Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.
Reading Lists
& Digitised Content at RGU:
Experiences and Expectations
Dr Susan Copeland
April 2015
Brief History of RGU
• 1729: Merchant trader Robert Gordon founded ‘Robert Gordon's Hospital’
• 1881: Transformed into Rob...
Ongoing Themes
• Entrepreneurship
• Founder’s view of the need for education & skills to
succeed internationally
• Vocatio...
Student Profile 2013 – 2014
• Over 17,000 students
• 59% full-time and 41% part-time
• 64% studied on campus / 36% studied...
Library Staffing Structure in 2013
Management of Reading Lists
& Creation of Reading Lists
• Considered in 2010 – introduction / pilot led by 2 Liaison Libra...
Advantages
of RGU Approach
• Liaison Librarians’ good understanding of practical aspects of the service
– helpful backgrou...
Disadvantages
of RGU Approach
• For a short period before transfer to Bib Services, high grade
staff on routine tasks crea...
Management of the Lists 2014-15:
Staff Time
• 1 LA transferred into Bib Services to assist (statistical evidence kept to
m...
Management of the Lists 2014-15:
Retrospective Issues
• Numerous lists had been archived – now deleting many
• Lack of use...
Management of the Lists 2014-15:
Ongoing Projects
• Dealing with links to items withdrawn from supplier / publisher
packag...
Workload activity statistics:
new lists & significant updates
Year Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb March April May June July ...
Workload activity pattern:
new lists & significant updates
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb March April ...
Activity Trends / Significance
• 2011-12 & 2012-13 work on new /updated lists was consistent -
activity doubled in 2013-14...
Digitised Content
• Introduced TADC in 2014 -15
• It replaced an alternative digitisation system
• Benefit of integration ...
In Retrospect
• Good to have cross-dept. buy-in across the Library for Aspire lists - but
there are issues associated with...
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in …5
×

