#TechedAfrica Summary for IW
Nov. 8, 2010•0 likes•374 views
Download to read offline
Report
Technology
Summary of sessions attended presented to IW on 2010-11-09
Veronique PalmerFollow
Recommended
Managing SharePoint Business Governance - SharePoint Summit - Feb 2011Veronique Palmer
Xelleration SharePoint Sales PresentationKaitlyn Knoll
SPSUK 2010-10 - SharePoint Business Governance and Evangelism for Enterprise ...Veronique Palmer
SharePoint Business Governance and User Adoption StrategiesVeronique Palmer
Share Point Summit 2010 - Selling SharePoint to Decision MakersRich Blank
MICROSOFT ACQUISITION OF LINKEDINgopalguru12
More Related Content
What's hot
Social is Not Like Facebook, It's Like eBayChristian Buckley
Webinar: Where Are You In Your Social Journey? WithumSmith+Brown, formerly Portal Solutions
Microsoft to acquire linkedin for $26.2 Billiondeesha joshi
SharePoint adoption - Swiss SharePoint Club 24 Sept 10 - Ems Conseil SIIMaximilien Chayriguès
Philadelphia Area SharePoint User Group 03.31.2010guest31b5ffc
The Business Case for SharePoint HybridBonzai Intranet
Viewers also liked
Improving Productivity and Changing Your Stars Using SharePointVeronique Palmer
Considerations for Starting a SharePoint Business #SPSCPTVeronique Palmer
Defending SharePoint (Veronique Palmer) #SPSCPTVeronique Palmer
Defending SharePoint Webinar (MetaVis) - Nov 2012Veronique Palmer
Office 365 for Beginners Veronique Palmer
Why SharePointVeronique Palmer
Similar to #TechedAfrica Summary for IW
Profiting from the Digital Shift: Time Series Databases as Value Creation Eng...Enterprise Management Associates
Introduction to jaspersoft7 customer webinarTIBCO Jaspersoft
2016 june disruption in enterprise software finalvibhorrastogi
At the Tipping Point: Considerations for Cloud BI in a Multi-platform BI Ente...Inside Analysis
Age of Exploration: How to Achieve Enterprise-Wide DiscoveryInside Analysis
Building the Cognitive Era : Big Data StrategiesKevin Sigliano
More from Veronique Palmer
Can I "Sway" You to Come to this SessionVeronique Palmer
4 Intranets, 4 ApproachesVeronique Palmer
SharePoint for BeginnersVeronique Palmer
SharePoint Team Site Permissions #Share4BizVeronique Palmer
10 Ways to Make SharePoint Fail #SPSJHBVeronique Palmer
Upgrading from SharePoint 2007 to 2010 slidedeck #Share2012Veronique Palmer
Recently uploaded
Product Research Presentation-Maidy Veloso.pptxMaidyVeloso
Advancing Equity and Inclusion for Deaf Students in Higher Education3Play Media
Future of SkillsAlison B. Lowndes
Getting your enterprise ready for Microsoft 365 CopilotVignesh Ganesan I Microsoft MVP
How is AI changing journalism? Strategic considerations for publishers and ne...Damian Radcliffe
Webhook Testing StrategyDimpy Adhikary
#TechedAfrica Summary for IW
- 1. SUMMARY FOR IW PRESENTED BY VERONIQUE PALMER 9 Movember 2010
- 2. Twitter?
