SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 14
Download to read offline
1
American Bar Association
July 2017
1
METHODOLOGY AND TECHNICAL DETAILS
This is the seventh wave of research for an ongoing Ipsos survey:
▪ Current fieldwork period: July 12-14, 2017
 The previous waves were conducted February 21-24 and December 2-6, 2014 and April 2-6, November 16-18, 2015, April 22-25, 2016, July 11-12, 2016.
▪ The current survey interviewed a national sample of 1,017 adults
 The previous waves included 1,005 adults, 1,004, 1,005, 1,003, 1,006, and 1,087 respectively.
 These slides also contain some data filtered on just those respondents reporting that they know ‘A great deal’, ‘A fair amount’, or ‘ A
little bit’ about the ICC at Q1 (cutting out those who say they know ‘Nothing at all’). This reduced the filtered base size to 506, and is
referred to in the data as ‘Aware of ICC’ audience.
─ The first wave included 379 of these respondents
─ The second wave included 338 of these respondents
─ The third wave included 408 of these respondents
─ The fourth wave included 349 of these respondents
─ The fifth wave included 372 of these respondents
─ The sixth wave included 528 of these respondents
▪ Weighting then employed to balance demographics and ensure that the sample's composition reflects that of the U.S. adult population
according to Census data and to provide results intended to approximate the sample universe.
▪ Statistical margins of error are not applicable to online polls because they are based on samples drawn from opt-in online panels, not on
random samples that mirror the population within a statistical probability ratio.
▪ All sample surveys and polls may be subject to other sources of error, including, but not limited to coverage error, and measurement error.
2
1.How much, if anything, would you say you know about the International Criminal Court?
8%
10%
29%
54%
A great deal
A fair amount
A little bit
Nothing at all
Base: All Respondents (n=1,017)
Knowledge of International Criminal Court
3
1.How much, if anything, would you say you know about the International Criminal Court?
Knowledge of International Criminal Court - Trend
54%55%
61%63%59%64%60%
29%26%
24%21%30%21%28%
10%9%
7%8%
9%
8%
8%
8%10%8%7%
2%7%4%
July 2017July 2016April 2016November
2015
April 2015December
2014
February 2014
Nothing at all A little bit A fair amount A great deal
4 Base: All Respondents (n=1,017)
2. Please indicate whether you agree or disagree with each of the statements
Attitudes towards U.S. Participation in ICC
38%
63%
70%
79%
25%
36%
62%
73%
21%
28%
5%
10%
10%
13%
45%
48%
12%
15%
52%
57%
57%
27%
21%
8%
31%
16%
26%
13%
27%
14%
Agree Disagree Don't know
The United States is currently a member of the
International Criminal Court
It is important for the United States to participate in international
organizations that support human rights and that hold individuals
accountable for mass atrocities
Joining international organizations concerned with human rights and
holding individuals accountable for mass atrocities is a risk to the US
because it could hurt our autonomy
We should dedicate US resources (financial, military, intelligence, etc)
to international organizations that support human rights and that
hold individuals accountable for mass atrocities
It is not in our best interests to dedicate US resources (financial,
military, intelligence, etc.) to supporting international organizations
that support human rights and that hold individuals accountable for
mass atrocities
ALL
Aware of ICC
ALL
Aware of ICC
ALL
Aware of ICC
ALL
Aware of ICC
ALL
Aware of ICC
5 Base: All Respondents (n=1,017); All at least aware of ICC (n=506)
2. Please indicate whether you agree or disagree with each of the statements (Agree Only)
Attitudes towards U.S. Participation in ICC - Trend
28
35
31 29
33 35
38
60 60
64
60
68
64
70
24 23 20 24 26 28
25
47 48
53 52
57 55
62
21 20
20 20 20 22 21
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Feb-14
Mar-14
Apr-14
May-14
Jun-14
Jul-14
Aug-14
Sep-14
Oct-14
Nov-14
Dec-14
Jan-15
Feb-15
Mar-15
Apr-15
May-15
Jun-15
Jul-15
Aug-15
Sep-15
Oct-15
Nov-15
Dec-15
Jan-16
Feb-16
Mar-16
Apr-16
May-16
Jun-16
Jul-16
Aug-16
Sep-16
Oct-16
Nov-16
Dec-16
Jan-17
Feb-17
Mar-17
Apr-17
May-17
Jun-17
Jul-17
The United States is currently a member of the International Criminal Court - Feb 2014
It is important for the United States to participate in international organizations that support human rights and that hold individuals accountable for mass atrocities- Feb 2014
Joining international organizations concerned with human rights and holding individuals accountable for mass atrocities is a risk to the US because it could hurt our autonomy - Feb 2014
We should dedicate US resources (financial, military, intelligence, etc) to international organizations that support human rights and that hold individuals
It is not in our best interests to dedicate US resources (financial, military, intelligence, etc) to supporting international organizations that support human rights and that hold individuals accountable for mass atrocities
- Feb 2014
% AGREE
6 Base: All Respondents (n=1,017)
Joining the International Criminal Court
3. The International Criminal Court (ICC)is the world’s only permanent international tribunal created by a treaty for the purpose of investigating and prosecuting war crimes,
genocide, and crimes against humanity (mass atrocities). Currently, 122 countries are members of the International Criminal Court. The United States formally announced in 2002 that
it would not become a member of the International Criminal Court for a multitude of reasons, including questions about the court’s jurisdiction and structure.
Some people believe that the US should become more involved in or fully join the ICC so that we can use our considerable power, influence, and resources to support the important
efforts of the Court to pursue individuals who have committed mass atrocities (when the perpetrator’s own country’s courts have failed to do so)
Some people believe that the US should not join the ICC because it compromises our sovereignty as a nation, and because our standing in the world means our military personnel
and civilian officials might be prosecuted via the ICC for political reasons
Which of these statements comes closer to your personal opinion?
50%
21%
29%
64%
21%
15%
The US should become more
involved in or fully join the ICC
The US should not join the ICC
Don't know
All Aware of ICC
7 Base: All Respondents (n=1,017); All at least aware of ICC (n=506)
Joining the International Criminal Court - Trend
3. The International Criminal Court (ICC)is the world’s only permanent international tribunal created by a treaty for the purpose of investigating and prosecuting war crimes,
