SlideShare uses cookies to improve functionality and performance, and to provide you with relevant advertising. If you continue browsing the site, you agree to the use of cookies on this website. See our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.
SlideShare uses cookies to improve functionality and performance, and to provide you with relevant advertising. If you continue browsing the site, you agree to the use of cookies on this website. See our Privacy Policy and User Agreement for details.
Successfully reported this slideshow.
Activate your 14 day free trial to unlock unlimited reading.
1.
#Eurovision:
Twitter as a Technology of
Fandom
Axel Bruns, Tim Highfield, and Stephen Harrington
ARC Centre of Excellence for Creative Industries and Innovation
Queensland University of Technology
Brisbane, Australia
a.bruns | t.highfield | s.harrington @ qut.edu.au
@snurb_dot_info | @timhighfield | @_StephenH
http://mappingonlinepublics.net/
2.
TWITTER, TELEVISION, AND FANDOM
• Twitter and television:
– Key role for Twitter in second-screen activities
– Major peaks in Twitter activity around televised events
– Important factor in driving audiences back to live viewing
(http://yearinreview.twitter.com/en/tps.html)
3.
TWITTER AND TELEVISION
• Four intersecting dimensions:
– Tweeting about TV
• Twitter as a virtual loungeroom, especially for live feedback
– Tweets as audience research
• Empirical evidence of ‘audiencing’ as it happens
– Tweeting for TV
• Direct incorporation into the show, especially live
– Twitter-enhanced ways of watching TV
• All of the above, and more – towards transmedia experiences
(Harrington, Highfield, & Bruns, 2012)
4.
TELEVISION HASHTAGS (AND MORE)
• Hashtags:
– Key mechanism for connecting audiences
– Ability to reach beyond one’s personal follower network
• Hashtags and television:
– Often pre-advertised by shows and broadcasters,
or created ad hoc by audiences
– Easy for audiences to follow during the live broadcast
(but do they, or do they only participate without reading?)
• But also:
– Dedicated accounts related to a specific show
(broadcasters and celebrities; fans, including spoof accounts)
5.
LIVE IS BACK
• Twitter and the live experience:
– Twitter is more effective for live coverage than Facebook:
• Short messages + public hashtags = more immediate reach
– Live audience communion around specific shows:
• Sports and other live events, but also first-run broadcasts
– Antidote to time-shifted viewing practices (PVRs etc.)
– Broadcasters back in control of viewers’ experience
– Sustaining a declining advertising market
6.
#EUROVISION
• Eurovision Song Contest:
– Pan-European event, held since 1956
– Operated by European Broadcasting Union
– One song entry per country, live performance on the night
– Past winners include ABBA, Celine Dion, and Lordi
• 2012:
– Host city: Baku, Azerbaijan
– 42 countries participating; two semis + final event
– Votes from each country are tallied and decide winner
– Television audience: 100+ million world-wide
– Live broadcast throughout Europe; delayed in Australia
7.
#EUROVISION AND TV
• Cult following:
– Change in audience attitudes over past decade
– From earnest contest to ironic detachment
– Eurovision as festival of pseudonational kitsch
– Strong gay audience at least since Dana International win
– Half-serious commentary on intra-EU relationships
– Broadcast in Australia by minority PSB SBS since 1986
• Terry Wogan:
– Long-standing BBC commentator (until 2008)
– Famous for snarky, acerbic commentary
– Similar tone adopted by many social media users
8.
#EUROVISION, #SBSEUROVISION 2012
• Dates:
– Semi-final 1: 22 May 2012 (SBS: 25 May 2012)
– Semi-final 2: 24 May 2012 (SBS: 26 May 2012)
– Final: 26 May 2012 (SBS: 27 May 2012)
• Datasets:
– #Eurovision: 22-28 May 2012; 688k tweets; 271k users
– #esc: 22-28 May 2012; 167k tweets; 48k users
– ‘Eurovision’: 22-28 May 2012; 1.2m tweets; 509k users
– #SBSEurovision: 25-28 May 2012; 112k tweets; 20k users
– Most activity during live broadcasts themselves:
#Eurovision: 85%; #esc: 88%; #SBSEurovision: 98%
9.
