Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

Finalppt

763 views

Published on

Published in: Technology, Business
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

Finalppt

  1. 1. Presented byGroup 8
  2. 2.  Introduction and problem definition Literature review Research Methodologya) Research Designb) Data Analysis Conclusions and Recommendation Bibliography
  3. 3.  Ever-expanding Indian economy has led to an increase in the appetite for management education in the country FORE is currently one of India’s leading business schools PGDM is one of the flagship programmes of FORE We will study the effectiveness of FORE PGDM
  4. 4.  To assess if FORE PGDM fosters improvements in the following characteristics of the students:1. Creativity2. Perseverance3. Communication Skills4. Leadership Styles5. Conflict Resolution
  5. 5.  Assessing the Effectiveness of Whole Person Learning Pedagogy in Skill Acquisition by Hoover, j. Duane The Use of Vignettes in Qualitative Research by Christine Barter and Emma Renold Learning Cognitive and Emotional Intelligence Competencies Through Graduate Management Education by Boyatzis, Richard E A holistic framework for the perceived return on investment in an MBA by Carmichael, T. Sutherland, M.
  6. 6.  Primary Data Collection1. Qualitative data : Focus groups2. Qualitative data: surveys Survey Design: Viginette Survey Type of sampling : Non probability convenient sampling Source of Error: non response error
  7. 7.  Creativity: Creativity assessment inventory, on a scale of 1-4 represented by the options in the questionnaire Perseverance: Value preference inventory and general beliefs survey, on a scale of 0-4 represented by the options in the questionnaire. Communication skills: Facom scale, on a range of 1-5 represented by the options in the questionnaire Leadership: Four options standing for four different styles of leadership Conflict resolution skills: Conflict resolution inventory, on a scale of 1-5
  8. 8. DATA ANALYSIS
  9. 9.  Hypothesis 1: Creativity H0: The creativity of a student is not changed by pursuing PGDM in FORE H1: The creativity of a student is changed by pursuing PGDM in FORE Hypothesis 2: Perseverance H0: The perseverance of a student is not changed by pursuing PGDM in FORE H1: The perseverance of a student is changed by pursuing PGDM in FORE
  10. 10.  Hypothesis 3: Communication H0: The communication skills of a student is not changed by pursuing PGDM in FORE H1: The communication skills of a student is changed by pursuing PGDM in FORE Hypothesis 4: Conflict resolution H0: The conflict management skills of a student is not changed by pursuing PGDM in FORE H1: The conflict management skills of a student is changed by pursuing PGDM in FORE
  11. 11.  Leadership We will assess the change in the leadership styles between the two batches The significance level would be set at 90% for all the tests
  12. 12.  T -TEST STATISTIC FOR HYPOTHESIS TESTS ABOUT µ1 - µ2. For e.g.: Hypothesis 1: Creativity Here µ1: mean creativity index for seniors µ2: mean creativity index for juniors Thus, H0: µ1 - µ2 = 0 H1: µ1 - µ2 ≠ 0
  13. 13.  To check whether FORE PGDM is effective in adding leadership skills in students 16 14 12 10 8 style 1 6 style 2 style 3 4 style 4 2 0 Batch 2010-12 Batch 2009-11
  14. 14.  Style 1 – high regulating, low nurturing - Directive Style 2 – high regulating, high nurturing - Supportive Style 3 – low regulating, high nurturing - Consulting Style 4 – low regulating, low nurturing - Delegating
  15. 15.  To check whether FORE PGDM is effective in adding creativity in students. CREATIVITY INDEX Particulars Batch 2009-11 Batch 2010-12 Mean 5.375 5.1333 Std dev 0.9418 1.279 No. Of res 32 30 T statistic = 0.84261, df = 53, t0.05= 1.674
  16. 16.  To check whether FORE PGDM is effective in adding conflict management skills CONFLICT RESOLUTION INDEX Particulars Batch 2009-11 Batch 2010-12 Mean 5.375 5.0067 Std dev 1.1845 1.2576 No. Of res 32 30 T statistic = 0.992096, df = 59, t0.05= 1.671
  17. 17.  To check whether FORE PGDM is effective in adding communication skills in students. COMMUNICATING SKILLS INDEX Particulars Batch 2009-11 Batch 2010-12 Mean 7.25 6.9 Std dev 2.170179 1.748891 No. Of res 32 30 T statistic = 0.701219, df = 58, t0.05= 1.672
  18. 18.  To check whether FORE PGDM is effective in adding perseverance in students. PERSEVERANCE INDEX Particulars Batch 2009-11 Batch 2010-12 Mean 5.6875 4.7333 Std dev 1.785922 2.132399 No. Of res 32 30 T statistic = 1.903672, df = 56, t0.05= 1.673
  19. 19.  ‘Creativity’ is not added through the PGDM program ‘Perseverance’ is added through the program ‘Communication Skills’ is not added through the program ‘Leadership style’ changes from directive to delegating ‘Conflict resolution skills’ are not added through this PGDM program
  20. 20.  Institute should have a proper evaluation of the courses which are in place If any of the above traits are not being imparted by the college through any direct means there should be an earnest effort to do so There should be proper evaluation of the trainer so as to judge the teacher student fit The effectiveness of the teacher in teaching a particular course should be checked
  21. 21.  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantitative_resear ch http://poq.oxfordjournals.org/content/42/1/93.a bstract http://search.ebscohost.com/ http://survey.cvent.com/blog/survey-and- questionnaire-design/using-vignettes-in-survey- research Training instruments in HRD and OD by Udai Pareek

×