genocide, and crimes against humanity (mass atrocities). Currently, 122 countries are members of the International Criminal Court. The United States formally announced in 2002 that
it would not become a member of the International Criminal Court for a multitude of reasons, including questions about the court’s jurisdiction and structure.
Some people believe that the US should become more involved in or fully join the ICC so that we can use our considerable power, influence, and resources to support the important
efforts of the Court to pursue individuals who have committed mass atrocities (when the perpetrator’s own country’s courts have failed to do so)
Some people believe that the US should not join the ICC because it compromises our sovereignty as a nation, and because our standing in the world means our military personnel
and civilian officials might be prosecuted via the ICC for political reasons
Which of these statements comes closer to your personal opinion?
34 37 37 37
44 44
50
24 25 23
19 21 21 21
42 38 40
45
35 35
29
10
20
30
40
50
60
Feb-14
Mar-…
Apr-14
May-…
Jun-14
Jul-14
Aug-14
Sep-14
Oct-14
Nov-…
Dec-14
Jan-15
Feb-15
Mar-…
Apr-15
May-…
Jun-15
Jul-15
Aug-15
Sep-15
Oct-15
Nov-…
Dec-15
Jan-16
Feb-16
Mar-…
Apr-16
May-…
Jun-16
Jul-16
Aug-16
Sep-16
Oct-16
Nov-…
Dec-16
Jan-17
Feb-17
Mar-…
Apr-17
May-…
Jun-17
Jul-17
The US should become more involved in or fully join the ICC The US should not join the ICC Don't know
8 Base: All Respondents (n=1,017)
The US should continue to dedicate moderate resources to
supporting some actions of the ICC without formally joining, such as
by providing satellite photos if our satellites are passing an area of
interest to the ICC
Joining the ICC would compromise America's sovereignty as a nation
The US should become more engaged and involved in the ICC
without becoming a member by making all forms of our vast
governmental resources available to support the work of the ICC
The US should become a full member of the International Criminal
Court and robustly support all of its work.
4. For each of the statements below, please indicate whether you agree or disagree with the statement.
Attitudes towards U.S. Participation in ICC
50%
59%
30%
42%
39%
50%
36%
48%
19%
22%
37%
42%
27%
29%
27%
32%
31%
20%
33%
16%
35%
21%
37%
20%
Agree Disagree Don't know
ALL
Aware of ICC
ALL
Aware of ICC
ALL
Aware of ICC
ALL
Aware of ICC
9 Base: All Respondents (n=1,017); All at least aware of ICC (n=506)
The US should continue to dedicate moderate resources to
supporting some actions of the ICC without formally joining,
such as by providing satellite photos if our satellites are passing
an area of interest to the ICC
Joining the ICC would compromise America's sovereignty as a
nation
The US should become more engaged and involved in the ICC
without becoming a member by making all forms of our vast
governmental resources available to support the work of the ICC
The US should become a full member of the International
Criminal Court and robustly support all of its work.
4. For each of the statements below, please indicate whether you agree or disagree with the statement (Agree Only).
Attitudes towards U.S. Participation in ICC - Trend
44% 47% 43% 42% 52% 49% 53%
0%
50%
100%
26% 28% 26% 24%
31% 32% 30%
0%
20%
40%
28% 31% 32% 33% 37% 37% 39%
0%
50%
22% 25% 24% 27% 32% 32% 36%
0%
20%
40%
Feb-14
Apr-14
Jun-14
Aug-14
Oct-14
Dec-14
Feb-15
Apr-15
Jun-15
Aug-15
Oct-15
Dec-15
Feb-16
Apr-16
Jun-16
Aug-16
Oct-16
Dec-16
Feb-17
Apr-17
Jun-17
10 Base: All Respondents (n=1,017)
4. For each of the statements below, please indicate whether you agree or disagree with the statement (Agree Only).
Attitudes towards U.S. Participation in ICC - Trend
44
47
43 42
52
49
53
26
28
26
24
31 32 3028
31 32 33
37 37
39
22
25
24
27
32 32
36
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
Feb-14
Mar-14
Apr-14
May-14
Jun-14
Jul-14
Aug-14
Sep-14
Oct-14
Nov-14
Dec-14
Jan-15
Feb-15
Mar-15
Apr-15
May-15
Jun-15
Jul-15
Aug-15
Sep-15
Oct-15
Nov-15
Dec-15
Jan-16
Feb-16
Mar-16
Apr-16
May-16
Jun-16
Jul-16
Aug-16
Sep-16
Oct-16
Nov-16
Dec-16
Jan-17
Feb-17
Mar-17
Apr-17
May-17
Jun-17
Jul-17
The US should continue to dedicate moderate resources to supporting some actions of the ICC without formally joining, such as by providing satellite
photos if our satellites are passing an area of interest to the ICC
Joining the ICC would compromise America's sovereignty as a nation
The US should become more engaged and involved in the ICC without becoming a member by making all forms of our vast governmental resources
available to support the work of the ICC
The US should become a full member of the International Criminal Court and robustly support all of its work
11 Base: All Respondents (n=1,017)
Methods of Combating Terrorism
Q5a. There are a range of tactics to combat terrorism. These tactics include but are not limited to military, financial, and legal means.
Which of the two tactics outlined below do you think is most effective in combatting the spread of terrorism?
20%
12%
52%
16%
21%
18%
53%
8%
Military action with the goal of killing terrorists is the most
effective way to combat terrorism
Treating terrorists as criminals and prosecuting them in the
courtroom is the most effective way to combat terrorism
A combination of military action aimed at combating terrorism
and criminal prosecution in the courtroom
Don’t know
All Aware of ICC
12 Base: All Respondents (n=1,017); All at least aware of ICC (n=506)
Perceptions of Terrorists
Q5b. Some people compare terrorists to [INSERT AND REVERSE STATEMENTS A OR B BELOW]. Others compare terrorists TO [INSERT AND REVERSE
STATEMENTS A OR B BELOW].
A. The mafia, because it is a network of criminals who conspire to commit crimes and who use violence to achieve their goals
B. An army of zealots, because they are working to achieve a common, religious cause and who use violence to achieve their goals
In your view, which of these is a better way of describing terrorists?
22%
45%
13%
3%
17%
26%
49%
14%
3%
8%
The mafia, because it is a network of criminals who conspire to commit
crimes and who use violence to achieve their goals
An army of zealots, because they are working to achieve a common,
religious cause and who use violence to achieve their goals
Neither
Other
Don’t know
All Aware of ICC
13 Base: All Respondents (n=1,017); All at least aware of ICC (n=506)
Ipsos Contacts
Clifford Young
President, US Ipsos Public Affairs
2020 K Street, NW, Suite 410
Washington, DC 20006
Phone: +1 202.420.2016
Email: clifford.young@ipsos.com
Julia Clark
Senior Vice President
222 S Riverside Plaza, Fifth Floor
Chicago, IL 60606
Phone: +1 312.526.4919
Email: julia.clark@ipsos.com

