Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.
1 April 2018
Should we really be worried
about predatory publishers?
HELEN DOBSON
Scholarly Communications Manager
The Uni...
Jeffrey Beall
Scholarly
Communications
Librarian, University
of Colorado, Denver
Your pledge
A picture of Jeffrey Beall. U...
The phrase
• ‘Predatory publishers’
• “there is always the
possibility of engaging
in unethical behaviour
to chase large p...
Subjectivity
• Individual view
• “No single person or
source is equipped to
bear the responsibility
of being the ultimate
...
EXTRA CRITERIA..?
Librarians and publishers
• Increased transparency
• Increased affordability
• Liaison with OA publisher...
‘BEALL’S’ LIST II
https://beallslist.
weebly.com/
CABELLS BLACKLIST
CABELLS BLACKLIST
WHAT CAN LIBRARIANS DO?
• Change the focus from journal to article
• Review publishing training/support
• Facilitate peer ...
WHAT CAN OTHER SERVICES DO?
• Review inclusion criteria regularly? (Ulrichs,
RoMEO, DOAJ, OASPA)
• Review application crit...
ACTIVITY
• Discuss questions in groups
• Feedback using Trello link
https://trello.com/b/KdnYM2pQ/uksg-predatory-
publishe...
helen.j.dobson@manchester.ac.uk
@h_j_dobson
THANK YOU
UKSG 2018 Breakout - Should we really be worried about predatory publishers? - Dobson
UKSG 2018 Breakout - Should we really be worried about predatory publishers? - Dobson
UKSG 2018 Breakout - Should we really be worried about predatory publishers? - Dobson
UKSG 2018 Breakout - Should we really be worried about predatory publishers? - Dobson
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in …5
×

0

Share

Download to read offline

UKSG 2018 Breakout - Should we really be worried about predatory publishers? - Dobson

Download to read offline

Does the notion of 'predatory' publishing alarm, confuse or amuse you? This session will consider what makes a publisher predatory, who is affected by so-called predatory publishers and how the scholarly community is responding to the perceived threats such publishers pose.

  • Be the first to like this

UKSG 2018 Breakout - Should we really be worried about predatory publishers? - Dobson

  1. 1. 1 April 2018 Should we really be worried about predatory publishers? HELEN DOBSON Scholarly Communications Manager The University of Manchester Library @h_j_dobson
  2. 2. Jeffrey Beall Scholarly Communications Librarian, University of Colorado, Denver Your pledge A picture of Jeffrey Beall. Uploaded on his Flickr account. CC-BY 2.0
  3. 3. The phrase • ‘Predatory publishers’ • “there is always the possibility of engaging in unethical behaviour to chase large profit margins and the publishing industry is no different” Raju (2018) • Assessment criteria https://beallslist.weebly.com/upl oads/3/0/9/5/30958339/criteria- 2015.pdf • Potential, possible or probable predatory publishers/journals A challenge • #predatorypublisher • https://beallslist.weebl y.com/ • A different lens Blacklists BEALL’S LEGACY
  4. 4. Subjectivity • Individual view • “No single person or source is equipped to bear the responsibility of being the ultimate authority on what constitutes as a best (or poor) practice scholarly publishing outlet” Pleffer & Shrubb (2017) • Criteria not limited to OA journals • “development of additional criteria that focuses on subject content” Olivarez et al (2018) • Conferences Angle • Geographical slant • “intolerance is a reflection of inward thinking and a superiority complex” Raju, 2018 Completeness CRITIQUING THE CRITERIA
  5. 5. EXTRA CRITERIA..? Librarians and publishers • Increased transparency • Increased affordability • Liaison with OA publishers • Payment on delivery • No paid-for fast-track publication option • Refunds for errors Authors and publishers • Clarity on peer review process/length • Clarity on costs • User-friendly systems • Get out option • Clarity on value- added/benefits
  6. 6. ‘BEALL’S’ LIST II https://beallslist. weebly.com/
  7. 7. CABELLS BLACKLIST
  8. 8. CABELLS BLACKLIST
  9. 9. WHAT CAN LIBRARIANS DO? • Change the focus from journal to article • Review publishing training/support • Facilitate peer support • Advocate for OA small presses/new journals
  10. 10. WHAT CAN OTHER SERVICES DO? • Review inclusion criteria regularly? (Ulrichs, RoMEO, DOAJ, OASPA) • Review application criteria regularly? (ISSN, Crossref)
  11. 11. ACTIVITY • Discuss questions in groups • Feedback using Trello link https://trello.com/b/KdnYM2pQ/uksg-predatory- publishers
  12. 12. helen.j.dobson@manchester.ac.uk @h_j_dobson THANK YOU

Does the notion of 'predatory' publishing alarm, confuse or amuse you? This session will consider what makes a publisher predatory, who is affected by so-called predatory publishers and how the scholarly community is responding to the perceived threats such publishers pose.

Views

Total views

740

On Slideshare

0

From embeds

0

Number of embeds

0

Actions

Downloads

6

Shares

0

Comments

0

Likes

0

×