SharonAndersonFiles MN AttorneyGeneral

805 views

Published on

Sharon Anderson, who is not a Liar or Lcensed Lawyer, Files again for MN Attorney General

0 Comments
1 Like
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

No Downloads
Views
Total views
805
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
15
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
3
Comments
0
Likes
1
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

SharonAndersonFiles MN AttorneyGeneral

  1. 1. Page 1 of 2 Subj: Sharons Filing Statement for MN Atorney General Date: 5/16/2010 4:01:03 P.M. Central Daylight Time From: Sharon4Anderson@aol.com To: Sharon4Anderson@aol.com CC: jon.roland@constitution.org Sun 16May10 To Minnesota at Large: Sharon Anderson aka Scarrella files for MN State Attorney General: Sharon is not a Liar or a Licensed Lawyer, check the Affidavit of Candidacy: Qualifications for Governor, does not list the other Constitutional Offices, Judges and City,Co Attorneys "Learned in Law"techinally VOIDS Affidavit ISSUES: Unabated by current DFL AG Lori Swanson Acorn Advocate, refuses to Publish Forensic Files for Public Scrunity, pdf format,must update site a. Repeal Obama's Health Care b. Prosecute Non Profits in violation of Title 26 501 c3 re: Sharons Consumer Complaint against www.2harvest.org re: MS256B.0914 https://www.revisor.mn.gov/data/revisor/statute/2009/256B/2009-256B.0914.pdf www.slideshare.net/sharon4anderson c. Prosecute White Collar Crime Immediately i: Perpetual Appointments "taking" our Right to Vote for and hold any Office, must be striken. ii: Manatron Software: deleting online Payments www.mnccc.org re: 62cv09-1163(Vandenorth) 62cv10-110 (Lindman) Tying to 62cv09-11693(Gearin) iii: Corrupt Judges: the Buck Stops at the AG's Office OnlineComplaints d. Advocate NonLawyers to hold office of Judges "Learned in Law" never defined by Legislature. In re: Scarrella for Assoc.Justice 221NW2d562 Denied by "License" e. Jon Roland Candidate Texas AG Sunday, May 16, 2010 AOL: Sharon4Anderson
  2. 2. Page 2 of 2 Forwarder's Note: The problem discussed below is not just the result of misconstruction of the Commerce Clause, but also of the Necessary and Proper Clause, and cannot be understood as merely redefining "commerce". It is also redefining "necessary and proper to carry into execution" to mean not just make an effort but to do anything convenient to get a desired outcome. Also, the misconstructions didn't begin in 1937, but trace back to such decisions as Gibbons v. Ogden, 22 U.S. 1 (1824). For more on this see Original Understanding of the Commerce Clause, Jon Roland: July 29, 2002. Fixing the Judiciary http://www.tulanelink.com/tulanelink/judicialfix_box.htm In 2006, only 21 states still held elections for judicial positions while 29 states appointed their high court judges (17 of the latter still require "retention" elections of the incumbant appointees) [1]. This trend has been encouraged by bar associations and organizations that represent the courts, and they are lobbying hard to convert the remaining elective states into appointive ones. LEGAL NOTICE: /s/Sharon4Anderson@aol.com ECF_P165913Pacersa1299 telfx: 651-776-5835: Attorney ProSe_InFact,Private Attorney General QuiTam Whistleblower, Candidate AG2010 www.sharonagmn2010.blogspot.com Blogger: http://www.the912project.us/profiles/blogs/digitalcourtericmagnusona1064a-1 Homestead Act of 1862 Twitter / Sharon4Anderson Shar1058's Buzz Activity Page - My Buzz Activity - Yahoo! Buzz neopopulism.org - Pro Se Dec Action Litigation Pack Sharon4Anderson | Scribd Document's are based on SEC filings, Blogger: Dashboard Home | FAIR USE NOTICEThis site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of whistleblower protection issues, MY FindLaw SharonsWritProA06_1150_30Jun06_26 The CAN-SPAM Act: Requirements for Commercial Emailers kare11.com_SA Sharons-Psychic-Whispers: Sharons Gypsy Curse-Court-Cop Corruption 3Apr0http://www.givemeliberty.org/RTPlawsuit/courtfilings/Docket.htm Sharon4Council: DLJ Management v. City St. Paul A06- 2118,Money LaunderinNo direct un-apportioned tax confirmed by the US Supreme Court rulings in CHAS. C. STEWARD MACH. CO. v. DAVIS, 301 U.S. 548, 581-582(1937) g andFCC Complaints - http://sharons-copywrite.blogspot.comknowledge gained as financial journalists , http://taxthemax.blogspot.com securities they recommend to readers, affiliated entities, employees, and agents an initial trade Public domain recommendation published on the Internet, after a direct mail publication is sent, before acting Google Search Times v. Sullvian Libel with malice - on that recommendations, and may contain errors. Investment decisions should not be based solely on these or other Public Office documents expressly forbids its writers from having financial interests in Google Search BlogItBabe2007 Candidate profile Sharon4Anderson's Legal BlogBriefs Sharon4And Sunday, May 16, 2010 AOL: Sharon4Anderson

×