DOUBLE JEOPARDY PROBLEMS THAT GEORGE ZIMMERMAN MAY FACE (For Translation)
WE THE PEOPLE
TAKING BACK OUR
UNDER THE LAW
MY peopleareDESTROYED for LACK OF
KNOWLEDGE: because thou hast
REJECTEDknowledge, I WILLALSO
REJECT THEE, . . .seeing thou hast
FORGOTTENthe law of thy God, I will
also FORGETTHY CHILDREN. - - Hosea 4:6 (KJV)
DOUBLE JEOPARDY DILEMMA:
CALLING FOR CITIZENS ARRESTSFor
FIRST-DEGREE MURDER CHARGES
In Bringing This
RACIST “COON-HUNTER”AND His
CRIMINAL CONSPIRATORS To JUSTICE
DOUBLE JEOPARDY and the
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA’S CONSTITUTION
WE THE PEOPLEof the
United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union,
establish Justice,insure domestic Tranquility,provide
for the common defence,promote the general
Welfare,and secure the Blessings of Libertyto
ourselvesand our Posterity, do ordain and establish
this Constitution for the United States of America.
No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a
grand jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the militia, when in actual service in time of war or public danger;
nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb;nor shall be compelled in any
criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life,liberty,or property, without due process of law;nor shall private
property be taken for public use, without just compensation.
REITERATED FOR TRANSLATION PURPOSES: Howard Baker BakerDonelson Shareholder and Former U.S. Senator;
Lewis Donelson Baker Donelson Shareholder; Joseph Biden Vice President of the United States of America with former U.S. Senators Bob Dole
and Howard Baker; CENTER LEFT: Lance B. Leggitt(Legal Counsel for Barack Obama) - - - CENTER RIGHT: Badley S. Clanton (Chief
Counsel U.S. House Judiciary – Serves as CLEARINGHOUSE for information in respect to DISCRIMINATION and EQUAL PROTECTION
OF THE LAWS – provides REPORTS, FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS to the PRESIDENT and CONGRESS. . .) - - Baker Donelson
Bearman Caldwell & Berkowitz is also Legal Counsel to the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)
REITERATED FOR TRANSLATION PURPOSES: United States House of Representatives – SPEAKER of the HouseJohn
Boehnerand House MAJORITY LeaderEric Cantor;United States House of RepresentativesMINORITY Leader Nancy Pelosi; United States
Senate MAJORITY Leader Harry Reid;and United States Senate MINORITY Leader Mitchell McConnell
Baker DonelsonBearman Caldwell &Berkowtiz’ CLIENT:LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE
COMPANY – Whose INSUREDS appear to be The RETREAT AT TWIN LAKESwhere George Zimmerman
KILLED/MURDERED Trayvon Martin and the SANFORD POLICE DEPARTMENTwho RESPONDED to
the 911 Call.
REITERATED FOR TRANSLATION PURPOSES:Liberty Mutual Insurance CompanyLeft: David H.
Long (Chairman) Right: Edmond Kelly (Former President &Chief Executive Officer) - - - Gates Realty GroupMihaiCiochir (Real Estate Agent
– The Retreat At Twin Lakes) - - - SANFORD, FLORIDA POLICE DEPARTMENTLeft: Bill Lee (Police Chief at the time of Trayvon Martin
Shooting) Right: Cecil E. Smith (Police Chief Replacing Bill Smith – i.e. FRONT for cover-up and married to a WHITE woman – person
termed as a HOUSE Negro)
THE TODAY SHOW’S COVERAGE OF THE:
INTERVIEW WITH JUROR B29 (MADDY) IN GEORGE ZIMMERMAN TRIAL
SAVANNAH GUTHRIE: Now to another high profile case. A second juror from the George
Zimmerman Trial is speaking out about the case and the controversial verdict. For the story,
here's NBC’s Mark Potter.
MARK POTTER:In an interview Juror B29 said she was the one whose first vote in
deliberations was to find George Zimmerman guilty of Second-Degree murder.
MADDY:George Zimmerman got away with murder but you can't get away from God and at
the end of the day, he's going to have a lot of questions and answers he has to deal with.
MARK POTTER:But the only ethnic minority juror who calls herself Maddie said the jury
came to agree there wasn't enough proof to find Zimmerman guilty.
MADDY:But as the law was read to me, if you have no proof that he killed him intentionally,
you can't find -- you can't say he is guilty.
COURT:We the jury find George Zimmerman not guilty.
MARK POTTER:And she stands by her verdict.
MADDY:I stand by the decision because of the law. If I stand by the decision because of my
heart, he would have been guilty.
MARK POTTER:In a statement made Thursday, Trayvon Martin's mother said, “It is
devastating for my family to hear the comments from Juror B29, comments which we already
knew in our hearts to be true. That George Zimmerman literally got away with murder.”
NBC News reached out to George Zimmerman's attorney but got no response.
Maddy says she feels the trial was a PUBLICITY STUNT and feels she
owes Trayvon Martin's family an apology. For Today, Mark Potter, NBC
THROWING OF THE GEORGE ZIMMERMAN TRIAL NOTE: Of course there most likely
will be NO Comment from George Zimmerman nor his Attorneys (Mark O’Mara and Don West - -
If FRAUD has beenCOMMITTED upon the Court’s this may mean PRISON TIME - - DISBARMENT.
. .). This INCLUDES the Florida’sPROSECUTING TEAM!
ROBIN ROBERT’S INTERVIEW WITH JUROR B29 (MADDY) – GEORGE
ROBIN ROBERTS: Her name is Maddy. She didn't want her full name to be revealed but she wanted to tell her
story and as you’ll see, not in shadow. Not in disguise. She is a 36-year-old mother of eight and works full-time as
a Certified Nurse's aide. She's of Puerto Rican decent. She lived in Chicago and moved to Florida just a few
months before the jury was selected.
Her attorney, David Chico, also joined us and it was important for Maddy to express to us what it was like to sit on
ROBIN ROBERTS: Take us into the deliberations.
You've heard all of the evidence. You've heard the closing arguments, all of that. You go into the room for the first
time, together as a group.
Did you take a vote right away. . .
MADDY:. . .No!
