1.
17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE
9/11 HIJACKERS WERE BROUGHT TO
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FROM SAUDI ARABIA BY
CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY…

2.
   
Sat Sep 1, 2018 07:13AM [Updated: Sat Sep 1, 2018
02:30PM ]
9/11 hijackers were brought to US
from Saudi Arabia by CIA: Scholar
Home / US / Interviews
9/11 hijackers
Fifteen of the 9/11 “hijackers” from Saudi Arabia were CIA agents who
were brought to the United States by the American spy agency, says Dr.
Kevin Barrett, an American academic who has been studying the events
of 9/11 since late 2003.
Dr. Barrett, a founding member of the Scientific Panel for the Investigation
of 9/11, made the remarks in a phone interview with Press TV on Friday
while commenting on a Newsweek report about a new explosive book on
9/11 that has revealed a US government-wide cover-up of Saudi complicity
in the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks.
High-ranking CIA and Saudi officials conspired to bury details about
their 9/11 roles, says a new book https://t.co/VXBxB7rz9d
pic.twitter.com/TqCAKkklMC
 Embed Download

3.
— Newsweek (@Newsweek) August 29, 2018
The 9/11 attacks were a series of strikes in the US which killed nearly 3,000
people and caused about $10 billion worth of property and infrastructure
damage.
US officials assert that the attacks were carried out by 19 al-Qaeda
terrorists – 15 of them were Saudi citizens -- but many experts have raised
questions about the official account.
They believe that rogue elements within the US government, such as
former Vice President Dick Cheney, orchestrated or at least encouraged the
9/11 attacks in order to accelerate the US war machine and advance the
Zionist agenda.
In The Watchdogs Didn’t Bark: The CIA, NSA, and the Crimes of the War on
Terror, John Duffy and Ray Nowosielski dismissed the official story that
9/11 was merely “a failure to connect the dots.” The book claimed that the
CIA and Saudi Arabia conspired to keep 9/11 details secret.

4.
PPrreessssTTVV--UUSS ggoovvtt..’’ss ccoovveerr--uupp ooff SSaauuddii ccoommpplliicciittyy iinn 99//1111 rreevveeaalleedd
The authors of a new book on 9/11 have revealed a US government-wide
cover-up of Saudi complicity in the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks.
“It’s a welcome development that we are getting some skeptical reportage
in the mainstream about 9/11 during the run-up to the holy, sacred
anniversary. The 9/11 human sacrifice event has been turned into a sort of
religious myth here in the United States—and that has been done so that
they can demonize the people who question the official story as heretics.
And that way they can prevent any rational scrutiny of the story, because
the official story falls apart instantly. It crumbles to dust under the most
superficial scrutiny,” Dr. Barrett said.
“So it’s great that Newsweek is at least poking another at least couple of
small holes in the story. The interesting part of this is that what it is about
is that FBI agents are now going on the record expressing their extreme
anger at the fact that they were prevented from looking at the alleged 9/11
hijackers, apparently by the CIA. These alleged hijackers were Saudi
agents. According to reports that I find convincing, they were actually CIA
agents,” he stated.
New Releases in Law
#7: The Watchdogs Didn't Bark: The CIA, NSA, and the Crimes of the
War on Terror by Ray Nowosielski, John Duffy https://t.co
/18XWdp8lLp #Kindle #Law pic.twitter.com/oZQj4Dt2o2
— KdlAzCA.bot (@KdlAzCA) September 1, 2018
“They were CIA assets from Saudi Arabia who were brought to the United
States. And the FBI saw that they were actually sheep-dipped in al-Qaeda,
that is that they were made to look like they had some kind of relationship
with al-Qaeda, and the FBI wanted to investigate them, and they were told
by higher-ups not to, hands off,” the analyst noted.
“And there were all sorts of reports about this. Congressman Curt Weldon
tried to investigate this about ten years ago and then his career was
destroyed as a result. So this is a sensitive topic. But it becomes even more
sensitive when we go one step beyond what Newsweek is reporting and
what this book is reporting and ask: ‘Why were higher-ups telling the FBI to
stay away from these guys who would be later blamed for the alleged 9/11
hijackings?’” he said.

5.
      
“The reason they are giving is that, well, perhaps the CIA was interested in
recruiting these guys, Khalid al-Mihdhar and Nawaf al-Hazmi among them,
and therefore the FBI would be getting in the way of their recruitment. But
that is a baby-step towards the actual truth, which is of course that the
people who ordered the FBI not to investigate these patsies, did so
precisely because these guys were being set up as proxies to be blamed
for the September 11 events that they really had nothing to do with other
than playing the role as patsies,” he stated.
“So this information does lead to the destruction of the official story of
9/11. And it leads towards the full truth that this was a false flag event, that
the World Trade Center was blown up with explosives. It just did not fall
down because of the minor office fire kindled by kerosene,” Dr. Barrett
argued.
Latest News
Iran's health minister resigns, Rouhani accepts
No deal Brexit ‘far more likely’ if MPs reject May’s deal
Riyadh says seeking death penalty for 5 in Khashoggi case
Entry of women into India temple sparks outcry, clashes
Niger's army ‘kills nearly 290 Boko Haram terrorists’
US troops, veterans weary of wars in Iraq, Afghanistan
French police arrest ‘Yellow Vest' leader in Paris
WATCH PRESS TV NEWS HEADLINES
New acting Pentagon chief calls China top priority
World through the aperture
‘China probe makes first-ever landing on far side of Moon’
US to conduct missile drill on Japan’s Okinawa: Report
'Israel acts like Nazis in dealing with Palestinian inmates'
Death toll rises to 37 in Russian building collapse
More Articles