Chris and Heidi – please weigh in on order – should systems or practice go first??
i.e. events outside the range of normal human experience. Does not include television or media violence
These include both violent and non-violent (e.g. accident, natural disaster, etc) events). In 2006, Minnesota ranked second in the nation for the highest number of refugees (11.8% of the national total), and third in 2007, receiving 6.6% of the total refugees entering the US [2, 3]. Refugees from Liberia, Ethiopia, Somalia, Vietnam, Laos, and other countries have made their homes primarily in the Twin Cities Metro Area. Similar to national trends, the Latino population is the largest immigrant group in the state. However, it is expected that 1,200 refugees from Ethiopia, Somalia and other war torn areas will arrive in Minnesota this year.Immigrant/refugee trauma is significant in the Metro region, requiring culturally responsive, trauma-informed treatment services. The largest groups of refugee populations in the Metro region come from East African nations. Current estimates put these populations close to 70,000, however, exact numbers are not known due to relocation tracking difficulties. Community members estimate that the number of Somalis is alone close to 70,000, making Minnesota home to the largest Somali population outside Africa .Findings from national and local studies indicate very high levels of PTSD among refugees; one in four men and 50% women report rape and/or torture histories. Based on national estimates of torture among African refugees and the number of refugees in Minnesota, it is likely that over 30,000 torture survivors currently live in Minnesota, primarily in the Metro region . Research conducted in Minnesota indicate that prevalence of torture ranges from 25-69% among Somali and Ethiopian (Oromo) refugees . Children of refugee families also experience high rates of PTSD and related disorders - as high as 75% in community samples [17, 18]. Local data suggest similar needs among Minnesota’s refugee youth. The Center for Victims of Torture, an Ambit Network partner, conducted a pilot study in two Metro Area suburbs, revealing high rates of trauma: 35% witnessed someone hurt or killed, 83% reported being separated from family due to war, and 23% reported their parents taken/arrested by authorities. The number of traumatic events was significantly related to PTSD and depression .
Approximately 5,400 children in the state were abused and neglected in 2008, and over 50%were children of color (23% Black; 10% American Indian; 3% Asian and Pacific Islanders; 17% Other). Most children were the victims of multiple maltreatment types.
Particularly difficult to identify young children – because they can’t tell the storyGive example of 2 yo who had witnessed shooting of father in restaurant – attacked police officer; guns in home, etc
Ghosts in the nurseryGive examples of traumatized parentse.g. dad who exploded when his kids dropped their backpacks on the floorFather who wouldn’t let his kids in the yard because of the fire antsMother whose (low) windows were wide open in hot summer with no screens and 4 toddlers running around
So that’s a bit of data- but what do traumatized parents look like? Particularly those exposed to chronic trauma….
Add citation: NCTSN parent trauma fact sheet
Distinguish between them
Going back to the original problem and question…We have children who have experienced trauma and are experiencing child traumatic stress2. Trauma-informed EBPs for children available, but children are not receiving these treatments. 3. We have a tool to bridge the two (training), but it's not being bridged because we are not provide the type of training needed to bridge4. Bring it back to the original question: why train providers in TF-CBT? 5. Reason to provide training: bridge the gap, and increase access to care for children who have experienced trauma
Training providers has been identified as one of the more challenging strategies to implement EBPs into the community because of the different types of models availableWhile didactic & competency trainings are the most successful, they are typically not used because they require investments of time, money, and effort that most community MH agencies don’t have.
