SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 34
Download to read offline
Impact Of Electromagnetic
radiations of biology and
behaviour of Apis
mellifera L.
Shweta Patel
42537
INTRODUCTION
 Honeybees play a vital role in the pollination of agricultural
crops
 In recent years honey bee colony declines have reached
10-30% in Europe, 30% in the United States and up to
85% in Middle East, but such declines are not apparent in
South America, Africa and Australia (Kluser,2010)
 The syndrome behind honeybee population decline is known
generally as Colony Collapse Disorder (CCD), which is
characterized by a rapid loss of adult worker bees (van
(Engelsdorp, 2009)
 EMFs are mentioned as a cause of honeybee colony losses,
the sudden disappearance of honeybees, which is a huge
problem in the field of beekeeping (VanEngelsdorp et
al,2009)
There are several factors for CCD and they fall into
two main classes:
 living organisms
human activity
Electromagnetic radiation can best be described as
waves of electric and magnetic energy moving together
(i.e. radiating ) through space .
Electromagnetic fields (EMF) are physical fields that
are produced by a source of EMR. Electric fields are
associated with electric charge and magnetic fields with
the movement of electric charge.
Radiation Pattern of a Cell Tower
Antenna
People living within 50 to 300 meter radius are in the
high radiation zone (dark blue) and are more prone to
ill-effects of electromagnetic radiation
Proportion of studies on different
groups of organisms
Birds; 3%
Bees; 1%
Wildlife;2%
Other
Animals;
12%
Plants; 1%Human; 81%
Bees Wildlife Other
Animals
HumanPlantsBirds
Studies on EMF impacts
MATERIALS AND METHODS
 Fifteen boxes of bees were place at specified
locations. First three boxes were placed below the
mobile tower. After measuring 200m, 400m, 600m and
800m distance from the tower, three boxes were
placed at each location, respectively.
 At each place 3 replications was taken. 6 Treatment
was considered at every place. Assuming first
treatment as a no. of bees (bees-strength), second,
third, fourth, fifth and sixth as area of honey, egg,
larva ,brood and pollen. Each were be measure after 14
days interval. The experiment was divided into 5 spot
with each spot different distances:
Spot 1: 0 m
Spot 2: 200 m
Spot 3: 400 m
Spot 4: 600 m
Spot 5: 800 m
Experimental Site
Radio Frequency Meter
Effect of Radiations on honey area
(cm2
) of honeybees during 2012
Treatment 30.6.12 14.7.12 28.7.12 11.8.12 25.8.12 8.9.12 22.9.12 6.10.12 Mean
E
(mV/m) B(µA/m)
S
(mW/m2
)
T1 (0 m) 275.833
(16.575)
665.000
(25.672)
277.500
(16.442)
387.500
(19.611)
478.333
(21.049)
745.833
(26.631)
554.166
(22.351)
616.666
(23.693)
500.101
(21.503)
304.297 541.22 302.913
T2 (200 m) 606.666
(24.300)
789.166
(27.588)
473.333
(21.448
521.666
(22.684)
372.500
(19.299)
305.000
(17.386)
308.333
(17.454)
514.166
(22.36)
486.35
(21.564)
10.663 24.08 0.248
T3 (400 m) 361.400
(18.346)
710.000
(26.442)
530.000
(22.799)
432.500
(20.333)
397.500
(19.686)
912.500
(28.609)
854.166
(28.753)
96.666
(9.791)
536.84
(21.844)
20.826 109.54 2.235
T4 (600 m) 500.833
(22.082)
798.333
(27.963)
455.833
(20.885)
370.833
(18.236)
542.500
(22.552)
460.833
(19.872)
407.333
(19.458)
234.633
(14.918)
471.388
(20.745)
7.198 19.338 0.0981
T5 (800 m) 645.000
(25.346)
733.333
(26.958)
488.333
(21.990)
527.500
(22.940)
190.623
(13.626)
883.316
(29.694)
592.083
(24.304)
347.500
(18.535)
550.958
(22.924)
7.088 19.12 0.132
Mean 477.946
(21.330)
739.166
(26.925)
445.000
(20.713)
448.000
(20.761)
396.291
(19.243)
661.496
(24.439)
543.216
(22.464)
361.926
(17.859)
509.130
(21.716) _ _ _
Sem 107.523
(2.635)
148.275
(2.851)
105.073
(2.5687)
102.057
(2.6173)
112.528
(2.828)
255.034
(4.9305)
163.145
(3.6768)
124.922
(3.026)
_ _ _ _
Cd at 5% 350.449
(8.589)
483.270
(9.294)
342.466
(8.372)
332.633
(8.530)
366.763
(9.218)
831.228
(16.070)
163.145
(11.984)
407.156
(9.863)
_ _ _ _
Cv 38.965
(21.40)
34.744
(18.344)
40.897
(21.480)
39.457
(21.835)
49.182
(25.458)
66.777
(34.943)
52.019
(28.349)
59.783
(29.350)
_ _ _ _
F value ns ns ns ns ns ns ns ns _ _ _ _
Honey area at different distance
from tower during the year 2012
Progressive increase in Honey area
during the year 2012
Method estimating the area of honey,
egg, pollen, larva and brood
Effect of Radiations on the egg laying capacity in
area (cm2
) of queen bee at Pantnagar during 2012
Treatment 30.6.12 14.7.12 28.7.12 11.8.12 25.8.12 8.9.12 22.9.12 6.10.12 Mean E(mV/m
)
B(µA/m) S(mW/m2
)
T1 (0 m) 126.666
(9.060)
15.000
(3.142)
157.500
(11.742)
167.500
(12.598)
152.500
(10.018)
95.833
(7.426)
144.166
(10.863)
150.000
(11.258)
126.143
(9.513)
304.297 541.22 302.913
T2 (200 m) 210.833
(14.059)
59.166
(6.796)
199.583
(13.824)
185.833
(13.547)
220.000
(14.803)
145.000
(11.954)
168.333
(11.864)
176.666
(10.808)
170.673
(12.206)
10.663 24.08 0.248
T3 (400 m) 0.000
(0.000)
48.333
(6.915)
215.000
(14.192)
200.833
(13.967)
145.833
(11.842)
45.833
(5.202)
261.666
(15.408)
102.500
(10.055)
127.497
(9.697)
20.826 109.54 2.235
T4 (600 m) 122.500
(8.364)
37.916
(6.052)
203.333
(11.639
140.000
(11.512)
75.000
(6.921)
115.833
(10.305)
105.000
(8.162)
115.833
(10.394)
114.425
(9.168)
7.198 19.338 0.0981
T5 (800 m) 61.666
(4.533)
34.166
(5.824)
100.000
(7.8867)
65.833
(5.712)
125.833
(11.205)
64.166
(6.540)
80.000
(8.7561)
47.833
(6.562)
72.433
(7.127)
7.088 19.12 0.132
Mean 104.333
(7.203)
38.916
(5.746)
175.083
(11.857)
152.000
(11.467)
143.833
(10.958)
93.333
(8.285)
151.833
(11.010)
118.566
(9.815)
122.237
(9.542)
_ _ _
sem 74.773
(4.292)
19.006
(1.374)
82.463
(3.960)
51.320
(2.622)
50.919
(3.154)
47.522
(3.200)
71.286
(3.164)
59.257
(3.145)
_ _ _ _
Cd at 5% 243.706
(13.991)
61.946
(4.480)
268.770
(12.909)
167.266
(8.546)
165.961
(10.280)
154.888
(10.432)
232.342
(10.312)
193.137
(10.250)
_ _ _ _
Cv 124.131
(103.214)
84.589
(41.435)
81.578
(57.860)
58.479
(39.604)
61.317
(49.853)
88.190
(66.912)
81.320
(49.772)
86.564
(55.497)
_ _ _ _
F value ns ns ns ns ns ns ns ns _ _ _ _
Egg laying by Queen bee at different
distance from tower during the year
2012
Progressive increase in area of egg laying
during the year 2012
Impact of Radiations on the brood area (cm2
) of
honeybees at Pantnagar during the year 2012Treatment 30.6.12 14.7.12 28.7.12 11.8.12 25.8.12 8.9.12 22.9.12 6.10.12 Mean E(mV/m
)
B(µA/m) S
(mW/m2
)
T1 (0 m) 109.166
(10.101)
161.449
(20.812)
281.666
(15.901)
198.333
(13.966
283.666
(14.336)
450.833
(17.861)
355.833
(16.619)
574.166
(23.838)
340.817
(16.679)
304.297 541.22 302.913
T2 (200 m) 189.166
(13.750)
435.416
(20.695)
389.583
(19.683)
453.333
(21.133
360.000
(18.883)
451.666
(21.131)
721.666
(26.608)
250.833
(14.163)
406.453
(19.505)
10.663 24.08 0.248
T3 (400 m) 314.166
(17.5487)
570.000
(23.688)
333.333
(18.175)
468.333
(21.585)
441.666
(20.974)
435.000
(20.812)
407.500
(19.234)
578.333
(23.901)
443.531
(20.739)
20.826 109.54 2.235
T4 (600 m) 261.666
(16.084)
553.750
(23.500)
223.541
(13.415)
505.000
(22.441)
204.166
(11.655)
635.833
(25.094)
490.833
(20.054)
587.500
(23.716)
432.772
(19.494)
7.198 19.338 0.0981
T5 (800 m) 164.166
(10.461)
339.166
(17.825)
252.500
(15.869)
286.666
(13.573)
240.833
(14.539)
225.833
(14.991)
215.833
(13.962)
245.000
(15.616)
246.246
(14.604)
7.088 19.12 0.132
Mean 207.666
(13.589)
474.250
(21.304)
296.125
(16.609)
382.333
(18.54)
306.066
(16.078)
439.833
(19.978)
438.333
(19.295)
447.166
(20.247)
_ _ _ _
sem 49.535
(2.647)
113.819
(2.634)
85.661
(3.036)
87.997
(3.455)
100.027
(4.431)
122.459
(3.796)
143.272
(4.560)
88.835
(2.545)
_ _ _ _
Cd at 5% 161.449
(8.629)
370.969
(8.587)
279.196
(9.896)
286.809
(11.263)
326.017
(14.443)
399.130
(12.373)
466.967
(14.864)
289.540
(8.297)
_ _ _ _
Cv 41.315
(33.744)
41.568
(21.420)
50.104
(31.663)
39.864
32.284
56.605
(47.738)
48.224