- 3. - ECM for the Masses - What’s New for IT Pros - Enterprise Search - Architecting a SharePoint Server Farm - Dashboards - Intranet Building - Unleashing the Business End User SESSIONS ATTENDED
- 4. 4 ECM for the Masses by Steven Magid (OFC202) 65% project failure rate User empowerment Valueless participation User purpose Value reasons SharePoint 2010 Policy makers
- 5. 5 ECM for the Masses by Steven Magid (OFC202) 30 million docs in a library – 4000 per view Folders – permissions, retention schedules Doc ID – duplicates, manual crawl for moved docs Drag n drop Content Type hub – get it right Record Centre access + doc library
- 6. 6 Sandbox Solutions : ringfenced + resources = < impact, governance? SSP’s 2007 = Service Architecture in 2010 : own db’s = scalability Upgrade BP = Database Detach and Upgrade : Farm av, content only What’s New for IT Pros by Richard Riley (OFC204)
- 7. 7 Enterprise Search by Peter Reid (OFC306) Configure Web parts, best bets, keywords, scopes Extend BCS, federation, terms, rank profiles, XSL edits Create iFilters, OpenSearch, API’s, web parts, custom connectors = Extensible search
- 8. 8 Enterprise Search by Peter Reid (OFC306) Small farm 0 – 10 million items Single server, 2 tier setup Medium (shared) 10 – 20 million items Query and Admin servers Medium (dedicated) 20 – 40 million items 6 – 7 servers, redundant Large farm 40 – 100 million items Many as you like, mirrored 22 out of box web parts for search (lots unsealed)
- 9. 9 Architecting a SharePoint Farm by Ben Curry (OFC307) Foundation – 4 service apps only No 2 service apps alike No guessing on memory Availability planning – LOB systems Index out, crawl in Separate web servers Adjust SMTP properties in IIS, 2MB default on incoming email Education of users on error msg, trace log, correlation ID
- 10. 10 Dashboards by Ryan Jamieson (BIN208) Single Screen Snapshot Story about something to someone Zero learning curve Graphical No scrolling See patterns Uncluttered Remove non essential ink
- 11. 11 #FAIL
- 12. 12 #FAIL
- 13. 13 #PASS
- 14. 14 #PASS
- 15. 15 Intranet Building by Steven Magid (WTB203) Does your intranet motivate and inspire your staff?
- 16. 16 Intranet Building by Steven Magid (WTB203) Build With the right suite of sites Promote Info from collaboration to public access Design A good theme, keep up with trends, uniform across intranet Plan According to your audience (storage, permissions, gov, collab) Govern Required for success (strategic, tactical and content teams)
- 17. 17 Unleashing the Business End User by Rian Durandt (BIN218) BI / Analytics / Performance Management Hardware / software / external services / internal efforts In 2010 …. Convergence with other Enterprise themes Collaboration, harnessing search, mining unstructured data = 59.3 Billion Dollars = 79.8 Billion Dollars = 139.1 Billion Dollars (or $381m every day!)
- 18. 18 Unleashing the Business End User by Rian Durandt (BIN218) Hermeneutics Ashby’s Law of Requisite Variety Autopoiesis Minger’s Definition
- 19. 19 Unleashing the Business End User by Rian Durandt (BIN218) Support for DIY BI not great No empire building Huge training implications Governance!!! Individual priorities vs business’s Steercom + competency centre IT + business Semi x 2 Make it easy
- 20. 20 My Overall Impression Bigger picture missing “Just”
- 22. © 2008 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved. Microsoft, Windows, Windows Vista and other product names are or may be registered trademarks and/or trademarks in the U.S. and/or other countries. The information herein is for informational purposes only and represents the current view of Microsoft Corporation as of the date of this presentation. Because Microsoft must respond to changing market conditions, it should not be interpreted to be a commitment on the part of Microsoft, and Microsoft cannot guarantee the accuracy of any information provided after the date of this presentation. MICROSOFT MAKES NO WARRANTIES, EXPRESS, IMPLIED OR STATUTORY, AS TO THE INFORMATION IN THIS PRESENTATION.