DISTRIBUTION OF ENGAGEMENT
Broadcast and date #eurovision #esc Broadcast and date #sbseurovision
Semi-final 1 214,579 tw, 47,416 tweets, Semi-final 1 39,950 tweets,
(22 May – 6 hours) 82,913 users 13,715 users (25 May) 8486 users
Semi-final 2 157,745 tw, 54,584 tweets, Semi-final 2 25,500 tweets,
(24 May – 6 hours) 50,771 users 15,215 users (26 May) 6175 users
Final 214,837 tw, 45,458 tweets, Final 45,213 tweets,
(26 May – 10 hours) 133,475 users 21,994 users (27 May) 10,093 users
Entire week 688,255 tw, 167,680 tw, Wider period 112,836 tweets,
(22-28 May) 271,826 users 48,546 users (25-28 May) 20,418 users
% tweets during 85.3% 87.9% % tweets during 98.1%* (shorter
broadcast periods broadcast periods period tracked)
14.
1000
1200
1400
200
400
600
800
0
21:00
21:04
21:08
21:12
21:16
21:20
21:24 Albania / Lithuania
21:28
21:32
21:36
Russia
21:40
tweets per minute
21:44
21:48
21:52
21:56
Estonia
22:00
22:04
22:08
22:12
22:16 Greece
22:20
22:24
22:28
22:32
Spain
22:36
#EUROVISION: FINAL
22:40
22:44
22:48
Ireland
22:52
22:56 Ukraine
23:00
23:04 Start of voting period
23:08
23:12
23:16
End of voting period
23:20
23:24
23:28
23:32 Results tally starts
23:36
23:40
23:44
23:48
23:52
23:56
0:00
0:04
0:08 Mr. Lordi: Finnish results
0:12
0:16
0:20
0:24
0:28
15.
1000
1200
200
400
600
800
0
19:30
19:35
19:40
19:45
19:50
19:55
20:00
20:05
20:10
20:15 Russia
tweets per minute
20:20
20:25 France
20:30 Italy
20:35
20:40
20:45
20:50
20:55 Romania
21:00
21:05
21:10 Sweden / Turkey
21:15
21:20
21:25
Malta
21:30
21:35 Ireland
21:40
#SBSEUROVISION: FINAL
21:45 Ukraine
21:50
21:55
22:00
22:05
22:10
22:15
22:20
22:25
22:30
22:35
22:40
22:45
22:50
22:55 Mr. Lordi: Finnish results
23:00
23:05
23:10
23:15
23:20
23:25
23:30
16.
MR. LORDI: FINNISH RESULTS
(http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=npQ8LpV2jG0)
17.
(http://www.eurovision.tv/page/history/year/participant-profile/?song=27943)
THE WINNER: SWEDEN
18.
#EUROVISION, 22-28 MAY 2012
Spain
Turkey
Greece
Serbia
Sweden
Jedward
Malta France
Albania
UK
Human Rights Italy
Ireland
(indegree 10+)
19.
#ESC, 22-28 MAY 2012
Sweden
Sweden
Serbia
Sweden
Italy
Germany
Austria
(indegree 10+)
20.
NOTABLE RESULTS
• Hashtag divergence:
– #Eurovision vs. #esc: Europe vs. Sweden, Germany, …
– Different lead users for each hashtag community
– Performers and broadcaster accounts prominent
– Language differences, but also interconnections
• #SBSEurovision:
– Separate hashtag for delayed telecast
– Effective at least for Australian east coast audiences (AEST):
substantial ‘live’ audience in spite of pre-determined outcome
– Limited engagement by central / western viewers, due to further
timezone differences
21.
NOTABLE RESULTS
• Terry Wogan’s legacy continues:
– Strong focus on (quasi-) comedy acts (e.g. Russia, Ireland)
– Clear evidence of ironic viewer detachment (and ironic voting?)
– Comedians prominent amongst most retweeted accounts:
RT @Queen_UK: Ok people, get voting for Greece. If
only for the look on the faces of European central
bankers. #eurovision
– But also reactions against national stereotyping:
Do you enjoy casual racism? Join the Twitter
conversation at #SBSeurovision
22.
FURTHER OUTLOOK
• Opportunities for broadcasters:
– Strong engagement by audiences:
• Possibility for more direct incorporation of tweets
– Important to understand diverging motivations for participation:
• E.g. general audiences vs. dedicated fans of specific acts
• Open questions:
– Who is represented here?
• Dedicated fans may seek to game the system
– Depth vs. breadth of engagement:
• Few highly active users or many less active participants?
Potential distinction between ‘fandom’ and ‘audiencing’