Didactic training only doesn’t prepare individuals to change their practiceReceive information, but no clear direction on how to move forwardSo more often than not, nothing changesThe problem with didactic trainings is that it doesn't support a change in practice. You get talked to for a half-day, full-day, then you go back to your office, you have all this work to do, and no support to try to implement what you learned.Like a college course: you go to class, you have homework, you develop competencies so that at the end, you're able to use what you learned
One model that uses a combination of didactic and competency training is the learning collaborative modelIHI, BSLCQuality improvement model for trainingLong-term training model, designed to be 6-15 months in lengthKey to change: work of improvement is part of normal daily activities of participantsAvoid “project” mentality – work is limited to the collaborativeIncorporates individuals at all levels of the system – agency administration and frontline providers – to ensure change occurs at all levelsIHI model: QI in medical settings; LCs have been done for:Treatment of asthmaEnd of life careEfficiency in health care settingsA few studies have been done in mental health care settingsNCTSI adaptation (National Child Traumatic Stress Initiative)QI: trauma-informed servicesTraining in EBP like TF-CBT
Topic selection: area needing improvement in which knowledge exists but not widely usedAmbit: Child Traumatic Stress, TF-CBTFaculty recruitment: Experts in the area to develop training content and deliver training, consultation, and coachingAmbit: Ambit Network, MN-DHS, Certified TF-CBT TrainersInnovation teams: Teams of 3-4 individuals to learn the new practice, implement on small scale, and then implement across the agency post-LC.Ambit: Recruit through RFPsLearning Sessions: Face to face meetings during the LC. Learn from experts, exchange ideas and learn from each other.Action Periods: Time between learning sessions to test and implement strategies; time for consultation and additional coaching.PDSA Cycles: Really part of the Action periods – steps for making sustainable changeWhat are we trying to accomplish?How will we know that a change is an improvement? What changes can we make that will result in an improvement?Measurement and Evaluation: Methods to monitor implementation and measure changeWhile each agency should develop a system, Ambit provides support during the LCProvides support while agencies develop their own measurement and evaluation planAre they continuing to implementing TF-CBT?Are they maintaining fidelity to the model?Are kids symptoms improving?How are they measuring and monitoring these types of indicators?
Total length of “training” activities: About 12 months Follow-up and practicum period: Indefinite for Ambit LC Trainees
3 Trainings over the course of the year: Training 1 --- 3 months --- Training 2 --- 6-9 months --- Training 3Additional topics include:Childhood traumatic griefDevelopmental trauma disorderAvoidance as a clinical issueCompassion fatigue in providers
Cohort consultation callsProvide 18 calls to ensure individuals meet the minimum 12-call requirement for certificationBegins about 1 month after training 1Case presentations begin in Month 2 or 3Usually about 2 case presentations per callSupervisor callsClinical questions for supervisorsSupervision questions from supervisorsSupervision topics and sustainability issues with supervisorsEarly adopters/late adoptersWorking with agency administration to support the modelSustaining TF-CBT after the LC endsConsultation calls is where we see a lot of collaboration and learning across providersDuring case presentations, are asked to bring a clinical questionThis is where although our trainer provides feedback, most of the time other trainees are providing feedback for how they did the issue as well
Web-based componentAllows Ambit to pull up clinical assessment, fidelity dashboards, trauma narratives during case presentationsAllows trainer to provide clinical feedback to trainee providing the casePlatform for discussion with all trainees on the call“One person has a question, everyone else has that same question”Additional supervision for trainees
Technical assistance from Ambit: provide scoring and tracking of clients over the course of the learning collaborativeThis technical assistance offers trainees an opportunity to focus on learning the TF-CBT model, implementing with their clients, without having to focus on the logistics of scoring assessments, keeping track of when follow-up assessments are dueAlso provides a system for monitoring the implementation of TF-CBT in MinnesotaClinical assessments: baseline, 3-month follow-ups, end of treatment – monitor client symptoms over course of treatmentSubmission to AmbitFidelity dashboards: provide immediate info on delivery of TF-CBT to cliniciansWhich components were delivered in each session, number of minutes spent on each componentInformation available for trainees, trainer, and Ambit staff to ensure adherence to the modelTracking interviews and assessments – email reminders for upcoming follow-ups for all active LC participantsUse two database: one for clinical data (Previously NICON, now Ambit is building our own database) and one for implementation (Access database)
31 of the 87 counties are listed as having at least 1 TF-CBT therapist
Types of problems and experiences child might have experienced within the past month/30 daysRange: 672 – 675Average: 674% of Screened Sample (average/total sample): 43%% Total Reporting is the number that reported somewhat/very divided by the TOTAL N that reported.
