Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

10/18/19 Letter (UIE-ICC & Michael Miller Matters)-Revised

524 views

Published on

17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE

The International Tribunal Matter That Brought About The USA's DESPOTISM Government Empire's DESTRUCTION and FALL!

REQUEST FOR “NEW” ICC REFERENCE NUMBER

DEMAND FOR INVESTIGATION(S) AND PROSECUTION(S) OF OFFICIALS/INDIVIDUALS INVOLVED IN THE AUGUST 28, 2018 AND MARCH 25, 2019 KIDNAPPING, FALSE IMPRISONMENT AND OTHER WAR CRIMES AGAINST THE UTICA INTERNATIONAL EMBASSY, ITS OFFICIAL – INTERIM PRIME MINISTER VOGEL DENISE NEWSOME – ALSO WAR CRIMES AGAINST CITIZENS/SUPPORTERS OF THE UTICA INTERNATIONAL EMBASSY

DEMAND FOR INVESTIGATION(S) AND PROSECUTION(S) OF OFFICIALS/INDIVIDUALS INVOLVED IN THE SEPTEMBER 21, 2019, MURDER OF PEARL LEO TORREY/TORRY NEWSOME AND OTHER WAR CRIMES…

DEMAND FOR FREEDOM OF “HOSTAGE” MICHAEL ANTHONY MILLER-EL – A/K/A BY THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA/UNITED STATES’ DESPOTISM GOVERNMENT EMPIRE AS MICHAEL ANTHONY MILLER
CUYAHOGA COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS (OHIO) – CRIMINAL CASE NO. 641058

Published in: News & Politics
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

10/18/19 Letter (UIE-ICC & Michael Miller Matters)-Revised

  1. 1. 17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE OCTOBER 18, 2019 DEMAND FOR INVESTIGATION(S) AND PROSECUTION(S) OF OFFICIALS/INDIVIDUALS INVOLVED IN THE AUGUST 28, 2018 AND MARCH 25, 2019 KIDNAPPING, FALSE IMPRISONMENT AND OTHER WAR CRIMES AGAINST THE UTICA INTERNATIONAL EMBASSY, ITS OFFICIAL – INTERIM PRIME MINISTER VOGEL DENISE NEWSOME – ALSO WAR CRIMES AGAINST CITIZENS/SUPPORTERS OF THE UTICA INTERNATIONAL EMBASSY DEMAND FOR INVESTIGATION(S) AND PROSECUTION(S) OF OFFICIALS/INDIVIDUALS INVOLVED IN THE SEPTEMBER 21, 2019, MURDER OF PEARL LEO TORREY/TORRY NEWSOME AND OTHER WAR CRIMES… DEMAND FOR FREEDOM OF “HOSTAGE” MICHAEL ANTHONY MILLER-EL – A/K/A BY THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA/UNITED STATES’ DESPOTISM GOVERNMENT EMPIRE AS MICHAEL ANTHONY MILLER CUYAHOGA COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS (OHIO) – CRIMINAL CASE NO. 641058
  2. 2. Page 1 of 95 17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE Page c/o Interim Prime Minister Vogel Denise Newsome Post Office Box 31265 - Jackson, Mississippi 39286 Toll Free - (888) 700-5056 Phone: (601) 885-3324 Website: www.uticainternationalembassy.website Email: interimpm@uticainternationalembassy.website October 18, 2019 1 TO: VIA EMAIL: International Criminal Court/The Office Of The Prosecutor – c/o Mark P. Dillon (Head of Information & Evidence Unit) - otp.informationdesk@icc-cpi.int Fadi El Abdallah/Spokesperson Fadi.El-Abdallah@icc- cpi.int ICC Public Affairs - PublicAffairs.Unit@icc-cpi.int VIA EMAIL and/or FACSIMILE: (202) 514-9769 and/or (202) 514-8844 Office Of The Solicitor General United States Department of Justice c/o Noel Francisco – Noel.Francisco@usdoj.gov 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW #5143 Washington, DC 20530 VIA EMAIL and/or FACSIMILE: (202) 225-8259 U.S. House Of Representatives ATTN: Nancy Pelosi – Speaker Of The House c/o Patti Ross – pattie.ross@mail.house.gov2 1236 Longworth H.O.B. Washington, DC 20515 VIA EMAIL and/or FACSIMILE: (202) 225-8259 U.S. House Of Representatives ATTN: Ilhan Omar - Congresswoman c/o Kelly Misselwitz – kelly.misselwitz@mail.house.gov 1517 Longworth H.O.B. Washington, DC 20515 VIA EMAIL and/or FACSIMILE: (410) 243-4095 Moorish Science Temple of America: The Asiatic Nation of North America c/o Hakim Elamenu-El, ALLI – Executive Ruler hakimelamenuel@yahoo.com 1050 East 33rd Street – Suite 206 Baltimore, Maryland 21218 VIA EMAIL and/or FACSIMILE: (601) 965-4409 United States Department of Justice/Attorney General c/o Carla J. Clark – carla.clark@usdoj.gov c/o D. Michael Hurst – mike.hurst@usdoj.gov 501 East Court Street – Suite 4.430 Jackson, MS 39201 VIA EMAIL and/or FACSIMILE: (212) 557-3528 venezuela@venezuelaonu.gob.be, venezuela@un.int Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela ATTN: President Nicolas Maduro c/o Permanent Mission of the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela to the United Nations 335 East 46th Street New York, NY 10017 VIA EMAIL and/or FACSIMILE: (212) 867-7086 Permanent Mission of the Islamic Republic Of Iran To the United Nations - iran@un.int ATTN: His Excellency Hassan Rouhani (President) 622 Third Avenue New York, NY 10017 FOREIGN NATIONS/LEADERS and the PUBLIC/WORLD-AT-LARGE RE: REQUEST FOR “NEW” ICC REFERENCE NUMBER DEMAND FOR INVESTIGATION(S) AND PROSECUTION(S) OF OFFICIALS/INDIVIDUALS INVOLVED IN THE AUGUST 28, 2018 AND MARCH 25, 2019 KIDNAPPING, FALSE IMPRISONMENT AND OTHER WAR CRIMES AGAINST THE UTICA INTERNATIONAL EMBASSY, ITS OFFICIAL – INTERIM PRIME MINISTER VOGEL DENISE NEWSOME – ALSO WAR CRIMES AGAINST CITIZENS/SUPPORTERS OF THE UTICA INTERNATIONAL EMBASSY DEMAND FOR INVESTIGATION(S) AND PROSECUTION(S) OF OFFICIALS/INDIVIDUALS INVOLVED IN THE SEPTEMBER 21, 2019, MURDER OF PEARL LEO TORREY/TORRY NEWSOME AND OTHER WAR CRIMES… DEMAND FOR FREEDOM OF “HOSTAGE” MICHAEL ANTHONY MILLER-EL – A/K/A BY THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA/UNITED STATES’ DESPOTISM GOVERNMENT EMPIRE AS MICHAEL ANTHONY MILLER CUYAHOGA COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS (OHIO) – CRIMINAL CASE NO. 641058 1 Boldface, Caps, Small Caps, Italics, and Underline, etc. are used for EMPHASIS! 2 PLEASE NOTE: Links/Internet Links provided and the documents/information contained therein as well as the Pictures and the information contained in them, are herein incorporated by reference as if set forth in full within this instant document. Information contained herein is based on Personal Knowledge, Research, Investigations, Interviews, Beliefs, etc. and at times have been cut and pasted for usage, etc.
  3. 3. 17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE Page 2 of 95 INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT REFERENCE: OTP-CR-367/18 Greetings! I, Vogel Denise Newsome (Interim Prime Minister [“IPM”] of the Utica International Embassy [“UIE”]) bring you Greetings on behalf of the UIE and its Officials and/or Citizens. This will confirm that we are in receipt of the International Criminal Court’s (“ICC”) letter dated, “Thursday, 04 April 2019,” in “Our Reference: OTP-CR-367/18.” With the recent March 25, 2019, Kidnappings of myself and my Mother (Pearl Leo Torrey/Torry Newsome) and the attempts made on our lives to have us Murdered, this letter will provide ICC Officials with an update as to what has and/or is transpiring. As ICC Officials may know, on September 21, 2019, the United States of America’s (“USA,” “US” and/or “United States”) Despotism Government Regime’s Nazis/Zionists with the assistance of my Siblings (Selina Ann Newsome, Edward Earl Newsome, Cloteal Jolquita Newsome Turner, Harvellia Lupene Newsome Thomas, Joe Lee Newsome, Geneva Rene/Renita Newsome Mosley, Maureen Arlean/Arleen Newsome Williams), Town of Utica Mississippi Officials (Kenneth Broome, Timothy Myles, Lisa Morris, Mary Moreland, Terence Crump, Melvin Wilson, Robin Robinson, George Walker, Aerrione Green, Calvin Williams, Doris Ross, Johnnie McDanial, Melvin J. Breeden Jr., June Hardwick, etc.), Hinds County Officials (Jody Owens, Robert Graham, Darrel McQuirter, Peggy Hobson Calhoun, Mike Morgan, Bobby “Bobcat” McGowan, Carmen Y. Davis, Victor Mason, etc.), State of Mississippi Officials (Dewey Phillip Bryant, James Matthew Hood, Perry Tate Sr., etc.) United States of America’s Officials (Donald John Trump, Melania Trump, Michael Richard Pence, Karen Sue Pence, William Jefferson Clinton, Hillary Diane Rodham Clinton, Albert Arnold Gore Jr., George Walker Bush, Laura Welch Bush, Richard Bruce Cheney, Lynne Ann Cheney, Barack Hussein Obama II, Michelle LaVaughn Robinson Obama, Joseph Robinette Biden Jr., Jill Tracy Biden, Nancy Pelosi, Addison Mitchell McConnell Jr., Elaine Lan Chao, Randal Howard Paul, Kelley Ashby Paul, Marco Antonio Rubio, John Glover Roberts Jr., Clarence Thomas, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Stephen Gerald Breyer, Samuel Anthony Alito Jr., Sonia Maria Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, Neil McGill Gorsuch, etc.) and their Legal Counsel Baker Donelson Bearman Caldwell & Berkowitz Attorney/Lawyers (Scott W. Pedigo, Amelia Williams Koch, and “ALL” other Attorneys/Employees employed, etc.) and other CO-Conspirators (James C. Duff, David Spears Addington), etc., were successful in each of their roles to bringing about the Murder/Death of my Mother in furtherance of “COUNT 4: Conspiracy To Murder” of the Criminal Complaint https://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/count-4-conspiracy-to-murder-for-uiecriminal-complaint being drafted – i.e. we advised of in our 12/06/18 Email and 01/07/19, correspondence submitted to the ICC and others! https://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/010719-utica-international-embassys-response-to-usa-shutdown-status-of- criminal-complaintcommunication We are presently updating the Charges in our Formal Criminal Complaint and are incorporating these Kidnappings as well as the attempts made on my life to Murder me as well as the Murder of my Mother Pearl Leo Torrey/Torry Newsome and now the recent July 2019, Kidnapping of Michael Anthony Miller-EL with attempts now being made on his life to have him murdered! These Kidnappings, attempted Murder efforts and Murder of my Mother are in keeping with the August 28, 2018, threats made by Timothy Myles who advised me during that Kidnapping, “We got something for you…” “They’re going to do it right this time!” Such threats which have manifested in keeping with the ongoing War Crimes and other criminal acts leveled against the UIE, its Officials, Citizens and others in Retaliation to our moving out as a “NEW” lawfully formed Government having satisfied the prerequisites and after making numerous notifications and efforts to afford the United States of America’s Despotism Government Officials to address the War Crimes, Terrorists, Racism/Discrimination and other Crimes being carried out under the direction and leadership of Nazis, Members of the Confederate States of America, Ku Klux Klan Members and Jews/Zionists that have INFILTRATED the USA’s Government as well as Control and Run it in their quest of a “NEW” World Order which seeks to make the WHITE Race “Supreme” over ALL other Races…!