(32.912)
56.613
(40.937)
34.409
(21.777)
_ _ _ _
F value ns ns ns ns ns ns ns ns _ _ _ _
Area of Brood at various distance
from tower during the year 2012
Progressive increase in brood area
during the year 2012
Impact of Radiations on the larva area (cm2
) of
honeybees at Pantnagar during the year 2012
Treatment 30.6.12 14.7.12 28.7.12 11.8.12 25.8.12 8.9.12 22.9.12 6.10.12 Mean E(mV/m
)
B(µA/m) S(mW/m2
)
T1 (0 m) 25.833
(3.865)
21.166
(3.554)
138.333
(10.561)
183.333
(12.959)
82.500
8.891)
146.666
(9.878)
220.000
(11.988)
169.166
(12.219)
123.37
(9.239)
304.297 541.22 302.913
T2 (200 m) 7.500
(2.017)
17.466
(4.432)
198.333
(13.982)
194.166
(13.738)
195.000
13.769)
213.333
(14.318)
251.666
(15.576)
164.166
(10.455)
155.2
(11.035)
10.663 24.08 0.248
T3 (400
m )
201.666
(13.680)
37.500
(6.046)
196.666
(14.011)
215.000
(14.284)
188.333
13.578)
70.000
(6.573)
273.333
(16.448)
263.333
(16.165)
180.726
(12.598)
20.826 109.54 2.235
T4 (600 m) 51.666
(5.849)
40.833
(6.175)
134.166
(9.291)
340.833
(17.956)
179.166
10.407)
124.166
(8.973)
122.500
(8.979)
255.000
(15.370)
156.037
(10.375)
7. 19.338 0.0981
T5 (800 m) 102.500
(7.142)
13.750
(3.700)
109.166
(7.625)
40.833
(5.195)
27.500
(5.210)
39.166
(5.042)
92.500
(8.922)
39.166
(5.9387)
58.07
(6.0968)
7.088 19.12 0.132
Mean 77.833
(6.511)
26.143
(4.782)
155.333
(11.094)
194.833
(12.826)
134.500
(10.371)
118.666
(8.957)
192.000
(12.382)
178.166
(12.029)
134.684
(9.869)
_ _ _
sem 56.032
(2.962)
26.143
(1.044)
74.674
(3.793)
74.950
(2.828)
63.498
(2.881)
51.631
(2.953)
66.675
(3.516)
62.312
(2.512)
_ _ _ _
Cd at 5% 182.626
(9.656)
32.051
(3.404)
243.385
(12.364)
244.286
(9.217)
206.961
(9.392)
168.280
(9.624)
217.313
(11.462)
203.094
(8.188)
_ _ _ _
Cv 124.691
(78.809)
65.151
(37.831)
83.265
(59.226)
66.630
(38.189)
81.772
(48.123)
75.360
(57.102)
60.148
(49.191)
60.577
(36.174)
_ _ _ _
F value ns ns ns ns ns ns ns ns _ _ _ _
Area of Larva at different distance from
tower during the year 2012
Area of comb occupied by the larvae
during the year 2012
Impact of Radiation on the pollen area at Pantnagar
during the year 2012
Treatment 30.6.12 14.7.12 28.7.12 11.8.12 25.8.12 8.9.12 22.9.12 6.10.12 Mean E(mV/m) B(µA/m) S
(mW/m2
)
T1 (0 m) 105.000
(8.856)
13.581
(3.092)
51.456
(6.995)
19.166
(4.136)
62.500
(7.146)
96.666
(9.643)
127.500
(11.245)
159.166
(12.342)
79.376
(7.931)
304.297 541.22 302.913
T2 (200 m) 216.666
(11.93)
1.041
(0.831)
57.500
(7.541)
89.166
(9.197)
129.166
(11.127)
165.000
(12.772)
121.666
(10.987)
140.000
(11.722)
110.52
(9.512)
10.663 24.08 0.248
T3 (400 m) 61.666
(7.7199)
.250
(0.288)
46.250
(6.086)
41.250
(6.266)
96.666
(9.623)
59.500
(7.029)
277.500
(15.765)
103.333
(10.160)
85.8
(7.867)
20.826 109.54 2.235
T4 (600 m) 71.666
(8.401)
19.583
(2.900)
50.833
(7.074)
76.750
(8.680)
95.000
(9.577)
69.166
(8.257)
200.000
(14.090)
185.000
(13.370)
95.997
(9.043)
7.198 19.338 0.0981
T5 (800 m) 289.166
(15.634)
.1233
(0.202)
35.623
(5.725)
40.400
(5.661)
16.666
(3.329)
18.333
(4.217)
33.7500
(5.4377)
10.873
(2.998)
55.613
(5.400)
7.088 19.12 0.132
Mean 148.833
(10.508)
6.916
(1.463)
48.332
(6.684)
53.346
(6.788)
80.000
(8.160)
81.733
(8.384)
152.083
(11.505)
119.674
(10.118)
373.971
(18.205)
_ _ _
sem 100.347
(3.687)
10.165
(1.257)
17.250
(1.266)
20.632
(1.337)
30.269
(1.840)
19.536
(1.149)
50.814
(2.013)
25.831
(1.042)
_ _ _ _
Cd at 5% 327.059
(12.019)
33.133
(4.097)
56.223
(4.126)
67.247
(4.360)
98.657
(5.998)
63.675
(3.747)
165.617
(6.562)
84.191
(3.396)
_ _ _ _
Cv 116.779
(60.783)
254.596
(148.82)
61.818
(32.804)
66.989
(34.133)
65.535
(39.064)
41.401
(23.752)
57.871
(30.310)
37.385
(17.839)
_ _ _ _
F value ns ns ns ns ns ** * ** _ _ _ _
Pollen area at different distance
from tower during the year 2012
Progressive increase in Pollen area
of comb during the year 2012
Impact of radiations on the Bees-strength of
honeybees at Pantnagar during the year 2012
Treatment 30.6.12 14.7.12 28.7.12 11.8.12 25.8.12 8.9.12 22.9.12 6.10.12 Mean E(mV/
m)
B
(µA/m)
S
(mW/m2
)
T1 (0 m) 19832.33
(136.754)
23000.00
(151.452)
23334.33
(150.975)
26962.33
(161.410)
9997.33
(98.946)
19719.67
(139.416)
20775.67
(139.811)
26053.33
(153.728)
21209.37
(141.562)
304.297 541.22 302.913
T2 (200 m) 21777.67
(147.485)
17000.00
(130.178)
20222.33
(141.621)
23388.67
(152.118)
27109.00
(164.536)
20887.67
(143.053)
23331.67
(152.678)
29941.67
(167.983)
22957.34
(149.957)
10.663 24.08 0.248
T3 (400 m) 22333.33
(148.830)
23055.33
(151.298)
87889.00
(254.890)
26443.33
(161.528)
28442.67
(167.184)
24053.67
(154.429)
24553.00
(156.530)
26479.67
(158.521)
32906.25
(169.151)
20.826 109.54 2.235
T4 (600 m) 20666.67
(142.159)
22000.33
(147.175)
28556.00
(168.252)
26388.33
(161.594)
26442.33
(161.783)
28998.33
(169.062)
17442.67
(131.90)
27276.00
(164.409)
24721.33
(155.792)
7.198 19.338 0.0981
T5 (800 m) 16333.33
(122.531)
14333.67
(114.536)
10333.33
(98.469)
13777.33
(117.182)
12058.33
(109.691)
12111.00
(109.934)
10886.33
(104.302)
9720.67
(98.483)
12444.25
(109.391)
7.088 19.12 0.132
Mean 20188.67
(139.552)
19877.87
(138.928)
34067.00
(162.941)
23392.00
(150.786)
20809.93
(140.428)
21154.07
(143.179)
19397.87
(137.044)
23894.27
(148.625)
22847.71
(145.185)
_ _ _
sem 5138.29
(19.088)
3752.13
(14.963)
29613.43
(50.973)
4771.11
(14.625)
2914.88
(8.986)
3814.267
(12.755)
553.77
(12.255)
8397.07
(25.921)
- _ _ _
Cd at 5% 16747.17
(62.215)
12229.30
(48.768)
96518.68
(166.137)
15550.43
(47.669)
9500.46
(29.290)
12431.79
(41.575)
11582.76
(39.943)
27368.47
(84.484)
- _ _ _
Cv 44.083
(23.691)
32.694
(18.654)
150.562
(54.184)
35.327
(16.80)
24.261
(11.084)
31.230
(15.430)
31.731
(15.488)
60.868
(30.208)
- _ _ _
F value ns ns ns ns ** ns ns ns - _ _ _
Method of estimating the Bees-
Strength
Impact of radiations on bee-strength at
different distances from tower during 2012
Progressive increase in number of bees
during the year 2012
Radiations at different spots
Radiation at 0 m (beneath,the mobile
tower) during the year 2012
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 Bees-strength in the starting of experiment in T1 (0
m, beneath, the mobile tower) was found to be
19,832.33 while, it was seen increased 26,053.33 at
the end of experiment, the first week of October,
under the influence of electromagnetic radiations
emitted from the mobile tower.
 The overall progressive increased in honey area
recorded during the month of June-October, Area of
comb, filled with honey was increased 340.833 cm2
in
T1 (0m, beneath, the mobile tower) while, decreased
in -297.5 cm2
in T5 (800m) followed by T4 (600 m) in
266.2 cm2
, -264.734 cm2
in T3(400m) and -92.5cm2
in
T2(200m).
 On the basis of observations recorded, it was
revealed that the area of egg was significantly
increased in T3 (T1102.5 cm2
) and T1 (23.334 cm2
)
whereas, it was found to be decreased in T2 (-34.167
cm2
), T5 (-13.836 cm2
) and T4 (- 6.667 cm2
).
 The radiation was recorded during month of June-
October. Highest radiation was observed in T1 (E
=304.297 mV/m, B =541.22 µA/m and S =302.913 m
W/m2
) while minimum in T5 (E =7.088 mV/m, B =19.12
µA/m and S =0.132 m W/m2
) followed by T4 (E =7.198
mV/m, B =19.338 µA/m and S =0.0981 m W/m2
), T2
(E=10.663 mV/m, B= 24.08 µA/m and S =0.248 m
W/m2
) and T3 (E =20.826 mV/m, B =109.54 µA/m and
S=2.235 m W/m2
), respectively.
Conclusion
As per the present investigation, all treated
colonies with mobile tower radiation had
perform well as normal colony and none of these
colonies were perished during the experiment.
At 0 m (beneath,the mobile tower) area of
honey, brood, larva, egg, pollen all were
increased.
The present investigation would help to bee-
keepers of Tarai region of Uttrakhand where,
their bee hives were placed near the mobile
tower .No impact of electromagnetic radiations
of colony strength and bees survivorship.
Thanks