More Related Content

What's hot

U.S. national registered voter survey on Iran nuclear deal--CHARTS
U.S. national registered voter survey on Iran nuclear deal--CHARTSU.S. national registered voter survey on Iran nuclear deal--CHARTS
U.S. national registered voter survey on Iran nuclear deal--CHARTSThe Israel Project
 
Ron wyden wikipedia(highlighted)
Ron wyden   wikipedia(highlighted)Ron wyden   wikipedia(highlighted)
Ron wyden wikipedia(highlighted)VogelDenise
 
This Week in Washington ~ November 11, 2012
This Week in Washington ~ November 11, 2012This Week in Washington ~ November 11, 2012
This Week in Washington ~ November 11, 2012Patton Boggs LLP
 
Civil Beat Poll October 2018 -- Constitutional Amendment
Civil Beat Poll October 2018 -- Constitutional AmendmentCivil Beat Poll October 2018 -- Constitutional Amendment
Civil Beat Poll October 2018 -- Constitutional AmendmentHonolulu Civil Beat
 
Health Reform Bracketology Oct 18
Health Reform Bracketology Oct 18Health Reform Bracketology Oct 18
Health Reform Bracketology Oct 18Leavitt Partners
 
Reuters/Ipsos Core Political: Presidential Approval Tracker (06/24/2020)
Reuters/Ipsos Core Political: Presidential Approval Tracker (06/24/2020)Reuters/Ipsos Core Political: Presidential Approval Tracker (06/24/2020)
Reuters/Ipsos Core Political: Presidential Approval Tracker (06/24/2020)Ipsos Public Affairs
 
Reuters/Ipsos Core Political: Presidential Approval Tracker (07/29/2020)
Reuters/Ipsos Core Political: Presidential Approval Tracker (07/29/2020)Reuters/Ipsos Core Political: Presidential Approval Tracker (07/29/2020)
Reuters/Ipsos Core Political: Presidential Approval Tracker (07/29/2020)Ipsos Public Affairs
 
Apgovpractexam5
Apgovpractexam5Apgovpractexam5
Apgovpractexam5shoetzlein
 
Complaint cj-pearson-v.-kemp-11.25.2020
Complaint cj-pearson-v.-kemp-11.25.2020Complaint cj-pearson-v.-kemp-11.25.2020
Complaint cj-pearson-v.-kemp-11.25.2020ELIAS OMEGA
 
Report to UN Human Rights Council, Troy Ware Mar 07
Report to UN Human Rights Council, Troy Ware Mar 07Report to UN Human Rights Council, Troy Ware Mar 07
Report to UN Human Rights Council, Troy Ware Mar 07waretc
 
Federal Landscape: Transportation Funding
Federal Landscape: Transportation FundingFederal Landscape: Transportation Funding
Federal Landscape: Transportation FundingRPO America
 
Electoral Process
Electoral ProcessElectoral Process
Electoral ProcessUD Teacher
 
Reuters/Ipsos Core Political: Presidential Approval Tracker (06/17/2020)
Reuters/Ipsos Core Political: Presidential Approval Tracker (06/17/2020)Reuters/Ipsos Core Political: Presidential Approval Tracker (06/17/2020)
Reuters/Ipsos Core Political: Presidential Approval Tracker (06/17/2020)Ipsos Public Affairs
 
This Week in Washington ~ December 14, 2012
This Week in Washington ~ December 14, 2012This Week in Washington ~ December 14, 2012
This Week in Washington ~ December 14, 2012Patton Boggs LLP
 
The Electoral Process
The Electoral ProcessThe Electoral Process
The Electoral Processitutor
 
Complaint cj-pearson-v.-kemp-11.25.2020
Complaint cj-pearson-v.-kemp-11.25.2020Complaint cj-pearson-v.-kemp-11.25.2020
Complaint cj-pearson-v.-kemp-11.25.2020Kenneth Hogge Sr
 

What's hot (18)

U.S. national registered voter survey on Iran nuclear deal--CHARTS
U.S. national registered voter survey on Iran nuclear deal--CHARTSU.S. national registered voter survey on Iran nuclear deal--CHARTS
U.S. national registered voter survey on Iran nuclear deal--CHARTS
 
Ron wyden wikipedia(highlighted)
Ron wyden   wikipedia(highlighted)Ron wyden   wikipedia(highlighted)
Ron wyden wikipedia(highlighted)
 
This Week in Washington ~ November 11, 2012
This Week in Washington ~ November 11, 2012This Week in Washington ~ November 11, 2012
This Week in Washington ~ November 11, 2012
 
Civil Beat Poll October 2018 -- Constitutional Amendment
Civil Beat Poll October 2018 -- Constitutional AmendmentCivil Beat Poll October 2018 -- Constitutional Amendment
Civil Beat Poll October 2018 -- Constitutional Amendment
 
Health Reform Bracketology Oct 18
Health Reform Bracketology Oct 18Health Reform Bracketology Oct 18
Health Reform Bracketology Oct 18
 
Reuters/Ipsos Core Political: Presidential Approval Tracker (06/24/2020)
Reuters/Ipsos Core Political: Presidential Approval Tracker (06/24/2020)Reuters/Ipsos Core Political: Presidential Approval Tracker (06/24/2020)
Reuters/Ipsos Core Political: Presidential Approval Tracker (06/24/2020)
 