Editor's Notes
- 1/29/2015 11:16 PM
- 1/29/2015 11:16 PM
- So if you take a look at this history there is a lot of tension, lots of different players involved. The first set of players you see on the screen here are the policymakers that people in govt, law enforcement agencies that are defining the requirements for storing disposing and retaining information,. They want to ensure that corps are being transparent and they want to ensure that ppl are acting in accordance with the law. The next group of ppl are the ppl who are runnig the company. The cxo. They want to ensure they getting the most value out of their people and the most value out of their informaiton. And they want to payback the shareholders or pvt owners of the company. Next is the group that is struggling, the legal people. The ppl in corp affairs, the records managers, the compliance officers. This is the group that is hard done by because they are typically beat up on. All those problems with file shares and enforcing corp metadata, these guys are ussually blamed for that. So these are the people that are typically down trodden bc the end user is saying, I don’t want to do this, this isnt helping me out. But these are the ppl responsible for ensuring that the company acts in accordance with the rules that are being pushed down on them and acts in accordance with responsible information management. Finally there is this huge gr of ppl.the end users. They justwant to get their job doen and if you going to tax them in any way then they better see a payback for their engagement – 3 mins for every 1 invest,ment. Otherwise its not worth their while an dthey will find alternative solutions. They will store information on USB drives, they will take it home with the,m. they will put it in the cloud. If you don’t make it easy for them to get their stuff into an info managemnt repository and see the value of what they doing they just not going to participate. So how do we solve all this. A lot of tension goiong on. Ppl with different objective,s, Its possible to bring these people together and to give them a solution.
- So if you take a look at this history there is a lot of tension, lots of different players involved. The first set of players you see on the screen here are the policymakers that people in govt, law enforcement agencies that are defining the requirements for storing disposing and retaining information,. They want to ensure that corps are being transparent and they want to ensure that ppl are acting in accordance with the law. The next group of ppl are the ppl who are runnig the company. The cxo. They want to ensure they getting the most value out of their people and the most value out of their informaiton. And they want to payback the shareholders or pvt owners of the company. Next is the group that is struggling, the legal people. The ppl in corp affairs, the records managers, the compliance officers. This is the group that is hard done by because they are typically beat up on. All those problems with file shares and enforcing corp metadata, these guys are ussually blamed for that. So these are the people that are typically down trodden bc the end user is saying, I don’t want to do this, this isnt helping me out. But these are the ppl responsible for ensuring that the company acts in accordance with the rules that are being pushed down on them and acts in accordance with responsible information management. Finally there is this huge gr of ppl.the end users. They justwant to get their job doen and if you going to tax them in any way then they better see a payback for their engagement – 3 mins for every 1 invest,ment. Otherwise its not worth their while an dthey will find alternative solutions. They will store information on USB drives, they will take it home with the,m. they will put it in the cloud. If you don’t make it easy for them to get their stuff into an info managemnt repository and see the value of what they doing they just not going to participate. So how do we solve all this. A lot of tension goiong on. Ppl with different objective,s, Its possible to bring these people together and to give them a solution.
- So if you take a look at this history there is a lot of tension, lots of different players involved. The first set of players you see on the screen here are the policymakers that people in govt, law enforcement agencies that are defining the requirements for storing disposing and retaining information,. They want to ensure that corps are being transparent and they want to ensure that ppl are acting in accordance with the law. The next group of ppl are the ppl who are runnig the company. The cxo. They want to ensure they getting the most value out of their people and the most value out of their informaiton. And they want to payback the shareholders or pvt owners of the company. Next is the group that is struggling, the legal people. The ppl in corp affairs, the records managers, the compliance officers. This is the group that is hard done by because they are typically beat up on. All those problems with file shares and enforcing corp metadata, these guys are ussually blamed for that. So these are the people that are typically down trodden bc the end user is saying, I don’t want to do this, this isnt helping me out. But these are the ppl responsible for ensuring that the company acts in accordance with the rules that are being pushed down on them and acts in accordance with responsible information management. Finally there is this huge gr of ppl.the end users. They justwant to get their job doen and if you going to tax them in any way then they better see a payback for their engagement – 3 mins for every 1 invest,ment. Otherwise its not worth their while an dthey will find alternative solutions. They will store information on USB drives, they will take it home with the,m. they will put it in the cloud. If you don’t make it easy for them to get their stuff into an info managemnt repository and see the value of what they doing they just not going to participate. So how do we solve all this. A lot of tension goiong on. Ppl with different objective,s, Its possible to bring these people together and to give them a solution.
