Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.
Upcoming SlideShare
What to Upload to SlideShare
What to Upload to SlideShare
Loading in …3
×
1 of 4

Trans-spatial governance of peripheral innovations

0

Share

Trans-spatial governance of peripheral innovations

Trans-spatial governance of peripheral innovations

  1. 1. Trans-spatiality Teodor Kalpakchiev the-enpi.org Copyright: Teodor Kalpakchiev, the-enpi.org
  2. 2. Institutionalization of post-growth epistemics Low Organizational Density and Institutional thinness • Hybrid polity (Lenschow et al, 2015) connectivity • Reflexivity (Feindt & Weiland, 2018) and feedback loops on externalities as engine • Autopoiesis (Teubner, 2011) and parallelism • Enabling environment, co-design, responsiveness (Cebotari, 2019) • layered, modular policy change • Excessive proximity can reduce renewal, produce closed mindset, sensitive balance to counteract possible lock-ins (Aswegen&Retief, 2020) • IPR and tech ownership: integrated vs. peripheral, adaptation to local conditions (Nordesvard, 2018) • New entrants incubating niches, simultaneous pressures versus incumbents (Matschoss & Heiskanen, 2018) Knowledge and Innovation Modalities • Transfer (Fernández-Esquinas et al., 2015): 1) Analytical, synthetic and symbolic tacit knowledge reproduction, 2) Codified vs. recombining/synthesis mode of transfer, 3) Absorptive capacity – exploration or/and exploitation • FDI linked inflow inefficiencies, import substitution, transparency, education (Osabutey, 2016) • Focus on value capture (also in terms of relationships), not only strategy, but also task innovation; tangible outcomes, long-term adjustment to company values (Shaikh, 2019) • Decouple individual embeddedness (manager, personal relations, adverse selection), move to extra-local specialized networks to compensate proximity (Galliano, 2019) Copyright: Teodor Kalpakchiev, the-enpi.org
  3. 3. Integrative approach • Multi-level epistemic discourse creation • Micro • Distributed learning through elements, extracting tacit knowledge, strategic alliances and open cooperation, ICT tools • Meso • Research facilities and universities, public sector at local level, infrastructure, enabling environment, cross-sector intelli • Macro • Extralocal connectivity – hybrid, parallelism, cross-border, concentric, correspondence • Interregional, trans-local and multilateral dimensions • UNCTAD, EU-regionalism, trade negotiations, platforms • Circular Economy Missions (clusterization) • City Twinning • Horizontal • Discourse through governance and inclusion • Deliberate: e.g. regenerative economy Meaning: • Red – Feedback? • Blue – trans-local • Green – inter/intra-firm Copyright: Teodor Kalpakchiev, the-enpi.org Liquid Governance
  4. 4. Literature • Aswegen&Retief, 2020, The role of innovation and knowledge networks as a policy mechanism towards more resilient peripheral regions • Lenschow et al., 2015, Globalization’s limit to the environmental state? Integrating telecoupling into global environmental governance • Fernández-Esquinas et al., 2015: Tracing the flows of knowledge transfer: Latent dimensions and determinants of university–industry interactions in peripheral innovation systems • Gunther Teubner, 2011, Autopoietic Law – A new approach to law and society • Cebotari, 2019, Against All Odds: Community-owned Renewable Energy Projects in North-West Romania • Graffenberger & Vonnahme, 2019, Questioning the ‘periphery label’ in economic geography: Entrepreneurial Action and Innovation in South Estonia • Nordesvard 2018, Innovation core, innovation semi-periphery and technology transfer: The case of wind energy patents • Osabutey, 2016, Factors influencing technology and knowledge transfer: Configurational recipes for Sub-Saharan Africa • Shaikh, 2019, Selecting an open innovation community as an alliance partner: Looking for healthy communities and ecosystems • Galliano, 2019, The peripheral systems of eco-innovation: Evidence from eco-innovative agro-food projects in a French rural area • Peter H. Feindt & Sabine Weiland, 2018, Reflexive governance: exploring the concept and assessing its critical potential for sustainable development • Kaisa Matschoss & Eva Heiskanen, 2018, Innovation intermediary challenging the energy incumbent: enactment of local socio-technical transition pathways by destabilisation of regime rules • Graffenberger, Vonnahme, 2019, Questioning the ‘periphery label’ in economic geography: Entrepreneurial Action and Innovation in South Estonia • Lang, 2016, Urban decline, resilience and change: Understanding how cities and regions adapt to socio-economic crises • Vonnahme & Lang, 2017, Rethinking Territorial Innovation: World Market Leaders outside of Agglomerations • Willet, 2019, The Periphery as a Complex Adaptive Assemblage: Local government and enhanced communication to challenge peripheralising narratives Copyright: Teodor Kalpakchiev, the-enpi.org

Editor's Notes

  • Love the intensity, we have quite a lot of common interests and cognitive proximity; complementarity is my primary focus is governance and the secondary – sustainable economy, yours economic geography with secondary in knowledge and innovation
  • ×