Manufacturing Interoperability Guideline Working Group

766 views

Published on

Published in: Technology, Business
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total views
766
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
1
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
27
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide
  • A virtual organization Maintained by MIMOSA No dues, participants volunteer from member groups Umbrella organization – A Forum for collaboration How does the organization work? OpenO&M does not dictate work or content of member groups standards OpenO&M issues whitepapers addressing standards related benefits of industry interest Participants harmonize key standards from their respective organizations Participants develop and demonstrate reference implementations based on their harmonized standards Participating organizations work to cross reference their related standards and collaborate on their content
  • Establish workgroup to review and recommend convergence of OAGi, ISA-95/B2MML and then related standards Encourage customer participation Facilitate cross industry alliance of standards groups, customers and supplier
  • Manufacturing Interoperability Guideline Working Group

    1. 1. Manufacturing Interoperability Guideline Working Group (MIG WG) Keith Unger Chairman, ISA-SP95 [email_address]
    2. 2. Keith Unger <ul><li>Principal MIT Consultant at Stone Technology Inc. </li></ul><ul><ul><li>ERP / MES / Automation consulting </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Chairman ISA-SP95 Enterprise – Control System Integration </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Past Vice Chairman ISA-SP88 – Batch Control </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Past Vice Chairman ISA-SP99 – Manufacturing Security </li></ul></ul><ul><li>29 years manufacturing Information technology experience focused on the hybrid manufacturing industries (Consumer Goods, Food and Beverage, Specialty Chemical). </li></ul>
    3. 3. Global Market Dynamics Drive Need for Manufacturing Interoperability <ul><li>Major manufacturers are standardizing business processes and data exchange practices globally </li></ul><ul><li>Information exchange between plants and enterprise (near real time) is increasing </li></ul><ul><li>Business flexibility </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Responding to market needs key to profitability </li></ul></ul>
    4. 4. 2005 Status of Plant 2 Business (P2B) Interoperable Standards Adoption <ul><li>Analysts feedback from software suppliers and customer organizations </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Too many overlapping standards </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Simplification needed to avoid redundant and inconsistent integration software components (services) </li></ul><ul><li>Customers need solutions that delivery </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Near real time interoperability </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Reduce cost and deployment time for system integration </li></ul></ul><ul><li>US. Dept of Commerce – NIST $billions are being lost </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Across the manufacturing supply chain due to inadequate adoption of data exchange standards and infrastructure </li></ul></ul>
    5. 5. 2005 Discrete IOP Team Results and Conclusions <ul><li>ISA-95/B2MML terminology and models for process industries </li></ul><ul><ul><li>ISA-95 standards and object models are easy to understand </li></ul></ul><ul><li>ISA-95 Standards provide </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Terminology, abstract models and plant to business transactions </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>ISA-59 Part 5 Transactions are based on ISA-95 Part 1, 2 and OAGIS </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><li>OAGIS Business Object Document (BOD) </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Consistent with United Nations specifications for common components </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Provides good coverage for discrete integration scenarios </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>XML data schema is mature and detailed </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Object (data) models for complex discrete manufacturing processes should be simplified and merged with ISA-95 standards </li></ul>
    6. 6. Standard Groups Agree to Convergence Efforts <ul><li>OAGi joins OpenO&M TM </li></ul><ul><ul><li>OAGi and ISA-SP95 joint agreement 12/8/05 </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Manufacturing Interoperability Guideline Working Group </li></ul><ul><ul><li>OAGi, ISA, MIMOSA, OPC and WBF establish Memorandum of Agreement to form Guideline Working Group (MIG WG) with Customer Participation 3/23/06 </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>First MIG WG Meeting and Review 4/26-28/06 </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Agree to issue Interim Guideline by January 2007 and Final Guideline by May 2007 </li></ul></ul>
    7. 7. OpenO&M™ Manufacturing Domain Mapping OAGIS Manufacturing Operations & Maintenance Enterprise Inter-Enterprise Machine OPC DA, HDA, A&E, OMAC Discrete Process OAGIS MIMOSA MIMOSA OPC UA ISA-95 B2MML OAGIS OpenO&M T M and the MIMOSA logo are marks of MIMOSA. All other marks are the property of their respective owners. .
    8. 8. Manufacturing Interoperability Standards Customer Advisory Council
    9. 9. Manufacturing Interoperability Standards & Customer Advisory Council Goal <ul><li>One top level generic ISA-95/OAGi manufacturing interoperability model is desired as much as practical. </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Analysis of discrete and process manufacturing to identify additional content needed in the model and standard. </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Customer input is being used to help establish the ISA-95 Part 4 models. </li></ul></ul>
    10. 10. Summary of Standards Contribution <ul><li>Manufacturing Interoperability Standards </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Have reached a maturity level to begin convergence </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Establish consistent data exchange practices across the enterprise and supply chain </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Have demonstrated reduced IT system cost and deployment time </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Have improved timeliness of information availability to the enterprise </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Standards convergence will require involvement of customers, suppliers and standards groups </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Improve and simplify standards content </li></ul></ul>
    11. 11. Key Contacts <ul><li>Alan T. Johnston – President – MIMOSA – Chair OpenO&M Initiative </li></ul><ul><ul><li>[email_address] </li></ul></ul><ul><li>David Emerson – WBF/B2MML WG - Director - OpenO&M MFG JWG </li></ul><ul><ul><li>[email_address] </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Thomas J. Burke – OPC Foundation President & Executive Director </li></ul><ul><ul><li>[email_address] </li></ul></ul><ul><li>David Connelly – President & CEO - Open Applications Group </li></ul><ul><ul><li>[email_address] </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Keith Unger – Chair - ISA-95 </li></ul><ul><ul><li>[email_address] </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Gary H. Sullivan – Chair – Manufacturing IOP Guideline Working Group </li></ul><ul><ul><li>[email_address] </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Greg Gorbach – ARC Advisory Group </li></ul><ul><ul><li>[email_address] </li></ul></ul>
    12. 12. ISA Values Your Input <ul><li>Questions on MIG-WG? </li></ul><ul><li>Ideas / Suggestions? </li></ul><ul><li>To get involved, contact: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Gary Sullivan, MIG WG Chair, [email_address] </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Chip Lee, ISA, [email_address] </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Website: www.isa.org/mnfginterop </li></ul>

    ×