More Related Content

Similar to Impact Of Electromagnetic radiations of biology and behaviour of Apis mellifera L.

Solar-cell based Power Generation - Will it affect Climate Change adversely i...
Solar-cell based Power Generation - Will it affect Climate Change adversely i...Solar-cell based Power Generation - Will it affect Climate Change adversely i...
Solar-cell based Power Generation - Will it affect Climate Change adversely i...DebdootGhosh8
 
Greencommunication anapproachtoreduceehsfromcellularphones-120316150959-phpapp02
Greencommunication anapproachtoreduceehsfromcellularphones-120316150959-phpapp02Greencommunication anapproachtoreduceehsfromcellularphones-120316150959-phpapp02
Greencommunication anapproachtoreduceehsfromcellularphones-120316150959-phpapp02Suhaib Ahmed
 
Greencommunication anapproachtoreduceehsfromcellularphones-120316150959-phpapp02
Greencommunication anapproachtoreduceehsfromcellularphones-120316150959-phpapp02Greencommunication anapproachtoreduceehsfromcellularphones-120316150959-phpapp02
Greencommunication anapproachtoreduceehsfromcellularphones-120316150959-phpapp02meena reddy
 
Ecological Statistics
Ecological StatisticsEcological Statistics
Ecological StatisticsGururaja KV
 
Jordi Sunyer Deu - (Efectes sobre la salut de la contaminació per trànsit)
Jordi Sunyer Deu - (Efectes sobre la salut de la contaminació per trànsit)Jordi Sunyer Deu - (Efectes sobre la salut de la contaminació per trànsit)
Jordi Sunyer Deu - (Efectes sobre la salut de la contaminació per trànsit)Medi Ambient. Generalitat de Catalunya
 
Gk emr-cfbp-24-june- 20110
Gk emr-cfbp-24-june- 20110Gk emr-cfbp-24-june- 20110
Gk emr-cfbp-24-june- 20110Neha Kumar
 
MOBILE PHONE & MOBILE TOWER RADIATION HAZARDS
MOBILE PHONE & MOBILE TOWER RADIATION HAZARDS MOBILE PHONE & MOBILE TOWER RADIATION HAZARDS
MOBILE PHONE & MOBILE TOWER RADIATION HAZARDS Neha Kumar
 
GIS-BASED LANDSLIDE SUSCEPTIBILITY MODELING USING WEIGHT OF EVIDENCE AND LOGI...
GIS-BASED LANDSLIDE SUSCEPTIBILITY MODELING USING WEIGHT OF EVIDENCE AND LOGI...GIS-BASED LANDSLIDE SUSCEPTIBILITY MODELING USING WEIGHT OF EVIDENCE AND LOGI...
GIS-BASED LANDSLIDE SUSCEPTIBILITY MODELING USING WEIGHT OF EVIDENCE AND LOGI...Adma Science and Technology University
 
環境溫濕度與皮膚之相關性研究 - 2022濕熱氣候美妝產業鏈創新創業論壇
環境溫濕度與皮膚之相關性研究 - 2022濕熱氣候美妝產業鏈創新創業論壇環境溫濕度與皮膚之相關性研究 - 2022濕熱氣候美妝產業鏈創新創業論壇
環境溫濕度與皮膚之相關性研究 - 2022濕熱氣候美妝產業鏈創新創業論壇kissmetaiwan
 
Radiation from Mobile Tower - Health Hazard, Norms, Cases
Radiation from Mobile Tower  - Health Hazard, Norms, Cases Radiation from Mobile Tower  - Health Hazard, Norms, Cases
Radiation from Mobile Tower - Health Hazard, Norms, Cases Neha Kumar
 
Cell Tower Radiation Report 2010 - sent to DOT, India
Cell Tower Radiation Report 2010 - sent to DOT, IndiaCell Tower Radiation Report 2010 - sent to DOT, India
Cell Tower Radiation Report 2010 - sent to DOT, IndiaNeha Kumar
 
Cell Tower Radiation Report 2010 - DOT, India
Cell Tower Radiation Report 2010 - DOT, IndiaCell Tower Radiation Report 2010 - DOT, India
Cell Tower Radiation Report 2010 - DOT, IndiaNeha Kumar
 