Reuters/Ipsos Core Political: Presidential Approval Tracker (07/29/2020)
Reuters/Ipsos Core Political: Presidential Approval Tracker (07/29/2020)Reuters/Ipsos Core Political: Presidential Approval Tracker (07/29/2020)
Reuters/Ipsos Core Political: Presidential Approval Tracker (07/29/2020)
 
Apgovpractexam5
Apgovpractexam5Apgovpractexam5
Apgovpractexam5
 
Complaint cj-pearson-v.-kemp-11.25.2020
Complaint cj-pearson-v.-kemp-11.25.2020Complaint cj-pearson-v.-kemp-11.25.2020
Complaint cj-pearson-v.-kemp-11.25.2020
 
Report to UN Human Rights Council, Troy Ware Mar 07
Report to UN Human Rights Council, Troy Ware Mar 07Report to UN Human Rights Council, Troy Ware Mar 07
Report to UN Human Rights Council, Troy Ware Mar 07
 
ADMJ2 - Intro to ADMJ - Chapter 2
ADMJ2 - Intro to ADMJ - Chapter 2ADMJ2 - Intro to ADMJ - Chapter 2
ADMJ2 - Intro to ADMJ - Chapter 2
 
Federal Landscape: Transportation Funding
Federal Landscape: Transportation FundingFederal Landscape: Transportation Funding
Federal Landscape: Transportation Funding
 
Electoral Process
Electoral ProcessElectoral Process
Electoral Process
 
Reuters/Ipsos Core Political: Presidential Approval Tracker (06/17/2020)
Reuters/Ipsos Core Political: Presidential Approval Tracker (06/17/2020)Reuters/Ipsos Core Political: Presidential Approval Tracker (06/17/2020)
Reuters/Ipsos Core Political: Presidential Approval Tracker (06/17/2020)
 
This Week in Washington ~ December 14, 2012
This Week in Washington ~ December 14, 2012This Week in Washington ~ December 14, 2012
This Week in Washington ~ December 14, 2012
 
The Electoral Process
The Electoral ProcessThe Electoral Process
The Electoral Process
 
Midterm election recap
Midterm election recapMidterm election recap
Midterm election recap
 
Complaint cj-pearson-v.-kemp-11.25.2020
Complaint cj-pearson-v.-kemp-11.25.2020Complaint cj-pearson-v.-kemp-11.25.2020
Complaint cj-pearson-v.-kemp-11.25.2020
 

Similar to American Bar Association ICC Project Topline-2017-07-14

ABA ICC Ipsos April 2016
ABA ICC Ipsos April 2016 ABA ICC Ipsos April 2016
ABA ICC Ipsos April 2016 abaiccproject
 
ABA ICC Data 12 09 2014
ABA ICC Data 12 09 2014ABA ICC Data 12 09 2014
ABA ICC Data 12 09 2014abaiccproject
 
ABA ICC November 2015
ABA ICC November 2015ABA ICC November 2015
ABA ICC November 2015abaiccproject
 
Psychology Of Interrogations
Psychology Of InterrogationsPsychology Of Interrogations
Psychology Of InterrogationsJan Champagne
 
2015 Human Rights Report Card
2015 Human Rights Report Card2015 Human Rights Report Card
2015 Human Rights Report CardAfif Rahman
 
2015 Human Rights Report Card
2015 Human Rights Report Card2015 Human Rights Report Card
2015 Human Rights Report CardAlyson Eller
 
Military Sexual Trauma
Military Sexual TraumaMilitary Sexual Trauma
Military Sexual TraumaJennifer Hill
 
There Is A 90% Probability That Your Son Is Pregnant: Predicting The Future ...
There Is A 90% Probability That Your Son Is Pregnant:  Predicting The Future ...There Is A 90% Probability That Your Son Is Pregnant:  Predicting The Future ...
There Is A 90% Probability That Your Son Is Pregnant: Predicting The Future ...Health Catalyst
 
Trust in Science and Scientists
Trust in Science and ScientistsTrust in Science and Scientists
Trust in Science and ScientistsJohn C. Besley
 
Reuters/Ipsos Core Political: Presidential Approval Tracker (06/10/2020)
Reuters/Ipsos Core Political: Presidential Approval Tracker (06/10/2020)Reuters/Ipsos Core Political: Presidential Approval Tracker (06/10/2020)
Reuters/Ipsos Core Political: Presidential Approval Tracker (06/10/2020)Ipsos Public Affairs
 
An Introduction to the Safety and Justice Challenge
An Introduction to the Safety and Justice ChallengeAn Introduction to the Safety and Justice Challenge
An Introduction to the Safety and Justice ChallengeJeanette Marshall, MBA
 
Reuters/Ipsos Core Political Survey: Presidential Approval Tracker (09/02/2020)
Reuters/Ipsos Core Political Survey: Presidential Approval Tracker (09/02/2020)Reuters/Ipsos Core Political Survey: Presidential Approval Tracker (09/02/2020)
Reuters/Ipsos Core Political Survey: Presidential Approval Tracker (09/02/2020)Ipsos Public Affairs
 
Mba Essay Short And Long-Term Career Goals
Mba Essay Short And Long-Term Career GoalsMba Essay Short And Long-Term Career Goals
Mba Essay Short And Long-Term Career GoalsJennifer Prive
 
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Technology
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Technology2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Technology
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - TechnologyEdelman
 
Veillant Media & Emotiveillance
Veillant Media & Emotiveillance  Veillant Media & Emotiveillance
Veillant Media & Emotiveillance Andrew_McStay
 
Universal Periodic Review - training
Universal Periodic Review - trainingUniversal Periodic Review - training
Universal Periodic Review - trainingARC International
 
Make Money Article Writing - Gta V Making Money Assa
Make Money Article Writing - Gta V Making Money AssaMake Money Article Writing - Gta V Making Money Assa
Make Money Article Writing - Gta V Making Money AssaMelissa Kula
 
Copyright 2016 cengage learning. all rights reserved. may not
Copyright 2016 cengage learning. all rights reserved. may not Copyright 2016 cengage learning. all rights reserved. may not
Copyright 2016 cengage learning. all rights reserved. may not SONU61709
 

