Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.
How to Think About
Semiconductor Stocks
What to expect:
• Reasons to invest in semiconductor stocks
• Making heads or tails of popular business models
• 3 Importa...
Rags or riches?
Stocks in the semiconductor industry can be
tempting
…but you have to learn the ropes first.
Big winners abound…
… But satisfaction is not guaranteed
How to beat the semiconductor market
Find the winners
The AMEX Semiconductor Index is not a
market-beater.
You need to kno...
Core thesis:
The biggest winners
tap into
stable or growing markets…
…with room for error.
For example…
You may have heard of the next
game-changing
mega-trend
in technology…
The Next Big Thing: Internet of Things
Source: Cisco Systems.
Who’s betting on the Internet of Things?
Source: Texas
Instruments.
Better question:
Who isn’t?
For example, Texas Instrum...
Another big name going all in: Qualcomm
QUALCOMM already dominates the last
game-changing market:
mobile communications.
B...
IoT is an easy stretch for Qualcomm
Source:
Qualcomm.
But that’s only half the battle!
Picking the right market is a great start…
…but you have to execute on those
big-ticket p...
Business models: Fab-less or not?
Source: Intel.
Strategies vary; Apples…
Strategies vary.
Intel sees its
chip factories as
a competitive
advantage.
Source: Intel.
(Factories can be risky)
Intel’s Fab 42 in Chandler, Arizona is a $5 billion investment.
Technology upgrades nixed, the fa...
…and oranges.
Others may focus on chip
design only.
Known as fab-less chip
companies, they
outsource manufacturing
to spec...
(Factories can be very helpful, too)
When dozens of chip designers rely on a handful of foundries,
they can run into bottl...
For example:
OmniVision Technologies got a huge
order from Apple in 2009.
The iPhone 3GS needed millions
of OmniVision’s c...
Oops!
But TSMC had its hands full with even bigger orders. OmniVision didn’t have exclusive
access to manufacturing lines ...
Fab-less chip designers are
not inherently
better or worse
than factory builders.
Investors simply need to
know the difference.
One style may
fit your portfolio
better than the other.
In-house factories give you more
control over operations.
Using foundries instead provides
more flexibility.
Metrics to watch
Source: Wikimedia Commons.
Numbers can tell the story
High and rising/stable gross margins show pricing power and efficient manufacturing.
• Qualcomm...
Choices in the mobile era
Qualcomm sacrificed margins to protect growth.
Intel sacrificed growth to protect margins.
3 powerful prediction tools: Book-to-bill
Some (but unfortunately not all) chip stocks report book-to-bill ratios.
• Book-...
3 powerful prediction tools: Book-to-bill
This is chiefly an industry metric, compiled and reported by bodies like
Semicon...
3 powerful prediction tools: Book-to-bill
Reporting book-to-bill at all is evidence of a certain swagger.
In particular, I...
3 powerful prediction tools: Order backlogs
Many companies report order backlogs instead of
book-to-bill ratios.
• Backlog...
3 powerful prediction tools: Order backlogs
• For example, ON Semiconductor feels good about backlog orders
accounting for...
3 powerful prediction tools: Research
Strong R&D budgets always get my seal of approval.
So do muscular capital expenses –...
3 powerful prediction tools: Research
This is a key reason why I own Intel.
• R&D budgets have grown 75% in
4 years.
• Inf...
3 powerful prediction tools: Research
Big R&D budgets are no guarantee for producing the right
inventions.
But it’s a grea...
Take this home with you:
Source: Texas Instruments.
Some semiconductor stocks are poised for takeoff; others may crash. Yo...
Are you ready to profit from
this $14.4 trillion
technology revolution?
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in …5
×

How To Think About Semiconductor Stocks

2,860 views

Published on

Semiconductor stocks can make you rich -- or help you lose your shirt. This slideshow shows you how to tell the difference...

Published in: Business, Economy & Finance
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

