1. Acute Kidney Injury
Responding to
AKI Warning Stage Test Results
Developing Guidance for Primary Care
Dr Tom Blakeman
GP & Clinical Senior Lecturer in Primary Care
NIHR CLAHRC for Greater Manchester
tom.blakeman@manchester.ac.uk
3. Aims:
•Put the test result in a clinical context
•Treat the patient not the test result
•Maximise clinical utility
•Minimise information overload and burden
•Ensure primary care engagement
4. 10 Key Steps: Development of Guidance
Step 1: Form Think Kidney Primary Care Working Group
Step 2: Review existing local and national AKI guidelines
Step 3: Identify and align with other relevant guidelines
Step 4: Conduct RAND Consensus Process
Step 5: Develop early drafts
Step 6: First Round of National Feedback
Step 7: Think Kidneys Primary Care Resource Workshop
Step 8: Multidisciplinary meeting 1 (North East)
Step 9: Multidisciplinary meeting 2 (Out of Hours -Bristol)
Step 10: Second round of National Feedback
5. Step 1: Form Think Kidneys Primary Care Working Group
April 2015
6. Step 2: Review existing local and national AKI guidelines
May-June 2015
7. Step 3: Identify and align with other relevant guidelines
May-June 2015
8. Step 4: Conduct RAND Consensus Process
Panel Membership:
•Clinical Biochemistry
•Acute & Emergency Medicine
•Routine General Practice:
Out of Hours Care
GP Commissioning
Medical ‘overdiagnosis’
July-September 2015
9. Step 4: Conduct RAND Consensus Process
Two Rounds of Rating:
652 Scenarios
•Timeliness in communication from
Labs to primary care
•Timeliness in clinician response on
knowledge of AKI test result
July-September 2015
10. Step 4: Conduct RAND Consensus Process - Leeds
Round 2 Rating:
• 1 Day Meeting
• Discussion then individual rating
• Not force consensus
July-September 2015
16. Step 7: Think Kidneys Resource workshop - London
January 2016
17. Step 8: Multidisciplinary meeting 1 – North East
• A GP
• A Biochemist
• A Nephrologist
February 2016
18. Step 9: Multidisciplinary meeting 2 – University of Bristol
Out of Hours Test Results Project:
• Medical Biochemist
• GP & Urgent Care Clinical Lead
• Consultant Medicine for Older People
• GP & Clinical Lead for OOH
• GP & AHSN perspective
• Service Improvement Lead
• OOH Case Manager
February 2016
19. Step 10: Invite final feedback
•Think Kidneys Workstreams
Risk
Education
Intervention
•RAND Panel members
•Respondents from first round of feedback
February-March 2016
24. How to find out more
Karen Thomas
Think Kidneys Programme Manager
UK Renal Registry
Karen.Thomas@renalregistry.nhs.uk
Teresa Wallace
Think Kidneys Programme Coordinator
UK Renal Registry
Teresajane.Wallace@renalregistry.nhs.uk
28.11.2014Acute Kidney Injury National Programme | Introducing the Think Kidneys campaign | Karen Thomas | 24
Contact Think Kidneys
Richard Fluck
National Clinical Director for Renal
NHS England
Richard.fluck@nhs.net
Joan Russell
Head of Patient Safety
NHS England
Joan.russell@nhs.net
Ron Cullen
Director
UK Renal Registry
Ron.cullen@renalregistry.nhs.uk
www.linkedin.com/company/think-kidneys
www.twitter.com/ThinkKidneys
www.facebook.com/thinkkidneys
www.youtube.com/user/thinkkidneys
www.slideshare.net/ThinkKidneys
www.thinkkidneys.nhs.uk
Editor's Notes
A 10-person panel was identified with representation from clinical biochemistry, acute and emergency medicine and routine general practice. Individuals with an expressed interest and expertise in AKI through membership of the Think Kidneys Programme were invited as well as general practitioners who represented typical practice in relation to out of hours care, GP commissioning and those who represented a medical ‘over-diagnosis’ perspective. The panel was co-chaired by one researcher (SC), who is expert in the RAND Appropriateness Method, and a nephrologist (CT) who is expert in AKI.
.
.
Formed TK Working Group - picture of Charlie Tomson
7.Drawn upon local guidance documents, building on Nick Selby’s Derby Guidance- Derby/Manchester/Berkshire
8.Sought to be aligned with other relevant guidelines (e.g. RA 2014 Hyperkalaemia; Sepsis February 2016) – pictures of existing documents
9. RAND Conesus process to inform timeliness in communication from labs to primary care and timeliness in response by clinicians – picture of RAND/scenarios/Leeds
10. Blog – invite:
11. Draft circulated December 2015 – feedback – uttererly baffling – iterations Tables: Jung: algorithm slimmed down to current version
12. Discussed TK Programme Board January 2016 – Resource for London meeting
13. Redrafted following TK (cross-workstream) workshop, January 2016 – picture of South Tees - changes
14. Discussed at Meeting with GP, Biochemist and Nephrologist in North East – Feb 2016 – OOH of care
Redrafted and taken to GP Discussion group (with OOH focus) in Bristol, led by professor Sarah Purdy (University of Bristol) February, 2016
15. Picture main front
16. Table 1
17 Table 2
Formed TK Working Group - picture of Charlie Tomson
7.Drawn upon local guidance documents, building on Nick Selby’s Derby Guidance- Derby/Manchester/Berkshire
8.Sought to be aligned with other relevant guidelines (e.g. RA 2014 Hyperkalaemia; Sepsis February 2016) – pictures of existing documents
9. RAND Conesus process to inform timeliness in communication from labs to primary care and timeliness in response by clinicians – picture of RAND/scenarios/Leeds
10. Blog – invite:
11. Draft circulated December 2015 – feedback – uttererly baffling – iterations Tables: Jung: algorithm slimmed down to current version
12. Discussed TK Programme Board January 2016 – Resource for London meeting
13. Redrafted following TK (cross-workstream) workshop, January 2016 – picture of South Tees - changes
14. Discussed at Meeting with GP, Biochemist and Nephrologist in North East – Feb 2016 – OOH of care
Redrafted and taken to GP Discussion group (with OOH focus) in Bristol, led by professor Sarah Purdy (University of Bristol) February, 2016
15. Picture main front
16. Table 1
17 Table 2