Similar to American Bar Association ICC Project Topline-2017-07-14 (20)

ABA ICC Ipsos April 2016
ABA ICC Ipsos April 2016 ABA ICC Ipsos April 2016
ABA ICC Ipsos April 2016
 
ABA ICC Data 12 09 2014
ABA ICC Data 12 09 2014ABA ICC Data 12 09 2014
ABA ICC Data 12 09 2014
 
ABA ICC November 2015
ABA ICC November 2015ABA ICC November 2015
ABA ICC November 2015
 
Psychology Of Interrogations
Psychology Of InterrogationsPsychology Of Interrogations
Psychology Of Interrogations
 
2015 Human Rights Report Card
2015 Human Rights Report Card2015 Human Rights Report Card
2015 Human Rights Report Card
 
2015 Human Rights Report Card
2015 Human Rights Report Card2015 Human Rights Report Card
2015 Human Rights Report Card
 
Military Sexual Trauma
Military Sexual TraumaMilitary Sexual Trauma
Military Sexual Trauma
 
There Is A 90% Probability That Your Son Is Pregnant: Predicting The Future ...
There Is A 90% Probability That Your Son Is Pregnant:  Predicting The Future ...There Is A 90% Probability That Your Son Is Pregnant:  Predicting The Future ...
There Is A 90% Probability That Your Son Is Pregnant: Predicting The Future ...
 
Trust in Science and Scientists
Trust in Science and ScientistsTrust in Science and Scientists
Trust in Science and Scientists
 
Reuters/Ipsos Core Political: Presidential Approval Tracker (06/10/2020)
Reuters/Ipsos Core Political: Presidential Approval Tracker (06/10/2020)Reuters/Ipsos Core Political: Presidential Approval Tracker (06/10/2020)
Reuters/Ipsos Core Political: Presidential Approval Tracker (06/10/2020)
 
July 2012-national-poll1
July 2012-national-poll1July 2012-national-poll1
July 2012-national-poll1
 
An Introduction to the Safety and Justice Challenge
An Introduction to the Safety and Justice ChallengeAn Introduction to the Safety and Justice Challenge
An Introduction to the Safety and Justice Challenge
 
Reuters/Ipsos Core Political Survey: Presidential Approval Tracker (09/02/2020)
Reuters/Ipsos Core Political Survey: Presidential Approval Tracker (09/02/2020)Reuters/Ipsos Core Political Survey: Presidential Approval Tracker (09/02/2020)
Reuters/Ipsos Core Political Survey: Presidential Approval Tracker (09/02/2020)
 
Mba Essay Short And Long-Term Career Goals
Mba Essay Short And Long-Term Career GoalsMba Essay Short And Long-Term Career Goals
Mba Essay Short And Long-Term Career Goals
 
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Technology
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Technology2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Technology
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Technology
 
Veillant Media & Emotiveillance
Veillant Media & Emotiveillance  Veillant Media & Emotiveillance
Veillant Media & Emotiveillance
 
Universal Periodic Review - training
Universal Periodic Review - trainingUniversal Periodic Review - training
Universal Periodic Review - training
 
Make Money Article Writing - Gta V Making Money Assa
Make Money Article Writing - Gta V Making Money AssaMake Money Article Writing - Gta V Making Money Assa
Make Money Article Writing - Gta V Making Money Assa
 
Copyright 2016 cengage learning. all rights reserved. may not
Copyright 2016 cengage learning. all rights reserved. may not Copyright 2016 cengage learning. all rights reserved. may not
Copyright 2016 cengage learning. all rights reserved. may not
 
Essay About Family Values
Essay About Family ValuesEssay About Family Values
Essay About Family Values
 

Recently uploaded

Town of Haverhill's Statement of Facts for Summary Judgment on Counterclaims ...
Town of Haverhill's Statement of Facts for Summary Judgment on Counterclaims ...Town of Haverhill's Statement of Facts for Summary Judgment on Counterclaims ...
Town of Haverhill's Statement of Facts for Summary Judgment on Counterclaims ...Rich Bergeron
 
Exciting news! ALB now integrates seamlessly with 3E, ProLaw, and Elite
Exciting news! ALB now integrates seamlessly with 3E, ProLaw, and EliteExciting news! ALB now integrates seamlessly with 3E, ProLaw, and Elite
Exciting news! ALB now integrates seamlessly with 3E, ProLaw, and EliteAccurate Legal Billing
 
Back Taxes for Businesses A Compliance Guide.pdf
Back Taxes for Businesses A Compliance Guide.pdfBack Taxes for Businesses A Compliance Guide.pdf
Back Taxes for Businesses A Compliance Guide.pdfIrsproblems
 
Town of Haverhill's Summary Judgment Motion for Declaratory Judgment Case
Town of Haverhill's Summary Judgment Motion for Declaratory Judgment CaseTown of Haverhill's Summary Judgment Motion for Declaratory Judgment Case
Town of Haverhill's Summary Judgment Motion for Declaratory Judgment CaseRich Bergeron
 
How to Grant the Greek Power of Attorney
How to Grant the Greek Power of AttorneyHow to Grant the Greek Power of Attorney
How to Grant the Greek Power of AttorneyBridgeWest.eu
 
Amit Kumar Kachhap vs Sangeeta Toppo.pdf
Amit Kumar Kachhap vs Sangeeta Toppo.pdfAmit Kumar Kachhap vs Sangeeta Toppo.pdf
Amit Kumar Kachhap vs Sangeeta Toppo.pdfadvsudhirdhc
 
Smarp snapshot 200 -- Google Cloud Next '24
Smarp snapshot 200 -- Google Cloud Next '24Smarp snapshot 200 -- Google Cloud Next '24
Smarp snapshot 200 -- Google Cloud Next '24Jong Hyuk Choi
 
Trustworthy Estate Planning in Colorado from Flatiron Legal Advisors, LLC
Trustworthy Estate Planning in Colorado from Flatiron Legal Advisors, LLCTrustworthy Estate Planning in Colorado from Flatiron Legal Advisors, LLC
Trustworthy Estate Planning in Colorado from Flatiron Legal Advisors, LLCFlatiron Legal Advisors, LLC
 