Reading Lists and Digitised Content at RGU: experiences and expectations

638 views

Published on

Susan Copeland at Talis Insight 2015

  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

Reading Lists and Digitised Content at RGU: experiences and expectations

  1. 1. Reading Lists & Digitised Content at RGU: Experiences and Expectations Dr Susan Copeland April 2015
  2. 2. Brief History of RGU • 1729: Merchant trader Robert Gordon founded ‘Robert Gordon's Hospital’ • 1881: Transformed into Robert Gordon's College - secondary school and adult ed. college • 1884: Educational work of the Aberdeen Mechanics' Institute transferred to the College • 1898: Aberdeen Pharmaceutical Society transfers training for apprentices to the College • 1903: Designated a ‘Central Institution for Specialised Instruction‘ by Scottish Education Dept. • 1910: Robert Gordon's Technical College formed • 1965: Becomes known as Robert Gordon's Institute of Technology (RGIT) • 1992: Awarded university status – Robert Gordon University • Recent years: new facilities / consolidation at Garthdee Campus on banks of the River Dee
  3. 3. Ongoing Themes • Entrepreneurship • Founder’s view of the need for education & skills to succeed internationally • Vocational focus – high graduate employment • Specific courses targeted at specific outcomes • Constant change and development • New facilities and high expectations of services
  4. 4. Student Profile 2013 – 2014 • Over 17,000 students • 59% full-time and 41% part-time • 64% studied on campus / 36% studied off campus • 63% Undergraduate: – 40% Health & Social Care courses – 33% Aberdeen Business School courses – 27% Design and Technology courses • Numerous taught postgraduate courses http://www.rgu.ac.uk/about/about-robert-gordon-university/facts-and-figures/facts-and-figures
  5. 5. Library Staffing Structure in 2013
  6. 6. Management of Reading Lists & Creation of Reading Lists • Considered in 2010 – introduction / pilot led by 2 Liaison Librarians • Continuity of leadership / operational activity in 2011-12 and 2012-13 • Once established, Liaison Librarians focus needed to be on advocacy • Limited delegation options within Client Services (Liaison) section • 2013-14 responsibility transferred to Bib Services section – where structure allowed separation of service management / list creation • 2014-15 introduced TALIS Aspire Digitised Content service • Aiming for academic staff / E-Learning Advisers / Distance Learning Co- ordinators to undertake increased role in list creation in 2015-16
  7. 7. Advantages of RGU Approach • Liaison Librarians’ good understanding of practical aspects of the service – helpful background for advocacy work – helpful for inter-departmental appreciation of workloads / timescales • Initial publicity to academics about Aspire - from known library staff • Transfer of operations to Bib Services – Bib Services inherited corpus of lists as exemplars – Efficiency gains – ‘Aspire’ work assigned to appropriate grades of staff – Efficiency gains – enabled streamlined book buying aligned to Aspire lists – Link with digitisation services undertaken in Bib Services • Effectiveness – re-aligned book budget allocation to meet needs better
  8. 8. Disadvantages of RGU Approach • For a short period before transfer to Bib Services, high grade staff on routine tasks creating lists • Lack of involvement in the introduction of Aspire lists, led to gaps in some background knowledge amongst Bib Services staff • Speed / timing of transfer of responsibility between Library depts. did not allow ‘tidying’ of lists / data prior to the handover • Initially Bib Services were overwhelmed by the additional work
  9. 9. Management of the Lists 2014-15: Staff Time • 1 LA transferred into Bib Services to assist (statistical evidence kept to make case for need / previous temp. post proved need) • Team-working enhanced • Workflow analysed and revised for improved efficiency (sequence of activity / who does what) • Purchase of e-books & heavy use of TADC reduced queries re. access • Digitisation work integrated with the reading list service • Streamlined book purchasing method • Placement student for 6 months in 2014-15 created time for housekeeping tasks / tidying backlogs
  10. 10. Management of the Lists 2014-15: Retrospective Issues • Numerous lists had been archived – now deleting many • Lack of use of time periods – now identifying / assigning • Backlog of ‘books not linked to catalogue’ – periodic checking now • Introduction of ‘Review’ in 2013-14 created large backlog – Cleared backlog in 2014 (procedures needed for one-off project) – high spending on e-books & new editions – Now use Optional Review / have staff rota to deal with ‘Reviews’
  11. 11. Management of the Lists 2014-15: Ongoing Projects • Dealing with links to items withdrawn from supplier / publisher packages • Planning for first ‘Rollover’ in line with Campus Moodle • Implications of upgrades to related Library systems • Identifying advocacy targets • Identifying further digitisation opportunities • Monitoring annual workflow cycle to judge when projects can fit into the ongoing tasks of dealing with requests for list creation
  12. 12. Workload activity statistics: new lists & significant updates Year Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb March April May June July Total 2011-12 43 44 9 9 8 31 11 1 8 29 14 4 211 2012-13 26 52 17 14 13 30 18 9 1 4 10 11 205 2013-14 43 41 13 11 27 41 32 30 16 20 65 57 396 2014-15 77 109 46 66 47 65 55 25 490
  13. 13. Workload activity pattern: new lists & significant updates 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb March April May June July 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15
  14. 14. Activity Trends / Significance • 2011-12 & 2012-13 work on new /updated lists was consistent - activity doubled in 2013-14 – affect of advocacy? Word of mouth / critical mass? – needed the workflow streamlining in order to cope with this • First 3 years annual pattern broadly similar but in 2014-15 lost the November ‘dip’ (lost opportunity for project work then) • June / July 2013 -14 big increase in lists – useful to get ahead for the next session
  15. 15. Digitised Content • Introduced TADC in 2014 -15 • It replaced an alternative digitisation system • Benefit of integration with Reading List software • Easy to use – though more to learn • Benefits appreciated across the university • Over 1300 digitised readings made available so far (3 times the number dealt with the previous year)
  16. 16. In Retrospect • Good to have cross-dept. buy-in across the Library for Aspire lists - but there are issues associated with the transfer of responsibility • Consider it beneficial to have management of Reading Lists and Digitised Content within Bib Services • Earlier understanding of implications of not applying time periods, not deleting items, not using ‘optional’ review process would have been useful • Should have taken more / earlier advantage of the offer of regular TALIS customer support calls • Would like to have more time to read and take advantage of the advice on TALIS web pages

×