  4. 4. 17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE Page 3 of 95 With that being said, we are requesting that the applicable Situation in United States of America – i.e. suggesting to be entitled, “Situation In USA – Utica International Embassy Matters” for Historical purposes, “UNIQUE” identification and in Memory of the UIE’s IPM’s Mother Pearl Leo Torrey/Torry Newsome! Due to such extraordinary and unique Historical undertakings, we are requesting that said Situation be opened in keeping with the September 2003, Paper On Some Policy Issues Before The Office Of the Prosecutor (“POSPIBTOOTP”); wherein, EXCERPT: https://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/090319-excerpt-from-international-criminal-courts- 092003-paper-on-some-policy-issues-before-the-office-of-the-prosecutor you have the support of National forces as the Utica International Embassy (“UIE”) and the Moorish Science Temple of America for the Asiatic Nation of North America (“MSTOA-ANOFNA”); wherein, I have been asked to serve as the Consulate General and accepted as both Nations move forward in such Historical VICTORIES, etc.! Our August 14, 2019, correspondence may be found at the following LINK: https://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/081419-uie-letter-for-micheal-anthony-millerel-with-confirmations A. DEMAND FOR INVESTIGATION(S) AND PROSECUTION(S) OF OFFICIALS/INDIVIDUALS INVOLVED IN THE AUGUST 28, 2018 AND MARCH 25, 2019 KIDNAPPING, FALSE IMPRISONMENT AND OTHER WAR CRIMES AGAINST THE UTICA INTERNATIONAL EMBASSY, ITS OFFICIAL – INTERIM PRIME MINISTER VOGEL DENISE NEWSOME – ALSO WAR CRIMES AGAINST CITIZENS/SUPPORTERS OF THE UTICA INTERNATIONAL EMBASSY In regards to the above referenced matter, we further state in support of same and reference to the POSPIBTOOTP – i.e. pictures have been added for emphasis - at: 1) At Page 2 (which states in part): In other words, the Prosecutor will need the support of national or international forces in order to investigate in situ. If these forces are not available, the Prosecutor will need to investigate from outside and rely on international co-operation for the arrest and surrender of the alleged perpetrators. . . .
  5. 5. 17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE Page 4 of 95 To the extent possible the Prosecutor will encourage States to initiate their own proceedings. As a general rule, the policy of the Office of the Prosecutor will be to undertake investigations only where there is a clear case of failure to act by the State or States concerned. . . . PLEASE BE ADVISED: We have evidence to support “clear cases of evidence” of the USA’s Despotism Government’s Officials “failure to act” on behalf of its State and/or USA and have repeatedly “failed to initiate proceedings” on the War Crimes, Terrorist Acts, Racist/Discriminatory, Human Rights Violations, and other Crimes, etc. reported to its Government Agencies and Officials/Lawyers, etc. by us and/or Citizens of the UIE and/or MSTOA-ANOFNA! Such evidence which we believe the ICC Officials already has knowledge of and/or the ability and resources available to them to obtain more (if required)! Furthermore, with the recent War Crimes, Kidnappings, Murder(s), Crimes Against Humanity, Acts Of Terrorism, etc. carried out against the UIE and MSTOA-ANOFNA Officials and Citizens, that a reasonable mind may conclude that the ICC has Jurisdiction of said matters and can move forward with Investigations and Prosecution of individuals that have perpetrated such atrocities reported herein as well as in the record of the ICC in other Situations before the Court addressing the USA’s Officials/Citizens, etc. active engagement in such atrocities within its own Lands/Territories and Abroad!
  6. 6. 17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE Page 5 of 95 2) At Page 4 of POSPIBTOOTP 1.1. The principle of complementarity The ICC is not intended to replace national courts, but to operate when national structures and courts are unwilling or unable to conduct investigations and prosecutions. . . . Consequently, in deciding whether to investigate or prosecute, the Prosecutor must first assess whether there is or could be an exercise of jurisdiction by national systems with respect to particular crimes within the jurisdiction of the Court. The Prosecutor can proceed only where States fail to act, or are not “genuinely” investigating or prosecuting, as described in article 17 of the Rome Statute.
  7. 7. 17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE Page 6 of 95 BAKER DONELSON TAMPERING & COACHING WITNESS IN TORTURE…HEARINGS Article 17 provides exceptions to the primacy of State jurisdiction. The Court will be able to declare a case to be admissible when a State is unwilling or unable genuinely to carry out the investigation or prosecution. A State is unwilling if the national decision has been made and proceedings are or were being undertaken for the purpose of shielding the person concerned from criminal responsibility; there has been an unjustified delay which is inconsistent with an intent to bring the person concerned to justice; or the proceedings were not or are not being conducted independently or impartially. To assess whether a State is unable to act, the Prosecutor will need to determine whether “due to a total or substantial collapse or unavailability of its national judicial system, the State is unable to obtain the accused or the necessary evidence and testimony or otherwise unable to carry out its proceedings”. This provision was inserted to take account of situations where there was a lack of central government, or a state of chaos due to the conflict or crisis, or public disorder leading to collapse of national systems which prevents the State from discharging its duties to investigate and prosecute crimes within the jurisdiction of the Court. . . . We are not asking the ICC to replace the courts of the USA/US, but to operate due to the fact that such national structures and courts have repeatedly been unwilling and unable to conduct investigations and prosecutions regarding the crimes that have been reported by UIE and MSTOA- ANOFNA… We believe that the evidence will support that the ICC has Jurisdiction by national systems to particular crimes as: Murder; Extermination; Enslavement; Deportation or forcible transfer of population; Imprisonment or other severe deprivation of physical liberty in violation of fundamental rules of international law; Torture; Rape, sexual slavery, enforced prostitution, forced pregnancy, enforced sterilization, or any other form of sexual violence of comparable gravity; Persecution against any identifiable group or collectivity on political, racial, national, ethnic, cultural, religious, gender…, or other grounds that are universally recognized as impermissible under international law, in connection with any act…or any crime within the jurisdiction of the Court; Enforced disappearance of persons, The crime of Apartheid; Other inhumane acts of a similar character intentionally causing great suffering, or serious injury to body or to mental or physical health… that are being carried out bythe USA/US’ Despotism Government’s Officials Nationallyand Internationally that is presenting an ever growing presence of threats to national and international security, peace, sovereignity, etc. Moreover, there is evidence to support the ICC’s Prosecutor(s) can proceed in that the USA/US has failed to act and/or is not genuinely investigating nor prosecuting as described in Article 17 of the Rome Statute. Furthermore, we incorporate a Video created in support of the MOCKERY of the USA’s Government Investigations by the likes of its Legal Counsel Baker Donelson Bearman Caldwell & Berkowitz (“Baker Donelson”) and how Investigations are obstructed and compromised for purposes of shielding/hiding the criminal activities and roles in War Crimes domestically/nationally as well as internationally;
  8. 8. 17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE Page 7 of 95 As of 10/17/19: https://vimeo.com/317716020 BAKER DONELSON TAMPERING & COACHING BAKER DONELSON WITNESS DAVID ADDINGTON IN TORTURE…HEARINGS wherein, the USA’s President Donald Trump (as recent as a 10/08/19 Tweet) also advised its tribunals as “Kangaroo Courts!” NOTE: How the White Man and its Mainstream Media “jumped on the bandwagon” to give Trump credit as if such a term is new! At least we know that the USA/US’ Legal Counsel and other Government Officials have read pleadings drafted by me in Legal matters! https://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/0091815-bankruptcy-hearing-transcribed-townsend-matter-photos-added
  9. 9. 17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE Page 8 of 95 https://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/082418-notice-of-nonattendance-091118-court-matter-town-of-utica-vs- newsome Pursuant to Article 17, “exceptions” exist to the “primacy of State Jurisdiction.” Therefore, the ICC will be able to declare the Case/Situation we seek as the USA/US is unwilling and/or unable genuinely to carry out the investigation(s) and/or prosecution(s) sought. We believe that there is sufficient evidence to support that the USA/US is unwilling because of a national decision has been made and proceedings are being undertaken to destroy evidence, obstruct justice, etc. for the purpose of shielding their President Donald Trump, Congressional Members, Judicial Members and their Lawyers/Attorneys of the Law Firm of Baker Donelson Bearman Caldwell & Berkowitz and their Co-Conspirators from criminal responsibility. Furthermore, there has repeatedly been unjustified delays as well as flat out refusal/failure to act on the War Crimes and/or Criminal Acts – i.e. as that investigated and prosecuted by the ICC – reported by us. Unjustified delays and/or failure to act are inconsistent with an intent to bring the person(s) to justice. Moreover, proceedings regarding our complaints that have been submitted by individuals who are now under our New Government(s) “were not or are not being conducted independently nor impartially.” We further believe that the evidence will support that the Prosecutor will find that there has been a “total or substantial collapse and/or unavailability for us to use the USA/US Judicial System.” Moreover, the USA/US and its Officials are unable and/or unwilling to obtain the accused and/or the necessary evidence and testimony as well as unable to carry out investigations, prosecutions and proceedings due to bias, financial interests, personal interests, conflict-of-interests, etc.! We believe that evidence support that the USA/US is currently in a “state of chaos due to the conflicts-of-interests, alleged impeachment inquiry proceedings that have been launched against their President Donald Trump, being implicated in the Situation in Afghanistan – i.e. fear of prosecution of Heads of State, Congressional Members, Military Members, etc., the collapse of the national system that has been infiltrated by Nazis/Zionists which prevents the USA/US from discharging its duties to investigate and prosecute crimes that are within the Jurisdiction of the ICC! 3) At Page 5 and 6 of POSPIBTOOTP It should however be recalled that the system of complementarity is principally based on the recognition that the exercise of national criminal jurisdiction is not only a right but also a duty of States. Indeed, the principle underlying the concept of complementarity is that States remain responsible and accountable for investigating and prosecuting crimes committed under their jurisdiction and that national systems are expected to maintain and enforce adherence to international standards. This principle is emphasised in the Preamble of the Rome Statute, recalling that “it is the duty of every State to exercise its criminal jurisdiction over those responsible for international crimes”. . . .
