Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

Chaos&Order: Using visualization as a means to
 explore large heritage collections

453 views

Published on

*note: download original powerpoint to view animations*. Presentation at 4th Int. Alexandria Workshop (19./20. October 2017) - Foundations for Temporal Retrieval, Exploration and Analytics in Web Archives.

Published in: Education
  • Be the first to comment

Chaos&Order: Using visualization as a means to
 explore large heritage collections

  1. 1. Chaos & OrderChaos & Order University of Oslo Library Using visualization as a means to explore large heritage collections Hugo Huurdeman @timelessfuture
  2. 2. Visual Navigation Project University of Oslo Library bit.ly/VisualNavigationProject
  3. 3. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0Ojz0jO8Moc
  4. 4. Stream 2: Physical Interaction • Stream 1 & 3 build on top of existing work and infrastructure • Approach Stream 2: experiment with novel ways of interaction in physical space • with library’s book collections • experiments with a touch table (Science Library) • Includes an INF2260 project & INF Master project Yaron Okun Physical interaction (2) Visualiza- tion (1) Visual navigation prototypes Picture: Marina Tofting
  5. 5. Visual Navigation Project University of Oslo Library bit.ly/VisualNavigationProject in collaboration with Department of Informatics by support of the National Library of Norway start: Sept. 2016. duration two years
  6. 6. 1 Introduction
  7. 7. One motivation: ‘underuse’ of Web archives • Web archives preserve the fast- changing Web. By now containing Petabytes of valuable Web data • This could be a valuable resource, however, archives have not frequently been used for research [DoughertyMeyer14], e.g. due to access issues. • Presentation focus: using visualization as a means to explore large heritage collections
  8. 8. 2 Theoretical framework
  9. 9. • Information seeking as a process of construction • E.g. [Kuhlthau91, Vakkari01] Inf. seeking process 2.1+uncertainty- feelings thoughts actions vague focused seeking general information (exploring) seeking pertinent information (documenting) uncertainty optimism confusion clarity confidence (dis)satisfaction doubt direction FormulationInitiation Selection Exploration Collection Presentation
  10. 10. Stage-based search support • Stage-based support [Huurdeman&Kamps14/15,HuurdemanWilson&Kamps16, Huurdeman17a/b]
  11. 11. Re/search as a constructive process 2.3 • Mapping Kendall’s (2012) Research Process Model • to Kuhlthau’s ISP Model (1991) [Huurdeman17b]
  12. 12. • Today: look at the initial (prefocus) phases • How does one get curious, inspired, interested? What support for this phase currently exists? Research as a constructive process 2.3
  13. 13. 3. Exploratory Interfaces
  14. 14. [Ahlberg&Shneiderman94] [Google Wonder Wheel] [ClusterMap] [Epicurious] [Donato10] [Hearst&Degler13] [Proulx et al., 2006] • SUIs may aid users to: • express needs, formulate queries, provide understanding & to track progress [Hearst09] • Complexity of designing effective SUIs [Shneiderman05] • Many proposed interactive features: • search suggestions [Niu14], facets [Tunkelang09], item trays [Donato10], .. Search User Interfaces 3.1
  15. 15. Few features have made it to the general search engines, however Some turned up in specific context, e.g. online shopping, analytics
  16. 16. Access to heritage collections 3.2 • Some developments have been incorporated in systems to access cultural heritage collections • Libraries, Museums, Archives • Web archives
  17. 17. Web Archives 3.3 • Wayback Machine: URL as starting point • Search Systems: Query as starting point
  18. 18. Assumptions of Wayback Machine 3.4 • Assumption that you know what you are looking for… !!!
  19. 19. Assumptions of search 3.5 • Searching (even exploratory) assumes that you have an initial idea what you would like to look for — however rough image:Google
  20. 20. Web archive Access Issues 3.7 • Problems* of • scale (large size) • dimensions (temporal and hierarchical) • Hence, the data is too much and too complex for regular URL browsing & basic searching (e.g. how to convey all this in 10 blue links?)
  21. 21. Towards Visualization? 3.8 • Any kind of visual representation of information designed to enable exploration, discovery, communication, etc. (Cairo, 2016) • Visualization - can be used throughout (re)search process • initial exploration, get a grasp (exploration) • as an artefact of ongoing research (discovery) • as an end product (science communication)
  22. 22. Guiding Questions 3.9 • Can we devise alternatives* to the Query and URL approach for web archive access? • To what extent can we provide more visual approaches for browsing web archives? [Ahlberg&Shneiderman94] [Pejtersen89]
  23. 23. 4. Initial explorations [Part presented as HuurdemanSamarEtAl16 (IIPC)]
  24. 24. Flickr: koninklijkebibliotheek Statistics (2016): •10,000+ websites •35,000+ harvests •16+ Terabyte •Categorized using UNESCO classification National Library of the Netherlands: Web archive since 2007
  25. 25. Data: extraction and processing 4.1 extracting all homepages + 1 level deep matching with seedlist adding KB metadata cleaning, processing, data enrichment (e.g. NER) generate visualizations~900K XML files thanks: Thaer Samar
  26. 26. Web sphere Page element Web site Web page 2010 2015 eyefilm.nl [Brügger] [Huurdeman15]