Range: 639-666Average: 654% of total sample reporting (using average): 42%
domestic violence713impaired caregiver688Emotional Abuse/Psychological Maltreatment647traumatic loss or bereavement576Physical maltreatment/abuse539Neglect385Sexual maltreatment/abuse329Sexual assault/rape302Physical assault275serious injury/accident221
From August 2012
From August 2012
On being lastSAVE THE BEST FOR LAST Last but not least Losers come in lastDownside and upsideGetting the last wordWhose in the roomSummarizeAbi – trauma and trauma-informed: knowledge building; screening/assessment; case planning, trauma treatments, collaborationHeidi – efforts in MN to date
Completed a total of 6 LC’s training over 214 therapists throughout MN
Talk about the positive impact of system integration and possible negative impact when system actions may worsen the traumatic experience for children and familiesMore attention paid to agencies ie law enforcement and CW that get involved with a child immediately following a TE, less attention paid to agencies that become involved later ie guardians ad litem, juvenile justice
Child serving agencies included family and dependency court, CW agencies, Foster care agencies, Mental health agencies, JJ agencies, Schools
Common interests include grades, recidivism, school attendance, service utilization, cost effectivenessGenerally SI means re-writing policy, employee education; supervisor educationGive an example – WE and the 3 counties – first exampleNow – benefits of evaluation
Family and Advisory committees help to establish representation, process and consensus on project goalsLaunch will facilitate stakeholder dialog, strategically plan, conduct community readiness assessmentPDSA Plan Do Study Act = some flexibility
PARENTING THROUGH CHANGEAFTER DEPLOYMENT: ADAPTIVE PARENTING TOOLSSustainability:providing further pathways from identification to screening and treatment.
Ambit network – navigating research and practice in child traumaNot a rudderless ship
Implementing Trauma Focused Cognitive Behavioral Therapy in MN
Implementing Trauma-FocusedCognitive Behavioral Therapy in MN Abi Gewirtz, Ph.D., L.P. Heidi Flessert, M.P.H. Chris Bray, Ph.D., L.P. Ambit Network, University of Minnesota
Overview• Traumatic and stressful events o Impact on children, adults, and parenting• Trauma-informed practice o Trauma-focused CBT o Implementation of TFCBT in Minnesota• What is a trauma-informed system?
Defining traumaIn its definition of posttraumatic stress disorder, theDiagnostic and Statistical Manual uses this definitionof trauma:An event or events the person experienced,witnessed, or was confronted with that involvedactual or threatened death or serious injury, or athreat to the physical integrity of self or others.
Trauma exposure is common15 to 43% of girls and 14 to 43% of boys haveexperienced at least one traumatic event in their lifetime.
Violent Crime in the USA• USA has the highest level of homicide of any developed country in the world.• Homicide is the third-leading cause of death for children ages 5-14, the second-leading cause of death for those aged 15-24, and has been the leading cause of death for African-American youth from the early 1980s into the early twenty-first century.
Domestic Violence• 1.8 to 4 million American women are physically abused each year.• It is estimated that 7-14 million children witness family violence each year (Edleson et al., 2007).
Child Abuse• Maltreatment incidence is 12 per 1,000 children, with 899,454 substantiated or indicated cases in 2005.• Approximately 5,400 children in Minnesota were abused and neglected in 2008, and over 50% were children of color (23% Black; 10% American Indian; 3% Asian and Pacific Islanders; 17% Other). Most children were the victims of multiple maltreatment types.• Maltreatment rates for under 3s:16.5 per 1,000 compared with 6.2 per 1,000 for children ages 16 to 17.
The Cycle of Violence• Both follow-up and follow-back studies have consistently shown a direct link between exposure to violence and subsequent perpetration of violence.• For example, Widom (2001) reported that child victims of violence and neglect were 59% more likely to be arrested as juvenile, 28% more likely to be arrested in adulthood, and 30% more likely to be arrested for a violent crime.