ROBIN ROBERTS: . . .to see where you stand?
MADDY:We didn't take a second vote.
ROBIN ROBERTS: What was your first vote?
MADDY:My first vote was second-degree murder.
ROBIN ROBERTS: And people want to know how did you go from, in nine hours, from feeling he was guilty of
second-degree murder, to not guilty?
MADDY:It was hard. A lot of us had wanted to find something bad, something that we could connect to the law
because all six of us -- let's not speak for all six of us. For myself, he's guilty because the evidence shows he's
ROBIN ROBERTS: He's guilty of?
MADDY:Killing Trayvon martin. But we couldn't prove that intentionally he killed him. And that's the way the
law was read to me.
ROBIN ROBERTS: Tell us more about the emotion, during those nine hours, from the initial vote of murder,
second-degree, to not guilty. What was going on in your mind? Your heart?
MADDY:I was the juror that was going to give them the hung jury. Oh, I was. I fought until the end.
ROBIN ROBERTS: Did you feel a little, for lack of a better word, bullied in the deliberations?
MADDY:I don't know if I was bullied. I trust God that I wasn't bullied. . .But a lot. . .
ROBIN ROBERTS: Do you feel your voice was heard?
MADDY:My voice was heard. I was the loudest. Yeah. That's for sure.
ROBIN ROBERTS: You're a mother, as you said.
ROBIN ROBERTS: You have children that were Trayvon's age. . .
MADDY:I have plenty of children.
ROBIN ROBERTS: You have plenty. . .eight of them. . .
MADDY:And. . .
ROBIN ROBERTS: And what would your reaction have been had your son, going to the store, getting candy and
iced tea, going home, an altercation happens and your son is killed.
MADDY:I feel that I was forcefully included in Trayvon Martin's death. I carry him on my back.
I'm hurting as much as Trayvon's mom is. Because there's no way that any mother should feel that pain.
ROBIN ROBERTS: And you said earlier, that you are the juror that could have made it a hung jury?
ROBIN ROBERTS: Do you have regrets that you didn't?
MADDY:Kind of. I want Trayvon's mom to know that I'm hurting. And if she thought that nobody cared about
her son, I could speak for myself, I do care.
I couldn't do anything about it. And I felt like I let a lot of people down. And I'm thinking to myself, did I go the
Did I go the wrong way? I know I went the right way because by the law and the way it's followed, is the way it
went. But if I would have used my heart, I probably would have went a hung jury.
And believing with all my heart because I do -- I do have kids.
ROBIN ROBERTS: You wanted to come forward.
ROBIN ROBERTS: You haven't asked for money.
ROBIN ROBERTS: You haven't asked for a book deal.
ROBIN ROBERTS: You haven't asking for anything other than a forum to be able to tell your story.
MADDY:Yeah. I don't need money. I think time is healing.
But Trayvon martin will always be in my heart.
ROBIN ROBERTS: Some people have said George Zimmerman got away with murder. How do you respond to
those people who say that?
MADDY:George Zimmerman. . .that’s. . . George Zimmerman got away with murder. But you can't get away
from God. And at the end of the day, he's going to have a lot of questions and answers he has to deal with.
The law couldn't prove it. We just have to believe in the lord that he's -- if he's asked to pay, he will pay.
ROBIN ROBERTS: But you feel in your heart of hearts, that you and the jury approached it and came with a
decision. And you stand by that decision to this day?
MADDY:I stand by the decision because of the law.
ROBIN ROBERTS: And finally for you, Maddy, what would you like to say to Trayvon's parents?
MADDY:I would like to apologize because I feel like I let them down. We just couldn't prove anything. And I
wish them the best.
And my God bless them through all this and peace.
ROBIN ROBERTS: And that is Maddy's hope. Peace for the martin family, for everyone in this country. She
was not going to say anything until juror b-37 spoke out two days after the verdict. And you may recall that four
other jurors signed a statement, distancing themselves from that juror's comments.
Maddy felt it didn't accurately reflect her feelings. But one thing that Maddy did agree with the other juror on, she
said race was not discussed in the deliberations. It never came up in their discussion.
But one thing George she came back to again and again and again. She said the law. . the law. . .the law. And you
remember, president Obama's first statement after the verdict, we are a nation of laws
GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:And we have to respect that law. Boy. . .Boy she really wanted to say, that
first juror did not speak for everyone. They all reacted so strongly. . .
REGARDING the REQUESTS for United States
Department of Justice INVESTIGATION(S):
YES, it appears Baker DonelsonBearman Caldwell & Berkowitz CONTROLS and RUNS the
United States Department of Justice as well. In fact, Vogel Denise Newsome as early as
SEPTEMBER 2004, submitted a COMPLAINT to the United States Department of Justice
REQUESTING INVESTIGATION(S) into this law firm as well as their CORRUPT Judges (as
Judge G. Thomas Porteous) that it appears they BRIBE for PURPOSES of “THROWING
LAWSUITS” on their behalf and/or their Clients (i.e. as LIBERTY MUTUAL
INSURANCE COMPANY).When Newsome filed this Complaint with the United States
Department of Justice, she was NOT aware of Baker Donelson’s LISTING of Judges it is
AFFILIATED with.However, Newsome later was able to obtain a copy of such listing(s). In fact, from
further research, Newsome was able to obtain information where Judge G. Thomas Porteouswas
IMPEACHED and REMOVED from the Benchabout December 2010. While it is a MATTER OF
LAWto inform parties of CONFLICTS-OF-INTEREST,it appears Baker
DonelsonDELIBERATELY FAILEDto do so!
Judge G. Thomas Porteous’ IMPEACHMENT
BD Lawyer Listing
WHY is this information IMPORTANT? Well remember how the News
Media Coverage and United States of America President Barack Obama’s IMPLICATION that the
United States Department of Justice’s INVOLVEMENT in bringing CIVIL RIGHTS
VIOLATION Charges AGAINST George Zimmerman are “VERY
UNLIKELY?” Well, at least the PUBLIC/WORLD may NOW KNOW why!