- So if you take a look at this history there is a lot of tension, lots of different players involved. The first set of players you see on the screen here are the policymakers that people in govt, law enforcement agencies that are defining the requirements for storing disposing and retaining information,. They want to ensure that corps are being transparent and they want to ensure that ppl are acting in accordance with the law. The next group of ppl are the ppl who are runnig the company. The cxo. They want to ensure they getting the most value out of their people and the most value out of their informaiton. And they want to payback the shareholders or pvt owners of the company. Next is the group that is struggling, the legal people. The ppl in corp affairs, the records managers, the compliance officers. This is the group that is hard done by because they are typically beat up on. All those problems with file shares and enforcing corp metadata, these guys are ussually blamed for that. So these are the people that are typically down trodden bc the end user is saying, I don’t want to do this, this isnt helping me out. But these are the ppl responsible for ensuring that the company acts in accordance with the rules that are being pushed down on them and acts in accordance with responsible information management. Finally there is this huge gr of ppl.the end users. They justwant to get their job doen and if you going to tax them in any way then they better see a payback for their engagement – 3 mins for every 1 invest,ment. Otherwise its not worth their while an dthey will find alternative solutions. They will store information on USB drives, they will take it home with the,m. they will put it in the cloud. If you don’t make it easy for them to get their stuff into an info managemnt repository and see the value of what they doing they just not going to participate. So how do we solve all this. A lot of tension goiong on. Ppl with different objective,s, Its possible to bring these people together and to give them a solution.
- So if you take a look at this history there is a lot of tension, lots of different players involved. The first set of players you see on the screen here are the policymakers that people in govt, law enforcement agencies that are defining the requirements for storing disposing and retaining information,. They want to ensure that corps are being transparent and they want to ensure that ppl are acting in accordance with the law. The next group of ppl are the ppl who are runnig the company. The cxo. They want to ensure they getting the most value out of their people and the most value out of their informaiton. And they want to payback the shareholders or pvt owners of the company. Next is the group that is struggling, the legal people. The ppl in corp affairs, the records managers, the compliance officers. This is the group that is hard done by because they are typically beat up on. All those problems with file shares and enforcing corp metadata, these guys are ussually blamed for that. So these are the people that are typically down trodden bc the end user is saying, I don’t want to do this, this isnt helping me out. But these are the ppl responsible for ensuring that the company acts in accordance with the rules that are being pushed down on them and acts in accordance with responsible information management. Finally there is this huge gr of ppl.the end users. They justwant to get their job doen and if you going to tax them in any way then they better see a payback for their engagement – 3 mins for every 1 invest,ment. Otherwise its not worth their while an dthey will find alternative solutions. They will store information on USB drives, they will take it home with the,m. they will put it in the cloud. If you don’t make it easy for them to get their stuff into an info managemnt repository and see the value of what they doing they just not going to participate. So how do we solve all this. A lot of tension goiong on. Ppl with different objective,s, Its possible to bring these people together and to give them a solution.