Gk cell-tower-rad-report-dot-dec2010
Gk cell-tower-rad-report-dot-dec2010Gk cell-tower-rad-report-dot-dec2010
Gk cell-tower-rad-report-dot-dec2010Neha Kumar
 
Celltowerradreportdot 101207073739.ppt
Celltowerradreportdot 101207073739.pptCelltowerradreportdot 101207073739.ppt
Celltowerradreportdot 101207073739.ppttrinnie
 
Project presentation, WBV Kirovsk
Project presentation, WBV KirovskProject presentation, WBV Kirovsk
Project presentation, WBV Kirovskarildovrum
 
A next-generation ground array for the detection of ultrahigh-energy cosmic r...
A next-generation ground array for the detection of ultrahigh-energy cosmic r...A next-generation ground array for the detection of ultrahigh-energy cosmic r...
A next-generation ground array for the detection of ultrahigh-energy cosmic r...Toshihiro FUJII
 

Similar to Impact Of Electromagnetic radiations of biology and behaviour of Apis mellifera L. (20)

988 hoffman[1]
988 hoffman[1]988 hoffman[1]
988 hoffman[1]
 
Solar-cell based Power Generation - Will it affect Climate Change adversely i...
Solar-cell based Power Generation - Will it affect Climate Change adversely i...Solar-cell based Power Generation - Will it affect Climate Change adversely i...
Solar-cell based Power Generation - Will it affect Climate Change adversely i...
 
Greencommunication anapproachtoreduceehsfromcellularphones-120316150959-phpapp02
Greencommunication anapproachtoreduceehsfromcellularphones-120316150959-phpapp02Greencommunication anapproachtoreduceehsfromcellularphones-120316150959-phpapp02
Greencommunication anapproachtoreduceehsfromcellularphones-120316150959-phpapp02
 
Greencommunication anapproachtoreduceehsfromcellularphones-120316150959-phpapp02
Greencommunication anapproachtoreduceehsfromcellularphones-120316150959-phpapp02Greencommunication anapproachtoreduceehsfromcellularphones-120316150959-phpapp02
Greencommunication anapproachtoreduceehsfromcellularphones-120316150959-phpapp02
 
17 session 2 fey - example sensitivity analysis
17 session 2   fey - example sensitivity analysis17 session 2   fey - example sensitivity analysis
17 session 2 fey - example sensitivity analysis
 
Ecological Statistics
Ecological StatisticsEcological Statistics
Ecological Statistics
 
Jordi Sunyer Deu - (Efectes sobre la salut de la contaminació per trànsit)
Jordi Sunyer Deu - (Efectes sobre la salut de la contaminació per trànsit)Jordi Sunyer Deu - (Efectes sobre la salut de la contaminació per trànsit)
Jordi Sunyer Deu - (Efectes sobre la salut de la contaminació per trànsit)
 
Gk emr-cfbp-24-june- 20110
Gk emr-cfbp-24-june- 20110Gk emr-cfbp-24-june- 20110
Gk emr-cfbp-24-june- 20110
 
MOBILE PHONE & MOBILE TOWER RADIATION HAZARDS
MOBILE PHONE & MOBILE TOWER RADIATION HAZARDS MOBILE PHONE & MOBILE TOWER RADIATION HAZARDS
MOBILE PHONE & MOBILE TOWER RADIATION HAZARDS
 
GIS-BASED LANDSLIDE SUSCEPTIBILITY MODELING USING WEIGHT OF EVIDENCE AND LOGI...
GIS-BASED LANDSLIDE SUSCEPTIBILITY MODELING USING WEIGHT OF EVIDENCE AND LOGI...GIS-BASED LANDSLIDE SUSCEPTIBILITY MODELING USING WEIGHT OF EVIDENCE AND LOGI...
GIS-BASED LANDSLIDE SUSCEPTIBILITY MODELING USING WEIGHT OF EVIDENCE AND LOGI...
 
環境溫濕度與皮膚之相關性研究 - 2022濕熱氣候美妝產業鏈創新創業論壇
環境溫濕度與皮膚之相關性研究 - 2022濕熱氣候美妝產業鏈創新創業論壇環境溫濕度與皮膚之相關性研究 - 2022濕熱氣候美妝產業鏈創新創業論壇
環境溫濕度與皮膚之相關性研究 - 2022濕熱氣候美妝產業鏈創新創業論壇
 
Radiation from Mobile Tower - Health Hazard, Norms, Cases
Radiation from Mobile Tower  - Health Hazard, Norms, Cases Radiation from Mobile Tower  - Health Hazard, Norms, Cases
Radiation from Mobile Tower - Health Hazard, Norms, Cases
 
Cell Tower Radiation Report 2010 - sent to DOT, India
Cell Tower Radiation Report 2010 - sent to DOT, IndiaCell Tower Radiation Report 2010 - sent to DOT, India
Cell Tower Radiation Report 2010 - sent to DOT, India
 
Cell Tower Radiation Report 2010 - DOT, India
Cell Tower Radiation Report 2010 - DOT, IndiaCell Tower Radiation Report 2010 - DOT, India
Cell Tower Radiation Report 2010 - DOT, India
 
Gk cell-tower-rad-report-dot-dec2010
Gk cell-tower-rad-report-dot-dec2010Gk cell-tower-rad-report-dot-dec2010
Gk cell-tower-rad-report-dot-dec2010
 
Celltowerradreportdot 101207073739.ppt
Celltowerradreportdot 101207073739.pptCelltowerradreportdot 101207073739.ppt
Celltowerradreportdot 101207073739.ppt
 
40220140501008 2
40220140501008 240220140501008 2
40220140501008 2
 
Ijeted
IjetedIjeted
Ijeted
 
Project presentation, WBV Kirovsk
Project presentation, WBV KirovskProject presentation, WBV Kirovsk
Project presentation, WBV Kirovsk
 
A next-generation ground array for the detection of ultrahigh-energy cosmic r...
A next-generation ground array for the detection of ultrahigh-energy cosmic r...A next-generation ground array for the detection of ultrahigh-energy cosmic r...
A next-generation ground array for the detection of ultrahigh-energy cosmic r...
 

More from Shweta Patel

Mass-production of bio-pesticide
Mass-production of bio-pesticideMass-production of bio-pesticide
Mass-production of bio-pesticideShweta Patel
 
Biological control
Biological control Biological control
Biological control Shweta Patel
 
Use of DNA Barcoding in Insect Taxonomy
Use of DNA Barcoding in InsectTaxonomyUse of DNA Barcoding in InsectTaxonomy
Use of DNA Barcoding in Insect TaxonomyShweta Patel
 
Screening Techniques for Different Insect Pests in Crop Plants
Screening Techniques for Different Insect Pests in Crop Plants Screening Techniques for Different Insect Pests in Crop Plants
Screening Techniques for Different Insect Pests in Crop Plants Shweta Patel
 
BEHAVIOURAL TRAITS UNDER NATURAL SELECTION
BEHAVIOURAL TRAITS UNDER NATURAL SELECTIONBEHAVIOURAL TRAITS UNDER NATURAL SELECTION
BEHAVIOURAL TRAITS UNDER NATURAL SELECTIONShweta Patel
 
Rabindranath tagore
Rabindranath tagoreRabindranath tagore
Rabindranath tagoreShweta Patel
 
Disease forcasting
Disease forcastingDisease forcasting
Disease forcastingShweta Patel
 
Genetic Improvements to the Sterile Insect Technique for Agricultural & Publi...
Genetic Improvements to the Sterile Insect Technique for Agricultural & Publi...Genetic Improvements to the Sterile Insect Technique for Agricultural & Publi...
Genetic Improvements to the Sterile Insect Technique for Agricultural & Publi...Shweta Patel
 
forecasting model for insect pest
forecasting model for insect pestforecasting model for insect pest
forecasting model for insect pestShweta Patel
 

More from Shweta Patel (10)

Mass-production of bio-pesticide
Mass-production of bio-pesticideMass-production of bio-pesticide
Mass-production of bio-pesticide
 
Biopesticide
BiopesticideBiopesticide
Biopesticide
 
Biological control
Biological control Biological control
Biological control
 
Use of DNA Barcoding in Insect Taxonomy
Use of DNA Barcoding in InsectTaxonomyUse of DNA Barcoding in InsectTaxonomy
Use of DNA Barcoding in Insect Taxonomy
 