Baker DonelsonBearman Caldwell & Berkowitz has a WELL-ESTABLISHED
HISTORY of putting together “FALSE”Reports to FURTHER their RACIST/KU
KLUX KLANAgendas. For instance, the PUBLIC/WORLD may want to know that it appears
that Baker DonelsonPLAYED a MAJOR/KEY role in the PREPARATION and RELEASE of the
“FALSE IRAQ REPORT”used by the United States of America’s WHITE HOUSE and CONGRESS
to support GOING to War. Moreover, the MAJOR/KEY Role that it appears that Baker Donelson
played in the “FALSE REPORT” of “WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION”for
purposes of going into IRAQ/IRAN. Wars which were used to TRAIN “WHITE
Baker Donelson Employees Listing:
CONFESSION VIDEO UNITED STATES SOLDIER DESCRIBING RACIST THRILL
KILLS OF INNOCENT CIVILIANS: http://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/confession-video-us-soldier-
It appears United States of America’s COMMANDER-IN-CHIEF (Barack Obama), SECRETARY OF
STATE (Hillary Clinton) and SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (Leon Panetta) along with the Legal Counsel (Baker
Donelson Bearman Caldwell & Berkowitz) with their ALLIES SNUCK Robert Bales (United States
Soldier) out of Afghanistan AFTER he COMPLETED what he had been TRAINED in the WARS to do – i.e.
KILL/MURDER Innocent Afghan Civilians for RACIST PURPOSES!
UNITED STATES SOLDIER (Robert Bale) IT APPEARS KILLS
AFGHANS IN RACIST SHOOTING SPREE:
It appears that Robert Bales may have committed such RACIST
Killings/Murders OVER a $1 DOLLAR BET!
There are some people wondering WHY United States of America President Barack
Obama made the July 19, 2013, Trayvon Martin Speech?One reason may be is that President Barack
Obama is PREPARING for a REVOLUTIONARY OVERTHOWby “THE
PEOPLE”he was WARNED ABOUTand is attempting to position himself as the STEWARD
did in LUKE 16: 1-9so that he will have a COMMUNITY(i.e. which he
BETRAYED by “pulling a JUDAS”) to go BACK toONCE OUSTED! However,
it appears hisand Michelle Obama’s NEXT STAY may be PRISON for theirFRAUDULENT
practices and ROLES in CRIMINAL CONSPIRACIES orchestrated byPresident Barack
Obamaandhis Legal Counsel Baker Donelson Bearman Caldwell & Berkowitz and their CO-
CONSPIRATORS - - Look what happened for former United States of America
President Richard Nixon!Well ObamaFraudGateis a WHOLE
LOTWORSE!EQUALJUSTICEunder the Laws - - NO
“RACE Card” to be played here!
And he said also unto his disciples, There was a certain rich man, which
had a steward; and the same was accused unto him that he had wasted his goods.
And he called him, and said unto him, How is it that I hear this of thee?give an
account of thy stewardship;for thou mayest be no longer steward.
Then the steward said within himself,What shall I do?for my lord taketh away
from me the stewardship:I cannot dig;to begI am ashamed.
I am resolved what to do,that, when I am put outof the stewardship,they may
receive me into their houses.
So he called every one of his lord's debtors unto him, and said unto the first, How
much owest thou unto my lord?
And he said,An hundred measures of oil.And he said unto him,Take thy bill, and sit
down quickly, and write fifty.
Then said he to another, And how much owest thou?And he said,An hundred
measures of wheat.And he said unto him, Take thy bill, and write fourscore.
And the lord commended the unjust steward, because he had done wisely: for the
children of this world are in their generation wiser than the
children of light.
And I say unto you, Make to yourselves friends of themammonof
unrighteousness; that, when ye fail, they may receive you into
TRANSCRIPT OF PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA’S SPEECH REGARDING TRAYVON MARTIN on or about July 19, 2013:
I wanted to come out here, first of all, to tell you that Jay is prepared for all your questions and
is very much looking forward to the session. The second thing is I want to let you know that over
the next couple of weeks, there’s going to obviously be a whole range of issues --
IMMIGRATION, economics, et cetera -- we'll try to arrange a fuller press conference to
address your questions.
The reason I actually wanted to come out today IS NOT to take questions, but to speak to an
issue that obviously has gotten a lot of attention over the course of the last week -- the issue of
the Trayvon Martin ruling. I gave a preliminary statement right after the ruling on Sunday. But
watching the debate over the course of the last week, I thought it might be useful for me to
expand on my thoughts a little bit.
First of all, I want to make sure that, once again, I send my thoughts and prayers, as well as
Michelle’s, to the family of Trayvon Martin, and to remark on the incredible grace and dignity
with which they’ve dealt with the entire situation. I can only imagine what they’re going through,
and it’s remarkable how they’ve handled it.
The second thing I want to say is to reiterate what I said on Sunday, which is there’s going to be
a lot of arguments about the legal issues in the case -- I'll let all the legal analysts and talking
heads address those issues. The judge conducted the trial IN A
The prosecution and the defense made their arguments. The juries were properly instructed that
in a case such as this reasonable doubt was relevant, and they rendered a verdict. And
once the jury has spoken, that's how our system works.
But I did want to just talk a little bit about context and how people have responded to it and how
people are feeling.
You know, when Trayvon Martin was first shot I said that this could have
been my son. Another way of saying that is Trayvon Martin could have been
me 35 years ago. And when you think about why, in the African American community
at least, there’s a lot of pain around what happened here, I think it’s important to recognize that
the African American community is looking at this issue
through a set of experiences and a history that doesn’t go
There are very few African American men in this country who haven't had the
experience of being followed when they were shopping in a department
store. That includes me. There are very few African American men who haven't
had the experience of walking across the street and
hearing the locks click on the doors of cars. That happens to me --
at least before I was a senator. There are very few African Americans who haven't had
the experience of getting on an elevator and a woman
clutching her purse nervously and holding her breath until she
had a chance to get off. That happens often.
And I don't want to exaggerate this, but those sets of experiences inform how the African
American community interprets what happened one night in Florida. And it’s inescapable for
people to bring those experiences to bear. The African American
community is also knowledgeable that there is a history
of racial disparities in the application of our criminal
laws -- everything from the death penalty to enforcement of our drug laws. And that ends up
having an impact in terms of how people interpret the case.
