Successfully reported this slideshow.
Plessy vs. Ferguson Armand Magardician & Anthony Parrillo
Case <ul><li>Homer Adolph Plessy was accused of sitting in the white section of a train when he was 1/8 black, which was not legal </li></ul><ul><li>Judge John Howard Ferguson was named in the case because he had been named in the petition to the Louisiana State Supreme Court, not because he was a party to the initial lawsuit. </li></ul><ul><li>Case went to the Supreme Court </li></ul>
Arguments PLESSY FERGUSON Ferguson was the judge. He decided that the state could choose to regulate railroad companies that operated solely within the state of Louisiana. Therefore, Ferguson found Plessy guilty and declared the Separate Car Act constitutional. Plessy argued in court that the Separate Car Act violated the Thirteenth and Fourteenth Amendments to the Constitution .
Supreme Court Decision <ul><li>Plessy appealed the case to the Louisiana State Supreme Court, which affirmed the decision that the Louisiana law as constitutional. Plessy petitioned for a writ of error from the Supreme Court of the United States. Supreme Court named the case Plessy v. Ferguson because of the petition that Plessy made. </li></ul>
Stack V. Boyle
Case <ul><li>The defendants were arrested for violating the Smith act. The Smith act is when someone wants to, teaches, or tries overthrowing the government. </li></ul><ul><li>Each of the defendants were charged with $50,000 bail. </li></ul><ul><li>The defendants tried to lower the bail, but the court denied them. </li></ul>
Arguments Stack Boyle The defendant thinks that the plaintiff is violating their Eighth amendment rights. The defendants violated The Smith Act. Decided bail was too much.
Supreme court decision <ul><li>Stack believed that it was too much bail and violated the Eighth Amendment. </li></ul><ul><li>They went to the supreme court who then concluded that their bail was too much </li></ul><ul><li>Their bail was reduced </li></ul>