The Project Team
Goodwin Stephen Holmes (Chief Operating Officer)
Richard Wilkes (Estate Construction)
AMC Alastair MacCallum (Architect)
Knight Frank Rebecca Stockley (Town Planner)
THE PROGRAM
1. ABOUT GOODWIN
2. THE SITE AND ITS CONTEXT
3. PROJECT BACKGROUND
4. THE MASTERPLAN
5. QUESTIONS?
Changing Models Of Delivery
• Consumer demand for:-
o Greater independence into older age
o Opportunities to age in place
o Accommodation that is non-institutional in character
o Resident choice
o High standards of care, irrespective of abilities
o Adaptable units
o Better solar access
o Common social facilities
o More engagement with the local community
o Out reach services
o Seniors community day care
• Goodwin has been running a development program since 2004, aimed at reinvigorating
its facilities to meet these changing demands
2. THE SITE AND ITS CONTEXT
Rebecca Stockley – Director Knight Frank
PARRALLELS….
Farrer Goodwin At Farrer
Established in 1967 Established in 1977
Both grown and developed over time
Both well loved, desirable places to be
Both reflect development patterns from 30 years ago
Farrer and ACT profile
• 3,300+ residents – surprisingly stable
population since 2001 Census
• 81% home ownership rate
• Median age of 43 (10 years more than the
ACT median)
• 20% of the population is aged 65+
(compared to 10.6% in the ACT)
• 80% dwellings are separate houses
• 82% of dwellings have three or more
bedrooms
• Average block size 1013m²
About AMC
• Established with clear aspirations in 2000
• Understand the balance
• Canberra based - national experience
• Working with Goodwin since 2004
• Broad range experience:
Masterplanning projects
Aged Care / Retirement Living / Special Needs
Residential
Interior Design
In the Woden Valley
AMC has successfully delivered over $500 million worth
of new / refurbished building projects in the last 5 years
Retirement Living
o Monash Green, Tuggeranong
o The Central, Crace
o Goodwin Farrer
o Salvation Army Apartments, Narrabundah
o Gungaderra Homestead Redevelopment, Harrison
Residential Development
o Eclipse Mixed Use Development, Bruce
o Aureus Apartments, Forrest
o Mirella Apartments, Gungahlin
o RMC Duntroon, Campbell
Commercial Buildings / Fitout
o Equinox Business Park, Deakin
o Gateway Business Park, Gungahlin Town Centre
o Clinical Services Building, Deakin
o Microsoft Canberra
o Lockheed Martin, Kingston
Brian Hadfield and Jim Crane
• The nicest sound is the lawnmower
• The area of our house is similar to our old house
• We understood there was a long waiting period
when we signed up…and here we are in
Canberra
• When you reach the point of time where
everything is a bit beyond you this is a great
option
• We have our immediate family and friends
nearby but this is like an extended family
Background
• Goodwin Farrer established in 1977
• Goodwin’s 2nd village at the time
• George Sautelle House one of ACT’s first purpose-designed aged care facilities
• New 4 storey apartment block was constructed (2005)
• AMC prepared a redevelopment masterplan to inform a lease variation - approved
in February 2012
• Point Project Management / DWP Suters / Clarke Keller prepared masterplan (2013)
• Goodwin sought proposals for ongoing architectural services (July 2014)
• AMC appointed and have developed the concept since then (August 2014)
Goodwin’s Project Brief
• Committed to providing highest quality services / care to residents
• Goodwin Farrer, despite being well loved, is at the end of its serviceable life
• Looking for new models for retirement living / aged care which:
o Allow for ageing in place and community
o Allow resident choice
o Ensure high standards of care and support are maintained
o Meet the growing demand in Canberra
• As with Goodwin - Ainslie and The Central - Crace:
o Make better use of limited land resources
o Allow for attractive landscaped areas, amenities and services for all residents
o Non-institutional character yet flexible to accommodate ageing in place
o Help support Residential Aged Care
• The site and all ILU’s designed to AS2124 and to be adaptable
• Create common / community areas such including the Clubhouse concept
• Maximise outlook and northern solar aspect
• Develop a staging strategy which protects residents
• Engage with the broader Farrer Community
What We Are Trying To Achieve For:
• Goodwin Residents (and their families)
• Goodwin Aged Care Services
• The Site and Broader Community
A Better Outcome For Residents
• Ability to stage the development
All residents can comfortably stay on site
• Better street address
All ILU apartment blocks have a street address
