Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

Methodological questions on serious games

718 views

Published on

presented at the seminar on Games Research Methods in Tampere

Published in: Education
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

Methodological questions on serious games

  1. 1. Some methodological questions about studying persuasion in serious games Valentina Rao University of Utrecht / GATE project [email_address]
  2. 2. Games for non-game purposes: a contradiction? <ul><li>Games for : health, social policy, advertising, ideology, education </li></ul><ul><li>Games for : buying, selling, interacting with other people, dating, making friends, learning, voting; the attitude is different </li></ul><ul><li>Ludification of culture, or exploitation of the game-specific qualities (altered state, suspension of disbelief, obedience to in-game rules to create acceptance of out-of-game elements) to manipulate players? </li></ul>
  3. 3. Big “serious” productions
  4. 6. Independent Productions
  5. 7. http://www.molleindustria.org/files/pedopriest.swf
  6. 8. Inspirations for analysis <ul><li>Casual games </li></ul><ul><li>Instrumental play </li></ul><ul><li>Rhetoric </li></ul>
  7. 9. <ul><li>Montfort/Bogost’s five levels model: </li></ul><ul><li>Reception/operation </li></ul><ul><li>Interface </li></ul><ul><li>Form/Function </li></ul><ul><li>Code </li></ul><ul><li>Platform </li></ul>Wardrip-Fruin/Mateas: Operational logics
  8. 10. Conclusions? <ul><li>Media effects: study both structures and reception: a “remediation” of this theory for serious games can maybe help overcome the (fake) separation between ludologists and narratologists? </li></ul><ul><li>Narratology is just ONE of many approaches to content; the textual metaphor is just a metaphor </li></ul><ul><li>Serious games present different playing conditions and a different attitude towards playing (“serious” or otherwise); that should be considered </li></ul>
  9. 11. ANY SUGGESTIONS?! Thank you for your attention <ul><li>[email_address] </li></ul><ul><li>References </li></ul><ul><li>Bogost, I. Persuasive Games, Cambridge/London: MIT Press, 2007 </li></ul><ul><li>Frasca, G. Playing with Fire: Serious Hype, Serious Opportunites, Serious Games Source, 2010 </li></ul><ul><li>http://seriousgamessource.com/features/feature_092906_hype_1.php </li></ul><ul><li>Gauntlett D. Media Studies 2.0. http://www.theory.org. uk /mediastudies2. htm </li></ul><ul><li>Montfort, N. and Bogost, I. Racing the Beam. MIT Press, Cambridge MA, 2009. </li></ul><ul><li>Shrum, L.J. Media Consumption and perceptions of Social Reality In Bryant, J. Oliver, M. B. Media Effects: Advances in Theory and Research, Taylor and Francis, 1994, 2002, 2009 </li></ul><ul><li>Wardrip-Fruin, N. Mateas, M. Defining Operational Logics, Digra Conference Proceedings, 2009 </li></ul>

×