Screening Techniques for Different Insect Pests in Crop Plants
Screening Techniques for Different Insect Pests in Crop Plants Screening Techniques for Different Insect Pests in Crop Plants
Screening Techniques for Different Insect Pests in Crop Plants
 
BEHAVIOURAL TRAITS UNDER NATURAL SELECTION
BEHAVIOURAL TRAITS UNDER NATURAL SELECTIONBEHAVIOURAL TRAITS UNDER NATURAL SELECTION
BEHAVIOURAL TRAITS UNDER NATURAL SELECTION
 
Rabindranath tagore
Rabindranath tagoreRabindranath tagore
Rabindranath tagore
 
Disease forcasting
Disease forcastingDisease forcasting
Disease forcasting
 
Genetic Improvements to the Sterile Insect Technique for Agricultural & Publi...
Genetic Improvements to the Sterile Insect Technique for Agricultural & Publi...Genetic Improvements to the Sterile Insect Technique for Agricultural & Publi...
Genetic Improvements to the Sterile Insect Technique for Agricultural & Publi...
 
forecasting model for insect pest
forecasting model for insect pestforecasting model for insect pest
forecasting model for insect pest
 

Recently uploaded

Observation of Gravitational Waves from the Coalescence of a 2.5–4.5 M⊙ Compa...
Observation of Gravitational Waves from the Coalescence of a 2.5–4.5 M⊙ Compa...Observation of Gravitational Waves from the Coalescence of a 2.5–4.5 M⊙ Compa...
Observation of Gravitational Waves from the Coalescence of a 2.5–4.5 M⊙ Compa...Sérgio Sacani
 
The Sensory Organs, Anatomy and Function
The Sensory Organs, Anatomy and FunctionThe Sensory Organs, Anatomy and Function
The Sensory Organs, Anatomy and FunctionJadeNovelo1
 
Abnormal LFTs rate of deco and NAFLD.pptx
Abnormal LFTs rate of deco and NAFLD.pptxAbnormal LFTs rate of deco and NAFLD.pptx
Abnormal LFTs rate of deco and NAFLD.pptxzeus70441
 
GLYCOSIDES Classification Of GLYCOSIDES Chemical Tests Glycosides
GLYCOSIDES Classification Of GLYCOSIDES  Chemical Tests GlycosidesGLYCOSIDES Classification Of GLYCOSIDES  Chemical Tests Glycosides
GLYCOSIDES Classification Of GLYCOSIDES Chemical Tests GlycosidesNandakishor Bhaurao Deshmukh
 
HEMATOPOIESIS - formation of blood cells
HEMATOPOIESIS - formation of blood cellsHEMATOPOIESIS - formation of blood cells
HEMATOPOIESIS - formation of blood cellsSachinSuresh44
 
Combining Asynchronous Task Parallelism and Intel SGX for Secure Deep Learning
Combining Asynchronous Task Parallelism and Intel SGX for Secure Deep LearningCombining Asynchronous Task Parallelism and Intel SGX for Secure Deep Learning
Combining Asynchronous Task Parallelism and Intel SGX for Secure Deep Learningvschiavoni
 
BACTERIAL SECRETION SYSTEM by Dr. Chayanika Das
BACTERIAL SECRETION SYSTEM by Dr. Chayanika DasBACTERIAL SECRETION SYSTEM by Dr. Chayanika Das
BACTERIAL SECRETION SYSTEM by Dr. Chayanika DasChayanika Das
 
Timeless Cosmology: Towards a Geometric Origin of Cosmological Correlations
Timeless Cosmology: Towards a Geometric Origin of Cosmological CorrelationsTimeless Cosmology: Towards a Geometric Origin of Cosmological Correlations
Timeless Cosmology: Towards a Geometric Origin of Cosmological CorrelationsDanielBaumann11
 
6.2 Pests of Sesame_Identification_Binomics_Dr.UPR
6.2 Pests of Sesame_Identification_Binomics_Dr.UPR6.2 Pests of Sesame_Identification_Binomics_Dr.UPR
6.2 Pests of Sesame_Identification_Binomics_Dr.UPRPirithiRaju
 
complex analysis best book for solving questions.pdf
complex analysis best book for solving questions.pdfcomplex analysis best book for solving questions.pdf
complex analysis best book for solving questions.pdfSubhamKumar3239
 
Efficient Fourier Pricing of Multi-Asset Options: Quasi-Monte Carlo & Domain ...
Efficient Fourier Pricing of Multi-Asset Options: Quasi-Monte Carlo & Domain ...Efficient Fourier Pricing of Multi-Asset Options: Quasi-Monte Carlo & Domain ...
Efficient Fourier Pricing of Multi-Asset Options: Quasi-Monte Carlo & Domain ...Chiheb Ben Hammouda
 
KDIGO-2023-CKD-Guideline-Public-Review-Draft_5-July-2023.pdf
KDIGO-2023-CKD-Guideline-Public-Review-Draft_5-July-2023.pdfKDIGO-2023-CKD-Guideline-Public-Review-Draft_5-July-2023.pdf
KDIGO-2023-CKD-Guideline-Public-Review-Draft_5-July-2023.pdfGABYFIORELAMALPARTID1
 
Role of Gibberellins, mode of action and external applications.pptx
Role of Gibberellins, mode of action and external applications.pptxRole of Gibberellins, mode of action and external applications.pptx
Role of Gibberellins, mode of action and external applications.pptxjana861314
 
Observational constraints on mergers creating magnetism in massive stars
Observational constraints on mergers creating magnetism in massive starsObservational constraints on mergers creating magnetism in massive stars
Observational constraints on mergers creating magnetism in massive starsSérgio Sacani
 
Pests of Sunflower_Binomics_Identification_Dr.UPR
Pests of Sunflower_Binomics_Identification_Dr.UPRPests of Sunflower_Binomics_Identification_Dr.UPR
Pests of Sunflower_Binomics_Identification_Dr.UPRPirithiRaju
 
Interpreting SDSS extragalactic data in the era of JWST
Interpreting SDSS extragalactic data in the era of JWSTInterpreting SDSS extragalactic data in the era of JWST
Interpreting SDSS extragalactic data in the era of JWSTAlexander F. Mayer
 
Introduction of Organ-On-A-Chip - Creative Biolabs
Introduction of Organ-On-A-Chip - Creative BiolabsIntroduction of Organ-On-A-Chip - Creative Biolabs
Introduction of Organ-On-A-Chip - Creative BiolabsCreative-Biolabs
 
CHROMATOGRAPHY PALLAVI RAWAT.pptx
CHROMATOGRAPHY  PALLAVI RAWAT.pptxCHROMATOGRAPHY  PALLAVI RAWAT.pptx
CHROMATOGRAPHY PALLAVI RAWAT.pptxpallavirawat456
 
3.-Acknowledgment-Dedication-Abstract.docx
3.-Acknowledgment-Dedication-Abstract.docx3.-Acknowledgment-Dedication-Abstract.docx
3.-Acknowledgment-Dedication-Abstract.docxUlahVanessaBasa
 

Recently uploaded (20)

Observation of Gravitational Waves from the Coalescence of a 2.5–4.5 M⊙ Compa...
Observation of Gravitational Waves from the Coalescence of a 2.5–4.5 M⊙ Compa...Observation of Gravitational Waves from the Coalescence of a 2.5–4.5 M⊙ Compa...
Observation of Gravitational Waves from the Coalescence of a 2.5–4.5 M⊙ Compa...
 