- So if you take a look at this history there is a lot of tension, lots of different players involved. The first set of players you see on the screen here are the policymakers that people in govt, law enforcement agencies that are defining the requirements for storing disposing and retaining information,. They want to ensure that corps are being transparent and they want to ensure that ppl are acting in accordance with the law. The next group of ppl are the ppl who are runnig the company. The cxo. They want to ensure they getting the most value out of their people and the most value out of their informaiton. And they want to payback the shareholders or pvt owners of the company. Next is the group that is struggling, the legal people. The ppl in corp affairs, the records managers, the compliance officers. This is the group that is hard done by because they are typically beat up on. All those problems with file shares and enforcing corp metadata, these guys are ussually blamed for that. So these are the people that are typically down trodden bc the end user is saying, I don’t want to do this, this isnt helping me out. But these are the ppl responsible for ensuring that the company acts in accordance with the rules that are being pushed down on them and acts in accordance with responsible information management. Finally there is this huge gr of ppl.the end users. They justwant to get their job doen and if you going to tax them in any way then they better see a payback for their engagement – 3 mins for every 1 invest,ment. Otherwise its not worth their while an dthey will find alternative solutions. They will store information on USB drives, they will take it home with the,m. they will put it in the cloud. If you don’t make it easy for them to get their stuff into an info managemnt repository and see the value of what they doing they just not going to participate. So how do we solve all this. A lot of tension goiong on. Ppl with different objective,s, Its possible to bring these people together and to give them a solution.
- So if you take a look at this history there is a lot of tension, lots of different players involved. The first set of players you see on the screen here are the policymakers that people in govt, law enforcement agencies that are defining the requirements for storing disposing and retaining information,. They want to ensure that corps are being transparent and they want to ensure that ppl are acting in accordance with the law. The next group of ppl are the ppl who are runnig the company. The cxo. They want to ensure they getting the most value out of their people and the most value out of their informaiton. And they want to payback the shareholders or pvt owners of the company. Next is the group that is struggling, the legal people. The ppl in corp affairs, the records managers, the compliance officers. This is the group that is hard done by because they are typically beat up on. All those problems with file shares and enforcing corp metadata, these guys are ussually blamed for that. So these are the people that are typically down trodden bc the end user is saying, I don’t want to do this, this isnt helping me out. But these are the ppl responsible for ensuring that the company acts in accordance with the rules that are being pushed down on them and acts in accordance with responsible information management. Finally there is this huge gr of ppl.the end users. They justwant to get their job doen and if you going to tax them in any way then they better see a payback for their engagement – 3 mins for every 1 invest,ment. Otherwise its not worth their while an dthey will find alternative solutions. They will store information on USB drives, they will take it home with the,m. they will put it in the cloud. If you don’t make it easy for them to get their stuff into an info managemnt repository and see the value of what they doing they just not going to participate. So how do we solve all this. A lot of tension goiong on. Ppl with different objective,s, Its possible to bring these people together and to give them a solution.
- So if you take a look at this history there is a lot of tension, lots of different players involved. The first set of players you see on the screen here are the policymakers that people in govt, law enforcement agencies that are defining the requirements for storing disposing and retaining information,. They want to ensure that corps are being transparent and they want to ensure that ppl are acting in accordance with the law. The next group of ppl are the ppl who are runnig the company. The cxo. They want to ensure they getting the most value out of their people and the most value out of their informaiton. And they want to payback the shareholders or pvt owners of the company. Next is the group that is struggling, the legal people. The ppl in corp affairs, the records managers, the compliance officers. This is the group that is hard done by because they are typically beat up on. All those problems with file shares and enforcing corp metadata, these guys are ussually blamed for that. So these are the people that are typically down trodden bc the end user is saying, I don’t want to do this, this isnt helping me out. But these are the ppl responsible for ensuring that the company acts in accordance with the rules that are being pushed down on them and acts in accordance with responsible information management. Finally there is this huge gr of ppl.the end users. They justwant to get their job doen and if you going to tax them in any way then they better see a payback for their engagement – 3 mins for every 1 invest,ment. Otherwise its not worth their while an dthey will find alternative solutions. They will store information on USB drives, they will take it home with the,m. they will put it in the cloud. If you don’t make it easy for them to get their stuff into an info managemnt repository and see the value of what they doing they just not going to participate. So how do we solve all this. A lot of tension goiong on. Ppl with different objective,s, Its possible to bring these people together and to give them a solution.