Now, this isn't to say that the African American community is naïve about the fact
that African American young men are disproportionately
involved in the criminal justice system;that they’re
disproportionately both victims and perpetrators of violence. It’s
not to make excuses for that fact -- although black folks do interpret the reasons for that in a
historical context. They understand that some of the violence that takes place in poor black
neighborhoods around the country is born out of a very violent past in this country, and that the
poverty and dysfunction that we see in those communities can be traced to a very difficult
And so the fact that sometimes that’s unacknowledged adds to the frustration. And the fact that a
lot of African American boys are painted with a broad brush and the excuse is given, well, there
are these statistics out there that show that African American boys are more violent -- using that
as an excuse to then see sons treated differently causes pain.
I think the African American community is also not naïve in understanding that, statistically,
somebody like Trayvon Martin was statistically more likely to be shot by a peer than he was by
somebody else. So folks understand the challenges that exist for African American boys. But they
get frustrated, I think, if they feel that there’s no context for it and that context is being denied.
And that all contributes I think to a sense that if a white male teen was involved in the same kind
of scenario, that, from top to bottom, both the outcome and the aftermath might have been
Now, the question for me at least, and I think for a lot of folks, is where do we take this? How do
we learn some lessons from this and move in a positive direction? I think it’s understandable that
there have been demonstrations and vigils and protests, and some of that stuff is just going to
have to work its way through, as long as it remains nonviolent. If I see any violence, then I will
remind folks that that dishonors what happened to Trayvon Martin and his family. But beyond
protests or vigils, the question is, are there some concrete things that we might be able to do.
I know that Eric Holder is reviewing what happened down there, but I think it’s important for
people to have some clear expectations here. Traditionally, these are issues of state
and local government, the criminal code. And law enforcement is
traditionally done at the state and local levels, not at the federal levels.
That doesn’t mean, though, that as a nation we can’t do some things that I think would be
productive. So let me just give a couple of specifics that I’m still bouncing around with my staff,
so we’re not rolling out some five-point plan, but some areas where I think all of us could
Number one, precisely because law enforcement is often determined at the state and local level, I
think it would be productive for the Justice Department, governors, mayors to work with law
enforcement about training at the state and local levels in order to reduce the kind of mistrust in
the system that sometimes currently exists.
When I was in Illinois, I passed racial profiling legislation, and it actually did just two simple
things. One, it collected data on traffic stops and the race of the person who was stopped. But the
other thing was it resourced us training police departments across the state on how to think
about potential racial bias and ways to further professionalize what they were doing.
And initially, the police departments across the state were resistant, but actually they came to
recognize that if it was done in a fair, straightforward way that it would allow them to do their
jobs better and communities would have more confidence in them and, in turn, be more helpful in
applying the law. And obviously, law enforcement has got a very tough job.
So that’s one area where I think there are a lot of resources and best practices that could be
brought to bear if state and local governments are receptive. And I think a lot of them would be.
And let's figure out are there ways for us to push out that kind of training.
Along the same lines, I think it would be useful for us to examine some state and local laws to see
if it -- if they are designed in such a way that they may encourage the kinds of altercations and
confrontations and tragedies that we saw in the Florida case, rather than diffuse potential
I know that there's been commentary about the fact that the "stand your ground" laws in Florida
were not used as a defense in the case. On the other hand, if we're sending a message as a
society in our communities that someone who is armed potentially has the right to use those
firearms even if there's a way for them to exit from a situation, is that really going to be
contributing to the kind of peace and security and order that we'd like to see?
And for those who resist that idea that we should think about something like these "stand
yourground" laws, I'd just ask people to consider, if Trayvon Martin was of age and armed,
could he have stood his ground on that sidewalk? And do we actually think that he would have
been justified in shooting Mr. Zimmerman who had followed him in a car because he felt
threatened? And if the answer to that question is at least ambiguous, then it seems to me that we
might want to examine those kinds of laws.
Number three -- and this is a long-term project -- we need to spend some time in thinking about
how do we bolster and reinforce our African American boys. And this is something that Michelle
and I talk a lot about. There are a lot of kids out there who need help who are getting a lot of
negative reinforcement. And is there more that we can do to give them the sense that their
country cares about them and values them and is willing to invest in them?
I'm not naïve about the prospects of some grand, new federal program. I'm not sure that that’s
what we're talking about here. But I do recognize that as President, I've got some convening
power, and there are a lot of good programs that are being done across the country on this front.
And for us to be able to gather together business leaders and local elected officials and clergy
and celebrities and athletes, and figure out how are we doing a better job helping young African
American men feel that they're a full part of this society and that they've got pathways and
avenues to succeed -- I think that would be a pretty good outcome from what was obviously a
tragic situation. And we're going to spend some time working on that and thinking about that.
And then, finally, I think it's going to be important for all of us to do some soul-searching. There
has been talk about should we convene a conversation on race. I haven't seen that be
particularly productive when politicians try to organize conversations. They end up being stilted
and politicized, and folks are locked into the positions they already have. On the other hand, in
families and churches and workplaces, there's the possibility that people are a little bit more
honest, and at least you ask yourself your own questions about, am I wringing as much bias out
of myself as I can? Am I judging people as much as I can, based on not the color of their skin,
but the content of their character? That would, I think, be an appropriate exercise in the wake of
And let me just leave you with a final thought that, as difficult and challenging as this whole
episode has been for a lot of people, I don’t want us to lose sight that things are getting better.
Each successive generation seems to be making progress in changing attitudes when it comes to
race. It doesn’t mean we’re in a post-racial society. It doesn’t mean that racism is eliminated.
But when I talk to Malia and Sasha, and I listen to their friends and I seem them interact, they’re
better than we are -- they’re better than we were -- on these issues. And that’s true in every
community that I’ve visited all across the country.
And so we have to be vigilant and we have to work on these issues. And those of us in authority
should be doing everything we can to encourage the better angels of our nature, as opposed to
using these episodes to heighten divisions. But we should also have confidence that kids these
days, I think, have more sense than we did back then, and certainly more than our parents did or
our grandparents did; and that along this long, difficult journey, we’re becoming a more perfect
union -- not a perfect union, but a more perfect union.
Thank you, guys.