  10. 10. 17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE Page 9 of 95 1.2. What does complementarity imply for the Office of the Prosecutor? The exercise of the Prosecutor’s functions under article 18 of notifying States of future investigations will alert States with jurisdiction to the possibility of taking action them-selves. In a case where multiple States have jurisdiction over the crime in question the Prosecutor should consult with those States best able to exercise jurisdiction (e.g. primarily the State where the alleged crime was committed, the State of nationality of the suspects, the State which has custody of the accused, and the State which has evidence of the alleged crime) with a view to ensuring that jurisdiction is taken by the State best able to do so. We believe that there is evidence to support that the USA/US’ Despotism Government’s Officials think that they are “above the law” and “cannot be prosecuted!” Thus, are irresponsible, unaccountable and/or incompetent in the ability to investigate and prosecute the crimes reported to have been committed within the jurisdiction of the USA/US which exhibits that its national systems are not expected to maintain nor enforce adherence to national and/or international standards. Furthermore, concluding, that the USA/US does not believe it is “its duty to exercise its criminal jurisdiction over those responsible for domestic and/or international crimes”… Because of the Global and/or International impact that multiple States have suffered from the USA/US’ atrocities, there are multiple jurisdictions available to hold Trials for prosecution and where crimes were committed and/or continue to be committed and, we believe, such victimized States also have evidence of the crimes alleged that fall within the Jurisdiction of the ICC! On or about September 28, 2019, Nicaragua’s Foreign Minister Denis Moncada made a bold call, “to move the U.N. Headquarters out of the U.S. and also requests redesign the organization so that all countries can participate, allowing the U.N. to fulfill its original mandate.”
  11. 11. 17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE Page 10 of 95 https://twitter.com/telesurenglish/status/1178102389355765762 The UIE stand in support of Nicaragua’s Foreign Minister’s suggestion! This is a move that is long overdue, and, in the interest of global peace and security, etc. is advisement well taken! As the ICC may know of Nicaragua’s tenacity in its legal action against the USA/US in Nicaragua vs United States: https://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/nicaragua-vunited-statesnhighlighted We here at the UIE and MSTOA-ANOFNA have been adversely impacted by the USA/US’ Despotism Government Officials’ roles in such War Crimes and/or Crimes within the Jurisdiction of the ICC! Not only that, it appears from evidence published by US Senator Marco Rubio, knowledge of Juan Guaido – i.e. the person the USA/US’ Officials had swear himself in as Interim-President of the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela over President Nicolas Maduro – have connections with Terrorists, Paramilitary Groups, etc. and “IS” the Link and/or Nexus (with his National Assembly Members) that serves as an “INSIDE” Terrorist Cell for the USA/US’ Nazis/Zionists and is a TOP/KEY Witness to the atrocities he and Assembly Members voluntarily submitted themselves to be used in!
  12. 12. 17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE Page 11 of 95 My knowledge of the USA’s Ku Klux Klan’s Legal Counsel Baker Donelson Bearman Caldwell & Berkowitz being at the “Helm of the Ship” to carry out such Terrorist/Racist Attacks, led us to provide responses via Twitter on behalf of the Utica International Embassy. Responses which were met with “SWIFT” Retaliation by the Jews/Zionists in REPEATEDLY SUSPENDING Twitter Accounts for purposes of keeping the Public/World from learning the TRUTH!
  13. 13. 17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE Page 12 of 95 Venezuela’s President Nicolas Maduro seeing the Tweets from the Utica INTERNATIONAL Embassy, reached out via Twitter and asked us for support and NOT to allow the Invasion to happen. the UIE responded! 2. The global nature of the International Criminal Court Despite all efforts deployed to promote State action, it is clear that there will be cases in which national systems will not be able or willing to fulfil their principal duty of investigating and prosecuting the most serious crimes of concern to the international community as a whole. In such cases, the ICC must fill the gap created by the failure of States to satisfy their duty to investigate and the Office of the Prosecutor will need to exercise its investigative powers with firmness and efficiency, using the means and procedures provided by the Statute. . . .
  14. 14. 17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE Page 13 of 95 . . . The Prosecutor may also be asked to act in a situation where those who have the legitimate monopoly of force in a State are themselves the ones to commit the crimes, and the enforcement authorities in that State will consequently not be available to the Prosecutor. In circumstances such as these the Prosecutor will not be able to exercise his powers without the intervention of the international community, whether through the use of peacekeeping forces or otherwise; the Prosecutor will not be able to establish an office in the country concerned without being assured of its safety. He will also have to be assured that there will be the means available for investigation, protection of witnesses and arrest of suspects. . . . As the ICC Officials know, “despite all efforts deployed to promote State action,” there are cases (as this one) in which national systems will not be able or willing to fulfill their principal duty of investigating and prosecuting serious crimes as those in which we have repeatedly reported on that adversely impact the international community as a whole! Therefore, in such a Historical undertaking as this one, the ICC must step in and “fill the gap” created by the USA/US’ failure to satisfy their duty to investigate the numerous Complaints submitted by the UIE and/or MSTOA-ANOFNA. Moreover, the ICC’s Office of the Prosecutor “will need to exercise its investigative powers with firmness and efficiency, using the means and procedures provided by the Statute…” As we have set forth in the draft of “COUNT 4: Conspiracy To Murder,” there is evidence to support that in the USA/US, situations exist where (as in this case) that USA’s Legal Counsel Baker Donelson Bearman Caldwell & Berkowitz “have the legitimate monopoly of force” in the USA/US and said Law Firm “IS” the one planning, orchestrating and carrying out under its direction and leadership, War Crimes and/or crimes domestically and internationally. Therefore, the enforcement authorities (i.e. Executive Branch Officials, Legislative Branch Officials and Supreme Court Justices, etc.) will NOT be available to the ICC Prosecutor because said Branches of Government Officials are COMPLICIT in the War Crimes being carried out and are being FINANCIALLY compensated and/or rewarded through EMPLOYMENT, etc.! There is record evidence to support that “the very next day (April 5, 2019) after the ICC’s letter to the UIE, the USA/US revoked the VISA of the ICC’s Prosecutor!” We believe that this retaliatory measure was not only done to obstruct the administration of justice, but with the USA’s Nazis/Zionists’ knowledge of the Kidnapping of the UIE’s IPM! Acts in furtherance of conspiracies to have me Murdered were launched! When moving forward in March 2018, with the Utica International Embassy, this name was chosen for such purposes and interests – i.e. INTERNATIONAL! With that being said, the UIE will serve as the platform to unite and unify the International Community in this Historical undertaking and obtaining the support of International Communities to assist the ICC with intervention in such matters – i.e. through the use of the applicable peacekeeping forces or otherwise! We will further strive to work with the ICC to establish the applicable organizations needed to assure the safety of its Officials! Moreover, through said unification goals, obtain the means available for investigation(s), protection of witnesses (i.e. as myself and others through requested “Protective Orders/Injunctions,” etc.) and arrest of suspects…! As of 10/14/19: https://www.icc-cpi.int/about/witnesses
  15. 15. 17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE Page 14 of 95 Protection The Court has a number of protective measures that can be granted to witnesses, victims who appear before the Court and other persons at risk on account of testimony given by a witness. The Court's protection system is based on best practices which are aimed at concealing the witness's interaction with the Court from their community and from the public in general. Where Witnesses Reside Protective measures where witnesses reside aim to limit the witness's exposure to threats or provide an appropriate response to an identified threat. Measures must be proportional to the risk. When there are multiple suitable and available options for protective measures, the Court will choose those that are the least intrusive on the witness's wellbeing. These measures could include local protection measures, an assisted move or various security arrangements aimed at addressing the identified threat. Witness relocation is only used as a last resort, due to the immense burden this puts on the witnesses and their families. IMPORTANT TO NOTE: The failed efforts of the USA/US’ DESPOTISM Government Officials to take the UIE’s lawful approach in the formation of a “NEW” Government to try such method under a “SOCIALIST” Government serves as FURTHER evidence that the UIE is a Lawfully formed “NEW” Government within the Lands/Territories presently known as the United States of America! On May 6, 2019, the USA’s Nazis/Zionists going as far as to have a “KANGAROO” Court Hearing – i.e. DEPRIVING me access to Legal Resources and Documents, etc. – in their QUEST to railroad me through FRIVOLOUS USA Courts that I have been BANNED from! Therefore, affording us to bring our matters before “INTERNATIONAL” Tribunals as the ICC, etc.
  16. 16. 17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE Page 15 of 95 4) At Page 6 and 7 of POSPIBTOOTP Should the Office seek to bring charges against all alleged perpetrators? The Statute gives some guidance to answer this question. The Preamble affirms that “the most serious crimes of concern to the international community as a whole must not go unpunished”. It continues that States Parties to the Statute are determined to establish a “permanent International Criminal Court in relationship with the United Nations system, with jurisdiction over the most serious crimes of concern to the international community as a whole”. . . . 2.3 Modalities of investigation In order to prove the responsibility of leaders, the investigation must put emphasis on a comprehensive analysis of crimes committed, in order to piece together patterns and chains of command, and to collect the type of evidence making it possible to establish the criminal responsibility of those who designed the plans, gave the orders or otherwise supervised or failed to prevent the commission of crimes, in accordance with the Statute. We ask that the ICC bring the applicable charges against all alleged perpetrators and that said crimes committed by them do not go unpunished! As the ICC Officials note, the USA/US’ Officials have gone to great lengths to avoid prosecution. About December 2000, US President William “Bill” Clinton signed the 1998 Rome Treaty to establish an International Criminal Court! IMPORTANT TO NOTE: The USA/US President Clinton executed the 1998 Rome Treaty approximately NINE (9) Months before the USA’s Legal Counsel Baker Donelson Bearman Caldwell & Berkowitz and their CO-Conspirators carried out the September 11, 2001, DOMESTIC Terrorist Attacks on the World Trade Center Towers and other alleged targets for purposes of creating FALSE Narratives to launch War Crimes, etc. in the Middle East in their QUEST to push Adolf Hitler’s “World Order” Agenda!
