Successfully reported this slideshow.
Your SlideShare is downloading. ×

Uniform Grant Guidance: How to Connect Performance and Financial Data

Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad

Check these out next

1 of 42 Ad

Uniform Grant Guidance: How to Connect Performance and Financial Data

Download to read offline

The Uniform Grant Guidance, released on Dec. 26, 2014, shifts how grantees are held accountable for performance and results.

On April 15 at 1 p.m. EDT, StreamLink Software and public sector consultant, Sandy Swab, joined forces for a webinar on how to connect performance and financial data in the UGG. The one-hour event covered:

• Why the UGG is increasing its focus on grant performance.
• The goals and objectives of federal programs.
• UGG organizational and award performance requirements.
• How to identify and address performance measures within your reporting processes.
• Tips for collecting the right data and creating data-driven reports.

About Sandy Swab

Sandy Swab is an independent public sector consultant at SRSwab Consulting. Previously, she was a senior policy analyst with the federal Office of Management and Data and policy manager for the Recovery Accountability and Transparency Board.

She managed the Grants Reporting Information Project (GRIP), a recipient reporting project, which was the basis of the 2014 DATA Act pilot project. She regularly speaks on the topics of grants and financial management, data analysis and data standardization, system development and implementation, government-wide reporting requirements and policy analysis.

The Uniform Grant Guidance, released on Dec. 26, 2014, shifts how grantees are held accountable for performance and results.

On April 15 at 1 p.m. EDT, StreamLink Software and public sector consultant, Sandy Swab, joined forces for a webinar on how to connect performance and financial data in the UGG. The one-hour event covered:

• Why the UGG is increasing its focus on grant performance.
• The goals and objectives of federal programs.
• UGG organizational and award performance requirements.
• How to identify and address performance measures within your reporting processes.
• Tips for collecting the right data and creating data-driven reports.

About Sandy Swab

Sandy Swab is an independent public sector consultant at SRSwab Consulting. Previously, she was a senior policy analyst with the federal Office of Management and Data and policy manager for the Recovery Accountability and Transparency Board.

She managed the Grants Reporting Information Project (GRIP), a recipient reporting project, which was the basis of the 2014 DATA Act pilot project. She regularly speaks on the topics of grants and financial management, data analysis and data standardization, system development and implementation, government-wide reporting requirements and policy analysis.

Advertisement
Advertisement

More Related Content

Similar to Uniform Grant Guidance: How to Connect Performance and Financial Data (20)

Recently uploaded (20)

