SHAKIL A ROMSHOOPROF. AND HEAD,DEPT OF EARTH SCIENCESUNIVERSITY OF KASHMIRENVIRONMENTAL SCENARIO IN J&K:INDICATORS AND TRE...
PRESENTATION SCHEME!  HIMALAYAS: OUR CROWN JEWEL!  DEPLETING WATER RESOURCES!  DEGRADING WETLANDS/WATER BODIES!  RECKLESS ...
SAMSABARI RANGELADAKH RANGEHIMALAYAS: OUR PRIDE
Misunderstanding Himalayan Glaciers
SNOW AND GLACIER REOURCES
Jammu & Kashmir
Water Tower of Asia
Changes in Alpine CryosphereTotal&Glacier&area&in&1969&(sq.&Km)!Total&Glacier&area&1992&(Sq.&Km)!Total&Glacier&area&2001(s...
0.000.100.200.300.400.500.600.70Jan Feb Mar Apr May JunSnow%% snow-06% snow-07% snow-08%Snow-09Snow Depletion Across Month...
Changing Hydrology and Land System
Water Demand in Srinagar City
Demographic Changes•  The state of has shown population growth from2.14 million in 1901 to 12.5 million 2011.•  A growth r...
IntroductionVarious beneficial functions of wetlands include lifesustaining processes like water storage (domestic,agricul...
Wetlands & Waterbodies
DAL LAKE CATCHMENT
DAL LAKE ENVIRONS
!34%1992! !2008 65%
WHAT DOES THISMEAN???More runoff in a shorteramount of timeDEVELOPEDHigher overall and peakvolumeShorter time to peak flow...
Land System ChangesCLASS NAME! 1972 AREA (HA)! 1992 AREA (HA)! 2008AREA (HA)!FOREST! 485473.31! 464798.36! 391368.55!AGRIC...
Chemicalcomponents1982 2002 ChangeNH4-N(µg/l) 14.9 85.0 70.1NO3-N(µg/l) 44.7 317.0 272.3PO4-P(µg/l) 17.5 40.0 22.5Total P ...
Yield – temperature plot for2011-2040 simulation1234567891039003950400040504100415042004250430043504400Temperature(0C)Yiel...
TOURISMDEVELOPMENT&ENVIRONMENT
Discrepancy Map89 discrepanciescovering an areaof 26 Ha
Energy Crisis in the State
" Hydro-power potential: > 25, 000 MW" Out of the identified hydro-electric potentialonly 2327 MWs (<10%) have been exploi...
S.&No.& Area& C E R ’ s&(Million/year)&1& Power&GeneraIon& 41.63&2& Transmission/DistribuIon& 1.07&3& Energy&ConservaIon& ...
POLITICS
Year& Total&Conflicts&1995& 1&1996& 1&1997& 2&1998& 1&1999& 1&2000& 5&2001& 8&2002& 7&2003& 7&2004& 19&2005& 48&2006& 51&20...
9 Districts& 76 Villages&
THE OTHER SIDE …..•  POOR UNDERSTANDING OF THE PROBLEM & NOACTION PLAN•  Lack of concrete and holistic measures on thegrou...
-101234561880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2020Average_Temperature(0C) Average Temperature (Dec. & Jan.) (0C)-1.000.001.0...
ANNUALAVERAGE MAXIMUM TEMPERATURE91011121314151617182011201620212026203120362041204620512056206120662071207620812086209120...
ANNUALAVERAGE MINIMUM TEMPERATURE-9-8-7-6-5-4-3-2-102011201620212026203120362041204620512056206120662071207620812086209120...
39IN CONCLUSION …..! L O U D A N D C L E A R T R E N D S O FENVIRONMENTAL DEGRADATION! TREMENDOUS TRANSFORMATION OF THESOC...
40Thank you
ENVIRONMENT LINKAGESUnderstanding the linkages between various components of theearth system
Environmental Scenario of Jammu and Kashmir: Indicators and Trends
Environmental Scenario of Jammu and Kashmir: Indicators and Trends
Environmental Scenario of Jammu and Kashmir: Indicators and Trends
Environmental Scenario of Jammu and Kashmir: Indicators and Trends
Environmental Scenario of Jammu and Kashmir: Indicators and Trends
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in …5
×

Environmental Scenario of Jammu and Kashmir: Indicators and Trends

805 views

Published on

The presentation showcases the environmental scenario in the state of Jammu and Kashmir. Various aspects of the environment and how they have changed over the last few decades was discussed at KCSDS interactive meeting of the Civil Society