Challenges in Identifying Traumatized Children• No way to know about children‘s histories of traumatic events o Particularly complicated by the shame and stigma associated with many types of trauma• Identifying ‗invisible‘ witnesses o E.g. emergency room visits o E.g. police reports• No national surveillance system• Concerns about formal identification via official statistics leading to government involvement (e.g. CPS)
The Impact of Trauma on Children Short Term Effects:Acute Disruptions in Self Regulation• Eating • Fearfulness• Sleeping • Re-experiencing• Toileting /Flashbacks• Attention & • Aggression; Turning Concentration passive into active• Withdrawal • Relationships• Avoidance • Partial memory loss
The Impact of Trauma on Children Long Term Effects:Chronic Developmental Adaptations • Depression • Anxiety • PTSD • Personality • Substance abuse • Perpetration of violence
Trauma and Developmental PsychopathologyTrauma & Cumulative Risk Overlap • Risks ‗pile up‘ (Rutter, 1985) • Secondary adversities during trauma events (Pynoos et al., 1996) • Multi-problem families risk for trauma (Widom, 1989; 1999) • Other risks contribute to PTSD
Why be concerned with trauma and posttraumatic stress in parents?• Associations between adult trauma and: o Child distress and child PTSD o Parenting impairments• How might parents respond differently to other adults (e.g. service providers) when they are dealing with traumatic stress?• And most important, how might they deal differently with their children?
Parents who are traumatized may be:• Suffering from PTSD and related disorders (e.g., depression, anxiety)• Using drugs to mask the pain• Disempowered• Parents of children who have become ―parentified‖ (i.e. responsible beyond their years)
How might parents‘ trauma histories affect their parenting?A history of traumatic experiences may:• Compromise parents‘ ability to make appropriate judgments about their own and their child‘s safety and to appraise danger; in some cases, parents may be overprotective and, in others, they may not recognize situations that could be dangerous for the child.• Make it challenging for parents to form and maintain secure and trusting relationships, leading to: o Disruptions in relationships with infants, children, and adolescents, and/or negative feelings about parenting; parents may personalize their children‘s negative behavior, resulting in ineffective or inappropriate discipline. o Challenges in relationships with caseworkers, foster parents, and service providers and difficulties supporting their child‘s therapy.
Trauma history can:• Impair parents‘ capacity to regulate their emotions.• Lead to poor self-esteem and the development of maladaptive coping strategies, such as substance abuse or abusive intimate relationships that parents maintain because of a real or perceived lack of alternatives.• Result in trauma reminders—or ―triggers‖—when parents have extreme reactions to situations that seem benign to others.• NCTSN, 2011: http://www.nctsn.org/products/birth- parents-trauma-histories-and-child-welfare-system
Traumatized parents may…• Find it hard to talk about their strengths (or those of their children)• Need support in managing children‘s behavior• Have difficulty labeling their children‘s emotions, and validating them• Have difficulty managing their own emotions in family communication o When posttraumatic stress symptoms interfere with daily interactions with children, parents should seek individual treatment.
How does adult posttraumatic stress disorder affect parenting?Growth in fathers‘ PTSD is associated with self-reportedimpairments in parenting one year after return fromcombat.Gewirtz, Polusny, DeGarmo, Khaylis, & Erbes, (2010), Journal ofConsulting and Clinical Psychology, 78, 5, 599-610
PTSDDiagnostic criteria for PTSD include a history of exposureto a traumatic event meeting two criteria and symptomsfrom each of three symptom clusters: intrusiverecollections, avoidant/numbing symptoms, and hyper-arousal symptoms. A fifth criterion concerns duration ofsymptoms and a sixth assesses functioning.
Criterion A: stressorThe person has been exposed to a traumatic event in whichboth of the following have been present:• The person has experienced, witnessed, or been confronted with an event or events that involve actual or threatened death or serious injury, or a threat to the physical integrity of oneself or others.• The persons response involved intense fear, helplessness, or horror. Note: in children, it may be expressed instead by disorganized or agitated behavior.
