Slope Modeling & Terrain Analysis (EPAN09)

3,816 views

Published on

What’s Your Angle?” – Slope Modeling & Terrain Analysis

Jessica Gormont, Jefferson County GIS/Addressing Office

Rachel Shirley, Shepherd University

Published in: Technology
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total views
3,816
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
30
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
54
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide
  • Blue Ridge has always been a planning concern due to its unique topography, geology, and land development patterns. Recently the County Commission tasked our office with creating new data layers that will aid planning staff and the public more easily analyze areas on the Blue Ridge and in the county as a whole when planning development. These layers include slope, 2ft topographic contours, and land cover.
  • This project was the first step in the data creation process. It’s purpose was… Once we have slope completed, we will go on to generate 2 ft contours, and we have already contracted out to produce land cover data. We hope to have everything ready by the end of the year.
  • The focus of this study was the Blue Ridge Mountain Area. This area contains all land in the county east of the Shenandoah River. Affectionately known as “The Mountain” to locals, it is the only part of the county located within the Appalachian Chain; the rest of the county is part of the Shenandoah Valley. Elevation -> lowest point located at junction of two rivers, Shenandoah and Potomac Addresses -> largely located in two main areas which we call Shannondale and Keyes Ferry Acres; much of the southern portion of the mountain is wildlife management areas
  • Currently slope is done on an individual parcel basis. Generally, the owner or developer of the property must provide 2-ft contours and an engineer has to hand calculate the slope of the parcel. This can be quite time consuming and expensive for the owner. Using GIS, we can generate slope over large areas very quickly. The entire county can be done in about a day. Since the computer is calculating the data, there is little chance for human error. Also, the GIS software allows for overlays of the slope data with other land conditions, such as geology, tree cover, nearby water bodies. This can give a greater understanding of how development will impact the area.
  • Upper Section Rail 25° = 47% Every 100’ run = 47’ rise Lower Section Rail 5° = 9% Every 100’ run = 9’ rise
  • Checked 3 slope models against ground truth to determine the accuracy of each. Hawths Analysis Tools – mimicked the way slope is currently calculated
  • represented
  • Vertical accuracy of GPS not important, using GPS strictly for cartographic purposes
  • We created three slope models in total, the 1 st one using a 10-meter DEM… As you can see, the accuracy is significantly better with the 1-m LIDAR data
  • The process used to determine the slopes for each model was… R 2 is the “coefficient of determination”, and is the percent of variation of one variable that is explained by the other
  • The graphs turned out as… We were trying to graphically depict the correlation between the model slope and the field slope; the field slope is on the x axis and the model slope is on the y axis. We added a trendline to show the correlation between the two slope methods. The closer the R2 value is to 1, the better
  • This slide shows how the resolution increased between the different DEMs. There are many more elevation points in the 1-m DEM which gives a more accurate representation of the Earth.
  • All of the DEMs created had high R2 values, which indicates that each alone can be used for slope analysis, but since the 1-m is available, it would be the best dataset to use.
  • R 2 is often in the 50-60% range in scientific analysis, so 97% is generally good. Is shows the 1-m data is more accurate because it directly ties to the field data. We were somewhat surprised that the 3-m and 10-m values were so similar, but it just be where the points fell.
  • Green lower slope, red highest
  • The slope is mostly made up of green which is in the 16 to 24 range, and the field slope calculated was 22%, which shows there is a good correlation between the 1-meter data and the field.
  • At viewshed – Historic Landmarks Commission interested in using terrain data for line of sight analysis
  • Base layer: digital surface model )DSM) 1 st Click: areas visible from a 40ft high tower on top of the Blue Ridge Elementary School. (Note: does not indicate signal propagation).
  • 1 st click: 2007 color infrared (CIR) aerial imagery from the National Agricultural Imagery Program (NAIP). NAIP provides important spectral (color) cues to distinguish between vegetated and non-vegetated areas. 2 nd click: 2005 normalized digital surface model (nDSM) derived from LiDAR. The nDSM represents the height of features relative to the ground (blue is ground, yellow to red indicates increasing height). 3 rd click: 2005 intensity image derived from LiDAR. While it appears similar to a black and white orthophoto the intensity image shows the strength of the LiDAR signal. This information is useful for separating out impervious surfaces from bare soil. 4 th click: land cover data. Automated techniques were used to extract land cover information for Jefferson County. The resulting land cover dataset contains over 1 billion pixels (1,157,175,600 to be precise). This picture shows the early stage Land Cover data for the Blue Ridge Elementary School area.
  • We would like to thank our project members. The 1 st 3 guided us through the project, and the last 3 peer-reviewed our methodologies.
  • Slope Modeling & Terrain Analysis (EPAN09)