The Sensory Organs, Anatomy and Function
The Sensory Organs, Anatomy and FunctionThe Sensory Organs, Anatomy and Function
The Sensory Organs, Anatomy and Function
 
Abnormal LFTs rate of deco and NAFLD.pptx
Abnormal LFTs rate of deco and NAFLD.pptxAbnormal LFTs rate of deco and NAFLD.pptx
Abnormal LFTs rate of deco and NAFLD.pptx
 
GLYCOSIDES Classification Of GLYCOSIDES Chemical Tests Glycosides
GLYCOSIDES Classification Of GLYCOSIDES  Chemical Tests GlycosidesGLYCOSIDES Classification Of GLYCOSIDES  Chemical Tests Glycosides
GLYCOSIDES Classification Of GLYCOSIDES Chemical Tests Glycosides
 
HEMATOPOIESIS - formation of blood cells
HEMATOPOIESIS - formation of blood cellsHEMATOPOIESIS - formation of blood cells
HEMATOPOIESIS - formation of blood cells
 
Combining Asynchronous Task Parallelism and Intel SGX for Secure Deep Learning
Combining Asynchronous Task Parallelism and Intel SGX for Secure Deep LearningCombining Asynchronous Task Parallelism and Intel SGX for Secure Deep Learning
Combining Asynchronous Task Parallelism and Intel SGX for Secure Deep Learning
 
BACTERIAL SECRETION SYSTEM by Dr. Chayanika Das
BACTERIAL SECRETION SYSTEM by Dr. Chayanika DasBACTERIAL SECRETION SYSTEM by Dr. Chayanika Das
BACTERIAL SECRETION SYSTEM by Dr. Chayanika Das
 
Timeless Cosmology: Towards a Geometric Origin of Cosmological Correlations
Timeless Cosmology: Towards a Geometric Origin of Cosmological CorrelationsTimeless Cosmology: Towards a Geometric Origin of Cosmological Correlations
Timeless Cosmology: Towards a Geometric Origin of Cosmological Correlations
 
6.2 Pests of Sesame_Identification_Binomics_Dr.UPR
6.2 Pests of Sesame_Identification_Binomics_Dr.UPR6.2 Pests of Sesame_Identification_Binomics_Dr.UPR
6.2 Pests of Sesame_Identification_Binomics_Dr.UPR
 
complex analysis best book for solving questions.pdf
complex analysis best book for solving questions.pdfcomplex analysis best book for solving questions.pdf
complex analysis best book for solving questions.pdf
 
Efficient Fourier Pricing of Multi-Asset Options: Quasi-Monte Carlo & Domain ...
Efficient Fourier Pricing of Multi-Asset Options: Quasi-Monte Carlo & Domain ...Efficient Fourier Pricing of Multi-Asset Options: Quasi-Monte Carlo & Domain ...
Efficient Fourier Pricing of Multi-Asset Options: Quasi-Monte Carlo & Domain ...
 
KDIGO-2023-CKD-Guideline-Public-Review-Draft_5-July-2023.pdf
KDIGO-2023-CKD-Guideline-Public-Review-Draft_5-July-2023.pdfKDIGO-2023-CKD-Guideline-Public-Review-Draft_5-July-2023.pdf
KDIGO-2023-CKD-Guideline-Public-Review-Draft_5-July-2023.pdf
 
Role of Gibberellins, mode of action and external applications.pptx
Role of Gibberellins, mode of action and external applications.pptxRole of Gibberellins, mode of action and external applications.pptx
Role of Gibberellins, mode of action and external applications.pptx
 
Observational constraints on mergers creating magnetism in massive stars
Observational constraints on mergers creating magnetism in massive starsObservational constraints on mergers creating magnetism in massive stars
Observational constraints on mergers creating magnetism in massive stars
 
Pests of Sunflower_Binomics_Identification_Dr.UPR
Pests of Sunflower_Binomics_Identification_Dr.UPRPests of Sunflower_Binomics_Identification_Dr.UPR
Pests of Sunflower_Binomics_Identification_Dr.UPR
 
Interpreting SDSS extragalactic data in the era of JWST
Interpreting SDSS extragalactic data in the era of JWSTInterpreting SDSS extragalactic data in the era of JWST
Interpreting SDSS extragalactic data in the era of JWST
 
Introduction of Organ-On-A-Chip - Creative Biolabs
Introduction of Organ-On-A-Chip - Creative BiolabsIntroduction of Organ-On-A-Chip - Creative Biolabs
Introduction of Organ-On-A-Chip - Creative Biolabs
 
PLASMODIUM. PPTX
PLASMODIUM. PPTXPLASMODIUM. PPTX
PLASMODIUM. PPTX
 
CHROMATOGRAPHY PALLAVI RAWAT.pptx
CHROMATOGRAPHY  PALLAVI RAWAT.pptxCHROMATOGRAPHY  PALLAVI RAWAT.pptx
CHROMATOGRAPHY PALLAVI RAWAT.pptx
 
3.-Acknowledgment-Dedication-Abstract.docx
3.-Acknowledgment-Dedication-Abstract.docx3.-Acknowledgment-Dedication-Abstract.docx
3.-Acknowledgment-Dedication-Abstract.docx
 

Impact Of Electromagnetic radiations of biology and behaviour of Apis mellifera L.

