3. Goals of a Water Loss Program
Maximize revenues
Minimize costs
Equitable to customers
Improve reputation
Greener operations
Meet any future regulations
4. Goals of a Water Loss Program
Maximize Revenues
80 to 90% of all revenues are user fees
Properly collect all revenue with accurate
meters and eliminating theft
11. Modern AWWA Water Audit
System Input Volume
The annual volume input
to the water supply
system
12. Modern AWWA Water Audit
Authorized Consumption
The annual volume of metered and/or
unmetered water taken by registered
customers, the water supplier, and others
who are authorized to do so.
Water Losses
The difference between the above:
System Input Volume – Authorized
Consumption
13. Modern AWWA Water Audit
Apparent Losses
Unauthorized Consumption, all types of
customer metering inaccuracies and
systematic data handling errors including
theft.
Real Losses
The annual volumes lost through all types of
leaks, breaks, and overflows up to the point of
customer metering
14. Modern AWWA Water Audit
Revenue Water
Those components of the System
Input Volume that are billed
and produce revenue.
Nonrevenue Water
The sum of Unbilled Authorized
Consumption, Apparent Losses
and Real Losses.
16. AWWA Water Audit Spreadsheet
What this spreadsheet will
help determine
– Water Losses in gallons
and dollars
– Apparent Losses in gallons
and dollars
– Non-Revenue Water in
gallons and % of Water
Supplied
17. AWWA Water Audit Spreadsheet
What this spreadsheet
will help determine
– Performance Indicators
like:
Unavoidable Annual Real
Losses (UARL)
Current Annual Real
Losses (CARL)
Infrastructure Leakage
Index (ILI) [CARL/UARL]
18. AWWA Water Audit Spreadsheet
What this spreadsheet will help determine
– A Business Case for Improvements
Where should we spend capital to best improve our
performance?
How much should we spend?
How much is lost and where?
How does utility compare to peers?
19. AWWA Water Audit Spreadsheet
Required Input data for
Spreadsheet
– Water Volume Supplied in gallons
Water Imported / Exported
Water Produced
Production Meter Inaccuracy
– Authorized Consumption in gallons
Billed Metered / Unmetered
Unbilled Metered / Unmetered
– Estimate of Apparent Losses in
gallons
Unauthorized Consumption
Customer Metering Inaccuracies by
volume or percentage
Systematic Data Handling Errors
20. AWWA Water Audit Spreadsheet
Required Input data for Spreadsheet
– System Data
Length of mains in miles
Number of service connections
Average length of service lines
Average Operating Pressure
– Cost Data
Total Annual Operating Costs
Retail Cost / 1000 gallons
Production Cost / million gallons
21. Quantifying Unbilled Unmetered
Authorized Consumption
– Spreadsheet will assume 1.25 % of Water Supplied
– Review following:
Fire fighting and training
Flushing mains, sewers
Street cleaning
Irrigation of Public Areas
Fountains
Swimming pools
Construction sites
Unmetered Public facilities
22. Quantifying Unauthorized Consumption
– Spreadsheet will assume 0.25 % of Water Supplied
– Review following:
Illegal connections
Hidden meters
Misuse of hydrants
Bypassed or tampered with meters
Illegally opening closed curb stops
Uninstalled meters
23. Water Audit Case Study
A city has the following input data for 2008:
– Water Supplied = 2,117,000,000 gallons imported.
– Authorized Consumption
Billed Metered = 1,792,000,000 gallons
Unbilled Metered = 2,000,000 gallons
Unbilled Unmetered = 2,000,000 gallons
24. Water Audit Case Study
– Water Losses
Unauthorized Consumption = 5,000,000 gallons
Customer Metering Inaccuracies = 91,000,000 gallons
Systemic Data Handling Errors = 0 gallons
– System Data
351.6 miles of main
18,047 service connections
72.4 psi Average Operating Pressure
– Cost Data
Retail cost per 1000 gallons - $2.49
Production Cost - $1,640 / million gallons
25. Water Audit Case Study Results
PERFORMANCE INDICATOR RESULTS
Financial Indicators
Non-revenue water as percent by volume of Water Supplied: 15.4%
Annual cost of Apparent Losses: $238,080
Annual cost of Real Losses: $369,000
26. Water Audit Case Study Results
PERFORMANCE INDICATOR RESULTS
Operational Efficiency Indicators
Apparent Losses per service connection per day: 14.57 gallons/connection/day
Real Losses per service connection per day: 34.16 gallons/connection/day
Real Losses per service connection per day per psi pressure: 0.47
gallons/connection/day/psi
Unavoidable Annual Real Losses (UARL): 155.67 million gallons/year
Real Losses = Current Annual Real Losses (CARL): 225.00 million gallons/year
Infrastructure Leakage Index (ILI) [CARL/UARL]: 1.45
27. Water Audit Case Study Results
WATER AUDIT DATA VALIDITY SCORE
*** YOUR SCORE IS: 72 out of 100 ***
A weighted scale for the components of consumption and water loss is included in the
calculation of the Water Audit Data Validity Score.
PRIORITY AREAS FOR ATTENTION: Based on the information provided, audit accuracy can
be improved by addressing the following components:
1: Water imported
2: Total annual cost of operating water system
3: Customer metering inaccuracies
28. Long Term Analysis using Audit
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
MGD
Fiscal Year
City of Philadelphia, PA Water Audit Trends over 10 Years
Water System Input Volume, mgd
Billed Consumption, mgd
Unbilled Unmetered (firefighting, etc.),
mgd
Apparent Losses (billing data error,
unauthorized consumption, customer
metering inaccuracies), mgd
Real Losses (Leakage), mgd
29. Long Term Analysis using Audit
0
5,000,000
10,000,000
15,000,000
20,000,000
25,000,000
30,000,000
35,000,000
40,000,000
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
CostinDollars
Fiscal Year
City of Philadelphia, PA Water Audit Cost Trends over 10
Years
Unbilled Unmetered water cost
Apparent Loss Cost
Real Loss (leakage) Cost
Non-revenue Water Cost Total
35. Leakage Reduction
Acoustic methods very
cost effective
– Start with pilot
Pressure Management
Area Master Meters
Other Upcoming
Technologies
36. Leakage Reduction
Canton, OH Case Study
– Surveyed about 280 miles of
water mains
– Found 80 leaks
31 at hydrants
19 at services
23 on the main lines
37. Leakage Reduction
Canton, OH Case Study
– Estimated 773,520 gpd from
identified leaks
– Survey Cost $35,000
$100 to $150/mile
38. Leakage Reduction
Surveyed 200 miles of water transmission main
for a cost of $15,000
“Elimination
of leaks paid
for the
survey.. and
then some!”
• Located 36 leaks that were repaired
• Reduction of 350,000 GPD of real
water losses!
• Represents 12% of the water being
purchased daily for Erie County!
• Resulted in a savings of $500 daily
or $182,500 per year!
Erie County, OH Case Study
39. Summary
The AWWA M36 Water Audit Manual
creates a business case and benchmarking
tool.
Starting points for water loss reduction
include:
– Auditing your accounting procedures
– A meter testing and replacement program
– A leak detection survey
Continuous Improvement