Criterion B: intrusive recollectionThe traumatic event is persistently re-experienced in at leastone of the following ways:• Recurrent and intrusive distressing recollections of the event, including images, thoughts, or perceptions. Note: in young children, repetitive play may occur in which themes or aspects of the trauma are expressed.• Recurrent distressing dreams of the event. Note: in children, there may be frightening dreams without recognizable content• Acting or feeling as if the traumatic event were recurring (includes a sense of reliving the experience, illusions, hallucinations, and dissociative flashback episodes, including those that occur upon awakening or when intoxicated). Note: in children, trauma-specific reenactment may occur.• Intense psychological distress at exposure to internal or external cues that symbolize or resemble an aspect of the traumatic event.• Physiologic reactivity upon exposure to internal or external cues that symbolize or resemble an aspect of the traumatic event
Criterion C: avoidant/numbingPersistent avoidance of stimuli associated with the trauma andnumbing of general responsiveness (not present before thetrauma), as indicated by at least three of the following:• Efforts to avoid thoughts, feelings, or conversations associated with the trauma• Efforts to avoid activities, places, or people that arouse recollections of the trauma• Inability to recall an important aspect of the trauma• Markedly diminished interest or participation in significant activities• Feeling of detachment or estrangement from others• Restricted range of affect (e.g., unable to have loving feelings)• Sense of foreshortened future (e.g., does not expect to have a career, marriage, children, or a normal life span)
Criterion D: hyper-arousalPersistent symptoms of increasing arousal (not present beforethe trauma), indicated by at least two of the following:• Difficulty falling or staying asleep• Irritability or outbursts of anger• Difficulty concentrating• Hyper-vigilance• Exaggerated startle response
Criterion E: durationDuration of the disturbance (symptoms in B, C, and D) is morethan one month.Criterion F: functional significanceThe disturbance causes clinically significant distress orimpairment in social, occupational, or other important areas offunctioning.
Trauma Treatment Trauma-Focused Cognitive Behavior Therapy• Child trauma treatment with largest body of evidence for its effectiveness• Developed by Cohen, Mannarino, Deblinger, and tested with various populations (child sexual abuse victims, children exposed to domestic violence, child traumatic grief, etc)• Targets trauma-related symptoms, not PTSD alone• Includes parent/caregiver throughout treatment, both together with and separately from the child
Trauma-Focused Cognitive Behavior Therapy• See http://tfcbt.musc.edu• Validated for 3-18 year olds• Essential components: o Establishing and maintaining therapeutic relationship with child and parent o Psycho-education about childhood trauma and PTSD o Emotional regulation skills o Individualized stress management skills
TF-CBT cont.• Connecting thoughts, feelings, and behaviors related to the trauma• Assisting the child in sharing a verbal, written, or artistic narrative about the trauma(s) and related experiences• Encouraging gradual in vivo exposure to trauma reminders if appropriate• Cognitive and affective processing of the trauma experiences• Education about healthy interpersonal relationships• Parental treatment components including parenting skills• Joint parent-child sessions to practice skills and enhance trauma-related discussions• Personal safety skills training• Coping with future trauma reminders
Overview• Defining trauma-informed care• Care systems serving traumatized children• Assessment• Intervention• Building trauma-informed systems o A Minnesota example
Defining Trauma-Informed Care• What is trauma?• Trauma-informed care o Practitioner knowledge about impact of traumatic events on children, adults, and families o Practitioner use of this knowledge in delivering care (skills) • E.g. ‗what happened to you?‘ vs. ‗why did you do this?‘ o Agency and system use of knowledge in training staff and implementing interventions
Practitioner Knowledge• How did you learn about trauma?• What did you learn?• Examples of trauma curricula o National Child Traumatic Stress Network Core Curriculum in Child Trauma o Example: Ibrahim
Practitioner Skills• Trauma assessment• Delivering o Evidence-based trauma treatments o Trauma-informed interventions
Notes on the Reporting of Trauma Exposure and Symptoms• By children o Underreporting consistent with posttraumatic symptoms (i.e. denial) o Fear of disclosure; shame; stigma• By their caregivers – underreporting well documented o Guilt o Denial o Concern about child protection involvement• Discrepancy between parent and child report of both history and symptoms
Benefits of TF-CBT• TF-CBT is a highly effective treatment for symptoms of traumatic stress in children and youth.• Over 80% of traumatized children show significant improvement in 12 to 16 weeks.• Family functioning is improved because TF-CBT encourages the parent to be the primary agent of change for the traumatized child.