  17. 17. 17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE Page 16 of 95 As of 11/06/18, an Article regarding the USA’s President Bill Clinton signing of the 1998 Rome Statute, may be found at the following LINK: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/1095580.stm While it is reported that the USA did NOT RATIFY said Treaty, information such as this may be used and will further SUPPORT the Complaint(s) to be submitted to the ICC! We do so to reaffirm our strong support for international accountability and for bringing to justice perpetrators of genocide, war crimes, and crimes against humanity. We do so as well because we wish to remain engaged in making the ICC an instrument of impartial and effective justice in the years to come. . . The treaty requires that the ICC not supersede or interfere with functioning national judicial systems; that is, the ICC prosecutor is authorised to take action against a suspect only if the country of nationality is unwilling or unable to investigate allegations of egregious crimes by their national. - - U.S. President Bill Clinton! The Clinton Administration signed the Rome Statute in 2000, but did not submit it for Senate ratification. The George W. Bush Administration, the U.S. administration at the time of the ICC’s founding, stated that it would not join the ICC. The Obama Administration subsequently re- established a working relationship with the Court as an observer… U.S. President Bill Clinton originally signed the Rome Statute in 2000. Signature of a treaty provides a preliminary endorsement, but a treaty that is signed but not ratified is not legally binding. Signing does not create a binding legal obligation, but does demonstrate the State’s intention to examine the treaty domestically and consider ratifying it, and it obliges the State to refrain from acts that would counter or undermine the treaty’s objective and purpose... After the Rome Statute reached the requisite 60 ratifications in 2002, President George W. Bush‘s Administration sent a note to the U.N. Secretary-General on May 6, 2002. The note informed the Secretary-General that the U.S. no longer intend to ratify the Rome Statute, and that it did not recognize any obligation toward the Rome Statute. The Obama Administration stated its intent to cooperate with the ICC. Cooperation with the Assembly of States Parties of the ICC was a key component of the Obama Administration’s first National Security Strategy. On November 16, 2009, the Ambassador-at-Large for War Crimes Issues, Stephen Rapp, announced that he would lead the U.S. delegation to the ICC’s annual meeting of the Assembly of States Parties in The Hague. He told journalists “Our government has now made the decision that Americans will return to engagement at the ICC.”,.. - - As of 10/14/19: https://www.iapss.org/2018/10/23/history-of-the-us-international-criminal-court-relations/
  18. 18. 17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE Page 17 of 95 It is the USA’s Legal Counsel Baker Donelson Bearman Caldwell & Berkowitz who PLANNED, ORCHESTRATED and CARRIED OUT the September 11, 2001, Domestic Terrorist Attacks on the World Trade Center Towers and NOT Osama Bin Laden! Can we LAY OUT THE FACTS and EVIDENCE? YES! 1) According to Hillary Clinton – i.e. who served as First Lady under USA/US President William “Bill” Clinton, US Senator for the State of New York, US Secretary of State under USA/US President Barack Obama, and ran for President of the USA/US and LOST each time, she ACKNOWLEDGES that under President Ronald Regan…the USA/US’: a) “CREATION” of Terrorist Forces in the Pakistan Region – i.e. as Mujahideen, Al Qaeda, ISIS, etc. (from research, there is evidence of USA/US Relationship with the Bin Laden Family, etc. before the September 11, 2001, DOMESTIC Terrorist Attacks on the World Trade Center Towers and other alleged Targets!) b) “EQUIPPING” the USA/US Terrorist Forces with “stinger missiles and everything else” to go inside Afghanistan… c) “TRAINING” and “LEAVING” the USA/US Terrorist Forces in the Middle East Region… d) “ADMISSION” to leaving Terrorist Group(s) “WELL ARMED” and “CREATION” of a “MESS!” e) “NOW FIGHTING” the Terrorists the USA/US “CREATED, TRAINED and SUPPORTED!” Slideshare: https://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/hillary-clinton-united-states-of-americas-terrorist- roles
  19. 19. 17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE Page 18 of 95 PATTERN OF PRACTICE HAVE CHASED RUSSIA INTO AFGHANISTAN HAVE CHASED RUSSIA INTO SYRIA HAVE CHASED RUSSIA INTO NORTH KOREA HAVE CHASED RUSSIA INTO VENEZUELA…. USING USA TERRORIST CELLS and SCRIPTS Slideshare: https://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/040717-u-s-ambassador-nikki-haley-confesses-to- united-states-war-of-aggression-on-040617-in-syria-airstrikes We believe that there is sufficient evidence to support the Prima Facie requirements have been met to support the USA/US’ DESPOTISM Government Officials’, their Legal Counsel Baker Donelson’s and CO-Conspirators’ engagement in “WAR OF AGGRESSION” against Sovereign Nations/States. Wherein a PATTERN-OF-PRACTICE can be established regarding the Sovereignty of other States of the USA/US’ War of Aggression:  Declaration of War “WITHOUT” probable cause  INVASION of USA’s Armed Forces, “WITHOUT” a Declaration of War, of the Territory of ANOTHER State  ATTACKS by USA’s Land, Naval or Air Forces, “WITHOUT” a Declaration of War, on the Territory, Vessels or Aircraft of ANOTHER State  NAVAL “BLOCKADE” of the “COASTS or PORTS” of ANOTHER State  USA’s “PROVISION OF SUPPORT” to its Terrorist Cells/Members through “UNLAWFUL” Sanctions against “SOVEREIGN” Nations for purposes of FINANCING USA Terrorism within the Territory of ANOTHER State  “REQUEST” of “UNLAWFULLY Invaded” States to use “ALL Power” to “DEPRIVE” USA’s Terrorist Cells/Members of “ALL” ASSISTANCE/PROTECTION…
  20. 20. 17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE Page 19 of 95 Slideshare: https://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/hillary-clinton-dealing-with-the-united-states-of- americas-stingers Hillary Clinton providing TESTIMONY of USA/US’: i) History of moving in and out of Pakistan. ii) The allege Terrorists being fought are those with the USA/US “FUNDING” and “SUPPORT!” iii) “PERSONAL VENDETTA” against Russia. iv) “CREATION” of Terrorist Cells (as Mujahideen, Al Qaeda, ISIS, etc.) in Pakistan/Afghanistan…- i.e. NOW being used throughout the Middle East and other Foreign Nations v) “CONSPIRACY” with REPUBLICAN President Ronald Reagan Administration and “DEMOCRAT-Led” Congress… vi) “DEALING” with the ISI – i.e. Pakistan’s Inter-Services Intelligence Agency – Pakistani Military… IMPORTANT TO NOTE: From research, we have found that the USA/US in its PERSONAL vendetta against Russia agreed to pay BILLIONS OF DOLLARS to Pakistan – i.e. moreover PRESSURED the Pakistan Government into joining their FRIVOLOUS “US War on Terrorism!”
  21. 21. 17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE Page 20 of 95 Since posting such information the USA’s Zionists have done their best to FINE-TUNE information: As of 06/06/12, here is the posting in SlideShare: https://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/pakistan-united-states-relations In keeping with the USA’s TRUE FORM of BETRAYAL, the Pakistan Government and its Officials, etc. have been left “HOLDING THE BAG” as the USA/US has abandoned them and CONTINUES to “SANCTION” said State as Hillary Clinton advised is done for States that OPPOSE the USA/US’!
  22. 22. 17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE Page 21 of 95 As of 10/16/19: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-pakistan-usa-sanctions/u-s-sanctions-pakistani-companies-over-nuclear-trade- idUSKBN1H20IO vii) “RECRUITMENT” of Mujahideen from “Saudi Arabia and other places…” IMPORTANT TO NOTE: The USA/US Department of Justice have EVIDENCE of Members of the USA’s Terrorist Cells (as Mujahideen) are part of the “NORTH American SUPPORT Cell designed to send money, physical assets, and mujahideen recruits to overseas jihad conflicts.” Operating from MANY cities within the Lands/Territories of the United States of America and SUPPORTED and COORDINATED with other support Networks and Mujahideen Groups engaging in VIOLENT War Crimes… --- As of 10/16/19 this information may be found at the following LINKS: https://www.justice.gov/archive/opa/pr/2005/November/05_crm_624.html http://uticainternationalembassy.website/index.php/k2/11-22-05-jose-padilla-charged-with-conspiracy-to-murder
  23. 23. 17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE Page 22 of 95 From Hillary Clinton’s TESTIMONY, she shared how the USA/US created the Terrorist Cell of the Mujahideen. Therefore, we believe a reasonable mind may conclude from US Department of Justice information that Terrorist Cell Members of the Mujahideen were brought to the USA for TRAINING, etc. viii) “IMPORTING” Saudi Arabia’s “WAHABI-Brand of Islam…” ix) “CREATION of Terrorist Cell STINGERS” throughout the Middle East Region x) “PLANTING MINES along the BOARDERS…” xi) “ABRUPTLY CUTTING OFF Relationships” with Nations and their Leaders and Military… xii) “ABUSING SANCTIONING POWERS” against Nations BETRAYED!
  24. 24. 17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE Page 23 of 95 https://books.google.com/books?id=MRA2jIyejwAC&pg=PA345&lpg=PA345&dq=Cheney%27s+Guys+barely+known+outsi de+Washington%27s+corridors+of+%22power,+but+David+Addington+is+the+most+powerful+man+you%27ve+never+hear d+of%22&source=bl&ots=3xnMk09BWw&sig=ACfU3U3k_JAue5Yxk4EGN4Ylp1d- dSTv5Q&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiut-XU-KHlAhVIQ6wKHZWtA7kQ6AEwBHoECAkQAQ
  25. 25. 17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE Page 24 of 95 The referenced May 29, 2006, U.S. News & World Report Article entitled, "Cheney's Guy. He's barely known outside Washington's corridors of power, but David Addington is the most powerful man you've never heard of. Here's why," was published also at LINKS provided here: https://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php/David_S._Addington However, only AFTER being PUBLISHED in my SlideShare Forum (about October 1, 2012) this Article has since been REMOVED! WHY The David Spears Addington Information Is IMPORTANT! Under Baker Donelson’s “PLANNING” Stage of the 9/11 Attacks which occurred during US President Ronald Regan’s (who was suffering from Alzheimer) Administration, Addington served as: Assistant General Counsel – Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) Counsel – House Permanent Select Intelligence Committee Counsel – House International Relations Committee Special Assistant For Legislative Affairs – Office Of Intergovernmental Affairs White House Deputy Assistant – Executive Office of the President
  26. 26. 17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE Page 25 of 95 It was also during the President Reagan Administration, Baker Donelson sent in their Attorney Howard Henry Baker Jr. to serve as his “CHIEF OF STAFF!” Baker who “prior” to said position served as the “MAJORITY” Leader of the US Senate! Baker was the “FIRST” Republican to be elected to the US Senate in Tennessee (Member State of the Confederate States of America) since the “RECONSTRUCTION” Era! As of 10/17/19: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Howard_Baker Preserved at: https://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/bd-howard-baker-wiki-info
  27. 27. 17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE Page 26 of 95 Reconstruction, in U.S. history, the period (1865–77) that followed the American Civil War and during which attempts were made to redress the inequities of slavery and its political, social, and economic legacy and to solve the problems arising from the readmission to the Union of the 11 states that had seceded at or before the outbreak of war. Long portrayed by many historians as a time when vindictive Radical Republicans fastened black supremacy upon the defeated Confederacy, Reconstruction has since the late 20th century been viewed more sympathetically as a laudable experiment in interracial democracy… - - As of 10/17/19: https://www.britannica.com/event/Reconstruction-United-States-history By the end of the Civil War, the South was in a state of political upheaval, social disorder, and economic decay. The Union’s tactics of total war destroyed southern crops, plantations, and entire cities, and hundreds of thousands of emancipated slaves rushed to Union lines as their masters fled the oncoming Union army. Inflation became so severe that by the end of the war a loaf of bread cost several hundred Confederate dollars. Thousands of southerners starved to death, and many who did not starve lost everything they owned: clothing, homes, land, and slaves. As a result, by 1865, policymakers in Washington had the nearly impossible task of southern Reconstruction. Reconstruction encompassed three major initiatives: restoration of the Union, transformation of southern society, and enactment of progressive legislation favoring the rights of freed slaves...—As of 10/17/19: https://www.sparknotes.com/history/american/reconstruction/context/ As of 10/17/19: https://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/united-states-of-americas-ku-klux-klan-run-government During US President George H. W. Bush’s (father of George W. Bush) Administration, keep in mind that Baker Donelson did a “DRY RUN” launching the 1993 Attacks on the World Trade Center Towers – i.e. it appears “FRAMING” others (as Eyad Ismoil) for the USA’s DOMESTIC Terrorist Attacks and War Crimes…