Advertisement

Uniform Grant Guidance: How to Connect Performance and Financial Data

  1. 1. Uniform Grant Guidance: How to Connect Performance and Financial Data Establishing Performance Measures and Reporting Presented by: Sandra Swab April 15, 2015 #uggwebinar
  2. 2. Housekeeping  Questions Post them in the ReadyTalk chat console for Q&A at the end.  Feedback We’d like to know what you thought of the presentation in our post-webinar survey!  Recording A recording of the presentation will be available within 48 hours of the presentation.  Issues For any issues during the presentation, please post them in the chat console for us to help troubleshoot.  Socialize Use the #uggwebinar hashtag to participate on social media. #uggwebinar
  3. 3. About the Presenter  Sandra Swab is currently an independent consultant focusing on grants, data standards and performance measurement.  Over 30 years government experience focusing on focusing grants, financial and program management.  Grants experience includes in setting up a federal funding program and developing reporting requirements for it, overseeing and writing grants agency policies, as well as developing electronic systems to support the management of agency grants.  Sandra also wrote and developed grant government-wide policies while working at the Office of Management and Budget as a Senior Policy Analyst.  She is a member of the National Grants Management Association (NGMA) and the Association of Government Accountants (AGA). She is also sits on the Grants Advisory Board for Thompson Publishing. #uggwebinar
  4. 4. Agenda  Performance Perspective  Proposal Identification of Performance: Projects & Organizations  Reporting: Linking Financial and Performance Data  Questions #uggwebinar
  5. 5. Performance Perspective GPRA (1993)—Requires strategic plans; long-term goals for major functions/programs and be results oriented FFATA (2006)—Reporting on federal spending on a public website ARRA (2009)—Central recipient reporting of awards with managed oversight GPRA Modernization (2010)—requires publication of agencies’ strategic plans; accountable official for performance improvement; and established Performance Improvement Council (PIC) DATA Act (2014)—Gov’t-wide data standards for financial data #uggwebinar
  6. 6. View of Federal Performance Reporting Agency Goals & Funding GPRA Strategic Plans Funding Program Funding Program Funding Program Recipients RecipientsRecipients Uniform Guidance Budget A-11 Publication FFATA DATA Act #uggwebinar
  7. 7. Performance Perspective  OMB’s Uniform Guidance stresses performance  Requires federal programs to identify goals and performance measures  Requires recipients to be able manage award, report on identified performance measures, and address risk  New award types focus on performance #uggwebinar
  8. 8. Performance Perspective  OMB’s Uniform Guidance stresses performance of grant funding by:  Requiring tangible results (outputs) by recipients  Requiring management be efficient and effective  Anticipating results will support the proposed goals (outcomes) of the grant and/or funding program #uggwebinar
  9. 9. PROPOSALS: FIRST STEPS IN IDENTIFYING PERFORMANCE #uggwebinar
  10. 10. Funding Announcements  Agencies or funding opportunity announcements will: 1. Identify the program goals for the opportunity 2. Indicate the type of performance measures for recipients to consider or use 3. Identify reporting requirements #uggwebinar
  11. 11. Proposals  Proposal Requirements  Project narrative/scope of work  Addresses specific priority—identifies the problem  Addresses capability to perform to meet specific priority or criteria  Identifies expected outcomes and outputs to support the outcomes  Relates to funding program/agencies goals #uggwebinar
  12. 12. Proposals  Proposal Requirements  Funding budget by category  Creation of budget narrative to justify the request  Sub-activities—may require a break-out of the budget per activity  Sub-activities—may require separate budget narrative #uggwebinar
  13. 13. Proposals  Proposal Requirements  Project design identifying: 1. Detailed work outline or project plan with timeline—include any measurement activity 2. Identification of any milestones (deliverables) 3. Identification of barriers & steps to overcome #uggwebinar
  14. 14. Proposals  Submitted proposals begin the process for organizations to: Identify & define performance measures to be captured Identify the financial & resource support for proposed activities Identify the timeline for deliverables, reporting and completing the work #uggwebinar
  15. 15. AWARD AND POST-AWARD: ADDRESSING PERFORMANCE #uggwebinar
  16. 16. Federal Awards Identify Performance Measures  Based upon review, award can define: 1. Timing & scope of performance to goals 2. Specific programmatic goals, indicators, or milestones to be accomplished 3. Specific outputs/outcomes Requires relating financial data to performance data Agency #uggwebinar
  17. 17. Federal Awards Identify Performance Measures  Based upon review, award can establish: 1. Special award conditions that can affect meeting performance requirements 2. Additional financial reports 3. Prior approvals for certain actions 4. Additional project monitoring Agency #uggwebinar
  18. 18. Federal Awards Reporting Performance Measures  Uniform Guidance requires that recipient reporting: Must be done on OMB approved government-wide standard data collections Is required to relate financial data to performance accomplishments Frequency be established to determine progress, as well as supporting agency program/performance decisions #uggwebinar
  19. 19. Performance Reporting Requirements  Reporting must cover each program, activity or function  Reports require (non-construction):  Comparison of actual accomplishments to objectives of the award established for the period  Some type of cost or trend data when applicable #uggwebinar
  20. 20. Performance Reporting Requirements  Reports require (non-construction) identification of:  When goals are met on time or earlier, and benefits  Reasons when goals not met—internal and external impacts  Any time adjustment  Any cost overruns  Unexpected delays #uggwebinar
  21. 21. Performance Reporting Requirements  Reports require (construction):  On-site technical inspections and certified percentage completion data  Significant developments require reporting to agency or pass-through (e.g., delays or adverse conditions)  Favorable conditions in meeting schedules and reduction of resources #uggwebinar
  22. 22. Performance Reporting Requirements  Pass-through non-federal entities or prime recipients can: 1. Pass reporting requirements down (flow- down requirement--§200.101—unless specified otherwise) 2. Establish additional performance measures that enables the pass-through to meet its reporting requirements (§200.331(a)(3)) #uggwebinar