Who is TF-CBT for?• TF-CBT is suitable for many children who have experienced trauma, including children with multiple or compound traumas.• TF-CBT has been successfully adapted to address the unique needs of several special populations including Latino, Native American, and hearing-impaired families.• Children as young as three can be treated with TF-CBT.
TRAINING IN TF-CBT:LEARNING COLLABORATIVES INMINNESOTA
Why train providers in TF-CBT? TrainingChildren with Trauma- Providers in Trauma, Informed Trauma- Traumatic EBPs for Informed Stress Children EBPs
How do you train providers?Different types of training models available • Didactic training models: workshops, written materials, presentations, web-based learning • Competency training models: Role-playing, demonstrations, ongoing consultation, case consultation • Most successful: Combination • Most used: Didactic
Training Providers• Limitations of didactic training o Effective for increasing knowledge o Doesn‘t support change in practice• In order to change and sustain practice, need to utilize models that support this o Combination training
Learning Collaborative (LC)• Quality improvement model o Change and sustain new practice to improve the delivery of care in health care setting • Avoid ―project mentality‖• Evidence-base for the LC• NCTSI adaptation
Key Elements of the LC PDSA Cycles ActionTopic Selection Periods Faculty Recruitment Learning SessionsInnovation Teams Measurement and Evaluation
History of TF-CBT Training• 2007-2008 o First TF-CBT Learning Collaborative o First Request For Proposals• 2009 -2010 o 2 Outpatient Treatment Groups o 1 Residential Treatment Group• 2011-2012 o 3 Outpatient Treatment Groups
Funding for ProvidersGrants pay hourly Medicaid rate for ―lost time‖• 10 hours for online training• 32 hours for classroom training• 18 hours for consultation calls• 18 hours for internal supervision• 36 hours for assessment/fidelity• 16 hours for follow-up training days• Travel/lodging costs
Ambit Network‘s TF-CBT LCFollow-up and Practicum Period Consultation Calls T1 T2 T3Follow-up and Practicum Period
In-Person Trainings• Training 1 o Trauma 101, Trauma-informed assessments, ―PRAC‖• Training 2 o ―TICE‖, Developing trauma-narrative, Gradual exposure• Training 3 o Case presentations, Sustainability after the LC• Additional topics in Trainings 2 and 3
Consultation Calls• 18 bimonthly cohort calls o Case presentations• 9 monthly supervisor calls• Phone conference with web-based component• Collaboration across agencies and providers o ―This is how I did it‖
Follow-up and Technical Assistance• ―Practicum period‖ – throughout the LC o Scoring clinical assessments o Fidelity monitoring o Tracking follow-up interviews, assessments• Purpose of technical assistance o Support trainee learning o Monitoring implementation
DATA FROM THEIMPLEMENTATION OF TF-CBTIN MINNESOTA
Serving Minnesota‘s Children1,555 children screened for trauma Male 44% Female 56%
Age of Children Screened for Trauma 1% 3% 28% 26% 0-4 5-9 10-14 15-17 18+ 42%
Race, Ethnicity of Children Screened for Trauma Race Number Percent American Indian/Alaskan Native 100 6.4% Black/African American 153 9.8% White 771 49.6% Asian 7 .5% Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander 5 .3% Multi-racial 121 7.8% Unknown 398 25.6% Ethnicity Number Percent Hispanic/Latino 117 7.5% Not Hispanic/Latino 990 63.7% Unknown 448 28.8%
Number of Clients Screened, Per Year600500400300200100 0 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012*
Top 10 Behavior Problems Reported Somewhat/Very Total N % Total ReportingAttachment Problems 472 673 70.1%Behavior 470 674 69.7%Problems, Home/CommunityAcademic Problems 451 673 67.0%Behavior Problems, 385 672 57.3%School/DaycareOther Self-Injurious Behaviors 186 673 31.1%Dev’tally Inapp. Sexual Behaviors 161 674 23.9%Problems Skipping School/Daycare 144 673 21.4%Other medical problems, 105 674 15.6%DisabilitiesCriminal Activity 102 674 15.1%
Top 10 Reported Traumas Domestic Violence Impaired Caregiver Emotional…Traumatic Loss/BereavementPhysical Maltreatment/Abuse Neglect Sexual Maltreatment/Abuse Sexual Assault/Rape Physical Assault Serious Injury/Accident 0 200 400 600 800 Number of Children Reporting
