THE USE OF DATA TO INFORMINSTRUCTION AND AS ANARTIFACT FOR PRINCIPALEVALUATIONUnpacking Criterion 3
CRITERION 3Element 3.1: Recognizes Element 3.3: Implements and seeks out multiple data driven plan for data sources improved teaching andElement 3.2 Analyzes and learning interprets multiple data Element 3.4 Assists staff sources to inform school- to use data to guide, level improvement efforts modify and improve classroom teaching and learning
School Year 2011-2012 OUTCOMES Ext Grad INDICATORS Reading Writing Math Science Rate Average Achievement of non-low income 7 7 6 6 5 6.20ACHIEVEMENT studentsINDEX Achievement of low income 4 5 4 3 3 3.80 students Achievement vs. peers 5 4 4 7 4 4.80 Improvement from the previous 4 4 5 7 4 4.80 year Index Scores 4.90 5.00 5.00 4.75 5.75 4.00 Good 2011-12 Achievement Gap Reading Math Ext Graduation Rate Met Met Met Peers Imp Peers Imp Peers Imp INDICATORS Std Std Std Average Achievement of Black, Pacific Islander, American 4 5 7 4 5 7 2 2 1 4.11 Indian/Alaskan Native, Hispanic stds Achievement of white and Asian 6 5 4 5 3 5 5 4 4 4.56 students Achievement Gap 0.45
LIMITED ENGLISH (ELL)STUDENTS Building Number of ELL StudentsNUMBER OF STUDENTS TESTED Tested Cascade HS 71 English Language Acquisition: Number of Students Cedar Wood 17 Number of Students Tested on WELPA Eisenhower MS 40 Emerson Elem 152 0 50 100 150 200 250 Everett HS 101 Everett HS 101 Evergreen MS 79 Cascade HS 71 Cedar Wood 17 Forest View Elem 35 Eisenhower MS 40 Garfield Elem 55 Emerson Elem 152 Gateway MS 4 Evergreen MS 79 Hawthorne Elem 229 Forest View Elem 35 Heatherwood MS 26 Garfield Elem 55 Henry M. Jackson HS 31 Gateway MS 4 Jackson Elem 35 Hawthorne Elem 229 Jefferson 94 Heatherwood MS 26 Lowell 81 Henry M. Jackson HS 31 Madison 128 Jackson Elem 35 Mill Creek 41 Jefferson 94 Lowell 81 Monroe 61 Madison 128 North MS 78 Mill Creek 41 Penny Creek 57 Monroe 61 Sequoia HS 12 North MS 78 Silver Firs 40 Penny Creek 57 Silver Lake 92 Sequoia HS 12 View Ridge 55 Silver Firs 40 Whittier 28 Silver Lake 92 Woodside 93 View Ridge 55 Whittier 28 Everett Average: Elems 76 Woodside 93 Everett Average: MS 45 Everett Average: HS 54
ELL STUDENTS REACHING PROFICIENCYAMAO - 2 English Language Acquisition: Transitioning Percent of Students Transitioning (AMAO-2) Transitioning= Student scoring at Level-4 and Transtioning out of ELL Services Everett HS: Total number of ELL students tested in 2012 101 0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0 50.0 60.0 (used in AMAO-2) Everett HS Cascade HS Cedar Wood Eisenhower MS The percentage on this Emerson Elem Evergreen MS chart represents the Forest View Elem percent of students who Garfield Elem Gateway MS demonstrated English Hawthorne Elem Heatherwood MS language proficiency by Henry M. Jackson HS scoring a Level-4 on the Jackson Elem Jefferson WELPA assessment. Lowell Madison Mill Creek Requires a minimum N of Monroe North MS 20 students. Penny Creek Sequoia HS Silver Firs Silver Lake View Ridge Whittier Woodside AMAO-2 Target: 7.1% of 2012 State students transitioning Result: 11.4%
GRADE 10 CRITICAL THINKING :COMPARISON OF SCHOOL TO STATE Difference Between School and State Percents Reading - Critical Thinking 100% with similar performance 50.0 80 25.0 60 40 0.0 20 -3.7 -5.1 -6.8 0 -25.0 Everett High District State School % 78.7 85.0 85.5 -50.0 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12
PLAN: COMMON CALENDARSuccesses: Next Steps: • Common core activities • Increasing frequency of • Common formative assessments formative assessments • Common learning targets and common learning targets
BIOLOGY END OF COURSEASSESSMENT PREP• Biology, district- wide, common assessment used for 1st semester final• Using data to target weaknesses prior to EOC in spring screenshot of classroom results
PLAN: DATA TALKS– Algebra 2 teachers with administrator– Informing instructional decisions for next year and current year– Led to discussion on grading
PLAN: COLLEGIAL TIME– Discussion of common grading of the subject, and assessments– Rotating weekly– Creating an ELL version of the final in Algebra 1– Integration of GLAD strategies into lessons and activities
PLAN: COLLEGIAL TIME– Creating manipulative and graphic organizers for student use– Creating of common formative and summative assessments in Algebra 1, Geometry,Algebra 2 and Pre-calculus.