- So if you take a look at this history there is a lot of tension, lots of different players involved. The first set of players you see on the screen here are the policymakers that people in govt, law enforcement agencies that are defining the requirements for storing disposing and retaining information,. They want to ensure that corps are being transparent and they want to ensure that ppl are acting in accordance with the law. The next group of ppl are the ppl who are runnig the company. The cxo. They want to ensure they getting the most value out of their people and the most value out of their informaiton. And they want to payback the shareholders or pvt owners of the company. Next is the group that is struggling, the legal people. The ppl in corp affairs, the records managers, the compliance officers. This is the group that is hard done by because they are typically beat up on. All those problems with file shares and enforcing corp metadata, these guys are ussually blamed for that. So these are the people that are typically down trodden bc the end user is saying, I don’t want to do this, this isnt helping me out. But these are the ppl responsible for ensuring that the company acts in accordance with the rules that are being pushed down on them and acts in accordance with responsible information management. Finally there is this huge gr of ppl.the end users. They justwant to get their job doen and if you going to tax them in any way then they better see a payback for their engagement – 3 mins for every 1 invest,ment. Otherwise its not worth their while an dthey will find alternative solutions. They will store information on USB drives, they will take it home with the,m. they will put it in the cloud. If you don’t make it easy for them to get their stuff into an info managemnt repository and see the value of what they doing they just not going to participate. So how do we solve all this. A lot of tension goiong on. Ppl with different objective,s, Its possible to bring these people together and to give them a solution.
- So if you take a look at this history there is a lot of tension, lots of different players involved. The first set of players you see on the screen here are the policymakers that people in govt, law enforcement agencies that are defining the requirements for storing disposing and retaining information,. They want to ensure that corps are being transparent and they want to ensure that ppl are acting in accordance with the law. The next group of ppl are the ppl who are runnig the company. The cxo. They want to ensure they getting the most value out of their people and the most value out of their informaiton. And they want to payback the shareholders or pvt owners of the company. Next is the group that is struggling, the legal people. The ppl in corp affairs, the records managers, the compliance officers. This is the group that is hard done by because they are typically beat up on. All those problems with file shares and enforcing corp metadata, these guys are ussually blamed for that. So these are the people that are typically down trodden bc the end user is saying, I don’t want to do this, this isnt helping me out. But these are the ppl responsible for ensuring that the company acts in accordance with the rules that are being pushed down on them and acts in accordance with responsible information management. Finally there is this huge gr of ppl.the end users. They justwant to get their job doen and if you going to tax them in any way then they better see a payback for their engagement – 3 mins for every 1 invest,ment. Otherwise its not worth their while an dthey will find alternative solutions. They will store information on USB drives, they will take it home with the,m. they will put it in the cloud. If you don’t make it easy for them to get their stuff into an info managemnt repository and see the value of what they doing they just not going to participate. So how do we solve all this. A lot of tension goiong on. Ppl with different objective,s, Its possible to bring these people together and to give them a solution.
- So if you take a look at this history there is a lot of tension, lots of different players involved. The first set of players you see on the screen here are the policymakers that people in govt, law enforcement agencies that are defining the requirements for storing disposing and retaining information,. They want to ensure that corps are being transparent and they want to ensure that ppl are acting in accordance with the law. The next group of ppl are the ppl who are runnig the company. The cxo. They want to ensure they getting the most value out of their people and the most value out of their informaiton. And they want to payback the shareholders or pvt owners of the company. Next is the group that is struggling, the legal people. The ppl in corp affairs, the records managers, the compliance officers. This is the group that is hard done by because they are typically beat up on. All those problems with file shares and enforcing corp metadata, these guys are ussually blamed for that. So these are the people that are typically down trodden bc the end user is saying, I don’t want to do this, this isnt helping me out. But these are the ppl responsible for ensuring that the company acts in accordance with the rules that are being pushed down on them and acts in accordance with responsible information management. Finally there is this huge gr of ppl.the end users. They justwant to get their job doen and if you going to tax them in any way then they better see a payback for their engagement – 3 mins for every 1 invest,ment. Otherwise its not worth their while an dthey will find alternative solutions. They will store information on USB drives, they will take it home with the,m. they will put it in the cloud. If you don’t make it easy for them to get their stuff into an info managemnt repository and see the value of what they doing they just not going to participate. So how do we solve all this. A lot of tension goiong on. Ppl with different objective,s, Its possible to bring these people together and to give them a solution.
