Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.
Richard Carter, Head of Technical Support, WaterAidChair, Rural Water Supply Network<br />Optimising community management ...
Rural water supply and community management<br />The dominant paradigm since the early 1980s<br />establish physical infra...
Rural water supply systems (1)<br />Point sources – the vast majority using groundwater<br />Typified by borehole – handpu...
Rural water supply systems (2)<br />Gravity flow piped systems – community-managed by tap and system committees<br />
Rural water supply systems (3)<br />Motorised borehole systems. Community-managed or more commonly private operator-manage...
Rural sanitation systems – household latrines<br />Household latrines – hh spending decisions to be taken when full<br />
Rural sanitation systems – institutional latrines<br />Generations of defunct and abandoned school latrines<br />
Common principles of household and community management for sustainability<br />
Field realities<br />lip-serviceto principles of community participation and management<br />benevolencerather than empowe...
Field realities<br />community management worksbut it has its limits<br />technologycan fail in ways which communities can...
The need for a paradigm shift<br />from belief in community management to community management plus<br />the ‘plus’ involv...
Doing differently and better<br />Community-management <br />Community-management  plus<br />Sustainable service<br />
Community management plus<br />Water user committee<br />External support (to both “hard” and “soft” infrastructure<br />E...
Community management plus<br />Enhanced performance of CM<br />external support  - both strategic and responsive<br />reco...
WaterAid’s sustainability framework<br />TRUE DEMAND<br />EXTERNAL SUPPORT<br />TO ACHIEVE COMPETENT CM<br />DESIGN & IMPL...
http://www.wateraid.org/documents/plugin_documents/sustainability_framework_final.pdf<br />http://www.wateraid.org/documen...
Why better models are needed: handpump functionality, 2009 [data and estimates RWSN]<br />Population-weighted average 63% ...
Why better models are needed: decline over time in Tanzania [WaterAid study, 2006, Haysom]<br />
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in …5
×

Optimising community management of rural water services

2,862 views

Published on

WASH 2011 conference: Richard Carter, Head of Technical Support, WaterAid Chair, Rural Water Supply Network

  • Be the first to comment

Optimising community management of rural water services

  1. 1. Richard Carter, Head of Technical Support, WaterAidChair, Rural Water Supply Network<br />Optimising community management of rural water services<br />
  2. 2. Rural water supply and community management<br />The dominant paradigm since the early 1980s<br />establish physical infrastructure<br />set up community management arrangements (water user committee and revenue collection)<br />hand over and walk away<br />Water user committee<br />organise, train<br />External intervention<br />manages <br />Water supply assets<br />design, construct<br />
  3. 3. Rural water supply systems (1)<br />Point sources – the vast majority using groundwater<br />Typified by borehole – handpump supplies<br />Community-managed by Water User Committee<br />
  4. 4. Rural water supply systems (2)<br />Gravity flow piped systems – community-managed by tap and system committees<br />
  5. 5. Rural water supply systems (3)<br />Motorised borehole systems. Community-managed or more commonly private operator-managed.<br />Need for sound management and financial viability.<br />Need for regulation.<br />Increasing in number?<br />
  6. 6. Rural sanitation systems – household latrines<br />Household latrines – hh spending decisions to be taken when full<br />
  7. 7. Rural sanitation systems – institutional latrines<br />Generations of defunct and abandoned school latrines<br />
  8. 8. Common principles of household and community management for sustainability<br />
  9. 9. Field realities<br />lip-serviceto principles of community participation and management<br />benevolencerather than empowerment for community management<br />lack of monitoring of post-construction performance<br />
  10. 10. Field realities<br />community management worksbut it has its limits<br />technologycan fail in ways which communities cannot fix<br />committees can failbecause of breakdown of trust or of voluntarism<br />the operating environmentcan militate against sustainable service provision<br />external shockscan undermine the best of systems<br />
  11. 11. The need for a paradigm shift<br />from belief in community management to community management plus<br />the ‘plus’ involves external support, due attention to financial viability and to the environment<br />not an abandonment of past practice, but building on experience to step up a gear<br />
  12. 12. Doing differently and better<br />Community-management <br />Community-management plus<br />Sustainable service<br />
  13. 13. Community management plus<br />Water user committee<br />External support (to both “hard” and “soft” infrastructure<br />External intervention<br />limited ability to maintain<br />Water supply technology<br />
  14. 14. Community management plus<br />Enhanced performance of CM<br />external support - both strategic and responsive<br />recognition of internal and external threats to community management<br />thinking beyond CM and CM+ to future models of ‘professionalised’ service delivery<br />
  15. 15. WaterAid’s sustainability framework<br />TRUE DEMAND<br />EXTERNAL SUPPORT<br />TO ACHIEVE COMPETENT CM<br />DESIGN & IMPLEMENTATION<br />
  16. 16. http://www.wateraid.org/documents/plugin_documents/sustainability_framework_final.pdf<br />http://www.wateraid.org/documents/plugin_documents/sustainability_framework_french_final.pdf<br />http://www.wateraid.org/documents/plugin_documents/sustainability_framework_portuguese_final.pdf<br />
  17. 17.
  18. 18. Why better models are needed: handpump functionality, 2009 [data and estimates RWSN]<br />Population-weighted average 63% - reduces coverage by one third<br />
  19. 19. Why better models are needed: decline over time in Tanzania [WaterAid study, 2006, Haysom]<br />

×