Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

1030 sykes open access uksg - phil sykes - april


Published on

  • Login to see the comments

1030 sykes open access uksg - phil sykes - april

  1. 1. Phil Sykes – University of LiverpoolUKSG Conference, Bournemouth 2012
  2. 2.  What’s happened so far Where we are now Some thoughts on what we do next
  3. 3.  High hopes at the turn of the century and gentle progress since the Budapest Declaration in 2002 Laaslo and Bjork survey in 2010 indicated that ◦ 2.7% of published articles going into institutional repositories ◦ 5.3% into Open Access journals ◦ 2% Open Access in hybrid journals
  4. 4.  UK Government very unsupportive to OA until recently Profound change with the appointment of strongly pro open access David Willets Willetts convened Round Table in March 2011 saying issue was not “whether” OA but “when” and “how Finch Group convened to answer the question “How can we make a breakthrough”
  5. 5.  OA best taken forward through Gold Open Access Earmarked funding should be provided by research funder for OA Articles should be made available on a liberal Creative Commons licence (CC- BY)
  6. 6.  Gold makes it possible for articles to be released on a liberal reuse licence. Minimum obstacles to text-mining etc. Needed to recommend something that would effect a dynamic changes Version of record of the article becomes instantly available- no waiting
  7. 7.  Researchers they funded had to publish on an OA basis in journals that complied with their policy ◦ Gold option; or ◦ Green option with maximum six month embargo period (12 in social sciences and humanities ◦ Provided funding for 45% to be published on Gold OA basis in 2013-14 ◦ Required CC-BY
  8. 8.  Allowed longer embargo periods for Green when the publisher provides a Gold option which the author doesn’t take up (Elsevier interpreting that as allowing 48 months!) OA is “a journey”. No need for 100% of articles to be in OA form in year 1. 45% have to be in OA form in 2013-14; but no prescription as to balance of Gold and Green
  9. 9.  Central proposition: in order to be submitted to REF 2020 research outputs, subject to exceptions to be agreed, have to be published in OA form Tone more even handed as between Green and Gold than RCUK policy HEFCE not making any specified funding available On licences and embargoes would like to align with RCUK
  10. 10. The triumph of Open Access is now inevitableThank you. Goodbye
  11. 11.  The current situation results from a very fortuitous combination of circumstances: David Willetts and key personnel in funding bodies all strongly pro-OA So we have to be resolute and make use of the improbable opportunity we now have. We have to provide strong support nationally through our professional bodies and skilled advocacy on campus We have to make Gold work too!
  12. 12. Phil Sykes – University of LiverpoolUKSG Conference, Bournemouth 2012