Ashutosh Yadav v. State of UP 22nd March, 2024 All HC.pdf
Ashutosh Yadav v. State of UP 22nd March, 2024 All HC.pdfAshutosh Yadav v. State of UP 22nd March, 2024 All HC.pdf
Ashutosh Yadav v. State of UP 22nd March, 2024 All HC.pdfVidit Agrawal
 
Town of Haverhill's Motion for Summary Judgment on DTC Counterclaims
Town of Haverhill's Motion for Summary Judgment on DTC CounterclaimsTown of Haverhill's Motion for Summary Judgment on DTC Counterclaims
Town of Haverhill's Motion for Summary Judgment on DTC CounterclaimsRich Bergeron
 
Power Point Obligations and contracts Article 1313-1327
Power Point Obligations and contracts Article 1313-1327Power Point Obligations and contracts Article 1313-1327
Power Point Obligations and contracts Article 1313-1327bariajenne
 
ENG7-Q4-MOD3. determine the worth of ideas mentioned in the text listened to
ENG7-Q4-MOD3. determine the worth of ideas mentioned in the text listened toENG7-Q4-MOD3. determine the worth of ideas mentioned in the text listened to
ENG7-Q4-MOD3. determine the worth of ideas mentioned in the text listened toirenelavilla52178
 
Appointment of Auditors Made For Firm
Appointment  of  Auditors  Made For FirmAppointment  of  Auditors  Made For Firm
Appointment of Auditors Made For FirmEbizfilingIndia
 

Recently uploaded (14)

Town of Haverhill's Statement of Facts for Summary Judgment on Counterclaims ...
Town of Haverhill's Statement of Facts for Summary Judgment on Counterclaims ...Town of Haverhill's Statement of Facts for Summary Judgment on Counterclaims ...
Town of Haverhill's Statement of Facts for Summary Judgment on Counterclaims ...
 
Exciting news! ALB now integrates seamlessly with 3E, ProLaw, and Elite
Exciting news! ALB now integrates seamlessly with 3E, ProLaw, and EliteExciting news! ALB now integrates seamlessly with 3E, ProLaw, and Elite
Exciting news! ALB now integrates seamlessly with 3E, ProLaw, and Elite
 
Back Taxes for Businesses A Compliance Guide.pdf
Back Taxes for Businesses A Compliance Guide.pdfBack Taxes for Businesses A Compliance Guide.pdf
Back Taxes for Businesses A Compliance Guide.pdf
 
Town of Haverhill's Summary Judgment Motion for Declaratory Judgment Case
Town of Haverhill's Summary Judgment Motion for Declaratory Judgment CaseTown of Haverhill's Summary Judgment Motion for Declaratory Judgment Case
Town of Haverhill's Summary Judgment Motion for Declaratory Judgment Case
 
How to Grant the Greek Power of Attorney
How to Grant the Greek Power of AttorneyHow to Grant the Greek Power of Attorney
How to Grant the Greek Power of Attorney
 
Amit Kumar Kachhap vs Sangeeta Toppo.pdf
Amit Kumar Kachhap vs Sangeeta Toppo.pdfAmit Kumar Kachhap vs Sangeeta Toppo.pdf
Amit Kumar Kachhap vs Sangeeta Toppo.pdf
 
Smarp snapshot 200 -- Google Cloud Next '24
Smarp snapshot 200 -- Google Cloud Next '24Smarp snapshot 200 -- Google Cloud Next '24
Smarp snapshot 200 -- Google Cloud Next '24
 
Trustworthy Estate Planning in Colorado from Flatiron Legal Advisors, LLC
Trustworthy Estate Planning in Colorado from Flatiron Legal Advisors, LLCTrustworthy Estate Planning in Colorado from Flatiron Legal Advisors, LLC
Trustworthy Estate Planning in Colorado from Flatiron Legal Advisors, LLC
 
Ashutosh Yadav v. State of UP 22nd March, 2024 All HC.pdf
Ashutosh Yadav v. State of UP 22nd March, 2024 All HC.pdfAshutosh Yadav v. State of UP 22nd March, 2024 All HC.pdf
Ashutosh Yadav v. State of UP 22nd March, 2024 All HC.pdf
 
Town of Haverhill's Motion for Summary Judgment on DTC Counterclaims
Town of Haverhill's Motion for Summary Judgment on DTC CounterclaimsTown of Haverhill's Motion for Summary Judgment on DTC Counterclaims
Town of Haverhill's Motion for Summary Judgment on DTC Counterclaims
 
Power Point Obligations and contracts Article 1313-1327
Power Point Obligations and contracts Article 1313-1327Power Point Obligations and contracts Article 1313-1327
Power Point Obligations and contracts Article 1313-1327
 
ENG7-Q4-MOD3. determine the worth of ideas mentioned in the text listened to
ENG7-Q4-MOD3. determine the worth of ideas mentioned in the text listened toENG7-Q4-MOD3. determine the worth of ideas mentioned in the text listened to
ENG7-Q4-MOD3. determine the worth of ideas mentioned in the text listened to
 
Nayoga Protocol by Author - Tushar Avinash Bagal A33.pptx
Nayoga Protocol  by Author - Tushar Avinash Bagal A33.pptxNayoga Protocol  by Author - Tushar Avinash Bagal A33.pptx
Nayoga Protocol by Author - Tushar Avinash Bagal A33.pptx
 
Appointment of Auditors Made For Firm
Appointment  of  Auditors  Made For FirmAppointment  of  Auditors  Made For Firm
Appointment of Auditors Made For Firm
 