Analyzes and interprets multiple data sources to inform school-levelTABLE improvement effortsTALK What other methods do you suggest that support teachers in the analysis and interpretation of multiple data sources?
3.3: IMPLEMENTS DATADRIVEN PLAN FORIMPROVED TEACHING ANDLEARNINGAWSP Leadership Framework Planning with Data
MSP/HSPE Annual Measurable Objective (AMO): 74.8 percent of students will meet standard in Mathematics asmeasured by MSP/HSPE. of the Continuously students will meet as measured byAMO Target: 63.9% Enrolled (CE)* Low Income standard in mathematics MSP/HSPE. of the Continuously students will meet as measured byAMO Target: 50.8% Enrolled (CE)* Hispanic standard in mathematics MSP/HSPE. of the Continuously Special students will meet as measured byAMO Target: 34.8% Enrolled (CE)* Education standard in mathematics MSP/HSPE.S.M.A.R.T. GOAL:Increase the number of students passing Algebra 1 and Geometry by 5% as compared to 2011-2012 data. Evidence of Person(s) Resources SIP Actions implementation Responsible Needed TimelineData on 3-5 EOC assessed math targets will be Teachers will have extensive Assistant Time for Data Talksgathered and compiled through common data showing where each Principal Math Teacher held by 12/15,assessments. A "Data Talk" conference will be student is performing. Math and Assistant and 5/1held with the teacher and administrator to The data is converted to an Teachers Principal tocreate a plan for getting each student to action plan and shared with meetstandard. the administrator.(PDCA Step 1) (CSR Recommendation)Algebra, Geometry and Algebra 2 teachers will Each teacher will have a clear Math District Initial targetdesign, develop, and implement instructional understanding of the tested teachers developed calendarcalendars for each target. GLEs and how they align with instructional developed(PDCA Steps 2 & 3) the Common Core State calendar 9/12 Standards. Common Ongoing Work Time to development further refine of calendar
TABLE Implements data driven plan for improved teaching andTALK learning Relate this cycle for implementing a data driven plan to the process that occurs in your district. What recommendation or suggestion would you make?
3.4 ASSISTS STAFF TO USEDATA TO GUIDE, MODIFY ANDIMPROVE CLASSROOMTEACHING AND LEARNINGAWSP Leadership Framework Planning with Data
Algebra 1 teachers meet every Friday Plan lessonsCreate common formative assessment summative activities assessments so all classes doing the same Adjust lessons based on students Formative assessments
DO: CONTENT AREA READINGSuccesses: – Incorporating AVID skillsNext Steps: – Refining assignments and assessments
CHECKSuccesses: – Common district assessments on LMS • Aligned to standards, improving validity and quality of test questions – Biology teacher attended OSPI EOC question writing/training sessionNext Steps: – Increase common formative assessments among EHS classes
ACT Successes: Average Summative Assessment – Teaching reading strategies: Scores, Biology 2011-2012 Marking the text and questions Summative Average Score Assessment Classification 69.85% Cells 72.25% DNA/Cell Cycle 64.05% Semester 2 Final Breakdown Protein Synthesis 67.9% Genetics/Meiosis 64.45%Section of Final Average Score Semester 1 Final 68.4%Evolution 90% Evolution 76%Photosynthesis 75.75 Photosynthesis 69.2% Ecology 74.2%Ecology 74.24% Semester 2 Final 79%
TABLE 3.4 Assists staff to use dataTALK to guide, modify and improve classroom teaching and learning What other methods do you use to achieve this goal?
EVERETT HIGH IS AGOOD SCHOOL….. on the path to EXEMPLARY status…through the use of data to inform instruction Destination Everett