  • 1. Impact Of Electromagnetic radiations of biology and behaviour of Apis mellifera L. Shweta Patel 42537
  • 2. INTRODUCTION  Honeybees play a vital role in the pollination of agricultural crops  In recent years honey bee colony declines have reached 10-30% in Europe, 30% in the United States and up to 85% in Middle East, but such declines are not apparent in South America, Africa and Australia (Kluser,2010)  The syndrome behind honeybee population decline is known generally as Colony Collapse Disorder (CCD), which is characterized by a rapid loss of adult worker bees (van (Engelsdorp, 2009)  EMFs are mentioned as a cause of honeybee colony losses, the sudden disappearance of honeybees, which is a huge problem in the field of beekeeping (VanEngelsdorp et al,2009)
  • 3. There are several factors for CCD and they fall into two main classes:  living organisms human activity Electromagnetic radiation can best be described as waves of electric and magnetic energy moving together (i.e. radiating ) through space . Electromagnetic fields (EMF) are physical fields that are produced by a source of EMR. Electric fields are associated with electric charge and magnetic fields with the movement of electric charge.
  • 4. Radiation Pattern of a Cell Tower Antenna People living within 50 to 300 meter radius are in the high radiation zone (dark blue) and are more prone to ill-effects of electromagnetic radiation
  • 5. Proportion of studies on different groups of organisms Birds; 3% Bees; 1% Wildlife;2% Other Animals; 12% Plants; 1%Human; 81% Bees Wildlife Other Animals HumanPlantsBirds Studies on EMF impacts
  • 6. MATERIALS AND METHODS  Fifteen boxes of bees were place at specified locations. First three boxes were placed below the mobile tower. After measuring 200m, 400m, 600m and 800m distance from the tower, three boxes were placed at each location, respectively.  At each place 3 replications was taken. 6 Treatment was considered at every place. Assuming first treatment as a no. of bees (bees-strength), second, third, fourth, fifth and sixth as area of honey, egg, larva ,brood and pollen. Each were be measure after 14 days interval. The experiment was divided into 5 spot with each spot different distances: Spot 1: 0 m Spot 2: 200 m Spot 3: 400 m Spot 4: 600 m Spot 5: 800 m
  • 9. Effect of Radiations on honey area (cm2 ) of honeybees during 2012 Treatment 30.6.12 14.7.12 28.7.12 11.8.12 25.8.12 8.9.12 22.9.12 6.10.12 Mean E (mV/m) B(µA/m) S (mW/m2 ) T1 (0 m) 275.833 (16.575) 665.000 (25.672) 277.500 (16.442) 387.500 (19.611) 478.333 (21.049) 745.833 (26.631) 554.166 (22.351) 616.666 (23.693) 500.101 (21.503) 304.297 541.22 302.913 T2 (200 m) 606.666 (24.300) 789.166 (27.588) 473.333 (21.448 521.666 (22.684) 372.500 (19.299) 305.000 (17.386) 308.333 (17.454) 514.166 (22.36) 486.35 (21.564) 10.663 24.08 0.248 T3 (400 m) 361.400 (18.346) 710.000 (26.442) 530.000 (22.799) 432.500 (20.333) 397.500 (19.686) 912.500 (28.609) 854.166 (28.753) 96.666 (9.791) 536.84 (21.844) 20.826 109.54 2.235 T4 (600 m) 500.833 (22.082) 798.333 (27.963) 455.833 (20.885) 370.833 (18.236) 542.500 (22.552) 460.833 (19.872) 407.333 (19.458) 234.633 (14.918) 471.388 (20.745) 7.198 19.338 0.0981 T5 (800 m) 645.000 (25.346) 733.333 (26.958) 488.333 (21.990) 527.500 (22.940) 190.623 (13.626) 883.316 (29.694) 592.083 (24.304) 347.500 (18.535) 550.958 (22.924) 7.088 19.12 0.132 Mean 477.946 (21.330) 739.166 (26.925) 445.000 (20.713) 448.000 (20.761) 396.291 (19.243) 661.496 (24.439) 543.216 (22.464) 361.926 (17.859) 509.130 (21.716) _ _ _ Sem 107.523 (2.635) 148.275 (2.851) 105.073 (2.5687) 102.057 (2.6173) 112.528 (2.828) 255.034 (4.9305) 163.145 (3.6768) 124.922 (3.026) _ _ _ _ Cd at 5% 350.449 (8.589) 483.270 (9.294) 342.466 (8.372) 332.633 (8.530) 366.763 (9.218) 831.228 (16.070) 163.145 (11.984) 407.156 (9.863) _ _ _ _ Cv 38.965 (21.40) 34.744 (18.344) 40.897 (21.480) 39.457 (21.835) 49.182 (25.458) 66.777 (34.943) 52.019 (28.349) 59.783 (29.350) _ _ _ _ F value ns ns ns ns ns ns ns ns _ _ _ _
  • 10. Honey area at different distance from tower during the year 2012
  • 11. Progressive increase in Honey area during the year 2012
  • 12. Method estimating the area of honey, egg, pollen, larva and brood
  • 13. Effect of Radiations on the egg laying capacity in area (cm2 ) of queen bee at Pantnagar during 2012 Treatment 30.6.12 14.7.12 28.7.12 11.8.12 25.8.12 8.9.12 22.9.12 6.10.12 Mean E(mV/m ) B(µA/m) S(mW/m2 ) T1 (0 m) 126.666 (9.060) 15.000 (3.142) 157.500 (11.742) 167.500 (12.598) 152.500 (10.018) 95.833 (7.426) 144.166 (10.863) 150.000 (11.258) 126.143 (9.513) 304.297 541.22 302.913 T2 (200 m) 210.833 (14.059) 59.166 (6.796) 199.583 (13.824) 185.833 (13.547) 220.000 (14.803) 145.000 (11.954) 168.333 (11.864) 176.666 (10.808) 170.673 (12.206) 10.663 24.08 0.248 T3 (400 m) 0.000 (0.000) 48.333 (6.915) 215.000 (14.192) 200.833 (13.967) 145.833 (11.842) 45.833 (5.202) 261.666 (15.408) 102.500 (10.055) 127.497 (9.697) 20.826 109.54 2.235 T4 (600 m) 122.500 (8.364) 37.916 (6.052) 203.333 (11.639 140.000 (11.512) 75.000 (6.921) 115.833 (10.305) 105.000 (8.162) 115.833 (10.394) 114.425 (9.168) 7.198 19.338 0.0981 T5 (800 m) 61.666 (4.533) 34.166 (5.824) 100.000 (7.8867) 65.833 (5.712) 125.833 (11.205) 64.166 (6.540) 80.000 (8.7561) 47.833 (6.562) 72.433 (7.127) 7.088 19.12 0.132 Mean 104.333 (7.203) 38.916 (5.746) 175.083 (11.857) 152.000 (11.467) 143.833 (10.958) 93.333 (8.285) 151.833 (11.010) 118.566 (9.815) 122.237 (9.542) _ _ _ sem 74.773 (4.292) 19.006 (1.374) 82.463 (3.960) 51.320 (2.622) 50.919 (3.154) 47.522 (3.200) 71.286 (3.164) 59.257 (3.145) _ _ _ _ Cd at 5% 243.706 (13.991) 61.946 (4.480) 268.770 (12.909) 167.266 (8.546) 165.961 (10.280) 154.888 (10.432) 232.342 (10.312) 193.137 (10.250) _ _ _ _ Cv 124.131 (103.214) 84.589 (41.435) 81.578 (57.860) 58.479 (39.604) 61.317 (49.853) 88.190 (66.912) 81.320 (49.772) 86.564 (55.497) _ _ _ _ F value ns ns ns ns ns ns ns ns _ _ _ _
  • 14. Egg laying by Queen bee at different distance from tower during the year 2012
  • 15. Progressive increase in area of egg laying during the year 2012
  • 16. Impact of Radiations on the brood area (cm2 ) of honeybees at Pantnagar during the year 2012Treatment 30.6.12 14.7.12 28.7.12 11.8.12 25.8.12 8.9.12 22.9.12 6.10.12 Mean E(mV/m ) B(µA/m) S (mW/m2 ) T1 (0 m) 109.166 (10.101) 161.449 (20.812) 281.666 (15.901) 198.333 (13.966 283.666 (14.336) 450.833 (17.861) 355.833 (16.619) 574.166 (23.838) 340.817 (16.679) 304.297 541.22 302.913 T2 (200 m) 189.166 (13.750) 435.416 (20.695) 389.583 (19.683) 453.333 (21.133 360.000 (18.883) 451.666 (21.131) 721.666 (26.608) 250.833 (14.163) 406.453 (19.505) 10.663 24.08 0.248 T3 (400 m) 314.166 (17.5487) 570.000 (23.688) 333.333 (18.175) 468.333 (21.585) 441.666 (20.974) 435.000 (20.812) 407.500 (19.234) 578.333 (23.901) 443.531 (20.739) 20.826 109.54 2.235 T4 (600 m) 261.666 (16.084) 553.750 (23.500) 223.541 (13.415) 505.000 (22.441) 204.166 (11.655) 635.833 (25.094) 490.833 (20.054) 587.500 (23.716) 432.772 (19.494) 7.198 19.338 0.0981 T5 (800 m) 164.166 (10.461) 339.166 (17.825) 252.500 (15.869) 286.666 (13.573) 240.833 (14.539) 225.833 (14.991) 215.833 (13.962) 245.000 (15.616) 246.246 (14.604) 7.088 19.12 0.132 Mean 207.666 (13.589) 474.250 (21.304) 296.125 (16.609) 382.333 (18.54) 306.066 (16.078) 439.833 (19.978) 438.333 (19.295) 447.166 (20.247) _ _ _ _ sem 49.535 (2.647) 113.819 (2.634) 85.661 (3.036) 87.997 (3.455) 100.027 (4.431) 122.459 (3.796) 143.272 (4.560) 88.835 (2.545) _ _ _ _ Cd at 5% 161.449 (8.629) 370.969 (8.587) 279.196 (9.896) 286.809 (11.263) 326.017 (14.443) 399.130 (12.373) 466.967 (14.864) 289.540 (8.297) _ _ _ _ Cv 41.315 (33.744) 41.568 (21.420) 50.104 (31.663) 39.864 32.284 56.605 (47.738) 48.224 (32.912) 56.613 (40.937) 34.409 (21.777) _ _ _ _ F value ns ns ns ns ns ns ns ns _ _ _ _