- So if you take a look at this history there is a lot of tension, lots of different players involved. The first set of players you see on the screen here are the policymakers that people in govt, law enforcement agencies that are defining the requirements for storing disposing and retaining information,. They want to ensure that corps are being transparent and they want to ensure that ppl are acting in accordance with the law. The next group of ppl are the ppl who are runnig the company. The cxo. They want to ensure they getting the most value out of their people and the most value out of their informaiton. And they want to payback the shareholders or pvt owners of the company. Next is the group that is struggling, the legal people. The ppl in corp affairs, the records managers, the compliance officers. This is the group that is hard done by because they are typically beat up on. All those problems with file shares and enforcing corp metadata, these guys are ussually blamed for that. So these are the people that are typically down trodden bc the end user is saying, I don’t want to do this, this isnt helping me out. But these are the ppl responsible for ensuring that the company acts in accordance with the rules that are being pushed down on them and acts in accordance with responsible information management. Finally there is this huge gr of ppl.the end users. They justwant to get their job doen and if you going to tax them in any way then they better see a payback for their engagement – 3 mins for every 1 invest,ment. Otherwise its not worth their while an dthey will find alternative solutions. They will store information on USB drives, they will take it home with the,m. they will put it in the cloud. If you don’t make it easy for them to get their stuff into an info managemnt repository and see the value of what they doing they just not going to participate. So how do we solve all this. A lot of tension goiong on. Ppl with different objective,s, Its possible to bring these people together and to give them a solution.
- So if you take a look at this history there is a lot of tension, lots of different players involved. The first set of players you see on the screen here are the policymakers that people in govt, law enforcement agencies that are defining the requirements for storing disposing and retaining information,. They want to ensure that corps are being transparent and they want to ensure that ppl are acting in accordance with the law. The next group of ppl are the ppl who are runnig the company. The cxo. They want to ensure they getting the most value out of their people and the most value out of their informaiton. And they want to payback the shareholders or pvt owners of the company. Next is the group that is struggling, the legal people. The ppl in corp affairs, the records managers, the compliance officers. This is the group that is hard done by because they are typically beat up on. All those problems with file shares and enforcing corp metadata, these guys are ussually blamed for that. So these are the people that are typically down trodden bc the end user is saying, I don’t want to do this, this isnt helping me out. But these are the ppl responsible for ensuring that the company acts in accordance with the rules that are being pushed down on them and acts in accordance with responsible information management. Finally there is this huge gr of ppl.the end users. They justwant to get their job doen and if you going to tax them in any way then they better see a payback for their engagement – 3 mins for every 1 invest,ment. Otherwise its not worth their while an dthey will find alternative solutions. They will store information on USB drives, they will take it home with the,m. they will put it in the cloud. If you don’t make it easy for them to get their stuff into an info managemnt repository and see the value of what they doing they just not going to participate. So how do we solve all this. A lot of tension goiong on. Ppl with different objective,s, Its possible to bring these people together and to give them a solution.
