SUMMARIZED OVERVIEW OF SCANMANIPULATIONS FROM THREE RX X-RAYPHOTO SERIES
In this document the findings of image manipulati...
- What is striking directly, is that all scans show marks of digital scan-equipment. In itself this is already remarkable,...
During the research after the visual position of the clip under rotation with the help of a photo-camera, next to that I h...
Clip-compairing Frontal X-ray scan series:
4
Clip-compairing Sagittal (Lateral) X-ray series:
5
As a final step in research if desired in shadow-play as with a diascreen-setup the position and shape of the clip (in con...
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in …5
×

Summarized overview of scanmanipulations

321 views

Published on

Appendix on Medical research part C (summary of RX FRAUD)

0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total views
321
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
1
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
2
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Summarized overview of scanmanipulations

  1. 1. SUMMARIZED OVERVIEW OF SCANMANIPULATIONS FROM THREE RX X-RAYPHOTO SERIES In this document the findings of image manipulation (which has been demonstrated in part C) have been put next to eachother again in a serie of image fragments belonging together and zoomed in further around the clip, being voorafgegaan by the tabel underneath. TABEL RX clip comparing ZHS1F ZHS1O ZHS1S ZHS1H ZHS2O ZHS2S ZHS3F ZHS3O ZHS3S ZHS3H double Processus Spinoza ZHS1H ZHS3S ZHS3H double Posteriore Boog ZHS3S ZHS3H strong deviating position/hight ZHS1F ZHS1O ZHS1S ZHS1H ZHS2O ZHS2S ZHS3F ZHS3O ZHS3S ZHS3H running off cypher/letter/image information ZHS1O ZHS1H ZHS2O ZHS2S line of vertebral body is not connecting well ZHS3F ZHS3S ‘wire' lower little eye visible ZHS1F ZHS1O ZHS2O ZHS3F ZHS3O ‘wire' upper little eye visible ZHS1F ZHS1O ZHS2O ZHS3F ZHS3O ZHS3S Deviating image of position body ZHS3O ZHS3S Nametag being overgeplakt ZHS1H ZHS2O ZHS2S proces of scan by hand ZHS1F ZHS1O ZHS1S ZHS1H manual inscription ZHS1F ZHS1O ZHS1S ZHS1H proces of digital scan ZHS2O ZHS2S ZHS3F ZHS3O ZHS3S ZHS3H digital inscritpion ZHS1F ZHS1O ZHS1S ZHS1H ZHS2O ZHS2S ZHS3F ZHS3O ZHS3S ZHS3H Image fragment lying underneath visible ZHS1F ZHS1S ZHS2O ZHS2S ZHS3F ZHS3S other aspect deserving to be mentiond marker R copy CT Black square no neck deviation The tabel on page one is making clear that there are quite some differances between the various X-rays. The images aren’t bepaald consequent: 1
  2. 2. - What is striking directly, is that all scans show marks of digital scan-equipment. In itself this is already remarkable, because the first serie was (should be) produced by hand completely with an oldfashion X-raphoto scanner with filmcassettes and a darkroom etc. - No photo is showing an image of the clip in accordance with another photo; in this little document this is shown further. - The ‘wire’ which is running through the little eyes is shown at the frontal scans consequently only. The sagittal scan ZHS3S comfirms the inconsistency once again, by only showing a wire through the lower eye, while scans ZHS1S and ZHS2S are not showing this. - The series of ZHS1 and ZHS2 have been made by placing negatives one over the other and being fotographed again in a print-though, likewise these physical negatives show elements of the image whereunder serialnumbers etc. are running off in the darker areas for instance. The third serie by ZHS3 is produced completely digital, wherein the has been photoshopped in layers, just only the double layers are not connecting nicely on each other, f.i. a double Posteriore arch and Processus Spinoza is shown and C3 is on ZHS3S taller. - In conclusie I assume that scans of myself have been mixed with imageinformation from other scans, which do not belong to my scan of that very moment. They have been made earlier and have been added later as a concealing layer placed over the scan. (Remains of probable underlying image fragments are making this also clear.) In serie ZHS1 and ZHS2 already excisting negatives even have been re- used, by which remains of underlying nametags became visible. The tabel is a summary of findings of deviations in comparison of the 3 X-rayseries. In de tabel also is indicated that none of the representations of the clip in exact form is marching with the representation of the clip on one of the other comparable scans. The differance between a frontal scan and a scan made from the side concerns a rotation of 90 degrees around a vertical ax in respect to the object. In the Medical Research part C this became already clear that the clip on the sagittal and the frontal scan are corresponding with each other in rotation. Imitation of the situation of rotation of a clip (imitated approximately) around a vertical ax showed out a rotation of 60 degrees. The actual rotaion is around diagonal ax: 60 degrees measured around a vertical ax and 30 degees measured round off around a horizontal ax. 2
  3. 3. During the research after the visual position of the clip under rotation with the help of a photo-camera, next to that I have recorded some moments with another camera. Likewise I was able to define the rotation around a horizontal ax approximately with the photo’s underneath. How the clip being situated between the second and third vertebral is showing itself is acoording the tabel in compair defferent. On each scan the clip is about at the height of the third neck vertebral C3 for sure, but is differing on each photo concerning the exact form and position of the clip. The differance is not much, but it is too much if we speak about a clip being encapsulated in the neck. At scan ZHS3H the clip for instance is reaching till the second vertebral C2, but at scan ZHS1F the clip is almost completely at the height of C3. Next to this the clip vary in degree of bend and position. In part C the photos were compared pair-wise. For clarity in overview therefore in this document I have placed all scans belonging together with an image selection around the clip in a row, to emphasize on making clear the the deviation in position and height between the separate images. Underneath is following a comparing. Note: Do pay attention especially at the contour-lines of the pieces of vertebras that are being shown, like the Proccessus Spinoza, the intervertebral disc etc. On this basis the difference in position and height of the clip is easily to oversee in respect to her background (being the vertebral colom).. Nowhere the clip is shown on the exact same location/height. On the sagottal serie the clip in itself is even differing in shape and position. Let the images talk: 3 In order to go from a photo alike in imitation of a clip in the frontal scan to the one of a clip in a sagittal scan I had to verschuiven and place the camera somewhat higher. That displacement in the height can be interpreted as a rotation around a horizontal ax of almost 30 degrees.
  4. 4. Clip-compairing Frontal X-ray scan series: 4
  5. 5. Clip-compairing Sagittal (Lateral) X-ray series: 5
  6. 6. As a final step in research if desired in shadow-play as with a diascreen-setup the position and shape of the clip (in contour-shape of the shadow) again can be imagined; but the image manipulation has been proven in part C already, so for this that is not needed anymore. 6 That medical personnel of AZ Nikolaas committed image manipulation subsequently after an assignment for a forensic investigation being formulated (and in spite of forgoing proof) is extraordinary. It is also illustrating the arrogance by with the medical crime is committed and the degree of being organized international in medical crime. This has her excistance due to a forsaking government in her supervison and discipline. The integrity and ethics of care and the supervision concerned are lost.

×