Lilacs submission indicadores_en

170 views

Published on

Published in: Technology, Business
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total views
170
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
1
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
2
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Lilacs submission indicadores_en

  1. 1. LILACScollaboration flowSueli Mitiko Yano SugaLILACS UnitBIREME/PAHO/WHOlilacs@bireme.org
  2. 2. LILACS Operation FflowPublishingTechnical andmethodological SupportMethodology promotionand difusionAssessment andimprovementsScientific productionrecords in LILACS
  3. 3. Collaboration flow with batches ofrecords
  4. 4. LILACS SubmissionindicatorsSueli Mitiko Yano SugaLILACS UnitBIREME/PAHO/WHOlilacs@bireme.org
  5. 5. Some numbersSubmissions (batches of records) in the system 789Submissions (batches of records) acepted 601Bibliographic records in the system 14.231Bibliographic records published or waiting for publication 7.018CC that have sent batches 107Countries that have sent batches 11Users registered in the system 189CC registered in the system 151In 6 months of operation including tests and pilotphase with 15 CC and on demand registering.
  6. 6. Distribution by Type of LiteratureMonographs, Thesisand Non-conventionals13%Indexed andreviewed records -LILACS Express47%Records as suppliedby publisher -LILACS-Express3%Journals37%Registros válidos: 601 – 08/04/2013
  7. 7. Submissions by CountryAR7%BR65%CL14%CO10%PE2%PY1%UY0%MX0%CU1%GT0%VE0%Registros válidos: 601 – 08/04/2013
  8. 8. Distribution by StatusNew submission1%Content validation2%Waiting for CCfeedback0%Format validation17%Available in LILACS43%File validation8%Submissionrejected24%Wainting forpublication5%Universo de registros: 789 – 08/04/2013
  9. 9. Reasons to reject a submission QuantityBatches with only 1 record 108Duplicated batches already sent from the system 39Duplicated records already published in LILACS 31Without feedback 23Tests 9Corrupted files 6Record files saved with no .ISO extension 3Duplicated batches with indexing already copied from MEDLINE 2Batches re-send from CC and NCC 2Files with journals url instead of its bibliographic records 1ID entries without .ISO files 1Different total number of records from declared 1Records without main descriptors 1Wrong bibliographic type 1
  10. 10. Submissions by CC Code0102030405060708090
  11. 11. Recommendations:• Check if the batches are in ISO extension;• Check duplicate in LILACS – some batches were alreadypublished;• Fill the data field “Observations” with – Journals’abbreviated title, volume, issue and year of publication orthe title of the books, theses and non-conventional docs.;• Check if the batches is already sent by Submission in“Observations” data field;• Check if the record is fully described: ej.URL, descriptors, authors’ affiliation;• Send batches with entire issues or minimum of 10 records.Do NOT send batches with only 1 record.
  12. 12. Thank you very much!http://submission.bvsalud.org/Doubts and sugestions:lilacs@bireme.org

×