American Bar Association ICC Project Topline-2017-07-14

  • 2. METHODOLOGY AND TECHNICAL DETAILS This is the seventh wave of research for an ongoing Ipsos survey: ▪ Current fieldwork period: July 12-14, 2017  The previous waves were conducted February 21-24 and December 2-6, 2014 and April 2-6, November 16-18, 2015, April 22-25, 2016, July 11-12, 2016. ▪ The current survey interviewed a national sample of 1,017 adults  The previous waves included 1,005 adults, 1,004, 1,005, 1,003, 1,006, and 1,087 respectively.  These slides also contain some data filtered on just those respondents reporting that they know ‘A great deal’, ‘A fair amount’, or ‘ A little bit’ about the ICC at Q1 (cutting out those who say they know ‘Nothing at all’). This reduced the filtered base size to 506, and is referred to in the data as ‘Aware of ICC’ audience. ─ The first wave included 379 of these respondents ─ The second wave included 338 of these respondents ─ The third wave included 408 of these respondents ─ The fourth wave included 349 of these respondents ─ The fifth wave included 372 of these respondents ─ The sixth wave included 528 of these respondents ▪ Weighting then employed to balance demographics and ensure that the sample's composition reflects that of the U.S. adult population according to Census data and to provide results intended to approximate the sample universe. ▪ Statistical margins of error are not applicable to online polls because they are based on samples drawn from opt-in online panels, not on random samples that mirror the population within a statistical probability ratio. ▪ All sample surveys and polls may be subject to other sources of error, including, but not limited to coverage error, and measurement error. 2
  • 3. 1.How much, if anything, would you say you know about the International Criminal Court? 8% 10% 29% 54% A great deal A fair amount A little bit Nothing at all Base: All Respondents (n=1,017) Knowledge of International Criminal Court 3
  • 4. 1.How much, if anything, would you say you know about the International Criminal Court? Knowledge of International Criminal Court - Trend 54%55% 61%63%59%64%60% 29%26% 24%21%30%21%28% 10%9% 7%8% 9% 8% 8% 8%10%8%7% 2%7%4% July 2017July 2016April 2016November 2015 April 2015December 2014 February 2014 Nothing at all A little bit A fair amount A great deal 4 Base: All Respondents (n=1,017)
  • 5. 2. Please indicate whether you agree or disagree with each of the statements Attitudes towards U.S. Participation in ICC 38% 63% 70% 79% 25% 36% 62% 73% 21% 28% 5% 10% 10% 13% 45% 48% 12% 15% 52% 57% 57% 27% 21% 8% 31% 16% 26% 13% 27% 14% Agree Disagree Don't know The United States is currently a member of the International Criminal Court It is important for the United States to participate in international organizations that support human rights and that hold individuals accountable for mass atrocities Joining international organizations concerned with human rights and holding individuals accountable for mass atrocities is a risk to the US because it could hurt our autonomy We should dedicate US resources (financial, military, intelligence, etc) to international organizations that support human rights and that hold individuals accountable for mass atrocities It is not in our best interests to dedicate US resources (financial, military, intelligence, etc.) to supporting international organizations that support human rights and that hold individuals accountable for mass atrocities ALL Aware of ICC ALL Aware of ICC ALL Aware of ICC ALL Aware of ICC ALL Aware of ICC 5 Base: All Respondents (n=1,017); All at least aware of ICC (n=506)
  • 6. 2. Please indicate whether you agree or disagree with each of the statements (Agree Only) Attitudes towards U.S. Participation in ICC - Trend 28 35 31 29 33 35 38 60 60 64 60 68 64 70 24 23 20 24 26 28 25 47 48 53 52 57 55 62 21 20 20 20 20 22 21 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 Feb-14 Mar-14 Apr-14 May-14 Jun-14 Jul-14 Aug-14 Sep-14 Oct-14 Nov-14 Dec-14 Jan-15 Feb-15 Mar-15 Apr-15 May-15 Jun-15 Jul-15 Aug-15 Sep-15 Oct-15 Nov-15 Dec-15 Jan-16 Feb-16 Mar-16 Apr-16 May-16 Jun-16 Jul-16 Aug-16 Sep-16 Oct-16 Nov-16 Dec-16 Jan-17 Feb-17 Mar-17 Apr-17 May-17 Jun-17 Jul-17 The United States is currently a member of the International Criminal Court - Feb 2014 It is important for the United States to participate in international organizations that support human rights and that hold individuals accountable for mass atrocities- Feb 2014 Joining international organizations concerned with human rights and holding individuals accountable for mass atrocities is a risk to the US because it could hurt our autonomy - Feb 2014 We should dedicate US resources (financial, military, intelligence, etc) to international organizations that support human rights and that hold individuals It is not in our best interests to dedicate US resources (financial, military, intelligence, etc) to supporting international organizations that support human rights and that hold individuals accountable for mass atrocities - Feb 2014 % AGREE 6 Base: All Respondents (n=1,017)
  • 7. Joining the International Criminal Court 3. The International Criminal Court (ICC)is the world’s only permanent international tribunal created by a treaty for the purpose of investigating and prosecuting war crimes, genocide, and crimes against humanity (mass atrocities). Currently, 122 countries are members of the International Criminal Court. The United States formally announced in 2002 that it would not become a member of the International Criminal Court for a multitude of reasons, including questions about the court’s jurisdiction and structure. Some people believe that the US should become more involved in or fully join the ICC so that we can use our considerable power, influence, and resources to support the important efforts of the Court to pursue individuals who have committed mass atrocities (when the perpetrator’s own country’s courts have failed to do so) Some people believe that the US should not join the ICC because it compromises our sovereignty as a nation, and because our standing in the world means our military personnel and civilian officials might be prosecuted via the ICC for political reasons Which of these statements comes closer to your personal opinion? 50% 21% 29% 64% 21% 15% The US should become more involved in or fully join the ICC The US should not join the ICC Don't know All Aware of ICC 7 Base: All Respondents (n=1,017); All at least aware of ICC (n=506)