  28. 28. 17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE Page 27 of 95 For instance, according to information published regarding Eyad Ismoil, who claimed his innocence regarding the alleged Terrorist Attacks on the World Trade Center in 1993, it states: According to Ismoil's attorney, Louis Aidala, Ismoil was tricked into cooperating with the others, and had in fact loaded the explosives into the van, thinking they were cleaning supplies. Throughout the trial, Ismoil continued to maintain his innocence, saying: "Jail me and you will add one number to the wrong list. But don't think that you will ever rest because tyrants always end up in trouble." https://govinfo.library.unt.edu/911/report/911Report_Ch3.htm (This document has been preserved). Under the US President George H.W. Bush’s Administration, David Addington served as: Special Assistant To Secretary of Defense Dick Cheney Republican Staff Director – Senate Select Intelligence Committee It appears from research that under the “ORCHESTRATION” phase of Baker Donelson and their CO-Conspirators setting up for the September 11, 2001, DOMESTIC Terrorist Attacks on the World Trade Center Towers and other alleged Targets under US President William “Bill” Clinton’s Administration, they relied on KNOWLEDGE and INFORMATION of Employees – i.e. as Albert Randall (who served as Assistant Chief Counsel, Legislation) of the Federal Aviation Administration (“FAA”) to obtain documents on the allege Airline(s) to be used as well as Flight Records! As with US President Donald Trump, who has a great deal of time to spend on “TWITTER” to ENTERTAIN and present DISTRACTIONS because he is merely a “FRONT” under the USA’s Despotism Government Empire; so it was with US President William “Bill” Clinton. Bill Clinton also had a great deal of time to play around with Monica Lewinsky – i.e. the DISTRACTION used by Baker Donelson to “ENTERTAIN” the Public/World as they moved forward with their 9/11 DOMESTIC Terrorism Agenda! As of 10/17/19, the Monica Lewinsky information may be found at the following LINKS: https://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/lewinsky- monicawikipedia-info https://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/monica- lewinsky-president-clinton-scandal
  29. 29. 17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE Page 28 of 95 According to information published on Baker Donelson’s website, as of 10/17/19, it THRIVES on BOASTING about Albert Randall’s “25-year career with the Federal Aviation Administration as the Assistant CHIEF Counsel for LEGISLATION!” Baker Donelson recruiting and employing TOP/KEY FAA Officials and then RELISHING and BROADCASTING such achievements PUBLICLY to ANNOUNCE their SUCCESSES! Mr. Randall joined Baker Donelson after a 25-year career with the Federal Aviation Administration. He previously served as the FAA's Assistant Chief Counsel for Legislation, overseeing the agency's participation in several hundred Congressional hearings on the full- range of aviation issues, including matters such as security, air traffic control, safety regulations, air carrier surveillance, and airport funding. - - https://www.bakerdonelson.com/Albert-B-Randall As of 10/1719: https://www.bakerdonelson.com/aviation-and-aerospace Then you also have Linda Daschle, who under US Presidents Reagan or George H.W. Bush, served as: Director/Regional Director – Civil Aeronautics Director, Federal Affairs – Air Transport Association of America Senior Vice President – American Association of Airport Executives
  30. 30. 17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE Page 29 of 95 As of 10/16/19: https://aireon.com/company/board-of-directors/linda-hall-daschle/ Under President Bill Clinton, Linda Daschle served as: Deputy Administrator – Federal Aviation Administration Acting Administrator – Federal Aviation Administration Senior Public Policy Advisor – Federal Aviation Administration (i.e. going straight to Baker Donelson upon leaving the FAA - - as did her husband Thomas Daschle [a former US Senator who sought to be Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services but FAILED] under US President Barack Obama) As of 10/16/19: https://www.opensecrets.org/revolving/rev_summary.php?id=50112 On September 11, 2001, the United States of America’s Legal Counsel Baker Donelson Bearman Caldwell & Berkowitz pulled off one of the MOST HIDEOUS and HORRIFIC “DOMESTIC” Terrorist Attacks on USA Soil and FRAMED other individuals for their WAR Crimes and other ATROCITIES for purposes of launching their “WAR on Terrorism” SCAM for purposes of beginning Wars in the Middle East Region in their QUEST to gain control of the STATES and their RESOURCES in said Region and to push the “WHITE” Supremacist Agenda and/or the “NEW” World Order Agenda designed after Adolf Hitler’s World Order Agenda!
  31. 31. 17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE Page 30 of 95 Under Baker Donelson’s “CARRYING OUT” Stage of the 9/11 Attacks which occurred during US President George W. Bush’s Administration, Addington served as: Legal Counsel – Vice President’s Office Chief of Staff – Executive Office of the President The USA’s Legal Counsel Baker Donelson, with KNOWLEDGE of the onslaught of War Crimes and other criminal activities to be carried out! About October 2001, the USA and its “EUROPEAN” Allies moved “SWIFTLY” to launch a BARRAGE of War Crimes and other Crimes in the Middle East Region and BEYOND, etc. using Afghanistan as their “LAUNCHING PAD” for the “NEW” World Order Agenda!
  32. 32. 17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE Page 31 of 95 As of 10/17/19: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/War_in_Afghanistan_(2001%E2%80%93present) So, given such FACTUAL EVIDENCE, Baker Donelson’s Lawyers/Attorneys/Employees and their CO-Conspirators and Clients, etc. - as the USA/US’ DESPOTISM Government Officials/Employees - are “ALLOWING” the use of the USA’s Executive, Legislative and Judicial Branches of Government to be used to “CARRY OUT” such GLOBAL and INTERNATIONAL Atrocities against other STATES, their Leaders/Officials/Citizens, etc. Said Law Firm of Baker Donelson (i.e. Lawyers/Attorneys who are WHITE Supremacists, Members of the Confederate State of America and Ku Klux Klan, etc.) was allowed to INFILTRATE and TAKE CONTROL of the USA’s Government and create a “DESPOTISM” Empire and move forward with their “NEW” World Order “SLAVERY” Agendas of People-Of-Color and/or Nations-Of-Color! Under “COUNT 4: Conspiracy To Murder” we here at the Utica INTERNATIONAL Embassy set forth “HOW” the USA’s Legal Counsel Baker Donelson and its CO-Conspirators have taken Adolf Hitler’s “WORLD Order” Agenda and are IMPLEMENTING it today under the GUISE of the “NEW World Order!” As of 10/17/19: https://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/count-4-conspiracy-to-murder-for-uiecriminal- complaint To GAIN control and running of the United States Department of Justice and its Agencies (as the Federal Bureau of Investigation since infiltration of the Central Intelligence Agency occurred during David Addington’s Employment as “Assistant General Counsel” for the CIA, etc.) during the LAUNCHING of the September 11, 2001, World Trade Center DOMESTIC Terrorist Attacks, Baker Donelson placed their Lawyer Lee Rawls in position as Counsel/Chief of Staff for the Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (“FBI”) – Robert Mueller. So, at the time of the September 11, 2001, Domestic Terrorist Attacks, you have Baker Donelson Lawyers/Attorneys serving as “CHIEF OF STAFF” for the FBI and David Addington serving as “CHIEF OF STAFF” for US Vice President Richard “Dick” Cheney for purposes of what are known as these “FOXES Guarding the HENHOUSE!”
  33. 33. 17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE Page 32 of 95 We believe that there is sufficient evidence to prove the responsibility of the USA/US’ Despotism Government and the Nazis/Zionists that control and run said Despot! Investigation(s) that put emphasis on the comprehensiveness of the crimes committed, which will support a “Pattern-Of-Practice” and “Chains Of Command” needed to establish the criminal responsibility of USA/US Officials and their Legal Counsel Baker Donelson and their Co-Conspirators that “designed the plans, gave the orders or otherwise supervised or failed to prevent the commission of crimes, in accordance with the Statute!” As of 10/09/19: https://www.icc-cpi.int/about/witnesses PROTECTION: The Court has a number of protective measures that can be granted to witnesses, victims who appear before the Court and other persons at risk on account of testimony given by a witness. The Court's protection system is based on best practices which are aimed at concealing the witness's interaction with the Court from their community and from the public in general. WHERE WITNESSES RESIDE: Protective measures where witnesses reside aim to limit the witness's exposure to threats or provide an appropriate response to an identified threat. Measures must be proportional to the risk. When there are multiple suitable and available options for protective measures, the Court will choose those that are the least intrusive on the witness's wellbeing. These measures could include local protection measures, an assisted move or various security arrangements aimed at addressing the identified threat. Witness relocation is only used as a last resort, due to the immense burden this puts on the witnesses and their families. We are here before the ICC, because as the Leader of the UIE, I have been BANNED from bringing matters before USA/US Courts. Thus, being deprived of protected Rights, Privileges, and Immunities afforded me under the laws of the USA! With that being said, as a Native (a Descendant of individuals ALREADY inhabiting and occupying the Lands/Territories during the time that Europeans CLAIM Christopher Columbus’ “DISCOVERY”) …
  34. 34. 17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE Page 33 of 95 who just happened to be born abroad (in Germany) and in 1972 was provided with a nice “Certificate of Citizenship,” we are moving forward on and are using said credentials to present our matters before the ICC as we “DENOUNCE” the USA/US’ War Crimes… and seek to RETRIEVE our Lands/Territories (i.e. challenging/enforcing Treaties), Nationality, Culture, Heritage, Traditions, etc. that have been STOLEN! On or about September 7, 2018, the Utica INTERNATIONAL Embassy moved forward in NOTIFYING of the August 28, 2018, KIDNAPPING and other War Crimes against me as its Interim Prime Minister! https://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/090718-notice-of-the-august-28-2018-kidnapping-request-for- icc-reference-number
  35. 35. 17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE Page 34 of 95 About 09/11/18 (approximately TWO days later), the USA/US Officials began to PUBLICLY ANNOUNCE their THREATS against the ICC Judges if they pursue PROSECUTION of Americans for WAR Crimes in Afghanistan… https://www.france24.com/en/20180910-usa-trump-threatens-arrest-icc-judges-american-soldiers-afghan- war-crimes https://www.dw.com/en/us-threatens-to-arrest-icc-judges-over-war-crimes-probe/a-45435900 https://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2018/09/11/world/politics-diplomacy-world/u-s-threatens-arrest-icc- judges-probe-americans-alleged-war-crimes-afghanistan/
  36. 36. 17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE Page 35 of 95 Said notification is important in that it set off a CHAIN OF HISTORICAL EVENTS exposing the USA/US Officials’ RETALIATION and issuance of THREATS against the International Criminal Court Officials/Judges/Prosecutors, etc. “AFTER” learning of our Lawfully UTILIZING International Laws and/or Tribunals to handle Investigations and Prosecution rather than rely on Baker Donelson’s and their Nazis/Zionists’ JUDICIAL System! https://www.npr.org/2018/09/11/646591434/u-s-will-retaliate-if-icc-tries-to-prosecute-americans-bolton-says As of 10/17/19: https://www.rferl.org/a/explainer-why-does-u-s-have-it-out-for-international-criminal-court- /29484529.html