DON’T BE TAKEN BY PRESIDENT BARACK
OBAMA’S JULY 19, 2013 TRAYVON MARTIN SPEECH - - -
See the following regarding the INFAMOUS MARCH 18, 2008 RACE
Well it appears President Barack Obama is UP TO THE SAME
GAMES – i.e. TRYING to use the RACE Card for
ILLEGAL MOTIVES!So here are a FEW OTHER
haveOCCURREDUNDER HIS WATCHas the President of the United
States of America and COMMANDER-IN-CHIEF!The following
documents it appears have had an INTERNATIONAL Interests:
FREDERICK JERMAINE CARTER– Mississippi LYNCHING it appears
COVERED UP by the Obama Administration:
JAMES CRAIG ANDERSON– It is a good thing this RACIST Killing in the BEATING
and RUNNING OVER by WHITE SUPREMACIST was CAUGHT on Video. Otherwise, it appears President
Barack Obama would have moved to COVER UP this MURDER/KILLLING/DEATH:
DANNY CHEN– Asian American serving in the United States Military that it appears was TREATED
LIKE A DOG and the Commander-In-Chief President Barack Obama COVERED UP this
TROY DAVIS– It appears to be an African-American MALE put to DEATH at the DIRECTION of
United States of America President Barack Obama and his LYNCHING Mobsters headed by Baker
DonelsonBearman Caldwell Berkowitz and their STACKED Supreme Court of The United States used to
CARRY OUT such BRUTAL Murders/Killings/Deaths to hide their CRIMES from the PUBLIC/WORLD:
NOW the COVER-UPof the RACIALLY-
MOTIVATEDKILLING/MURDERof Trayvon Martin in which the February 26, 2012,
911 Call it appears ECORDED the FOLLOWING:http://youtu.be/qb6rzu9gGJU
The back entrance. These Fu@@king Coons!
(sound of wind gush still going in background)
Are you following him?
(sound of wind gush still going in background)
(sound of wind gush still going in background)
Okay, we don’t need you to do that.
(sound of wind gush still going in background)
(sound of wind gush still going in
1) Whose father is a JUDGE (Robert Zimmerman)and mother (Gladys)
worked for a COURT!
2) DOMESTIC Violence – RESTRAINING Order Issued
3) RESISTING Officer with VIOLENCE–BATTERY of Law
Enforcement Officer. . .
4) No tellingWHAT OTHER CRIMINAL acts of George Zimmerman
may have been COVERED UP prior to the recent trial regarding Trayvon
Nevertheless, it appears BECAUSE he was given SPECIAL TREATMENT and
notPROSECUTED for PRIOR CRIMES and TAKEN OFF THE STREETS,on or
about February 26, 2012, he went on to commit FIRST-DEGREE Murderof
Trayvon Benjamin Martin!STALKING,RUNNINGAFTER and in COLD
BLOODSHOOTING Trayvon Martin AFTERbeing TOLD NOTto FOLLOW
himand Zimmerman AGREEING NOT to do so as well as SHOOTING Trayvon
Martin AFTER being told that the POLICE were being called!
HAVING KNOWLEDGE that Trayvon Martin’s KILLING/MURDER was RACIALLY
Motivated and this appears the reason for Florida State Prosecutor JOHN GUY telling an
outrightBOLDFACE LIE stating that George Zimmerman called Trayvon Martin a
“F@@cking Punk” rather than a “F@@cking COON!”Now it appears the PUBLIC/WORLD can
see JUST who John Guy and other State Prosecutors CONSPIRED with to
THROW the Criminal Trial.While the MEDIA attempted to “PAINT”their
POORLY acted/scripted LEGAL performance as “MISSTEPS!”
UNDERSTANDING HOW THE FOLLOWING
HOUSE NEGROESARE BEING USED
By The Likes Of
Baker Donelson Bearman Caldwell & Berkowitz
WHAT IS A HOUSE
CHECK OUT THESE HOUSE NEGROES (Black-Americans) – NOTICE HOW THEY
ALL HAVE THAT INTERRACIAL LOOK (White Look – Just Keeping it REAL):Eric Himpton
Holder, Jr. - U.S. Attorney General; Barack Hussein Obama II – United States of America President; and Benjamin Todd Jealous – President and Chief
Executive Officer National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP).
NOW LOOK AT THE FOLLOWING CIVIL RIGHTS ACTIVISTS(African-
Americans) that it appears the United States of America’s Government ORCHESTRATED to have
MURDERED/KILLED:Medgar Evers;Malcolm Xand Martin Luther King– STRONG MEN who would
NOT COMPROMISEtheir RIGHTS and/or SELL OUT THEIR SOULS to the United States of America’s
Government TERRORIST REGIME!
GEORGE MICHAEL ZIMMERMAN WAS NEVER
IN JEOPARDY DURING THE RECENT MOCK TRIAL
PUT ON FOR SECOND-DEGREE MURDER/MANSLAUGHTER
THE FOLLOWING IS A COPY OF AN EXCERPT OF
PAGES FROM THE
DOUBLE JEOPARDY and the
On December 8, 1993, a COOK County,ILLINOIS,GRAND JURYreturned an
INDICTMENT chargingHarry Aleman, a REPUTED CRIME SYNDICATE ASSASSIN, with the
murder of William Logan, a truck dispatcher and Teamsters union steward, who was SHOT TO DEATH
outside his home in CHICAGO in 1972. INDICTMENTS for MURDER are NOT uncommon in
COOK County. What is UNUSUAL about this particular indictment, however,
is that Aleman PREVIOUSLY had been ACQUITTED of Logan's
MURDER,having been found NOT guilty following a bench trial in 1977.
- - PAGE 607
At FIRST glance it would appear that the DOUBLE JEOPARDY
Clause of the FIFTH Amendment BARS the SECOND prosecution of
Aleman and PROHIBITS the state of Illinois from forcing him to
defend himself a SECOND time for the SAME offense. Cook County
STATE'S Attorney Jack O'Malley contends, however, that the GUARANTEE against
DOUBLE JEOPARDY does NOT protect Aleman because his
ACQUITTAL resulted from a $10,000 BRIBE paid to the TRIAL judge
by a CORRUPT LAWYER at the behest of LOCAL POLITICIANS
with TIES tothe CRIME SYNDICATE.
