Colby George Com Viz And Municipal Con Planning

459 views

Published on

The Practice and Potential of Ecosystem-Based Management
Applying lessons from land use and coastal management in Maine hosted by Wells National Estuarine Research Reserve,
Maine Coastal Program, Maine Sea Grant,the University of New England, and the Ecosystem-based Management Tools Network

Published in: News & Politics, Technology
0 Comments
1 Like
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

No Downloads
Views
Total views
459
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
2
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
3
Comments
0
Likes
1
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide
  • Colby George Com Viz And Municipal Con Planning

    1. 1. Public Participation and Municipal Conservation Planning Judy Colby-George Spatial Alternatives
    2. 2. Overview <ul><li>Take time for storytelling </li></ul><ul><li>Allow time for play </li></ul><ul><li>Be transparent </li></ul><ul><li>Keep it simple </li></ul><ul><li>Combine high tech and low tech to match your audience </li></ul>
    3. 3. Topsham Natural Areas Plan
    4. 4. Storytelling
    5. 9. Be Transparent
    6. 18. Keep it Simple
    7. 21. Time for Play or Exploration
    8. 22. 100% 9% 8% 8% 20% 15% 15% 25% % of Total                   831 72 70 66 166 124 125 208 Vote Value                 TOTAL 100% 10% 8% 6% 30% 10% 15% 22% % of Total                   351 34 27 21 107 34 51 77 Vote Value                 6/27/07 100% 5% 11% 6% 19% 7% 22% 30% % of Total                   240 11 26 15 46 16 53 73 Vote Value                 6/14/07 100% 11% 7% 13% 5% 31% 9% 24% % of Total                   240 27 17 30 13 74 21 58 Vote Value                 5/29/07 Total Community Character and Culture Multi-functioning Wetlands Public Health and Safety Land Productivity Recreational Water Quality Habitat Natural Resource Functional Categories Values
    9. 26. Combine Hi Tech and Low Tech Voting by putting money in a bucket vs. voting through keypad polling
    10. 27. Are you a committee member? <ul><li>Yes </li></ul><ul><li>No </li></ul>
    11. 28. Are you a resident of Topsham? <ul><li>Yes </li></ul><ul><li>No </li></ul>
    12. 29. Rank the 5 Recommendations
    13. 30. Direct Conservation Resources to Priority Areas <ul><li>Strongly Agree </li></ul><ul><li>Agree </li></ul><ul><li>Neutral </li></ul><ul><li>Disagree </li></ul><ul><li>Strongly Disagree </li></ul><ul><li>Don’t Know/Need more Information </li></ul>
    14. 31. Gather Natural Resource Data <ul><li>Strongly Agree </li></ul><ul><li>Agree </li></ul><ul><li>Neutral </li></ul><ul><li>Disagree </li></ul><ul><li>Strongly Disagree </li></ul><ul><li>Don’t Know/Need more Information </li></ul>
    15. 32. Should the town consider working with developers early in the process as a potential future policy tool? <ul><li>Strongly Agree </li></ul><ul><li>Agree </li></ul><ul><li>Neutral </li></ul><ul><li>Disagree </li></ul><ul><li>Strongly Disagree </li></ul><ul><li>Don’t Know/Need more Information </li></ul>
    16. 33. Should the town consider peer review for natural resource evaluation as a potential future policy tool? <ul><li>Strongly Agree </li></ul><ul><li>Agree </li></ul><ul><li>Neutral </li></ul><ul><li>Disagree </li></ul><ul><li>Strongly Disagree </li></ul><ul><li>Don’t Know/Need more Information </li></ul>
    17. 34. Should the town consider Cluster Subdivisions and Conservation Subdivisions as a potential future policy tool? <ul><li>Strongly Agree </li></ul><ul><li>Agree </li></ul><ul><li>Neutral </li></ul><ul><li>Disagree </li></ul><ul><li>Strongly Disagree </li></ul><ul><li>Don’t Know/Need more Information </li></ul>
    18. 35. Should the town pursue a strategy of applying for grants or other funds for land acquisition? <ul><li>Strongly Agree </li></ul><ul><li>Agree </li></ul><ul><li>Neutral </li></ul><ul><li>Disagree </li></ul><ul><li>Strongly Disagree </li></ul><ul><li>Don’t Know/Need more Information </li></ul>

    ×