  37. 37. 17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE Page 36 of 95 Let me be very clear! We (the Utica International Embassy as well as the Moorish Science Temple of America for the Asiatic Nation of North America) are here to ENFORCE the Laws and will NOT allow the USA’s DESPOTISM Government Regime’s Officials and the Nazis/Zionists that CONTROL and RUN said DESPOT to “ENSLAVE” our Nations/Governments and their Leaders/Citizens and continue to hold them “HOSTAGE” and as “SLAVES!” Our Leaders as myself (of the UIE) and the Honorable Drew Ali (of the MSTOA-ANOFNA) have taken the LAWFUL and NECESSARY steps to secure our FREEDOMS from such CRIMINAL Empires as the USA/US and their WAR Crimes… Enforcers! We take the THREATS of the USA/US Officials against the ICC, its Judges/Officials/Prosecutors very seriously and “DENOUNCE” the furtherance of such WAR Crimes…. Practices that are done for purposes such as follows: OBSTRUCTING JUSTICE INTIMIDATION HARASSMENT THREATS COERCION BLACKMAIL, etc. Furthermore, we are ASSERTING International Laws/Statutes (as the Rome Statute) and other governing Laws to support that the USA/US, its Officials/Employees/Lawyers, etc. are NOT immune from! For instance, the Rome Statute states in part: Section 1.01 Article 54 - Duties and Powers of the Prosecutor With Respect To Investigations 1. The Prosecutor shall: a. In order to establish the truth, extend the investigation to cover all facts and evidence relevant to an assessment of whether there is criminal responsibility under this Statute, and, in doing so, investigate incriminating and exonerating circumstances equally; b. Take appropriate measures to ensure the effective investigation and prosecution of crimes within the jurisdiction of the Court, and in doing so, respect the interests and personal circumstances of victims and witnesses, including … health, and take into account the nature of the crime…; and c. Fully respect the rights of persons arising under this Statute. 2. The Prosecutor may conduct investigations on the territory of a State: a. In accordance with the provisions of Part 9; or b. As authorized by the Pre-Trial Chamber under article 57, paragraph 3 (d). Authorize the Prosecutor to take specific investigative steps within the territory of a State Party without having secured the cooperation of that State under Part 9 if, whenever possible having regard to the views of the State concerned, the Pre-Trial Chamber has determined in that case that the State is clearly unable to execute a request for cooperation due to the unavailability of any authority or any component of its judicial system competent to execute the request for cooperation under Part 9; - - - Article 57 Paragraph 3(d) 3. The Prosecutor may: a. Collect and examine evidence; b. Request the presence of and question persons being investigated, victims and witnesses; c. Seek the cooperation of any State or intergovernmental organization or arrangement in accordance with its respective competence and/or mandate;
  38. 38. 17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE Page 37 of 95 d. Enter into such arrangements or agreements, not inconsistent with this Statute, as may be necessary to facilitate the cooperation of a State, intergovernmental organization or person; e. Agree not to disclose, at any stage of the proceedings, documents or information that the Prosecutor obtains on the condition of confidentiality and solely for the purpose of generating new evidence, unless the provider of the information consents; and f. Take necessary measures, or request that necessary measures be taken, to ensure the confidentiality of information, the protection of any person or the preservation of evidence. As of 10/17/19: https://www.icc-cpi.int/resourcelibrary/official-journal/rome- statute.aspx#article54 In my recent Kidnapping and the attempts made on my life to have me Murdered, the USA’s Legal Counsel Baker Donelson Bearman Caldwell & Berkowitz used one of their State Agencies (State of Mississippi) to bring legal matters against me in the Hinds County (Mississippi) Chancery Court located in Jackson, Mississippi. Having knowledge that they would NOT be able to defeat me in a Courtroom, “ALL” access to Legal Resources were DENIED me; nevertheless, “shackled in chains – i.e. wrist and ankles” they set the stage for one of the most HISTORICAL defeats in the USA/US Records and we are here to move forward and seek the applicable Restitution and Relief afforded to us under National and International Laws from Individuals and/or Officials employed and acting on behalf of the United States of America, State of Mississippi, Hinds County Mississippi, Town of Utica Mississippi, etc. that were recruited to carry out such hideous atrocities on me as well as my Mother Pearl Leo Torrey/Torry Newsome! As you may know, when Kidnapped and taken HOSTAGE, it is about Survival and making the right decisions when under duress, being subjected to daily torture techniques, threats to life, etc. so that one lives to share the TESTIMONIES of such horrific atrocities… and bring the Criminals to JUSTICE! 18 U.S. Code § 2441 - War crimes (a) Offense. Whoever, whether inside or outside the United States, commits a war crime, in any of the circumstances described in subsection (b), shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for life or any term of years, or both, and if death results to the victim, shall also be subject to the penalty of death. (b) Circumstances. The circumstances referred to in subsection (a) are that the person committing such war crime or the victim of such war crime is a member of the Armed Forces of the United States or a national of the United States (as defined in section 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act).
  39. 39. 17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE Page 38 of 95 (c) Definition. As used in this section the term “war crime” means any conduct: (1) defined as a grave breach in any of the international conventions signed at Geneva 12 August 1949, or any protocol to such convention to which the United States is a party; (2) prohibited by Article 23, 25, 27, or 28 of the Annex to the Hague Convention IV, Respecting the Laws and Customs of War on Land, signed 18 October 1907; (3) which constitutes a grave breach of common Article 3 (as defined in subsection (d)) when committed in the context of and in association with an armed conflict not of an international character; or . . . (d) Common Article 3 Violations. (1) Prohibited conduct. In subsection (c)(3), the term “grave breach of common Article 3” means any conduct (such conduct constituting a grave breach of common Article 3 of the international conventions done at Geneva August 12, 1949), as follows: (A) Torture. The act of a person who commits, or conspires or attempts to commit, an act specifically intended to inflict severe physical or mental pain or suffering (other than pain or suffering incidental to lawful sanctions) upon another person within his custody or physical control for the purpose of obtaining information or a confession, punishment, intimidation, coercion, or any reason based on discrimination of any kind. (B) Cruel or inhuman treatment. The act of a person who commits, or conspires or attempts to commit, an act intended to inflict severe or serious physical or mental pain or suffering (other than pain or suffering incidental to lawful sanctions), including serious physical abuse, upon another within his custody or control.
  40. 40. 17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE Page 39 of 95 (C) Performing biological experiments. The act of a person who subjects, or conspires or attempts to subject, one or more persons within his custody or physical control to biological experiments without a legitimate medical or dental purpose and in so doing endangers the body or health of such person or persons. USA’S SECRET KILL LIST: https://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/obama-secret-kill-list-13166139 (D) Murder. The act of a person who intentionally kills, or conspires or attempts to kill, or kills whether intentionally or unintentionally in the course of committing any other offense under this subsection, one or more persons taking no active part in the hostilities, including those placed out of combat by sickness, wounds, detention, or any other cause.
  41. 41. 17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE Page 40 of 95 (E) Mutilation or maiming. The act of a person who intentionally injures, or conspires or attempts to injure, or injures whether intentionally or unintentionally in the course of committing any other offense under this subsection, one or more persons taking no active part in the hostilities, including those placed out of combat by sickness, wounds, detention, or any other cause, by disfiguring the person or persons by any mutilation thereof or by permanently disabling any member, limb, or organ of his body, without any legitimate medical or dental purpose. (F) Intentionally causing serious bodily injury. The act of a person who intentionally causes, or conspires or attempts to cause, serious bodily injury to one or more persons, including lawful combatants, in violation of the law of war. (G) Rape. The act of a person who forcibly or with coercion or threat of force wrongfully invades, or conspires or attempts to invade, the body of a person by penetrating, however slightly, the anal or genital opening of the victim with any part of the body of the accused, or with any foreign object. As of 10/17/19: https://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/032519-usas-kidnappingof-interim-prime-minister-vogel-denise- newsome (H) Sexual assault or abuse. The act of a person who forcibly or with coercion or threat of force engages, or conspires or attempts to engage, in sexual contact with one or more persons, or causes, or conspires or attempts to cause, one or more persons to engage in sexual contact.
  42. 42. 17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE Page 41 of 95 (I) Taking hostages. The act of a person who, having knowingly seized or detained one or more persons, threatens to kill, injure, or continue to detain such person or persons with the intent of compelling any nation, person other than the hostage, or group of persons to act or refrain from acting as an explicit or implicit condition for the safety or release of such person or persons. IMPORTANT TO NOTE: The August 28, 2018, THREATS issued by the Town of Utica, Mississippi’s Police Chief Timothy Myles THREATENING me advising, “We got something for you…” constitutes CONSPIRACY(S) and “They’re going to do it right this time…” and INTENT to make GOOD on such THREATS on my Life, Freedoms, Safety, Wellbeing, Peace, Security, etc. and are indeed THREATS that were acted upon AGAIN on March 25, 2019, when I was KIDNAPPED, FALSELY Imprisoned… and subjected to WAR Crimes and other Criminal Acts! 18 U.S. Code § 1513 - Retaliating Against A Witness, Victim… (a) (1) Whoever kills or attempts to kill another person with intent to retaliate against any person for— (A) the attendance of a witness or party at an official proceeding, or any testimony given or any record, document, or other object produced by a witness in an official proceeding; or . . . shall be punished as provided in paragraph (2).
  43. 43. 17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE Page 42 of 95 (2) The punishment for an offense under this subsection is— (A) in the case of a killing, the punishment . . .; and (B) in the case of an attempt, imprisonment for not more than 30 years…. (e) Whoever knowingly, with the intent to retaliate, takes any action harmful to any person, including interference with the lawful employment or livelihood of any person, for providing to a law enforcement officer any truthful information relating to the commission or possible commission of any Federal offense, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 10 years, or both. https://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/notice-of-eeoc-complaint-against-1-st-heritage- credit-llc-filed IMPORTANT TO NOTE: That the USA/US’ DESPOTISM Government Empire’s Nazis/Zionists have gone as far as allowing their Legal Counsel Baker Donelson, their CO-Conspirators and others with whom they conspired to further engage in WAR Crimes… and other Criminal Acts and have me BLACKLISTED and BANNED from employment! Unlawful practices which are also deemed to be WAR Crimes… Criminal Acts!
  44. 44. 17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE Page 43 of 95 There is sufficient evidence to support: EXCEPTIONAL Skillset to perform the duties assigned me by Employers: In another case (Lagies v. Copley, 110 Cal App 3d 958, 16 Cal Rptr 368), the plaintiff, . . .alleged that officials and managerial employees of his corporate employer abused their positions of authority over him by conduct including demotions, discriminatory treatment, denial of long- accepted avenues of advancement, and defamation of his reputation to his coworkers, . . . and to the public generally, apparently in retaliation for a story which offended the chairperson of the board. The complaint further charged that the individual defendants conspired to get plaintiff to quit, tarnish his reputation, and blackball him by preventing his being hired . . .; that they published his confidential sources thus destroying his credibility . . .; that they virtually isolated plaintiff in his place of employment rendering him a de facto pariah, . . ., assigning him to more and more degrading tasks . . .. Reversing a dismissal of the complaint, the court held the plaintiff alleged facts and circumstances which reasonably could lead trier of fact to conclude that defendants’ conduct was extreme and outrageous. The court noted that according to the pleadings, defendants intentionally humiliated plaintiff, . . . singled him out for denial of merit raises, . . ., blackballed him, thus precluding other employment, . . . thus destroying his credibility . . ., all without just cause or provocation. The court concluded that the pleadings charged more than insult and more than mere direction of job activities. Hundley v. Louisville & N.R. Co., 48 S.W. 429 (Ky.) - A conspiracy between defendant railroad company and other . . .companies to prevent discharged employees from obtaining employment, if unlawful, does not give an employee who has been discharged by defendant a right of action, unless the conspiracy has been carried out by the refusal to give him employment. . .