  • 17. Area of Brood at various distance from tower during the year 2012
  • 18. Progressive increase in brood area during the year 2012
  • 19. Impact of Radiations on the larva area (cm2 ) of honeybees at Pantnagar during the year 2012 Treatment 30.6.12 14.7.12 28.7.12 11.8.12 25.8.12 8.9.12 22.9.12 6.10.12 Mean E(mV/m ) B(µA/m) S(mW/m2 ) T1 (0 m) 25.833 (3.865) 21.166 (3.554) 138.333 (10.561) 183.333 (12.959) 82.500 8.891) 146.666 (9.878) 220.000 (11.988) 169.166 (12.219) 123.37 (9.239) 304.297 541.22 302.913 T2 (200 m) 7.500 (2.017) 17.466 (4.432) 198.333 (13.982) 194.166 (13.738) 195.000 13.769) 213.333 (14.318) 251.666 (15.576) 164.166 (10.455) 155.2 (11.035) 10.663 24.08 0.248 T3 (400 m ) 201.666 (13.680) 37.500 (6.046) 196.666 (14.011) 215.000 (14.284) 188.333 13.578) 70.000 (6.573) 273.333 (16.448) 263.333 (16.165) 180.726 (12.598) 20.826 109.54 2.235 T4 (600 m) 51.666 (5.849) 40.833 (6.175) 134.166 (9.291) 340.833 (17.956) 179.166 10.407) 124.166 (8.973) 122.500 (8.979) 255.000 (15.370) 156.037 (10.375) 7. 19.338 0.0981 T5 (800 m) 102.500 (7.142) 13.750 (3.700) 109.166 (7.625) 40.833 (5.195) 27.500 (5.210) 39.166 (5.042) 92.500 (8.922) 39.166 (5.9387) 58.07 (6.0968) 7.088 19.12 0.132 Mean 77.833 (6.511) 26.143 (4.782) 155.333 (11.094) 194.833 (12.826) 134.500 (10.371) 118.666 (8.957) 192.000 (12.382) 178.166 (12.029) 134.684 (9.869) _ _ _ sem 56.032 (2.962) 26.143 (1.044) 74.674 (3.793) 74.950 (2.828) 63.498 (2.881) 51.631 (2.953) 66.675 (3.516) 62.312 (2.512) _ _ _ _ Cd at 5% 182.626 (9.656) 32.051 (3.404) 243.385 (12.364) 244.286 (9.217) 206.961 (9.392) 168.280 (9.624) 217.313 (11.462) 203.094 (8.188) _ _ _ _ Cv 124.691 (78.809) 65.151 (37.831) 83.265 (59.226) 66.630 (38.189) 81.772 (48.123) 75.360 (57.102) 60.148 (49.191) 60.577 (36.174) _ _ _ _ F value ns ns ns ns ns ns ns ns _ _ _ _
  • 20. Area of Larva at different distance from tower during the year 2012
  • 21. Area of comb occupied by the larvae during the year 2012
  • 22. Impact of Radiation on the pollen area at Pantnagar during the year 2012 Treatment 30.6.12 14.7.12 28.7.12 11.8.12 25.8.12 8.9.12 22.9.12 6.10.12 Mean E(mV/m) B(µA/m) S (mW/m2 ) T1 (0 m) 105.000 (8.856) 13.581 (3.092) 51.456 (6.995) 19.166 (4.136) 62.500 (7.146) 96.666 (9.643) 127.500 (11.245) 159.166 (12.342) 79.376 (7.931) 304.297 541.22 302.913 T2 (200 m) 216.666 (11.93) 1.041 (0.831) 57.500 (7.541) 89.166 (9.197) 129.166 (11.127) 165.000 (12.772) 121.666 (10.987) 140.000 (11.722) 110.52 (9.512) 10.663 24.08 0.248 T3 (400 m) 61.666 (7.7199) .250 (0.288) 46.250 (6.086) 41.250 (6.266) 96.666 (9.623) 59.500 (7.029) 277.500 (15.765) 103.333 (10.160) 85.8 (7.867) 20.826 109.54 2.235 T4 (600 m) 71.666 (8.401) 19.583 (2.900) 50.833 (7.074) 76.750 (8.680) 95.000 (9.577) 69.166 (8.257) 200.000 (14.090) 185.000 (13.370) 95.997 (9.043) 7.198 19.338 0.0981 T5 (800 m) 289.166 (15.634) .1233 (0.202) 35.623 (5.725) 40.400 (5.661) 16.666 (3.329) 18.333 (4.217) 33.7500 (5.4377) 10.873 (2.998) 55.613 (5.400) 7.088 19.12 0.132 Mean 148.833 (10.508) 6.916 (1.463) 48.332 (6.684) 53.346 (6.788) 80.000 (8.160) 81.733 (8.384) 152.083 (11.505) 119.674 (10.118) 373.971 (18.205) _ _ _ sem 100.347 (3.687) 10.165 (1.257) 17.250 (1.266) 20.632 (1.337) 30.269 (1.840) 19.536 (1.149) 50.814 (2.013) 25.831 (1.042) _ _ _ _ Cd at 5% 327.059 (12.019) 33.133 (4.097) 56.223 (4.126) 67.247 (4.360) 98.657 (5.998) 63.675 (3.747) 165.617 (6.562) 84.191 (3.396) _ _ _ _ Cv 116.779 (60.783) 254.596 (148.82) 61.818 (32.804) 66.989 (34.133) 65.535 (39.064) 41.401 (23.752) 57.871 (30.310) 37.385 (17.839) _ _ _ _ F value ns ns ns ns ns ** * ** _ _ _ _
  • 23. Pollen area at different distance from tower during the year 2012
  • 24. Progressive increase in Pollen area of comb during the year 2012
  • 25. Impact of radiations on the Bees-strength of honeybees at Pantnagar during the year 2012 Treatment 30.6.12 14.7.12 28.7.12 11.8.12 25.8.12 8.9.12 22.9.12 6.10.12 Mean E(mV/ m) B (µA/m) S (mW/m2 ) T1 (0 m) 19832.33 (136.754) 23000.00 (151.452) 23334.33 (150.975) 26962.33 (161.410) 9997.33 (98.946) 19719.67 (139.416) 20775.67 (139.811) 26053.33 (153.728) 21209.37 (141.562) 304.297 541.22 302.913 T2 (200 m) 21777.67 (147.485) 17000.00 (130.178) 20222.33 (141.621) 23388.67 (152.118) 27109.00 (164.536) 20887.67 (143.053) 23331.67 (152.678) 29941.67 (167.983) 22957.34 (149.957) 10.663 24.08 0.248 T3 (400 m) 22333.33 (148.830) 23055.33 (151.298) 87889.00 (254.890) 26443.33 (161.528) 28442.67 (167.184) 24053.67 (154.429) 24553.00 (156.530) 26479.67 (158.521) 32906.25 (169.151) 20.826 109.54 2.235 T4 (600 m) 20666.67 (142.159) 22000.33 (147.175) 28556.00 (168.252) 26388.33 (161.594) 26442.33 (161.783) 28998.33 (169.062) 17442.67 (131.90) 27276.00 (164.409) 24721.33 (155.792) 7.198 19.338 0.0981 T5 (800 m) 16333.33 (122.531) 14333.67 (114.536) 10333.33 (98.469) 13777.33 (117.182) 12058.33 (109.691) 12111.00 (109.934) 10886.33 (104.302) 9720.67 (98.483) 12444.25 (109.391) 7.088 19.12 0.132 Mean 20188.67 (139.552) 19877.87 (138.928) 34067.00 (162.941) 23392.00 (150.786) 20809.93 (140.428) 21154.07 (143.179) 19397.87 (137.044) 23894.27 (148.625) 22847.71 (145.185) _ _ _ sem 5138.29 (19.088) 3752.13 (14.963) 29613.43 (50.973) 4771.11 (14.625) 2914.88 (8.986) 3814.267 (12.755) 553.77 (12.255) 8397.07 (25.921) - _ _ _ Cd at 5% 16747.17 (62.215) 12229.30 (48.768) 96518.68 (166.137) 15550.43 (47.669) 9500.46 (29.290) 12431.79 (41.575) 11582.76 (39.943) 27368.47 (84.484) - _ _ _ Cv 44.083 (23.691) 32.694 (18.654) 150.562 (54.184) 35.327 (16.80) 24.261 (11.084) 31.230 (15.430) 31.731 (15.488) 60.868 (30.208) - _ _ _ F value ns ns ns ns ** ns ns ns - _ _ _
  • 26. Method of estimating the Bees- Strength
  • 27. Impact of radiations on bee-strength at different distances from tower during 2012
  • 28. Progressive increase in number of bees during the year 2012
  • 30. Radiation at 0 m (beneath,the mobile tower) during the year 2012
  • 31. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION  Bees-strength in the starting of experiment in T1 (0 m, beneath, the mobile tower) was found to be 19,832.33 while, it was seen increased 26,053.33 at the end of experiment, the first week of October, under the influence of electromagnetic radiations emitted from the mobile tower.  The overall progressive increased in honey area recorded during the month of June-October, Area of comb, filled with honey was increased 340.833 cm2 in T1 (0m, beneath, the mobile tower) while, decreased in -297.5 cm2 in T5 (800m) followed by T4 (600 m) in 266.2 cm2 , -264.734 cm2 in T3(400m) and -92.5cm2 in T2(200m).
  • 32.  On the basis of observations recorded, it was revealed that the area of egg was significantly increased in T3 (T1102.5 cm2 ) and T1 (23.334 cm2 ) whereas, it was found to be decreased in T2 (-34.167 cm2 ), T5 (-13.836 cm2 ) and T4 (- 6.667 cm2 ).  The radiation was recorded during month of June- October. Highest radiation was observed in T1 (E =304.297 mV/m, B =541.22 µA/m and S =302.913 m W/m2 ) while minimum in T5 (E =7.088 mV/m, B =19.12 µA/m and S =0.132 m W/m2 ) followed by T4 (E =7.198 mV/m, B =19.338 µA/m and S =0.0981 m W/m2 ), T2 (E=10.663 mV/m, B= 24.08 µA/m and S =0.248 m W/m2 ) and T3 (E =20.826 mV/m, B =109.54 µA/m and S=2.235 m W/m2 ), respectively.
  • 33. Conclusion As per the present investigation, all treated colonies with mobile tower radiation had perform well as normal colony and none of these colonies were perished during the experiment. At 0 m (beneath,the mobile tower) area of honey, brood, larva, egg, pollen all were increased. The present investigation would help to bee- keepers of Tarai region of Uttrakhand where, their bee hives were placed near the mobile tower .No impact of electromagnetic radiations of colony strength and bees survivorship.