Successfully reported this slideshow.

Chancellor Cheek DDDH Presentation

1,391 views

Published on

Chancellor Cheek provided an overview of the university's accomplishments and progress toward its goals at the DDDH retreat on August 27.

Published in: Education
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

Chancellor Cheek DDDH Presentation

  1. 1. Deans, Directors and Department Heads August 27, 2012 UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE, KNOXVILLE
  2. 2. Journey to the Top 25
  3. 3. June Board of Trustees 8% Tuition Increase Fee Increases Take 15, Graduate in 4 5% Raises Long Term Compensation
  4. 4. Campus/System/BOT Relationships
  5. 5. DevelopmentCelebration: $860 Million
  6. 6. Development Priorities Chairs & Professorships (Chancellor’s Challenge) Scholarships & Graduate Fellowships College Priorities
  7. 7. Athletics
  8. 8. Compensation/Performance Hire at market Work with Provost and Human Resources Performance-based raises Merit raises/plan for full Professor
  9. 9. Teacher/Scholar Model Teaching/Advising Scholarship Research Creative Activities
  10. 10. Take 15,Graduate in 4 Fall 2013 Tuition Model A New Expectation for Undergraduate Students
  11. 11. Graduation in Four Years  Used to be the “norm”  Off track  Must become the “new norm”  Critical to our Top 25 goal  Better for our students and our state
  12. 12. It’s Better for Students  Spend less on their education  Incur less debt  Opportunity costs  Begin their careers earlier
  13. 13. It’s Better for Students“ Students who complete a bachelor’s degree within four years earned more than all other degree ” recipients “A Profile of Non-Completers in Tennessee Dr. Bill Fox Higher Education”—a study by the Center for Director of the Center for Business and Economic Research and the Tennessee Higher Education Commission Business and Economic Research
  14. 14. Impact on Student DebtAverage UT student debt: Less than $20,000UT students with NO debt: 52%Average expenses: ~$24,000/yearMost scholarships expire: 4 years
  15. 15. It’s Better for UT Improves graduation rate Increases state funding Increases capacity to serve other students Produces more undergraduate degrees/year Accelerates progress toward Top 25
  16. 16. It’s Better for Tennessee Increase the number of college graduates Population with Bachelors Degree* *25+ years of age 35% 30% 25% 20% 15% 30% 10% 21% 5% 0% Nat. Average Tennessee
  17. 17. Degrees Awarded 2010-2011 Academic Year 7000 6161 6000 2053 5000 4344 4000 715 3624 3496 3000 1062 2704 1913 831 2001 2000 4108 1734 3629 473 1433 1424 459 1146 2562 449 267 1000 129 800 1873 1583 1528 1275 1157 1017 984 683 0 117 Bachelors Graduate/Professional
  18. 18. Graduation Rates80.0% 60% 58% 60% 61% 61% 63% 66%70.0% 4.5%60.0% 4.7% 5.3% 5.1% 5.1% 4.7% 4.7%50.0% 25.8% 26.3% 24.8% 24.2% 24.7% 24.3% 25.2%40.0% 23.7%30.0%20.0% 40.0% 33.7% 35.7% 36.7% 30.6% 29.4% 30.0% 31.2% 30.6%10.0% 0.0% 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 FOUR-YEAR FIVE-YEAR SIX-YEAR Preliminary
  19. 19. Six-Year Graduation RateFall 2006 cohort 100% Aspiration Target Peer 95% 90% 85% 80% 75% 70% 65% 60% 55% 50%
  20. 20. Proposed New Tuition Model Take 15, graduate in 4 Students pay for 15 hours Implementation in Fall 2013 Full year to communicate No additional cost for 15+ hours Increase revenue by ~$6 million in year 1
  21. 21. Funds Will Provide Courses and laboratories needed for graduation More academic advisors UTracK system for monitoring progress to graduation More tutoring and academic support services More effective communication with undergraduates Increased communications with prospective students
  22. 22. Funds Will Provide  Better faculty/student ratio  More summer school options  More courses online  Additional need-based scholarships for Tennesseans  Performance-based, market-driven compensation
  23. 23. Implementation All current students continue under the old model – No change for current students Proposed new model starts fall 2013 Expectation – limit tuition increases to 3% annually for three years After four years, pay the prevailing rate 15 hours becomes the “new norm”