0 Comments
1 Like
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

No Downloads
Views
Total views
805
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
2
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
31
Comments
0
Likes
1
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Environmental Scenario of Jammu and Kashmir: Indicators and Trends

  1. 1. SHAKIL A ROMSHOOPROF. AND HEAD,DEPT OF EARTH SCIENCESUNIVERSITY OF KASHMIRENVIRONMENTAL SCENARIO IN J&K:INDICATORS AND TRENDS
  2. 2. PRESENTATION SCHEME!  HIMALAYAS: OUR CROWN JEWEL!  DEPLETING WATER RESOURCES!  DEGRADING WETLANDS/WATER BODIES!  RECKLESS URBANIZATION!  LAND SYSTEM CHANGES, WQ & FOOD!  TOURISM AND ENVIROMENT!  ENERGY CRISIS!  MAN-BEAR CONFLICT
  3. 3. SAMSABARI RANGELADAKH RANGEHIMALAYAS: OUR PRIDE
  4. 4. Misunderstanding Himalayan Glaciers
  5. 5. SNOW AND GLACIER REOURCES
  6. 6. Jammu & Kashmir
  7. 7. Water Tower of Asia
  8. 8. Changes in Alpine CryosphereTotal&Glacier&area&in&1969&(sq.&Km)!Total&Glacier&area&1992&(Sq.&Km)!Total&Glacier&area&2001(sq.&Km)!Total&Glacier&area&2010&(Sq.&Km)!45.63! 42.33! 39.41! &37.56!
  9. 9. 0.000.100.200.300.400.500.600.70Jan Feb Mar Apr May JunSnow%% snow-06% snow-07% snow-08%Snow-09Snow Depletion Across Months (2006-2009)There is a decreasing trend in the snow precipitation asshown by the snow depletion curves.Trend in Snow Depletion
  10. 10. Changing Hydrology and Land System
  11. 11. Water Demand in Srinagar City
  12. 12. Demographic Changes•  The state of has shown population growth from2.14 million in 1901 to 12.5 million 2011.•  A growth rate of about 23% compared to thepopulation figures of 10.1 million in 2001.Population changes from 1981-2001
  13. 13. IntroductionVarious beneficial functions of wetlands include lifesustaining processes like water storage (domestic,agriculture, industrial usage) protection from storm andfloods, ground water recharge, storage for nutrients,erosion control and stabilisation of local climate(temperature, rainfall) and thus helps in maintainingecological balance.During the recent past wetlands have been recklesslydestroyed to create land for ‘development’ and only inrecent years their uses and values have begun to beunderstood and appreciated.Wetland!Map!–!Jammu!and!Kashmir!
  14. 14. Wetlands & Waterbodies
  15. 15. DAL LAKE CATCHMENT
  16. 16. DAL LAKE ENVIRONS
  17. 17. !34%1992! !2008 65%
  18. 18. WHAT DOES THISMEAN???More runoff in a shorteramount of timeDEVELOPEDHigher overall and peakvolumeShorter time to peak flowUNDEVELOPEDSmaller volume, lowerpeakLonger time to peak flowHydrologic Response: Developed vs.Undeveloped ConditionsRunoffVolume(Q)Time
  19. 19. Land System ChangesCLASS NAME! 1972 AREA (HA)! 1992 AREA (HA)! 2008AREA (HA)!FOREST! 485473.31! 464798.36! 391368.55!AGRICULTURE! 337788.45! 301094.00! 269138.93PLANTATION! 92240.15! 89443.34! 85876.76HORTICULTURE ! 17954.44! 28858.26! 71899.18!WATER! 12795.11! 11024.42! 6827.09!RIVER BED! 9899.81! 9812.22! 7512.82!AQUA_VEGETATION! 3981.44! 7503.56! 11729.20!BUILT-UP! 578.07! 5914.96! 21432.81!
  20. 20. Chemicalcomponents1982 2002 ChangeNH4-N(µg/l) 14.9 85.0 70.1NO3-N(µg/l) 44.7 317.0 272.3PO4-P(µg/l) 17.5 40.0 22.5Total P (µg/l) 55.9 228.0 172.1Cl (µg/l) 11.9 13.5 1.6Ca (µg/l) 23.7 56.5 32.8Mg (µg/l) 2.8 22.0 19.2Change in WQ of river Jhelum(1982–2002)