- So if you take a look at this history there is a lot of tension, lots of different players involved. The first set of players you see on the screen here are the policymakers that people in govt, law enforcement agencies that are defining the requirements for storing disposing and retaining information,. They want to ensure that corps are being transparent and they want to ensure that ppl are acting in accordance with the law. The next group of ppl are the ppl who are runnig the company. The cxo. They want to ensure they getting the most value out of their people and the most value out of their informaiton. And they want to payback the shareholders or pvt owners of the company. Next is the group that is struggling, the legal people. The ppl in corp affairs, the records managers, the compliance officers. This is the group that is hard done by because they are typically beat up on. All those problems with file shares and enforcing corp metadata, these guys are ussually blamed for that. So these are the people that are typically down trodden bc the end user is saying, I don’t want to do this, this isnt helping me out. But these are the ppl responsible for ensuring that the company acts in accordance with the rules that are being pushed down on them and acts in accordance with responsible information management. Finally there is this huge gr of ppl.the end users. They justwant to get their job doen and if you going to tax them in any way then they better see a payback for their engagement – 3 mins for every 1 invest,ment. Otherwise its not worth their while an dthey will find alternative solutions. They will store information on USB drives, they will take it home with the,m. they will put it in the cloud. If you don’t make it easy for them to get their stuff into an info managemnt repository and see the value of what they doing they just not going to participate. So how do we solve all this. A lot of tension goiong on. Ppl with different objective,s, Its possible to bring these people together and to give them a solution.
- So if you take a look at this history there is a lot of tension, lots of different players involved. The first set of players you see on the screen here are the policymakers that people in govt, law enforcement agencies that are defining the requirements for storing disposing and retaining information,. They want to ensure that corps are being transparent and they want to ensure that ppl are acting in accordance with the law. The next group of ppl are the ppl who are runnig the company. The cxo. They want to ensure they getting the most value out of their people and the most value out of their informaiton. And they want to payback the shareholders or pvt owners of the company. Next is the group that is struggling, the legal people. The ppl in corp affairs, the records managers, the compliance officers. This is the group that is hard done by because they are typically beat up on. All those problems with file shares and enforcing corp metadata, these guys are ussually blamed for that. So these are the people that are typically down trodden bc the end user is saying, I don’t want to do this, this isnt helping me out. But these are the ppl responsible for ensuring that the company acts in accordance with the rules that are being pushed down on them and acts in accordance with responsible information management. Finally there is this huge gr of ppl.the end users. They justwant to get their job doen and if you going to tax them in any way then they better see a payback for their engagement – 3 mins for every 1 invest,ment. Otherwise its not worth their while an dthey will find alternative solutions. They will store information on USB drives, they will take it home with the,m. they will put it in the cloud. If you don’t make it easy for them to get their stuff into an info managemnt repository and see the value of what they doing they just not going to participate. So how do we solve all this. A lot of tension goiong on. Ppl with different objective,s, Its possible to bring these people together and to give them a solution.
- So if you take a look at this history there is a lot of tension, lots of different players involved. The first set of players you see on the screen here are the policymakers that people in govt, law enforcement agencies that are defining the requirements for storing disposing and retaining information,. They want to ensure that corps are being transparent and they want to ensure that ppl are acting in accordance with the law. The next group of ppl are the ppl who are runnig the company. The cxo. They want to ensure they getting the most value out of their people and the most value out of their informaiton. And they want to payback the shareholders or pvt owners of the company. Next is the group that is struggling, the legal people. The ppl in corp affairs, the records managers, the compliance officers. This is the group that is hard done by because they are typically beat up on. All those problems with file shares and enforcing corp metadata, these guys are ussually blamed for that. So these are the people that are typically down trodden bc the end user is saying, I don’t want to do this, this isnt helping me out. But these are the ppl responsible for ensuring that the company acts in accordance with the rules that are being pushed down on them and acts in accordance with responsible information management. Finally there is this huge gr of ppl.the end users. They justwant to get their job doen and if you going to tax them in any way then they better see a payback for their engagement – 3 mins for every 1 invest,ment. Otherwise its not worth their while an dthey will find alternative solutions. They will store information on USB drives, they will take it home with the,m. they will put it in the cloud. If you don’t make it easy for them to get their stuff into an info managemnt repository and see the value of what they doing they just not going to participate. So how do we solve all this. A lot of tension goiong on. Ppl with different objective,s, Its possible to bring these people together and to give them a solution.
- 1/29/2015 11:16 PM