  27. 27. Example: eyefilm.nl (2010- 2015) redesign redesign content links images overall
  28. 28. Example: escherinhetpaleis .nl (2010-2015) content links images overall
  29. 29. Web sphere Page element Web site Web page 2010 2015 unesco classifications
  30. 30. Changerate (type of site) Changes per unesco category (all p/quarter harvests, n=~600, 2009-2015) Meteorology Law & government History Sports Agriculture
  31. 31. Web sphere Page element Web site Web page 2010 2015 nu.nl
  32. 32. Exploring content (news) 2014 2015
  33. 33. Jan’13 Feb’13 Mar’13 Apr’13 May’13 Jun’13 Jul’13 Aug’13 Sep’13 Oct’13 Nov’13 Dec’13
  34. 34. Daily (2012)
  35. 35. 5. ‘CollectionXplorer’
  36. 36. CollectionXplorer Characteristics • Using d3js as a basis • “Playful”, short-form development • Different visualizations as a ‘lens’ to the archive • As a starting point to rethink web archive access • How to induce interest, inspiration & curiosity in the context of web archives?
  37. 37. Clusters color: representations of websites, size: number of crawls
  38. 38. Clusters color: representations of websites, size: number of crawls
  39. 39. Word Clouds size: number of sites
  40. 40. Bar Charts color: unesco category, size: avg change %
  41. 41. Bar Charts color: unesco category, size: avg change %
  42. 42. Network (Force-directed) connetions: unesco category, size: number of crawls
  43. 43. Scatterplots horizontal: category, vertical: user rating (books) So, lots of opportunities distinct properties of each type of visualization
  44. 44. CollectionXplorer - some char’istics • “Playful” - engage potential users, encourage to interact • Easy to add new types of visualizations • Various modalities to explore • Initial testing on touch table (swipe!) • Next steps: further explore dimensions of the archive • Develop a “design language” • Infrastructural demands, user testing. Evaluation.
  45. 45. 7. Conclusion
  46. 46. Conclusion • Looking at initial stages of the complex (re)search process - open-ended browsing • Exploring temporal and hierarchical dimensions • Short-form prototypes - how to visualize web archive content in “engaging” ways? • …further infrastructure, dev and testing is needed
  47. 47. Closing off: conveying complexity • “I want [people] to use the visualizations I provide as a starting point for their own explorations” • They should expose “the complexity, the inner contradictions, the manifold nature of the underlying phenomenon. (Moritz Stefaner) In a web archive context, a simple results list hides a lot of complexities…
  48. 48. References • Ben-David A. & Huurdeman H. (2014). Web Archive Search as Research: Methodological and Theoretical Implications. Alexandria Journal, Volume 25, No. 1 (2014) • Brügger, N. (2013). Historical Network Analysis of the Web. Social Science Computer Review, 31(3), 306–321 • Dougherty, M., & Meyer, E. T. (2014). Community, tools, and practices in web archiving: The state-of-the-art in relation to social science and humanities research needs. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 65(11), 2195– 2209. http://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23099 • Hearst M. A.. Search User Interfaces. Cambridge University Press, 2009. • Huurdeman, H. C. (2017). Dynamic Support for the Complex Dynamics of the Information Seeking Process, PhD thesis (exp.2017) • Huurdeman, H. C. (2017). Dynamic Compositions: Recombining Search User Interface Features for Supporting Complex Work Tasks. In SCST@ CHIIR (pp. 21–24). • Huurdeman, H. C., Wilson, M. L., & Kamps, J. (2016). Active and Passive Utility of Search Interface Features in Different Information Seeking Task Stages. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM on Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval (pp. 3–12). New York, NY, USA: ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2854946.2854957 • Huurdeman, Samar, Kamps, De Vries (2016). Towards Multidimensional Web Archive Access. Presented at IIPC conference ‘16 • Hugo C. Huurdeman and Jaap Kamps (2015). Supporting the Process: Adapting Search Systems to Search Stages. In: S. Kurbanoğlu, S. Špiranec, J. Boustany, E. Grassian, D. Mizrachi, & L. Roy (Eds.), Information Literacy: Moving towards sustainability, Communication in Computer and Information Science series (Vol. 552, pp. 394-404). • Huurdeman, H. (2015). Towards Research Engines: Supporting Search Stages in Web archives. In Two-day conference at Aarhus University, Denmark. • Huurdeman, H., & Kamps, J. (2014). From Multistage Information-seeking Models to Multistage Search Systems. In Proceedings of the 5th Information Interaction in Context Symposium (pp. 145–154). New York, NY, USA: ACM. • C. C. Kuhlthau. Inside the search process: Information seeking from the user’s perspective. JASIS, 42:361–371, 1991. • B. Shneiderman and C. Pleasant. Designing the user interface: strategies for effective human-computer interaction. Pearson Education, 2005. • P. Vakkari. A theory of the task-based information retrieval process: a summary and generalisation of a longitudinal study. Journal of Documentation, 57:44–60, 2001.
  49. 49. Acknowledgements • Thaer Samar & Jaap Kamps & Arjen & others in WebART • NWO grant • Colleagues at University of Oslo (Science Lib) • NB grant • René Voorburg & Kees Teszelsky at the KB
  50. 50. Chaos & Order University of Oslo Library Using visualization as a means to explore large heritage collections Hugo Huurdeman @timelessfuture

×