  23. 23. MEETING THE REQUIREMENT: LINKING FINANCIAL DATA TO PERFORMANCE #uggwebinar
  24. 24. Review the Award  Review the project scope Identify specific activities within the project Identify discrete activities that make up one major deliverable or objective Identify the associated resources with each activity—funds, staff and contracts #uggwebinar
  25. 25. Review the Award  Review the project scope Set up a timeline for specific measured activities Identify required reporting timeframes and what milestones or deliverables fall within the timeframe Establish an internal management report on the activities #uggwebinar
  26. 26. Establish Data Structure  For each grant or activity Use a defined data structure to link the financial expenditures to an activity Each grant or activity may have additional internal identifiers Link internal identifiers to required award data for required federal reports #uggwebinar
  27. 27. Establish Internal Reports  For each grant or activity: Produce a defined financial activity report for each grant/major activity on a regular basis Establish an internal progress report for each grant/major activity; may include estimate on % complete Both reports should be produced on a regular basis and should be reviewed internally. #uggwebinar
  28. 28. Comparing Performance Reports to Financial Reports  3 Key Comparisons 1. Internal progress report to the internal financial expenditure report (within a specified timeframe) 2. Total expenditures for the specified timeframe to the activities identified in the progress report(s) 3. Results to the overall project plan/detailed work plan, or the milestones defined in the award #uggwebinar
  29. 29. Reporting the Results  Recipients should: 1. Associate costs with activities to identify performance progress 2. Identify potential changes in timeframes for meeting goals or in costs—which may require adjustments to the award (budget and scope) 3. Identify clearly when performance goals were met and clearly identify associated costs and savings 4. Identify any new strategies used or being considered to deliver services and meet program goals #uggwebinar
  30. 30. Suggestions to Link Financial Data to Performance  Identifying financial expenditures  Recipients must be able to identify each federal award with certain data (e.g., award ID, CFDA, program, etc.)  To break-down expenditures for more than one activity in a grant may require internal identifiers—mentioned earlier #uggwebinar
  31. 31. Suggestions to Link Financial Data to Performance  Creating internal identifiers for multiple activities  Award ID: ABC:A1; A2; A3, etc.  Identify resources with each activity and add tag (e.g., staff resources assigned to a grant and activity may be ABC: A1 on any time sheet)  Identify travel or contracts in same manner; request all documents contain the identifiers (invoices, reimbursements) #uggwebinar
  32. 32. Suggestions to Link Financial Data to Performance  Performance Reports  Use internal numbering scheme for reports: Grant ID: ABC:A1  Establish regular reporting schedule for progress reports  Identify the required reporting period covered under the progress reports (e.g., Federal Reporting Period One: April 30 Progress Report covers Jan. 1-15)  Identify any milestones, deliverables or major activities that will covered within the reporting period #uggwebinar
  33. 33. Suggestions to Link Financial Data to Performance  Performance Reports  Based on milestone, deliverables or identified goals—report activities undertaken:  Some may be specific: No. client meetings, provided transportation for clients, # of miles (quantifiable)  Some activities may be narrative: Kick-off meeting with partners (3 hrs.)—outcome draft schedule of events—next meeting 2 weeks #uggwebinar
  34. 34. Suggestions to Link Financial Data to Performance  Performance Reports  Identify or note any expenditures associated with activity  Compare time spent on activity and costs to budget  Use progress reports to produce grant award’s performance report with financial data  Use electronic systems designed to expedite & simplify standardized tasks #uggwebinar
  35. 35. PERFORMANCE REPORTING SUMMARY #uggwebinar
  36. 36. Performance Reporting  Performance measures and goals will be identified by the awarding agency  May be identified in funding announcement  Can be adjusted in the award and may have specific requirements of what to measure; program specific #uggwebinar
  37. 37. Performance Reporting  Recipients must identify awards in their accounting systems to accurately track funds and report  May require additional internal data identifiers for awards with several activities  Each federal award requires separate reporting  Link internal identifiers to required award data #uggwebinar
  38. 38. Performance Reporting  Identify major milestones, deliverables or major activities by reporting periods  Use routine progress or activity reports to manage performance  Breakdown activities for manageable tracking  Always identify potential changes that impact dates and funding #uggwebinar
  39. 39. Performance Reporting  Use tools or create standard formats for internal management reporting  Use approved data collection formats for submitted reports  Use electronic systems that can report at every level #uggwebinar
  40. 40. Performance Reporting  Recipients should consider: 1. Producing internal management reports from their progress reports 2. Producing financial expenditure reports on the grant awards on a regular basis— outside of the required financial report Internal report production identifies sound organizational business practice. #uggwebinar
  41. 41. Performance Reporting  Requires Management and Oversight  Associated with performance reporting are other aspects of the award that may need to be considered:  Cost-Sharing  Budget Revisions  Program Income  Requesting Payments #uggwebinar
  42. 42. Questions #uggwebinar

Editor's Notes

  • GPRA (Government Performance Results Act) of 1993 &GPRA Modernization Act of 2010
    Requires strategic plans; long-term goals for major functions/programs and be results oriented
    Agencies submit annual performance plans
    Agencies evaluate success or failure of meeting goals
    Modernization Act requires publication of agencies’ strategic plans; accountable official for performance improvement; and established Performance Improvement Council (PIC)
    Agencies address GPRA in annual budget submissions
    Current administration focus on accountable government and issued several memoranda outlining requirements to agencies and E.O. 13576 Delivering on Efficient, Effective and Accountable Government
  • Awards may require entering data into an agency’s established performance measurement system

×