According to O'Malley, Aleman was NEVER in"JEOPARDY" at his FIRST
trial. On October 12, 2994, a circuit court judge ACCEPTED O'Mally's legal argument and REFUSED
to grant Aleman's motion to dismiss the 1993 INDICTMENT on DOUBLE JEOPARDY grounds. On
March 9, 1995, following an EVIDENTIARY hearing, the Judge
CONCLUDED that the Judge in Aleman's FIRST trial had BEEN
BRIBED to find Aleman NOT guilty, and that, therefore, the
GUARANTEE against DOUBLE JEOPARDY does NOTPROTECT
Aleman from being RETRIED for Logan's MURDER. - - -PAGE 608
. . .anACQUITTAL obtained through FRAUD, i.e.,
unfairly, does NOT bar a subsequent prosecution for the
SAME offense. . . - - - PAGE 621
. . .Bishop subsequently wrote in his treatise on CRIMINAL law: "[T]here is . . . direct
English authority, and there are NUMEROUS judicial dicta, English
and American, to the proposition that if the DEFENDANT'SFRAUD at
the hearing brings about his ACQUITTAL, the PROSECUTOR may
have a NEW TRIAL.". . . "Moreover, whether this view of the law is correct or not, [a]
JUDGMENT of ACQUITTAL upon a VERDICTprocured by
FRAUD will NOT bar a SECOND trial for the SAME
offense." Corpus Juris Secundum takes the SAME position,
stating, "A verdict of ACQUITTALPROCURED by accused
by FRAUD and COLLUSION is a NULLITY and does
NOTput him in JEOPARDY; and consequently is NO bar to a
SECOND trial for the SAME offense."- - - PAGE 621
The supreme court. . .went on to say that the PROSECUTOR could proceed against the defendant
under the ORIGINAL indictment or, if the statute of limitations had not yet run, under a NEW
indictment, allowing the JURY to decide whether the INITIAL ACQUITTAL
resulted from the defendant's FRAUD, because "[c]ases of
AQUITTALPROCURED by FRAUD of the defendant form an EXCEPTION to the
general rule, that no one shall be twice put in JEOPARDY for the SAME
offence." Further WEAKENING the support this case provides for Bishop's assertion is the court's
acknowledgment that "[t]his EXCEPTION [to general DOUBLE JEOPARDY principles] does NOT
apply to capital cases, and perhaps NOT to felonies in general."
Similarly, in both cases cited by Corpus Juris Secundum, the statement that an ACQUITTAL
obtained through FRAUD does NOT bar a subsequent prosecution for the SAME offense is merely dicta,
as NEITHER case involved an allegation by the GOVERNMENT that the defendant's ACQUITTAL
resulted in FRAUD. . . - - - PAGE 624
. . .Although totally unnecessary for its decision, the court quoted the assertion made in Corpus
Juris Secundum that an ACQUITTAL PROCURED by the defendant through
FRAUD does NOT bar the GOVERNMENT from AGAIN prosecuting
him for the SAME offense;it then stated that the government did NOT claim that the
defendant's ACQUITTAL resulted from COLLUSION or FRAUD. FIFTEEN years later, however, in
State v. Johnson, the same court REJECTED a defendant's motion to dismiss the government's appeal from
a verdict of ACQUITTAL. In doing so, the court characterized its quotation from C.J.S. in Howell as a
"holding" and concluded that, because the government contended that the defendant's ACQUITTAL
resulted from FRAUD and COLLUSION, it could consider the appeal on its merits. . . - - - PAGE 626
NUMEROUS cases have held that a conviction"PROCURED
FRAUDULENTLY or by COLLUSION of the offender for the purpose of
protecting himselffrom further prosecution and adequate punishment . . . is
NO bar to a subsequent prosecution for the SAME offense."- - - PAGE 627
It appears well settled that the DOUBLE JEOPARDY Clause does NOT bar a subsequent
prosecution . . . declared because of FRAUD, such as where the defendant KNOWINGLY
presented PERJURED testimony, FRAUDULENTLY managed to have a friend IMPANELED on the
jury, or TAMPERED with a juror, or where a juror misrepresented during voir dire examination her
relationship to the accused. . . .- - - PAGE 630
B. THEORETICAL BASIS AND POLICY CONSIDERATIONS FOR AN
EXCEPTION TO NORMAL DOUBLE JEOPARDY PRINCIPLES. . . PAGE 635
. . .That is, any EXCEPTION to normal DOUBLE JEOPARDY principles may apply
ONLY to situations in which the ACQUITTAL would not be broad to encompass it. That is, ANY
EXCEPTION to normal DOUBLE JEOPARDY principles may apply ONLY to situations
in which the ACQUITTAL resulted from FRAUD occurring in the
JUDICIAL proceeding itself. On the other hand, an ACQUITTAL based upon the
FRAUDULENTLY-PROCURED absence of a witness is still an
ACQUITTALresulting from FRAUD,and there does NOT appear to be any principled basis
for distinguishing among TYPES of FRAUD when creating an EXCEPTION to normal DOUBLE
JEOPARDY principles. . . . - - - PAGE 637
2. THEORETICAL BASIS FOR THE CONTEMPLATED EXCEPTION
In REFUSING to dismiss the indictment of Harry Aleman for a murder for which he already had
been TRIED and ACQUITTED by a judge, the trial court concluded that Aleman had
NEVER been in "jeopardy" at his FIRST trial because the judge had
been PAID a BRIBE to find Aleman NOT GUILTY. It is true that the DOUBLE
JEOPARDY Clause does NOT bar a SECOND trial of a defendant for a particular offense if she were
NOT in jeopardy at her FIRST trial for that offense. For"an accused MUST suffer
JEOPARDYBEFORE [she] can suffer DOUBLE JEOPARDY." . . .- - -
A sounder theory for REFUSING to allow a FRAUDULENTLY-
OBTAINEDACQUITTAL to bar a subsequent prosecution for the
SAME offense would be that of "FORFEITURE."That is, it could be
said that a defendant who OBTAINS her ACQUITTAL through
FRAUDULENT means forfeits her RIGHT to raise the DOUBLE
JEOPARDY Clause as a BAR tothe subsequent prosecution for the
SAME offense. This approach places a limit upon the scope of the contemplated
EXCEPTION to normal DOUBLE JEOPARDYprinciples: a SECOND trial WOULD be
PERMITTED ONLYwhere the accused either PARTICIPATED in or
ACQUIESCED in the FRAUDULENT conduct leading to her