    1. 1. What’s Your Angle? Slope Modeling & Terrain Analysis Jessica Gormont & Rachel Shirley 3 rd Eastern Panhandle, West Virginia GIS Users Group Meeting September 18, 2009
    2. 2. INTRODUCTIONS <ul><li>Jessica Gormont GIS Technician, Jefferson County </li></ul><ul><li>Rachel Shirley GIS Intern, Jefferson County </li></ul><ul><li>Project Members: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Todd Fagan GIS Specialist, Jefferson County </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Jennie Brockman Planning & Zoning Director, Jefferson County </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Dr. Edward Snyder Professor, Shepherd University </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>John Maxey Jefferson County Planning Commission </li></ul></ul>
    3. 3. LINEUP <ul><li>Background </li></ul><ul><li>Purpose </li></ul><ul><li>Definitions </li></ul><ul><li>Field QA </li></ul><ul><li>Data </li></ul><ul><li>Results </li></ul><ul><li>Future Applications </li></ul>
    4. 4. BACKGROUND <ul><li>Project Culmination: </li></ul><ul><li>Planning concerns in the Blue Ridge Mountain Community </li></ul><ul><li>GIS Office tasked by County Commission to fill data gaps – slope, 2 ft contours, land cover </li></ul><ul><li>Will aid planning staff and public analyze topography </li></ul>
    5. 5. PURPOSE <ul><li>Purpose: To create an accurate slope model for the entire County, focusing on the Blue Ridge Mountain Area </li></ul><ul><li>Slope  2ft topographic contours, land cover </li></ul>
    6. 6. BLUE RIDGE MOUNTAIN STUDY AREA <ul><li>“ The Mountain”: all land in Jefferson County east of the Shenandoah River </li></ul><ul><li>Area = 24.3 sq mi (11% of County) </li></ul><ul><li>Elevation = Approx. 250ft to 1700ft (1450ft change) </li></ul><ul><li>Includes Federal, State, County, and privately owned land </li></ul><ul><li>Addresses = 3,285 (13% of County) mostly residential </li></ul>
    7. 7. WHY USE GIS FOR STUDY? <ul><li>Can generate slope over large areas quickly </li></ul><ul><li>Less chance for human error </li></ul><ul><li>Combine with other overlays for enhanced understanding of land conditions </li></ul>
    8. 8. DEFINITIONS - SLOPE <ul><li>Measured in Percent or Degrees </li></ul><ul><li>50% = 26.5° 100% = 45° 150% = 56.3° Infinite = 90° </li></ul>Photo Source: LaserCraft Inc. Slope is “an inclined surface or ground that has a natural incline”.
    9. 9. DEFINITIONS - LIDAR Photo Source: Dewberry LiDAR ( Li ght D etection A nd R anging) is an optical remote sensing technology that utilizes light to gather topographic data . DEM Hillshade
    10. 10. METHODS/DATA <ul><li>5 methods compared: </li></ul><ul><li>Field calculated slope with laser range finder </li></ul><ul><li>10-meter Slope Model </li></ul><ul><li>3-meter Slope Model </li></ul><ul><li>1-meter Slope Model </li></ul><ul><li>Rise/Run using 1-meter DEM and points obtained from GPS </li></ul>
    11. 11. FIELD CALCULATIONS <ul><li>34 locations for field slope verification </li></ul><ul><li>Selection Attributes: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Varying levels of slope </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>(gentle, moderate, and steep) </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Ownership (public vs. private) </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Distribution over study area </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Un-modified since 2003 </li></ul></ul>
    12. 12. FIELD CALCULATIONS <ul><li>Equipment : </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Contour XLRic Laser Rangefinder (LaserCraft Inc.) </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Trimble Geo XT handheld GPS receiver </li></ul></ul>
    13. 13. ACCURACY <ul><li>LaserCraft Contour XLRic </li></ul><ul><li>Laser Rangefinder: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Range Accuracy = 0.10 meter at 85 meters </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Inclination = +/- 0.1 degrees </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Trimble Geo XT handheld GPS receiver: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Horizontal Accuracy = < 1 meter (submeter) </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Vertical Accuracy = 1.5 to 2 meters </li></ul></ul>
    14. 14. FIELD WORK <ul><ul><ul><li>Measured points: 10ft and 40ft from basepoint </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Slope calculated by internal inclinometer </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Gathered GPS points (at basepoint, 10ft target, and 40ft target) for mapping purposes </li></ul></ul></ul>Blue Ridge Elementary School Field Slope = 22%
    15. 15. DATA <ul><li>10-meter Slope Model </li></ul><ul><ul><li>2003 USGS 10-meter DEM (UTM NAD 1983) </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Vertical Accuracy = +/- 7 meters </li></ul></ul><ul><li>3-meter Slope Model </li></ul><ul><ul><li>2003 USGS 3-meter DEM (UTM NAD 1983) </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Vertical Accuracy = +/- 1 meter </li></ul></ul><ul><li>1-meter Slope Model (LiDAR) </li></ul><ul><ul><li>2005 USDA-NRCS 1-meter DEM (UTM NAD 1983) </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Vertical Accuracy = 0.15 meter </li></ul></ul>
