image: http://nyuniversity.tumblr.com/
• Speech Writer
• Government Relations
• PR and Marketing
• Web Communications
• Migrate NYU.edu from a static site to CMS (Adobe
CQ)
• Bringing groups and sites from outside into a single
system
The New York State
School of Industrial and
Labor Relations
http://kheelcenter.tumblr.com/
I Love Reading?
• Branding problem
• Long history in Labor
• Active HR Alumni
• Strong faculty
• Conflicting views on what the school is
“selling” and offering
MVP Content Strategy
• Thorough content inventory
• finished but after launch
• Work as much with clients/stakeholders as possible
given the timeframe
• Rethink / Rewrite / Reorg, Move As Is
• Migrate content
(Strategery?)
Pro
• Identify content that doesn’t need to be
migrated
• Improve the contributor experience
• Improve site reliability
• Everyone has to go along with it
• Must finish the task
• No matter what, produce something new
http://www.higheredgeek.com/
Con
• Not flexible if things change
• It really is a minimum product
• No time for content assessment
• No time for content rewrites
• No time for content collection
http://www.albany.asn.au/
A Bare Bones Strategy(not the company that makes BBEdit)
The Website
• Limited content types. Got specific.
• Built in tagging system to help meet use cases
• Created categories to increase functionality
• Used publishing options (featured, sticky) to create
additional use cases
• Mobile first
• Limited theming
• Basic Cornell University branding
• Limited navigation
• Kept side navigation operation same in mobile as desktop
User Roles
• First piece of culture change
• Limited number of user roles (admin, contributor)
• A few specialty user roles for specific functionality
• Contributors have the ability to edit the whole site
• Everyone on their best behavior
• Encouraging content exchange across the site
• Encouraging familiar user experience
The Good
• Site launched “on time”
• Essential content was in
• Site is on Acquia and has had no downtime
• Spawned conversations with stakeholders
(not all positive)
• Identified key projects moving forward
• Set priorities
• Identified areas where we need to improve
as a team
• Implemented change
The Bad
• Broken things (are now fixed)
• Not good client interaction
• Loss of trust (all the trust)
• Content STILL needs a rewrite
• Things were moved, but not
necessarily in the best places
The Ugly
● Angry people were angry
● Mean people were mean
● Two stakeholders moved
properties elsewhere
● Some groups
wouldn’t/couldn’t speak to
us
● Town halls to listen to
complaints
● Had to focus on HiPPO
needs, eroding trust in
other groups
● Build some functionality
that’s no longer used
(attrition)
● 3-6 Months cleaning up
the mess
Student Feedback• 3 months after launch
• 38 Undergraduate and 3 Graduate students interviewed
• 25 of those polled had used the new website since January 15
• 17 had not. Roughly 40%.
• Of that 25:
• 18 liked the new website
• 2 strongly did not
• 5 were ambivalent toward it
• Of that 25:
• 17 found what they were looking for
• 8 did not and had to go through some other means to get it, i.e call or visit
associated office
More Purposeful Meetings
• Weekly project meetings with major
stakeholders
• Groups with identifiable goals/outcomes
• Representatives from individual silos
• Acknowledge school-wide needs, not just silo
https://www.usability.gov
Group Hug
• Involve everyone in the process
• Micro-managing (hopefully) turns to trust
https://reachingforsoul.wordpress.com
Build Trust
• You are starting at zero
• Incremental growth gives an opportunity to
prove yourselves again and again
http://rhapsodystrategies.com/
Change the Process
• Broke work down into smaller stories
• Created an order to our work that is shared
with all stakeholders (REQ, U/X, ENG, ART)
• Created in-team quality control/review
https://http://www.discoverwildlife.com
Avoid the Pitfall of Saying “No”
• We know what it takes to do this and some things
sound crazy.
• Identify the real need.
Testing and Data
• Stakeholders acknowledge data is
important
• Want to use it to identify
strengths/weaknesses
• Want more
http://memory-beta.wikia.com/wiki/Data
Student Testing
• 17 students / 20 minute test time
• Look is ok
• Search is how they find things
• Google and site search
• Don’t see our left hand navigation
• Don’t need to use the site
• Other resources available to them to do specific tasks
(Handshake, Cornell Courses, etc)
• They want student stories ALWAYS
• Admissions primary driver (UG, Grad, Professional)
the process and methods of moving a site from commonspot to Drupal - the pros and cons of moving a site quickly without ideal input - the content strategy behind this kind of move - the process of migrating content - how to clearly identify their audiences and stakeholders - how to foster culture change in your organization after something goes wrong
Later i will be telling the very nerdy story about my twitter handle if you’re interested.
I want to issue a trigger warning before i really start because i’m going to be talking about the process of migrating a website at a higher ed institution, which may have been traumatic for so many here.
came from NYU almost 2 years ago. i was a speech writer, government relations, marketing and pr. moved to webcom to help with migration from static site to content management system (Adobe CQ, part of their web experience manager), bringing in groups from outside into a single system, creating a new architecture.
came from NYU almost 2 years ago. i was a speech writer, government relations, marketing and pr. moved to webcom to help with migration from static site to content management system (Adobe CQ, part of their web experience manager), bringing in groups from outside into a single system, creating a new architecture.
and then we had another one. i promise you this is important. i’m not just talking about my kids. i’ll get to it in a few minutes.
ilr not irl - ilr irl
ilr not irl - ilr irl
migration from a content management system to ANOTHER cms, outside hosting solution
Take your expected launch date and add six months, we gave them ours and they took 6 off.
Basic page, news, events (events are giving us trouble), people, promos, videos, registration, courses)
Bulk of this work on us/me. Had some help, but not that much.
And now we get to the aftermath
We lost some people and because of that they showed us what work we didn’t need to do.
I didn’t take the brunt of this, but if you see David DeMello, give him a hug.
More meetings, but with specific purpose
one kid is simple, easy to maintain. two kids is a little more complex. you’ve probably got more going on. there are more political conversations
three kids is a mess.
beyond three, someone is always unhappy. you understand that “things get broken.” nothing is ever “finished.”
And then just when you think you’ve got it figured out, someone gets you to take their dog.