  24. 24. Average Net Price of Tuition $4,000.00 $2,870.00 $3,040.00 $3,000.00 $2,013.00 $2,000.00 $1,000.00 $-$(1,000.00)$(2,000.00)$(3,000.00)$(4,000.00)$(5,000.00)$(6,000.00) $(5,711.00)$(7,000.00) Second Third Fourth Bottom Quartile Quartile Quartile Quartile ($43,066 - ($87,801 - ($143,045 - ($0 - $43,065) $87,800) $143,044) $1,430,000)
  25. 25. We Remain aGreat Value
  26. 26. New Tuition Model Endorsed “The prime beneficiaries will be UT students. Graduating sooner translates into spending less money on school and incurring less debt…. The new tuition model is a positive step that will bring UT closer to its laudable goal of becoming a top-25 public research institution.”
  27. 27. JOURNEY TO THE TOP 25
  28. 28. UTK Position UTK UTK UTK Change Metrics June 2010 June 2012 2010-2012ACT Equivalent 29/24 29/24 No changeRetention Rate 84% 85% +1 pt6-Year Graduation Rate 60% 63% +3 ptPh.D. Degrees 277 270 -7Master’s and Professional Degrees 1,845 1726 - 119Federal Research Expenditures $70 M $109 +$39Total Research Expenditures $165 M $208 +$43Tenure-Line Salary Range $66 to $107 K $71 to $115 + $5 to $8Undergraduate Student/Tenure-Line 20 20 No changeFacultyFaculty Awards 10 TBDTeaching and Support Expenditures/ $16,100 $17,698 + $1,598StudentEndowment/ Student $14,380 $16,250 + $1,870
  29. 29. Progress 7 Metrics improved 2 stayed same 2 decreased 1 Metric TBD
  30. 30. 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 Vanderbilt Florida Texas A&M Auburn Georgia UTKSouth Carolina Arkansas LSU Missouri Alabama Kentucky Miss. State ACT Scores for SEC Schools Mississippi
  31. 31. Freshman Retention Rate1st to 2nd Year Retention Rate; 2004 to 2010 Freshmen Cohort Years 90 88 86 84.5% 84 82 80 78 76 74 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
  32. 32. ResearchFederal Research Expenditures; 2004-2011 $200 $180 $160 $140 $120 $100 $80 $60 Top 25 Target Peers, No Med School $40 UTK $20 $- 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
  33. 33. Faculty Average Assistant Professor Salary; Fall 2011$95 Aspiration Target Peer$90$85 UTK in$80 2010 – up 4$75 positions$70 $71$65$60$55$50
  34. 34. Faculty Average Associate Professor Salary, Fall 2011$120 Aspiration Target Peer$110 UTK in$100 2010 – up 1 position $90 $83 $80 $70 $60 $50
  35. 35. Faculty Average Full Professor Salary, Fall 2011$170 Aspiration Target Peer$150 UTK in 2010 –$130 up 1 position $115$110$90$70$50
  36. 36. Top 25 Infrastructure Progress Buildings underway  Student Union  Natalie Haslam Music Center  John Tickle Engineering Building  Strong Hall  Residence Hall Major Renovations Humanities and Social Sciences Greve Hall Brehm Animal Science and Food Science Buildings
  37. 37. Top 25 Investments Strategic Instructional Fund Relieve bottleneck courses Additional tenure-line faculty Additional lecturers Raises First Year and Transition Programs Additional advisors
  38. 38. The journey we take is just asimportant asachieving the goal
  39. 39. Issues forthe Future
  40. 40. Civility/Diversity/Citizenship
  41. 41. Internationalization
  42. 42. Internationalization Top 25 Institutions % of Total Enrollment 2010-11#13 University of Illinois-Urbana- 18.22%Champaign#2 UCLA 15.78%#17 Ohio State University 10.85%#19 University of Florida 10.82%#25 Rutgers University 7.26%#46 University of Tennessee 3.79%
  43. 43. Communication How do wecommunicate better?
  44. 44. Academics Focus on Better Teaching and on Student Learning Rigor Advising Tracking students Course availability
  45. 45. Academics How much do we grow? When? Utilization of summer Distance education Harvard/MIT/Berkeley Experiment Multiple Approaches to Institution
  46. 46. Higher Education is Under Attack
  47. 47. Higher Education is Under Attack
  48. 48. Governor’s Review of Higher Education  Access  Quality  Preparing the Workforce
  49. 49. Morrill Act Anniversary Celebrating the 150th Anniversary Land grants vital to future of higher education
  50. 50. Questions/Comments

×