    16. 16. DATA GENERATED <ul><li>1) Drew slope lines between points </li></ul><ul><li>2) Used Hawth’s Analysis Tools to calculate slope of line for each DEM </li></ul><ul><li>3) Plotted model v. field slopes on graph </li></ul><ul><li>4) Obtained R 2 value for each dataset from linear regression model </li></ul>
    17. 17. 10-m NED DEM (USGS)
    18. 18. 3-m NED DEM (USGS)
    19. 19. 1-m LiDAR DEM (USDA-NRCS)
    20. 20. RESOLUTION PROGRESSION 10-m Slope 3-m Slope 1-m Slope
    21. 22. RESULTS <ul><li>1-meter LiDAR DEM more accurate than other datasets available: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Higher R 2 value </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Finer detail allows for more accurate representation of the surface </li></ul></ul>
    22. 23. FINAL MAP <ul><li>This is the map generated using the best available, most accurate, digital data </li></ul>
    23. 24. ZOOMING IN…
    24. 25. BLUE RIDGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Field Slope = 22% Slope Model = 16 – 24%
    25. 26. POTENTIAL FUTURE USES <ul><ul><li>2-ft topographic contours </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Useful for baseline data for future comprehensive plans </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Data freely accessible by citizens for planning purposes </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>If used, would provide monetary savings to the public </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Better way to measure average slope for an area </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Useful for determining amount of necessary remediation on a site </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Sub-watershed and riparian zone delineation </li></ul></ul>
    26. 27. TRUE 3D LINE OF SIGHT ANALYSIS
    27. 28. HIGH RESOLUTION LAND COVER
    28. 29. POTENTIAL FUTURE USES CONTD. <ul><li>Land Stability Map: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Would include overlay of soils, geology, land cover, impermeable surfaces, tree canopy, etc </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Could be combined with Universal Soil Loss Equation (USLE) to determine potential soil loss </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Useful for assessing potential ground-movement and erosion-prone areas </li></ul></ul>
    29. 30. SUMMARY <ul><li>Most accurate data available </li></ul><ul><li>Reasonably represents the terrain in Jefferson County </li></ul><ul><li>Provides a good confidence of accuracy for 2-ft contours </li></ul><ul><li>1-m LiDAR can be used for planning purposes and combined with other data layers for the creation of valuable datasets </li></ul>
    30. 31. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS <ul><li>Jennie Brockman </li></ul><ul><li>John Maxey </li></ul><ul><li>Dr. Ed Snyder </li></ul><ul><li>Mike Schwartz </li></ul><ul><li>John Young </li></ul><ul><li>University of Vermont </li></ul>
    31. 32. REFERENCES <ul><li>Aguilar, F. and J. Mills. 2008. Accuracy Assessment of LiDAR-derived digital elevation models. The Photogrammetric Record 23(122): 148-169. </li></ul><ul><li>Beyer, H. L. 2004. Hawth's Analysis Tools for ArcGIS. Available at: http://www.spatialecology.com/htools. </li></ul><ul><li>LaserCraft Inc. 2009. Contour XLRic Laser Rangefinder. Norcross, GA. </li></ul><ul><li>FEMA 2003. Federal Emergency Management Agency. Guidelines and Specifications for Flood Hazard Mapping Partners, Appendix A: Guidance for Aerial Mapping and Surveying. Available online at http://www.fema.gov/library/viewRecord.do?id=2206. </li></ul><ul><li>FGDC 1998. Federal Geographic Data Committee. Geospatial Positioning Accuracy Standards, Part 3: National Standard for Spatial Data Accuracy. FGDC-STD-007.3-1998. Available online at http://www.fgdc.gov/standards/projects/FGDC-standards-projects/accuracy/part3/chapter3. </li></ul><ul><li>NDEP 2004. National Digital Elevation Program. Guidelines for Digital Elevation Data, Version 1.0. Available online at http://www.ndep.gov/NDEP_Elevation_Guidelines_Ver1_10May2004.pdf. </li></ul><ul><li>Trimble Navigation Limited 2009. Trimble GeoXT Handheld Receiver. Sunnyvale, CA. </li></ul><ul><li>USDA-NRCS 2005. United States Department of Agriculture-Natural Resources Conservation Service. 1-m LiDAR Raster Dataset. 07/31/2005. </li></ul><ul><li>USGS 2003a. United States Geological Survey. National Elevation Dataset (NED) 1/9 Arc Second (~ 3m resolution). Available at: http://seamless.usgs.gov/products/9arc.php. </li></ul><ul><li>USGS 2003b. United States Geological Survey. National Elevation Dataset (NED) 1/3 Arc Second (~10m resolution). Available at: http://seamless.usgs.gov/products/3arc.php. </li></ul>

    ×