ACQUITTAL. For an accused CANNOT be deemed to have FORFEITED
her PROTECTIONAGAINSTDouble Jeopardy when she did NOT even
KNOW about the FRAUDULENT conduct that RESULTED in her
being found NOT guilty. Such a limitation is sound, however. FAIRNESS dictates
that an individual not to be stripped of her protection against DOUBLE
JEOPARDY on account of the conduct of othersof which she was
UNAWARE,even if that conduct confers a BENEFIT upon her in the form of a judgment of
ACQUITTAL. Perhaps this explains why many of the text writers and cases indicating the
EXISTANCE of an EXCEPTION to normal DOUBLE JEOPARDY
principles for a FRAUDULENTLY-OBTAINED ACQUITTAL limit
the EXCEPTION to situations in which the defendant PROCURED the
ACQUITTAL through FRAUD . . .PAGE 641
. . .FIRST, it should be limited to cases in which the
defendant eitherENGAGED in IMPROPER conduct AIMED at
PROCURING . . .ACQUITTAL or KNEW about the
IMPROPER conduct of a THIRD personINTENDED to
ACHIEVE that GOAL. - - - PAGE 650
. . .SECOND, the government should be required to
PROVE a CAUSAL CONNECTION BETWEEN the alleged
IMPROPER conduct and the defendant's ACQUITTAL. In
cases in which the government alleges that the factfinder in the
defendant's FIRST trial was IMPROPERLY influenced to
ACQUIT the accused, the government should be required to
SHOW that on the BASIS of the EVIDENCE presented in that
trial, the factfinder should have CONVICTED the defendant. .
. In cases which the government alleges. . . that the
PROSECUTOR was IMPROPERLY influenced to PRESENT a
WEAK CASE against the accused,
the government ought to show that the factfinder in the
defendant's FIRST trial would NOT have ACQUITTED . .
.had it had heard, in the FORMER situation, the
TRUTHFULTESTIMONY. . .all the TESTIMONY the
government would have presented ABSENT the IMPROPER
conduct.FINALLY, and perhaps MOSTIMPORTANTLY, the
government should be PERMITTED to CONTEST the
VALIDITY of an ACQUITTAL only AFTER the defendant
(or, in cases in which the defendant merely KNEW about the
FRAUD, a THIRD person) has been PROSECUTED and
convicted of the impropr conduct in question. That is, if the
government seeks to prosecute a defendant following. .
.acquittal of the SAME offense, on the ground that the
ACQUITTAL was FRAUDULENTLY-OBTAINED, it should
be able to do so ONLY after CONVICTING
the PERPETRATOR of the FRAUD in
a SEPARATE criminal proceeding.- - - PAGE
The PUBLIC/WORLD may recall that George Zimmerman and his lawyers had
Judge Kenneth Lester, Jr. REMOVED from case alleging BIAS; however, MOVED
SWIFTLY to replace him with a JEWISH JUDGE (Debra Steinberg Nelson). George
Zimmerman’s father who is a JUDGE and JEWISH.Baker Donelson MAKING their
ANNOUNCEMENT about moving into FLORIDA approximately THREE months PRIOR to
this COLD BLOODED MURDER:
The PUBLIC/WORLD needs to KNOW that there are REPORTS that the ANTI-
MUSLIM VIDEO released last year (2012) that it appears that President Barack Obama
and his Legal Team Baker DonelsonBearman Caldwell & Berkowitz attempted to
DECEIVE the PUBLIC/WORLD about alleging it was the MOTIVE for the “BENGHAZI
ATTACKS” which led to the BRUTAL DEATH of United States of America’s Ambassador
Christopher Stevens and others:
wasFINANCED with JEWISH monies:
NOT only that, it appears that the United States of
America is ALLOWING Israel to use its MILITARY to FIGHT
Wars that are RACIALLY and RELIGIOUSLY MOTIVATED!
There were those who were WONDERING HOW George
Zimmerman’s LEGAL BILLS were getting paid through his alleged PAYPAL
Account – i.e. well Baker Donelson Bearman Caldwell and Berkowitz (President
Barack Obama’s Attorney) is also Legal Counsel to PayPal – i.e. appears
to be the COMPANY allegedly used to FUNNEL finances to SUPPORT George
Zimmerman’s CRIMINAL ACTS:
and then of course the BIAS Media Coverage on the George Zimmerman Trial
in which it was obviously COMPROMISED in its News on the COVERAGE of
the trial? To better understand this, perhaps seeing for oneself the POSITIONS
HELD by JEWS and White Supremacist Members may help the PUBLIC/WORLD
see how monies EARNED and/or STOLEN are used to support such
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA’S FEDERAL RESERVES/TREASURY
DEPARTMENT/SENATE JEWISH CONTROL/CONNECTIONS:
WALLSTREET JEWISH CONTROL/CONNECTIONS:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA’S MAINSTREAM and
SOCIAL MEDIA JEWISH CONTROL/CONNECTIONS:
NOW the United States of America’s TERRORIST REGIME
led by BAKER DONELSON BEARMAN CALDWELL & BERKOWITZ is
out to TAKE AWAY YOUR VOTING RIGHTS-i.e. for those who
THOUGHTtheir VOTESplaced Barack Obama in the White House,
THINK AGAIN! It appears that Barack Obama KNEWas early as
about May 2008, he would be the one being placed in the White
Just as it appears Mitt Romney KNEWhe would be the one being
placed in the White House PRIOR to the November 2012 Elections
– i.e. HOWEVER, it appears that actions from Vogel Denise
Newsomeresulted in them “PULLING-THE-RUG”from underneath
Mitt Romney and placing Barack Obama BACK in the White
House. That was NO mistakewhen Mitt Romney
RELEASED his Presidential Website! Yes, Newsome’s actions, it
appears is the ONLY reason for returning Barack Obama BACK to
the White House and then her EXPOSURE of the GAMES being
played by United States of America President Barack Obama, his
Legal Counsel Baker DonelsonBearman Caldwell & Berkowitz,
CONGRESS, the SUPREME COURT and their other
Supreme Court of the United States Brief
RECEIVED on or about November 5, 2012 –
DAY PRIORto the Elections:
For those who may recall, this was also about the time when
it appears the Obama Administration released the “DAVID
PETRAEUS and MISTRESS PAULA BROADWELL SCANDAL”for
purposes of DISTRACTION as to what was REALLY taking place –
i.e. FRAUDULENT Election!