  45. 45. 17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE Page 44 of 95 . . .that while engaged in the discharge of his duties he was wrongfully, unlawfully, and maliciously discharged by it; that it wrongfully, unlawfully, and maliciously blacklisted him; that he was blacklisted wrongfully, unlawfully, maliciously, and falsely by its placing upon its records a pretended cause of discharge, to wit, neglect of duty, with a view of injuring and preventing him from entering its employment or that of other . . .companies; that it had entered into a conspiracy and combination with other . . .companies by which its employés discharged for cause will not be given employment by other. . . companies; that, on account of its false and malicious acts and its conspiracy with other . . .companies, he has been deprived of the right to again engage in the employment of the defendant or other . . . companies; that the wrongful acts mentioned were committed for the purpose of making, and had made, it impossible for him to ever again get employment from the defendant on any of its lines, or from other . . .companies in the United States; . . . It is the part of every man's civil rights to enter into any lawful business, and to assume business relations with any person who is capable of making a contract. It is likewise a part of such rights to refuse to enter into business relations, whether such refusal be the result of reason, or of whim, caprice, prejudice, or malice. If he is wrongfully deprived of these rights, he is entitled to redress. Every person sui juris is entitled to pursue any lawful trade, occupation, or calling. It is part of his civil rights to do so. He is as much entitled to pursue his trade, occupation, or calling, and be protected in it, as is the citizen in his life, liberty, and property. Whoever wrongfully prevents him from doing so inflicts an actionable injury. For every injury suffered by reason of a violent or malicious act done to a man's occupation, profession, or way of getting a livelihood, an action lies. Such an act is an invasion of legal rights. A man's trade, occupation, or profession may be injured to such an extent, by reason of a violent or malicious act, as would prevent him from making a livelihood. One who has followed a certain trade or calling for years may be almost unfitted for any other business. To deprive him of his trade or calling is to condemn, not only him, but perchance a wife and children, to penury and want. Public interests, humanity, and individual rights, alike, demand the redress of a wrong which is followed by such lamentable consequences. A . . company has the right to engage in its service whomsoever it pleases, and, as part of its right to conduct its business, is the right to discharge any one from its service, unless to do so would be in violation of contractual relations with the employé. It is the duty of a . . .company to keep in its service persons who are capable of discharging their important duties in a careful and skillful manner. The public interest, as well as the vast property interests of the company, require that none other should be employed by it. Its duty in this regard and its right to discharge an employé does not imply the right to be guilty of a violent or malicious act, which results in the injury of the discharged employé's calling. The company has the right to keep a record of the causes for which it discharges an employé, but in the exercise of this right the duty is imposed to make a truthful statement of the cause of the discharge. If, by an arrangement among the . . .companies of the country, a record is to be kept by them of the causes of the discharge of their employés, and when they are discharged for certain causes the others will not employ them, it becomes important that the record kept should contain a true statement of the cause of an employé's discharge. A false entry on the record may utterly destroy and prevent him from making a livelihood at his chosen business. Such false entry must be regarded as intended to injure the discharged employé; therefore a malicious act. . . .“A tort may be dependent upon, or independent of, contract. If a contract imposes a legal duty upon a person, the neglect of that duty is a tort founded on contract; so that an action ex contractu for the breach of contract, or an action ex delicto for the breach of duty, may be brought, at the option of the plaintiff.” It was one of the purposes of the common law to protect every person against the wrongful acts of every other person, and it did not matter whether they were
  46. 46. 17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE Page 45 of 95 committed by one person or by a combination of persons, and under it an action was maintainable for injuries done by disturbing a person in the enjoyment of any right or privilege which he had. It is said in Cooley, Torts, 278: “Thus, if one is prevented, by the wrongful act of a third party, from securing some employment he has sought, he suffers a legal wrong, provided he can show that the failure to employ him was the direct and natural consequences of the wrongful act.” It is said in 1 Add. Torts, 14: “When a violent or malicious act is done to a man's occupation, profession, or way of getting a livelihood, there an action lies in all cases.” The plaintiff does not seek to recover because he was discharged in violation of a contract which he had with the defendant. He does not allege that he had a contract with it to perform services for it for a given length of time. He seeks to recover damages for its alleged wrongful act in making the false entry upon its record against him, to prevent him from pursuing his calling by rendering it impossible for him to get employment from other . . .companies. . . The liability is damages for doing, not for conspiracy. The charge of conspiracy does not change the nature of the act. In an action for damages, there must be some overt act, consequent upon the agreement to do a wrong, to give the plaintiff a standing in a court of law. Jag. Torts, 638; Cooley, Torts, 279 as well as GOOD work ethics: As of 10/17/19: https://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/051212-complaint-exhibits-pkh-final As of 10/17/19: https://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/120310-complaint-mmsexhibits
  47. 47. 17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE Page 46 of 95 The information found in this document is further EVIDENCE of the USA’s Department of Labor’s DISCRIMINATORY and BIAS towards me in the handling of their Investigations; moreover, that the Charges/Complaints upon which the following Settlements were reached were made on LESS Threshold Requirements and Evidence (if any) than that presented in my Equal Employment Opportunity Complaints! As of 10/17/19: https://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/dol-whd-mississippi-actions-news-releaseofsettlements Website as of 10/17/19: http://www.dol.gov/whd/media/press/Southeast/default.asp We are confident that the USA/US’ DESPOTISM Government’s Nazis/Zionists will NOT be able to JUSTIFY their actions! Moreover, lawfully rebut our moving forward in the execution and implementation of our “OWN” Nations/Governments as permitted under National and International Laws governing said matters! There is record evidence that Baker Donelson’s Lawyers/Attorneys have abused their POWERS in holding positions as “DIRECTOR” of the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts and have attempted to “LABEL” me a “Serial Litigator” when I am not! Going as far as to DEPRIVE me “JURY Trials” because the USA/US DESPOTISM Government Officials and their Nazis/Zionists do NOT see me nor the Citizens of the UIE as well as the MSTOA-ANOFNA as Citizens but ONLY as “SLAVES” and or “BLACKS” under their “BLACK Code/JIM Crow Laws,” etc. without Rights, Privileges, Immunity, Sovereign Protection, etc.
  48. 48. 17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE Page 47 of 95 As of 10/17/19: https://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/united-states-abuse-of-the-serial-litigator- defense Baker Donelson going as far as using its position as Legal Counsel for the United States of America: to also place one of their Lawyers/Attorneys (James C. Duff) in the TOP/KEY position as Director of the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts that oversee and control Court proceedings in the USA/US. Placing Duff in this position to act as a GATEKEEPER in their ANTI-Vogel Denise Newsome System! A system put into place to obstruct “ALL” legal proceedings brought by me and “NOW” that of the UIE and MSTOA-ANOFNA!
  49. 49. 17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE Page 48 of 95 As of 10/17/19: https://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/021407-complaint-sla-99 JAMES C. DUFF: Director of the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts https://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/duff-jameswikipediaresignhighlighted-copy This instant photo provides information also regarding “HOW” Baker Donelson placed its Attorneys/Lawyers into TOP/KEY positions prior to their Domestic Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001, on the World Trade Center Towers and other alleged targets! For instance placing Lee Rawls in as Counsel/Chief of Staff for the Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (“FBI”) – Robert Mueller. So, at the time of the September 11, 2001, Domestic Terrorist Attacks, you have Baker Donelson Lawyers/Attorneys as: W. LEE RAWLS: Counsel/Chief of Staff to the Director Robert Mueller of the Federal Bureau of Investigation who was placed in this position approximately SEVEN (7) Days before Baker Donelson and CO-Conspirators carried out the Domestic Terrorist Attacks on the World Trade Center Towers and other alleged Targets: https://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/rawls-w-lee-baker-donelsonemployeesenior- counsel-to-fbi
  50. 50. 17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE Page 49 of 95 DAVID SPEARS ADDINGTON: Legal Counsel (2001-2005) and Chief of Staff (2005- 2009) to U.S. Vice President Dick Cheney (David Spears Addington) – Assistant General Counsel for the Central Intelligence Agency – Special Assistant to Legislative Affairs – Deputy Assistant to U.S. President Ronald Reagan – Special Assistant for the Secretary of Defense – General Counsel for the Department of Defense – provided extensive assistance to Dick Cheney when he was Chief Executive Officer for Halliburton (i.e. Emphasis – Info crucial to the failed U.S. Mission to invade Venezuela where Halliburton has an operation located) Understanding Role in AFGHANISTAN Matter: https://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/092812-david- addington-article-english Wikipedia Information: https://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/david-addington- wikipedia-baker-donelson-weapon Further supporting “WHY” we here at the UIE and MSTOA-ANOFNA are now able to bring our matters before the International Criminal Court and/or Foreign Tribunals for relief! As of 10/17/19: https://vimeo.com/317716020 BAKER DONELSON TAMPERING & COACHING BAKER DONELSON WITNESS DAVID ADDINGTON IN TORTURE…HEARINGS
  51. 51. 17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE Page 50 of 95 https://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/ex-34-091704-petition-seekingintervention-entergymatter https://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/092304-request-interventiondoj-mms-flsa-matter
  52. 52. 17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE Page 51 of 95 https://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/062606-fbi-complaint-mississippi-matter https://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/101308-fbi-complaint-gmm-properties https://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/122809-fbi-complaint-ohio-supreme-court
  53. 53. 17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE Page 52 of 95 https://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/092409-fbi-complaint-storall https://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/060910-fbi-complaint-public-storage
  54. 54. 17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE Page 53 of 95 https://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/063015-fbi-criminal-complaintanna-louise-inn-final THE KIDNAPPING OF MICHAEL ANTHONY MILLER-EL/MICHAEL MILLER-EL B. DEMAND FOR FREEDOM OF “HOSTAGE” MICHAEL ANTHONY MILLER-EL – A/K/A BY THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA/UNITED STATES’ DESPOTISM GOVERNMENT EMPIRE AS MICHAEL ANTHONY MILLER CUYAHOGA COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS (OHIO) – CRIMINAL CASE NO. 641058
  55. 55. 17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE Page 54 of 95 We are making it VERY CLEAR that the FEDERAL Laws of the United States of America PROHIBITS the Obstruction of Justice/Obstruction of Administration of Justice – i.e. TAMPERING WITH WITNESSES… as with issuing a FRIVOLOUS “WARRANT: Fugitive With A Felony Arrest…” alleging: 1) Intimidation of an Officer 2) Retaliation 3) Telecommunication Harassment MAY BE DEEMED: TAMPERING WITH A WITNESS/VICTIM PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C § 1512 AND/OR THE APPLICABLE STATUTES/LAWS GOVERNING SAID MATTER(S) (a) (1) Whoever kills or attempts to kill another person, with intent to— (A) prevent the attendance or testimony of any person in an official proceeding; (B) prevent the production of a record, document, or other object, in an official proceeding; or . . . shall be punished as provided in paragraph (3).