Clinical Outcomes: UCLA N=396 40 35Average Overall Score on the UCLA 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 Baseline Average Follow-up Average PTSD Overall Score 34.43 24.17
Clinical Outcomes: TSCC N=388 60 58Average Score on TSCC-A 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 Baseline Average Score Last Follow-up Average Score Anxiety 57.68 50.94 Dissociation 56.77 51.56 Anger 53.96 49.13 Depression 56.13 50.06 PTSD 57.9 50.88
The Next Four Years• Improve access to trauma-informed practices and treatment for traumatized children and families• Implement and sustain evidence-based trauma treatment models in the Upper Midwest and in particular throughout four targeted regions• Build and maintain consensus for child trauma
The Next Four Years Learning Collaboratives• Recently completed a LC in Northwest MN• Completing a LC Southeast MN• Initiate two cultural providers LC‘s in the metro• Initiate a second LC for residential treatment center providers• Initiate a second LC in Central MN• Initiate a LC in Southwest MN
The Next Four Years Evaluation and Reporting• Continue tracking and data collection for LC sites• Provide evaluation reports for completed cohorts• Conduct exploratory analysis on fidelity• Provide TF-CBT booster trainings• Manage TF-CBT certification process in MN
Systems Integration• Many child and family serving agencies touch lives following traumatic experiences.• The way these organizations work together is critically important.• They can reduce the harmful impact of traumatic experiences OR …
Systems Integration• Literature on integrating systems around trauma expertise and responses is scant to nonexistent.• Survey conducted in 2005 by NCTSN assessed o Ways agencies gather, assess, and share trauma-related information o Child trauma training that staffs receive Taylor, Siegfried, NCTSN Systems Integration Working Group, 2005.
Systems Integration• Findings from the survey across all child serving agencies included: o Trauma history rarely follows the child. o Many agencies do not conduct standardized trauma screening or assessment. o More information is gathered on behavior and problems than duration of abuse, # of episodes, and internalizing symptom. o Less than half receive training on trauma treatments and where to refer.
Systems IntegrationRecommendations from NCTSN:• Identify common interests across systems• Evaluate the benefits of systems integration• Introduce core training for every child and family serving agency• Provide trauma-informed interventions early and strategically• Emphasize interdisciplinary collaboration and relationships Brymer, Layne, 2008
The Next Four Years Systems Integration• Convene Advisory and Families Committees• Convene a 2-day launch in each region o Conduct a community needs/readiness assessment o Facilitate stakeholder dialog• Convene parents and providers to deliver a NAMI/parent- led training on working with traumatized families• Deliver training on trauma-informed practice (i.e. NCTSN Toolkit for child welfare providers, and the NCTSN Toolkit for juvenile justice providers)• Convene quarterly meetings to develop trauma-informed practices (i.e. universal screening protocols, case management and collaboration protocols
The Next Four Years Systems Integration• Convene military stakeholders in parallel launch process• Two LCs in PTC/ADAPT targeting providers serving military and refugee families• Year four: further diffuse trauma-informed practice by training school social workers who will then participate in the regional hubs• Work with each region throughout the grant period on sustainability
The Next Four Years Number Served• 400 practitioners trained in EBP Toolkits• 240 families in parent led trainings• 115 providers trained in TF-CBT• 40 providers trained in PTC• 2450 children screened and assessed• 1280 children receiving TF-CBT
Contact InformationAbigail Gewirtz, Ph.D, L.P. Program Director Heidi Flessert, M.P.H. Evaluator Chris Bray, Ph.D, L.P. Associate Director Ambit Network, University of Minnesota 612-624-8063 firstname.lastname@example.org Ambitnetwork.org