect biodiversity Soil erosion Soil carbon Soil chemical quality Soil physical quality Human condition Food security* Nutrition* Food safety Capacity to experiment Human health Social Dietary diversity by gender* Training received on agricultural machinery* Gender equity Age equity Equity of marginalized groups Social cohesion Collective action Draw arrows for connections ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐> Use +, ++, or +++ to show synergies Use ‐, ‐‐ , or ‐‐‐ to show tradeoffs * Indicator included in research poster +++ ++ + -- ++ -- ++ ++ ++ -- Net Cultivated Area decimal min=0 max=284.1 Average Aman Season Production kg/decimal min=0 max=18 Weekly Consumption Expenditure BDT min=0 max=1883 Average maximum willingness to pay for transplanting (hand) BDT/Bigha min=0 max=1491 Average maximum willingness to pay for transplanting (machine) BDT/Bigha min=0 max=1221 Value of Agricultural Implements BDT min=0 max=5484.6 Water Availbility % of farmers reporting salinity and/or water shortage min=0 max=69.6 Pesticide Use BDT/Decimal min=0 max=3834 Food Deficit-Self-reported % of farmers min=0 max=92 Household Dietary Diversity Scores # of food groups min=0 max=6.19 Intervention Farmer Adoption Farmer Control
Advertisement