NOW they are AFTER GUTTINGthe AFFIRMATIVE ACTION Laws
and the RIGHTS of IMMIGRANTS!
DEMOCRACY is HYPCRISY – Malcolm X
democracy-is-hyprocrisy We Are Living In A “POLICE STATE”
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA’S IMMIGRATION REFORM:
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE:That on or about January 10,
2012,United States of America President Barack Obama, his Legal Counsel Baker
DonelsonBearman Caldwell &Berowitz and CONGRESSIONAL Members were SERVED
with EVICTION – i.e. NOTIFIED of DATES to VACATE their OFFICES! However, United
States of America President Barack Obama attempted to COVER UP being served by
DESTROYING PROCESS – i.e. the Certified Mail GREEN CARD:
So it appears that “WE THE PEOPLE” have been placed in a LEGAL
POSITIONto OVERTHROW the United States of America’s
GOVERNMENT to get JUSTICE not ONLY for Trayvon Martin but OTHERS who
have been VICTIMIZED by this TERRORIST REGIME headed by
BAKER DONELSON BEARMAN CALDWELL & BERKOWITZ:
“This country, with its institutions, BELONGS TO THE PEOPLE who inhabit it. Whenever they shall
grow wearyof the EXISTING government, they can exercise their CONSTITUTIONAL
Right of amending it, or exercise their REVOLUTIONARY Right to
OVERTHROW it.” - - United States President Abraham Lincoln
The UNITED STATES OF AMERICA’S SUPREME COURT CONSISTS OF JUSTICES WHO
ARE EITHER JEWISH OR CATHOLIC – i.e. DISCRIMINATORY PRACTICES in
itself. No wonder there is NO JUSTICE and LOOK at the FACES
of the JUDICIAL GATEKEEPERS to see that African-Americans
and/or People of Color are OPPRESSED while they PROMOTE their OWN
Laws that are CREATED and/or DRAFTED by Baker Donelson Bearman Caldwell &
Berkowitz (i.e. Legal Counsel for the Justices of the Supreme Court of the United
My GOODNESS, hasn’t the PUBLIC/WORLD had ENOUGH of the
OPPORTUNISTS:These are people who EXPLOIT circumstances to gain
IMMEDIATE advantagerather than being guided by PRINCIPLES or MORALS - i.e. alleging
being given opportunities to serve the people based on the SACRIFICES of Civil Rights
Leaders as Martin Luther King, Jr., etc.; then when they are in office and in a position to
bring about CHANGE and EQUALITY for ALL regardless of race, etc. They turn to their
"INNER" Greed for MONEY, FAME and SUCCESS at the "SACRIFICE"of OTHERS!"
The United States of America’s
Opportunists such as the Reverend Al Sharpton and Reverend Jesse
Jackson. Perhaps the PUBLIC/WORLD has noticed HOW EACH and
EVERYTIME there is a LARGE PROTEST regarding RACIAL ISSUES, the
United States of America’s Government THROW out these TWO
“INSIDE” INFORMANTS to provide them with feedback as to what
is taking place in the African-American/Black-American
Communities.It is so obvious that the United States of America’s
Government has IMPLEMENTED the “WILLIE LYNCH” practices:
This information has also been placed at:
where the TRANSLATION KEY is in the UPPER “RIGHT” corner of website.
NOW ask yourself WHAT have these TWO“HOUSE
NEGROES”(Reverend Al Sharpton and Reverend Jesse
Jackson) done for the PAST 50YEARS – i.e. since the
DEATHS of PROMINENT Civil Rights Leaders as Malcolm
X, Medgar Evers and Martin Luther King Jr.?
A PAIR of “HOUSE NEGROES” merely the LAUGHING STOCK and or
made to be a MOCKERY of BLACK-Americans in that it appears they are
REPEATEDLY thrown out by President Barack Obama and/or the United
States of America’s Government to be their MOUTHPIECE and/or
REPRESENTATIVES – i.e. however, clearly NOT that of those who claim to
be African-American because clearly Reverend Al Sharpton and Reverend
Jesse Jacksonare a DISGRACE!
QUIT playing PATTY-CAKES
with United States of America’s CORRUPTTERRORIST REGIME!
“WE THE PEOPLE”have the POWER to
Also todemandINTERNATIONAL ASSISTANCE to get
theseTERRORISTSOUT OF POWER IF they
REFUSE to SURRENDER or lose LIBERTIESand
FREEDOMS that are SLOWLY but SURELY being STRIPPED AWAY!
If the SYRIAN citizens can ask for assistance, then
Vogel Denise Newsome believes that when “WE THE
PEOPLE”in the United States of America CANNOT get
CONTROL of the GOVERNMENT in a country that is
supposed to be a DEMOCRACY and the Terrorists are
REFUSING to SURRENDER, then INTERNATIONAL
INTERVENTION may be necessary! It appears the MIDDLE
EAST has become LEADERS in showing HOW the
REVOLUTIONARY PROCESS is SUCCESSFUL! Look at
what just happened here in 2013 in Egypt – the
OUTSING of President Mohammad Morsi AFTER
about serving for ONLY“ONE” year! Also, look at
the message being sent regarding PROTEST towards the
United States of America(i.e. THANKS SO MUCHbecause
it is time for people to WAKE UP and see the United
States’ CORRUPTION and CRIMINAL actions) SENDING a
STRONG MESSAGE to the United States of America. Vogel
Denise Newsome WELCOMES “INTERNATIONAL”
ASSISTANCE in the OVERTHROW of the United States of
America’s TERRORIST REGIME!