How To Think About Semiconductor Stocks

  1. 1. How to Think About Semiconductor Stocks
  2. 2. What to expect: • Reasons to invest in semiconductor stocks • Making heads or tails of popular business models • 3 Important metrics to watch • Putting it all together.
  3. 3. Rags or riches? Stocks in the semiconductor industry can be tempting …but you have to learn the ropes first.
  4. 4. Big winners abound…
  5. 5. … But satisfaction is not guaranteed
  6. 6. How to beat the semiconductor market Find the winners The AMEX Semiconductor Index is not a market-beater. You need to know where to find the big winners.
  7. 7. Core thesis: The biggest winners tap into stable or growing markets… …with room for error.
  8. 8. For example… You may have heard of the next game-changing mega-trend in technology…
  9. 9. The Next Big Thing: Internet of Things Source: Cisco Systems.
  10. 10. Who’s betting on the Internet of Things? Source: Texas Instruments. Better question: Who isn’t? For example, Texas Instruments sees all sorts of growth opportunities opening up… …and Internet of Things is the key to almost all of them. Remember: IoT is machines sending data to other machines.
  11. 11. Another big name going all in: Qualcomm QUALCOMM already dominates the last game-changing market: mobile communications. But Qualcomm wants more…
  12. 12. IoT is an easy stretch for Qualcomm Source: Qualcomm.
  13. 13. But that’s only half the battle! Picking the right market is a great start… …but you have to execute on those big-ticket plans, too. So let’s find out how to sift the wheat from the chaff.
  14. 14. Business models: Fab-less or not? Source: Intel.
  15. 15. Strategies vary; Apples… Strategies vary. Intel sees its chip factories as a competitive advantage. Source: Intel.
  16. 16. (Factories can be risky) Intel’s Fab 42 in Chandler, Arizona is a $5 billion investment. Technology upgrades nixed, the facility sits empty today. Intel would love to have that cash back today. Source: Intel.
  17. 17. …and oranges. Others may focus on chip design only. Known as fab-less chip companies, they outsource manufacturing to specialized foundries such as Taiwan Semiconductor. Source: TSMC.
  18. 18. (Factories can be very helpful, too) When dozens of chip designers rely on a handful of foundries, they can run into bottlenecks.
  19. 19. For example: OmniVision Technologies got a huge order from Apple in 2009. The iPhone 3GS needed millions of OmniVision’s camera chips. Being fab-less, OmniVision needed tons of capacity from TSMC. Right away, please.Source: Wikimedia Commons.
  20. 20. Oops! But TSMC had its hands full with even bigger orders. OmniVision didn’t have exclusive access to manufacturing lines anywhere. OmniVision’s huge order never led to massive sales in 2009. Apple had to get camera sensors from multiple sources. …All for lack of a company- owned factory.
  21. 21. Fab-less chip designers are not inherently better or worse than factory builders.
  22. 22. Investors simply need to know the difference. One style may fit your portfolio better than the other.
  23. 23. In-house factories give you more control over operations. Using foundries instead provides more flexibility.
  24. 24. Metrics to watch Source: Wikimedia Commons.
  25. 25. Numbers can tell the story High and rising/stable gross margins show pricing power and efficient manufacturing. • Qualcomm is a leading fab-less chip designer. • Margins are still strong, but have been falling since 2011. • Qualcomm’s mobile products moved from boutique to commodities very quickly. • Intel is king of the factory owners. • If the PC is dead, Intel never got that memo. • Pricing Power 101.
  26. 26. Choices in the mobile era Qualcomm sacrificed margins to protect growth. Intel sacrificed growth to protect margins.
  27. 27. 3 powerful prediction tools: Book-to-bill Some (but unfortunately not all) chip stocks report book-to-bill ratios. • Book-to-bill above 1.0 means orders are coming in faster than shipments of finished products are going out. • A 1.12 book-to-bill ratio means the company received $112 worth of firm orders for every $100 of products shipped and billed in the same period. • This is a bullish sign, pointing to solid revenue growth in coming quarters. • Low numbers make semiconductor investors nervous, as the order pipeline dries out. Source: Intel.
  28. 28. 3 powerful prediction tools: Book-to-bill This is chiefly an industry metric, compiled and reported by bodies like Semiconductor Equipment and Materials International and the Semiconductor Industry Association. • Many companies report it separately. • Texas Instruments likes to talk about book-to-bill numbers. Cypress Semiconductor reports it often. So do Freescale and Linear Technology. • Increased visibility and transparency is a beautiful thing. When available, this metric is very helpful. • Just getting your feet wet with semiconductor stocks? Start with companies that report book-to-bill numbers, to easily get the hang of how sales forecasting works here.
  29. 29. 3 powerful prediction tools: Book-to-bill Reporting book-to-bill at all is evidence of a certain swagger. In particular, I appreciate seeing this optional metric when it’s below 1.0. Why? Because there’s a management team that respects shareholders and loves transparent reporting. Ideally, the company can explain why bookings ran low – and describe how to turn the metric around.
  30. 30. 3 powerful prediction tools: Order backlogs Many companies report order backlogs instead of book-to-bill ratios. • Backlogs are orders received but not yet shipped. • Like high book-to-bill ratios, large backlogs point to guaranteed sales growth. • Unlike that ratio, there is no hard and fast rule to evaluate the strength of backlogs – every company is different. Source: ON Semiconductor.
  31. 31. 3 powerful prediction tools: Order backlogs • For example, ON Semiconductor feels good about backlog orders accounting for 80% of the coming quarter’s revenue. • Taken from a recent earnings report, this figure represented a two-year high for Atmel. • Intel, on the other hand, declines to report order bookings and backlogs at all – because they are generally too small to make a difference. • “Over time, our larger customers have generally moved to lean-inventory or just-in-time operations rather than maintaining larger inventories of our products. […] Only a small portion of our orders is non-cancelable, and the dollar amount associated with the non-cancelable portion is not significant,” the company says in SEC filings.
  32. 32. 3 powerful prediction tools: Research Strong R&D budgets always get my seal of approval. So do muscular capital expenses – putting the research results to work. Source: Marcin Wichary via Flickr, under CC2.0.
  33. 33. 3 powerful prediction tools: Research This is a key reason why I own Intel. • R&D budgets have grown 75% in 4 years. • Infrastructure investments nearly tripled. • Intel is investing heavily in its future.
  34. 34. 3 powerful prediction tools: Research Big R&D budgets are no guarantee for producing the right inventions. But it’s a great start and the right thing to do in this industry. Following up with meaty capital expense budgets says that management believes in the current direction. They may be wrong, but have more information and bigger incentives to get it right than anybody else.
  35. 35. Take this home with you: Source: Texas Instruments. Some semiconductor stocks are poised for takeoff; others may crash. You must learn to tell the difference. • Picking the right markets is half the battle – stay on top of macro trends in technology. • Execution is the other half. Watch the right metrics to judge this part. • You want to see: • Strong gross margins • Healthy revenue growth • Solid book-to-bill ratios and/or order backlogs • Confident R&D and CapEx budgets are special. High growth here can override other weaknesses – because it means the company is planning for the very long term.
  36. 36. Are you ready to profit from this $14.4 trillion technology revolution?

×