  • 8. Joining the International Criminal Court - Trend 3. The International Criminal Court (ICC)is the world’s only permanent international tribunal created by a treaty for the purpose of investigating and prosecuting war crimes, genocide, and crimes against humanity (mass atrocities). Currently, 122 countries are members of the International Criminal Court. The United States formally announced in 2002 that it would not become a member of the International Criminal Court for a multitude of reasons, including questions about the court’s jurisdiction and structure. Some people believe that the US should become more involved in or fully join the ICC so that we can use our considerable power, influence, and resources to support the important efforts of the Court to pursue individuals who have committed mass atrocities (when the perpetrator’s own country’s courts have failed to do so) Some people believe that the US should not join the ICC because it compromises our sovereignty as a nation, and because our standing in the world means our military personnel and civilian officials might be prosecuted via the ICC for political reasons Which of these statements comes closer to your personal opinion? 34 37 37 37 44 44 50 24 25 23 19 21 21 21 42 38 40 45 35 35 29 10 20 30 40 50 60 Feb-14 Mar-… Apr-14 May-… Jun-14 Jul-14 Aug-14 Sep-14 Oct-14 Nov-… Dec-14 Jan-15 Feb-15 Mar-… Apr-15 May-… Jun-15 Jul-15 Aug-15 Sep-15 Oct-15 Nov-… Dec-15 Jan-16 Feb-16 Mar-… Apr-16 May-… Jun-16 Jul-16 Aug-16 Sep-16 Oct-16 Nov-… Dec-16 Jan-17 Feb-17 Mar-… Apr-17 May-… Jun-17 Jul-17 The US should become more involved in or fully join the ICC The US should not join the ICC Don't know 8 Base: All Respondents (n=1,017)
  • 9. The US should continue to dedicate moderate resources to supporting some actions of the ICC without formally joining, such as by providing satellite photos if our satellites are passing an area of interest to the ICC Joining the ICC would compromise America's sovereignty as a nation The US should become more engaged and involved in the ICC without becoming a member by making all forms of our vast governmental resources available to support the work of the ICC The US should become a full member of the International Criminal Court and robustly support all of its work. 4. For each of the statements below, please indicate whether you agree or disagree with the statement. Attitudes towards U.S. Participation in ICC 50% 59% 30% 42% 39% 50% 36% 48% 19% 22% 37% 42% 27% 29% 27% 32% 31% 20% 33% 16% 35% 21% 37% 20% Agree Disagree Don't know ALL Aware of ICC ALL Aware of ICC ALL Aware of ICC ALL Aware of ICC 9 Base: All Respondents (n=1,017); All at least aware of ICC (n=506)
  • 10. The US should continue to dedicate moderate resources to supporting some actions of the ICC without formally joining, such as by providing satellite photos if our satellites are passing an area of interest to the ICC Joining the ICC would compromise America's sovereignty as a nation The US should become more engaged and involved in the ICC without becoming a member by making all forms of our vast governmental resources available to support the work of the ICC The US should become a full member of the International Criminal Court and robustly support all of its work. 4. For each of the statements below, please indicate whether you agree or disagree with the statement (Agree Only). Attitudes towards U.S. Participation in ICC - Trend 44% 47% 43% 42% 52% 49% 53% 0% 50% 100% 26% 28% 26% 24% 31% 32% 30% 0% 20% 40% 28% 31% 32% 33% 37% 37% 39% 0% 50% 22% 25% 24% 27% 32% 32% 36% 0% 20% 40% Feb-14 Apr-14 Jun-14 Aug-14 Oct-14 Dec-14 Feb-15 Apr-15 Jun-15 Aug-15 Oct-15 Dec-15 Feb-16 Apr-16 Jun-16 Aug-16 Oct-16 Dec-16 Feb-17 Apr-17 Jun-17 10 Base: All Respondents (n=1,017)
  • 11. 4. For each of the statements below, please indicate whether you agree or disagree with the statement (Agree Only). Attitudes towards U.S. Participation in ICC - Trend 44 47 43 42 52 49 53 26 28 26 24 31 32 3028 31 32 33 37 37 39 22 25 24 27 32 32 36 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 Feb-14 Mar-14 Apr-14 May-14 Jun-14 Jul-14 Aug-14 Sep-14 Oct-14 Nov-14 Dec-14 Jan-15 Feb-15 Mar-15 Apr-15 May-15 Jun-15 Jul-15 Aug-15 Sep-15 Oct-15 Nov-15 Dec-15 Jan-16 Feb-16 Mar-16 Apr-16 May-16 Jun-16 Jul-16 Aug-16 Sep-16 Oct-16 Nov-16 Dec-16 Jan-17 Feb-17 Mar-17 Apr-17 May-17 Jun-17 Jul-17 The US should continue to dedicate moderate resources to supporting some actions of the ICC without formally joining, such as by providing satellite photos if our satellites are passing an area of interest to the ICC Joining the ICC would compromise America's sovereignty as a nation The US should become more engaged and involved in the ICC without becoming a member by making all forms of our vast governmental resources available to support the work of the ICC The US should become a full member of the International Criminal Court and robustly support all of its work 11 Base: All Respondents (n=1,017)
  • 12. Methods of Combating Terrorism Q5a. There are a range of tactics to combat terrorism. These tactics include but are not limited to military, financial, and legal means. Which of the two tactics outlined below do you think is most effective in combatting the spread of terrorism? 20% 12% 52% 16% 21% 18% 53% 8% Military action with the goal of killing terrorists is the most effective way to combat terrorism Treating terrorists as criminals and prosecuting them in the courtroom is the most effective way to combat terrorism A combination of military action aimed at combating terrorism and criminal prosecution in the courtroom Don’t know All Aware of ICC 12 Base: All Respondents (n=1,017); All at least aware of ICC (n=506)
  • 13. Perceptions of Terrorists Q5b. Some people compare terrorists to [INSERT AND REVERSE STATEMENTS A OR B BELOW]. Others compare terrorists TO [INSERT AND REVERSE STATEMENTS A OR B BELOW]. A. The mafia, because it is a network of criminals who conspire to commit crimes and who use violence to achieve their goals B. An army of zealots, because they are working to achieve a common, religious cause and who use violence to achieve their goals In your view, which of these is a better way of describing terrorists? 22% 45% 13% 3% 17% 26% 49% 14% 3% 8% The mafia, because it is a network of criminals who conspire to commit crimes and who use violence to achieve their goals An army of zealots, because they are working to achieve a common, religious cause and who use violence to achieve their goals Neither Other Don’t know All Aware of ICC 13 Base: All Respondents (n=1,017); All at least aware of ICC (n=506)
  • 14. Ipsos Contacts Clifford Young President, US Ipsos Public Affairs 2020 K Street, NW, Suite 410 Washington, DC 20006 Phone: +1 202.420.2016 Email: clifford.young@ipsos.com Julia Clark Senior Vice President 222 S Riverside Plaza, Fifth Floor Chicago, IL 60606 Phone: +1 312.526.4919 Email: julia.clark@ipsos.com