• Better accessibility
AS1428.1 compliance for access and mobility
• Better solar access and outlook
Opportunities to maximise(91% of all ILUs have a northerly aspect)and provide
internal amenity
• Attractive ILUs
Well planned, attractive and efficient allowing aging in place
• Better landscaping
More generous, accessible and user friendly
• Better choice
More options for aging in place and community
• Creating a community hub
Delivering a Clubhouse to become the heart of the community as soon as possible
A Better Outcome For Goodwin
• A more sustainable development
Energy efficient
Water efficient (including WSUD)
More efficient use of existing site services
• More cost effective
Civil design
Operational costs
Life cycle costing and on-going maintenance
• Greater flexibility
Easier servicing generally
Efficient servicing of the RACF and Clubhouse – eg. Kitchen
Greater discretion for some RACF functions
• More legible site design, easier servicing, ease of use
• Integrating the existing apartment building
A Better Outcome For The Site / Community
• Steep site slope to inform attractive development character
• Generous setbacks from all boundaries
• Building heights (Like Ainslie)
• Meet growing demand, greater choice and support RACF
• Preservation of significant trees
• Revitalise the site and provide opportunity for meaningful new landscaped areas
• Allows aging in community / aging in place
• Better connectivity
• Clearer entrances
• Road / pedestrian linkages across the site
• Greater safety - outlook to all frontages
• Better community services for an aging population
• More local employment opportunities
• Support local shops
• Rejuvenating Farrer
RS
Quick review of program
Opportunity to Q&A at end – hold off questions until then
Hope to wrap up by 7pm but attendees are welcome to stay afterwards if they have any specific questions to ask the project team
RS
For those who haven't had a chance to look at the posters
Quick review of the existing site layout
George Sautell House – 63 bed spaces
73 ILUs – in one, two and four storey buildings
RS
Sure all attendees are familiar with the site
Photos of the style of development on site.
RS
Exception is the new apartment building
Constructed 2005
RS
- Real mix of development
RS
Farrer and Goodwin at Farrer share a similar story
Goodwin established at Farrer 10 years after the suburb was established
At that time the cutting edge of design
George Sautell House one of the ACT’s purpose designed aged care facilities
Like Farrer, Goodwin has grown over time
2005 – new apartment building
Taken advantage of its great location – 200m to Farrer Shops, 3.8km to Woden
Both Farrer and Goodwin at Farrer are well loved, desirable places to be.
BUT both reflect development patterns from 30 years ago
Existing ILUs now 30 years old – sustainability, energy efficiency etc
Rejuvenation required
RS
Some tid bits to set the scene
While population has stayed very stable, the demographic has changed
Aging population – the ACT is expected to have a significant growth in older age groups generally, but this is accentuated in Farrer
Woden and Tuggeranong have been identified by the Government as key areas of retirement living need
Most residents are in larger homes on large blocks
Likely that there will be increasing demand for more manageable supported living options in coming years
RS
Site is zoned for community facility purposes.
Broad zone enabling a wide range of uses, including retirement village and aged care.
Both uses permitted by the lease. No GFA limit in the lease.
Very flexible controls – allows considerable discretion for operational requirements
Setbacks - 6m from a residential block boundary
Height – two storeys within 30m of a residential boundary, four storeys elsewhere
Greater height can be approved subject to compliance with criteria, addressing
The desired character
A scale appropriate to use
Reasonable separation from adjoining developments
Reasonable privacy and solar access for dwellings and their private open space on adjoining residential blocks
No subdivision/unit titling permitted
RS
Review of site within its context
Predominately surrounding by residential development
Separated by road reserves and flood ways
Sloping topography – dwellings on Marshall Street set above the site
Plan illustrates the Territory Plan height controls – everything within black dotted line can go to 4 storeys as rule compliant
RS
-Hand over to AMC
RS
Example of opportunities
Poor visibility into/out of the site from its most prominent view point
No contribution to the streetscene