  21. 21. Yield – temperature plot for2011-2040 simulation1234567891039003950400040504100415042004250430043504400Temperature(0C)YieldKg/hectareYearsyield kg/haAverage Temperature24681012142500270029003100330035003700390041004300450020402042204420462048205020522054205620582060206220642066206820702072207420762078208020822084208620882090Temperature(0C)Yieldkg/hectaresYearsYield – temperature plot for2040-2090 simulationSimulated yield under futureclimatic scenario for 2040 showeda decrease of 6.6% from thebaseline (4305.55 kg/ha ) .Simulated yield under future climaticscenario 2090 showed a decrease of29.1% (3049 kg/ha) from thebaseline (4305.55 kg/ha )CC IMPACTS ON FOOD SECURITYThe yield simulations were centered at437 ppm and 630 ppm carbon levels forthe year 2025 and 2075
  22. 22. TOURISMDEVELOPMENT&ENVIRONMENT
  23. 23. Discrepancy Map89 discrepanciescovering an areaof 26 Ha
  24. 24. Energy Crisis in the State
  25. 25. " Hydro-power potential: > 25, 000 MW" Out of the identified hydro-electric potentialonly 2327 MWs (<10%) have been exploited sofar" 767 MWs in the state sector from 21 powerprojects and 1560 MWs from three powerprojects under central sector.Energy Scenario
  26. 26. S.&No.& Area& C E R ’ s&(Million/year)&1& Power&GeneraIon& 41.63&2& Transmission/DistribuIon& 1.07&3& Energy&ConservaIon& 2.629&4& Municipal&solid&waste& 0.125&5.& Forestry&(LULUCF)& 0.74&Total& 46.19&CDM Potential In J&K
  27. 27. POLITICS
  28. 28. Year& Total&Conflicts&1995& 1&1996& 1&1997& 2&1998& 1&1999& 1&2000& 5&2001& 8&2002& 7&2003& 7&2004& 19&2005& 48&2006& 51&2007& 80&2008& 130&2009& 186&THE OTHER SIDE ……•  INCREASING BEAR ATTACKSACROSS THE VALLEY•  ILL EQUIPPED GOVT. MACHINERY
  29. 29. 9 Districts& 76 Villages&
  30. 30. THE OTHER SIDE …..•  POOR UNDERSTANDING OF THE PROBLEM & NOACTION PLAN•  Lack of concrete and holistic measures on theground•  Lack of awareness among the people•  Thus, BEAR-PHOBIA, Frustration and PANICREACTIONSBear Attack Cases operated at SKIIMS
  31. 31. -101234561880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2020Average_Temperature(0C) Average Temperature (Dec. & Jan.) (0C)-1.000.001.002.003.004.005.006.007.008.001975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010Temperature(0C)Average Temperature (Dec &Jan)-515355575951971197419771980198319861989199219951998Rainfall(mm)Total Precipitation Dec-Jan0501001502002503003504004505001979 1982 1985 1988 1991 1994 1997 2000 2003 2006Rainfall(mm)Total Precipitation (Dec. &Jan. )
  32. 32. ANNUALAVERAGE MAXIMUM TEMPERATURE9101112131415161718201120162021202620312036204120462051205620612066207120762081208620912096Temperature(0C)Years7891011121314151617201120162021202620312036204120462051205620612066207120762081208620912096Temperature(0C)Years15161718192021222324201120162021202620312036204120462051205620612066207120762081208620912096Temperature(0C)Years1516171819202122232425201120162021202620312036204120462051205620612066207120762081208620912096Temperature(0C)Years
  33. 33. ANNUALAVERAGE MINIMUM TEMPERATURE-9-8-7-6-5-4-3-2-10201120162021202620312036204120462051205620612066207120762081208620912096Temperature(0C)Years-11-10-9-8-7-6-5-4-3-2-10201120162021202620312036204120462051205620612066207120762081208620912096Temperature(0C)Years2345678910201120162021202620312036204120462051205620612066207120762081208620912096Temperature(0C)Years123456789201120162021202620312036204120462051205620612066207120762081208620912096Temperature(0C)Years
  34. 34. 39IN CONCLUSION …..! L O U D A N D C L E A R T R E N D S O FENVIRONMENTAL DEGRADATION! TREMENDOUS TRANSFORMATION OF THESOCIO-ECONOMIC AND ENVIRONMENTALSCENARIO IN THE STATE! A N T H R O P O G E N I C A N D N A T U R A LCOMPONENT! CALLOUSNESS AND INACTION. NEED FORINVOLVEMENT OF THE ENTIRE SOCIETY! NEED FOR SECTOR-WISE ACTION PLANSBASED ON INTEGRATED SCIENTIFICANALYSIS
  35. 35. 40Thank you
  36. 36. ENVIRONMENT LINKAGESUnderstanding the linkages between various components of theearth system

×