  56. 56. 17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE Page 55 of 95 (2) Whoever uses physical force or the threat of physical force against any person, or attempts to do so, with intent to— (A) influence, delay, or prevent the testimony of any person in an official proceeding; (B) cause or induce any person to— (i) withhold testimony, or withhold a record, document, or other object, from an official proceeding; (ii) alter, destroy, mutilate, or conceal an object with intent to impair the integrity or availability of the object for use in an official proceeding; . . . (iii) evade legal process summoning that person to appear as a witness, or to produce a record, document, or other object, in an official proceeding; or (iv) be absent from an official proceeding to which that person has been summoned by legal process; . . . shall be punished as provided in paragraph (3). (3) The punishment for an offense under this subsection is— (A) in the case of a killing, the punishment provided . . .; (B) in the case of— (i) an attempt to murder; or (ii) the use or attempted use of physical force against any person; imprisonment for not more than 30 years; and (C) in the case of the threat of use of physical force against any person, imprisonment for not more than 20 years. (b) Whoever knowingly uses intimidation, threatens, or corruptly persuades another person, or attempts to do so, or engages in misleading conduct toward another person, with intent to— (1) influence, delay, or prevent the testimony of any person in an official proceeding; (2) cause or induce any person to— (A) withhold testimony, or withhold a record, document, or other object, from an official proceeding; (B) alter, destroy, mutilate, or conceal an object with intent to impair the object’s integrity or availability for use in an official proceeding; . . . shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both.
  57. 57. 17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE Page 56 of 95 (a) Whoever corruptly— (1) alters, destroys, mutilates, or conceals a record, document, or other object, or attempts to do so, with the intent to impair the object’s integrity or availability for use in an official proceeding; or (2) otherwise obstructs, influences, or impedes any official proceeding, or attempts to do so, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both. (d) Whoever intentionally harasses another person and thereby hinders, delays, prevents, or dissuades any person from— (1) attending or testifying in an official proceeding; . . . (2) arresting or seeking the arrest of another person in connection with a Federal offense; or (3) causing a criminal prosecution, or a parole or probation revocation proceeding, to be sought or instituted, or assisting in such prosecution or proceeding; or attempts to do so, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 3 years, or both. (e) In a prosecution for an offense under this section, it is an affirmative defense, as to which the defendant has the burden of proof by a preponderance of the evidence, that the conduct consisted solely of lawful conduct and that the defendant’s sole intention was to encourage, induce, or cause the other person to testify truthfully. (f) For the purposes of this section— (1) an official proceeding need not be pending or about to be instituted at the time of the offense; and (2) the testimony, or the record, document, or other object need not be admissible in evidence or free of a claim of privilege. (g) In a prosecution for an offense under this section, no state of mind need be proved with respect to the circumstance— (1) that the official proceeding before a judge, court, magistrate judge, grand jury, or government agency is before a judge or court of the United States, a United States magistrate judge, a bankruptcy judge, a Federal grand jury, or a Federal Government agency; or . . . (h) There is extraterritorial Federal jurisdiction over an offense under this section. (i) A prosecution under this section or section 1503 may be brought in the district in which the official proceeding (whether or not pending or about to be instituted) was intended to be affected or in the district in which the conduct constituting the alleged offense occurred. (j) If the offense under this section occurs in connection with a trial of a criminal case, the maximum term of imprisonment which may be imposed for the offense shall be the higher of that otherwise provided by law or the maximum term that could have been imposed for any offense charged in such case.
  58. 58. 17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE Page 57 of 95 (k) Whoever conspires to commit any offense under this section shall be subject to the same penalties as those prescribed for the offense the commission of which was the object of the conspiracy. With that being said, PLEASE BE ADVISED of our concerns that we believe that Michael-EL has been KIDNAPPED with intent to have him MURDERED for purposes of TAMPERING with a Witness/Victim and to Obstruct Justice/Obstruct the Administration of Justice. Moreover, we are reminded that when the USA’s War Crimes… Enforcers (i.e. Chicago Police Department, etc.) KIDNAPPED the Honorable Drew Ali – Prophet/Founder of a “NEW” Government under the Name of the Moorish Science Temple of America – his DEATH/MURDER (at the early age of 43) occurred SHORTLY after his release from the CHICAGO POLICE! Furthermore, I have only been provided with EXCERPTS of a few COURT documents that Michael Miller- EL had submitted for filing IN (it appears) Cleveland, Ohio. IF this is true, then I am disturbed by the RECENT Criminal Acts being carried out AGAINST him for purposes of TAMPERING WITH A WITNESS, OBSTRUCTING a Court Action and/or Obstructing the Administration of Justice! Moreover, RETALIATORY Acts against a Party and/or Witness (Michael-EL) by the United States of America’s Officials and/or its STATE Corporate Empire’s Officials (i.e. in Virginia and Ohio, etc.) which ARE PROHIBITED under National and INTERNATIONAL Laws, etc. OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE/OBSTRUCTION OF ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C § 1503, 1505, 1512 AND/OR THE APPLICABLE STATUTES/LAWS GOVERNING SAID MATTER(S) ORC §2921.04 INTIMIDATION OF … VICTIM OR WITNESS IN CRIMINAL CASE…PROCEEDING (A) No person shall knowingly attempt to intimidate or hinder the victim of a crime or delinquent act in the filing or prosecution of criminal charges… or proceeding, and no person shall knowingly attempt to intimidate a witness to a criminal… act by reason of the person being a witness to that act. (B) No person, knowingly and by force or by unlawful threat of harm to any person or property or by unlawful threat to commit any offense or calumny against any person, shall attempt to influence, intimidate, or hinder any of the following persons: (1) The victim of a crime… or prosecution of criminal… proceeding; (2) A witness to a criminal or delinquent act by reason of the person being a witness to that act; (3) An attorney by reason of the attorney's involvement in any criminal or delinquent child action or proceeding. (D) Whoever violates this section is guilty of intimidation… victim, or witness in a criminal case.… A violation of division (B) of this section is a felony of the third degree. (E) As used in this section, "witness" means any person who has or claims to have knowledge concerning a fact or facts concerning a criminal or delinquent act, whether or not criminal or delinquent child charges are actually filed.
  59. 59. 17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE Page 58 of 95 “LACK OF JURISDICTION CONCERNS:” The following is a snapshot of the “Affidavit of Criminal Complaint” executed on the “10th day of November, 2018.” The document also references being mailed via “certified mail;” however, according to Docket Entries of the Court, it does NOT reflect receipt, filing and/or return of document noting deficiency (if any) from the Sheriff, State Attorney General and Court Clerk. It appears from the “Affidavit of Criminal Complaint” it provides TESTIMONY regarding what Michael Miller El believes to be criminal acts and EVIDENCE to support his “duty” and “obligation” to REPORT Crimes – i.e. which he reported to the Sheriff, State Attorney General and Court Clerk! We believe from the documents reviewed, that there is sufficient evidence to support that the Cuyahoga County Court, etc. “LACKS JURISDICTION!” Nevertheless, it appears, from the KIDNAPPING of our Brother Michael Anthony Miller-EL, the STATE Courts of the United States of America are USURPING Jurisdiction for which they LACK! I have been provided information regarding what appears to be an “Affidavit of Criminal Complaint” executed by “Missionary Sheik: Michael Miller El;” wherein, he references himself as a Witness in “attempting to record certain contract documents…” as well as Court Officials (i.e. Clerk, Supervisor) refusing “to record certain required contract evidence.” From said Affidavit, it appears from the writing, etc. that Michael-EL appears to be UNDER DURESS and notes concerns of THREAT, MAIL FRAUD, COERCION, etc. He further request INVESTIGATION by the Sherriff’s Office and State Attorney General! Thus, we are interested in finding out the STATUS of Michael-EL’s requests in that, it appears, that from the United States Postal Service Tracking Information, said Affidavit was served in September 2018, February 2019, and April 2019. From research, it appears that on or about May 24, 2019, Sheriff Clifford Pinkney “ABRUPTLY” announced RESIGNATION and/or Retirement; which for us raise valid concerns considering further research yields information regarding the involvement of the Federal Government as well as Pinkney’s Attorney expressing concerns of potential Civil and Criminal Investigations and Lawsuits!
  60. 60. 17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE Page 59 of 95 REFUSING to answer dozens of questions: https://www.news5cleveland.com/news/local- news/investigations/county-jail/sheriff-pinkney-refuses-to-answer-dozens-of-questions-about-county-jail- during-council-meeting Upon checking the “DOCKET Sheet” [which has been preserved] for the Criminal Case No. CR19-637205A noted (i.e. for Nathaniel D. Taylor), there is NO entry of the Affidavits submitted for filing by Michael Miller-EL! Furthermore, we have valid concerns regarding what is being seen and NOT being seen in the Docket Entries of the Cuyahoga County Clerk of Courts in such matters brought to our attention!
  61. 61. 17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE Page 60 of 95 It appears according to the “DOCKET Sheet” for Michael Miller-EL, the “Date of Offense” is being shown as “04/25/19!” - - - KEEP IN MIND Pinkney’s ABRUPT announcement regarding resignation/retirement about May 24, 2019! However, a CONFLICT exist between the alleged “Date of Offense 04/25/19” and the “A True Bill Indictment…” for “Count One Intimidation – F3 §2921.03(A)” dates alleged as, “Dates of Offense (on or about) 02/19/2019 to 06/10/2019!” FILED on June 20, 2019! A CONFLICT also exist between the alleged “Date of Offense 04/25/19” and the “A True Bill Indictment…” for “Count Two Retaliation – F3 §2921.05(A)” dates alleged as, “Dates of Offense (on or about) 02/19/2019 to 06/10/2019!” FILED on June 20, 2019!
  62. 62. 17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE Page 61 of 95 However, a CONFLICT exist between the alleged “Date of Offense 04/25/19” and the “A True Bill Indictment…” for “Count Three Intimidation – F3 §2917.21(A)(6)” dates alleged as, “Dates of Offense (on or about) 02/19/2019 to 06/10/2019!” Not ONLY is the “LACK OF JURISDICTION” a concern of ours, we believe the “UNLAWFUL” handling of each matter and document is enough to warrant our CONCERNS and demand RESOLUTION through obtaining Michael Miller-EL’s IMMEDIATE RELEASE/FREEDOM! In this instant Correspondence, we provide SNAPSHOTS of some of Michael Miller-EL’s work to SUPPORT that HE INITIATED and/or IS ENGAGED in what he believes to be LAWFUL and/or LEGAL proceedings in the Court(s) within the Lands/Territories of the United States of America – i.e. Roanoke, Virginia and Cuyahoga County, Ohio! Michael-EL appears to have DRAFTED and submitted FOR RECORDING/FILING, documents to the Court(s) Officials, etc. that ARE WITHIN the Jurisdiction of the United States of America, etc.

×