Learning through 'self-building' in a new social care landscape
1. Learning through 'self-building' in a new social care landscape
Andy Coverdale | Melanie Nind | Andrew Power | Edward Hall | Hannah Macpherson | Alexandra Kaley
ECER 2019 | Hamburg@SelfBuildCare
2. A new social care landscape
• Personalisation agenda - direct payments and personal budgets
• Reforms in commissioning of services
• Austerity - local authority cuts and declining day services
5. Agency
The ”capacity to envisage and realise
an improved form of subjectivity”
(Holland et al., 1998)
Self-building individually and collectively…
Relational Agency
Distributed competence,
ability, intelligence and capacity
(Goodley, 2001)
Peers
Support
Workers
PAsFamily
Peers
Providers
LAs
“Relational agency involves a capacity to offer
support and to ask for support from others.”
(Edwards & Mackenzie, 2005)
3 Planes of Focus
(Rogoff, 1995)
6. Data Collection & Analysis
4 case study areas: one urban and one rural in both England and Scotland
Weekly
Timetables
Support Circles
Photo
Elicitation
PWLD Focus
Groups
Follow-up
Interviews
Site visits
Observations
Practitioner
Interviews
Stage One
Stage Two
Dataset:
• Transcriptions
• Field notes
• Participant profiles
Advisory Groups
People with learning
disabilities and
practitioners from case
study areas
7. The Realities of Self-building
• Limited examples of ‘self-build’ practices and initiatives
• Unevenly spread across and within case study areas
• Not adequately replacing declining services
• New initiatives subject to competitive short-term funding
• Reliance on established but diminishing services
8. Learning through Self-building
• Choice and decision making
• Sourcing information (use of new technology)
• Responding to shifts in activities, places and social groups
• Managing life balance - work / volunteering, advocacy and
recreational activities
• Peer learning is often still reliant on staff support
• Opportunities for informal and community learning are being missed
9. Risk as a Conceptual Tool
Risk Taking
Learning & training cultures that
support and encourage risk taking
Support for co-production / user-led
activities
Strong support structures and
networks - family, support workers etc.
New opportunities and skills in
sourcing and networking
Peer advocacy - sharing of
information, advice and experience
Access to new activities and new
initiatives
Risk Aversion
Risk averse learning and training cultures
Lack of initiative for co-production /
user-led activities
Limited support structures and networks
Lack of networking skills and
opportunities
Isolation and marginalisation
Reliance on existing services and slow
transitioning of services
10. Self-building in Advocacy Groups
• Mitigates risks in self-building
• Provides structure for further lifelong learning
• Skills development: problem-solving, team-working and
communication etc.
• Peer groups support sharing of information, knowledge and
experiences
• Formal and informal mentorship
• Promotes self-awareness, self-motivation and self-confidence
• Transference of knowledge, skills and capacities to external social
and inclusive settings and activities
11. Yeah, because I recently noticed once you do
something new, someone else will be watching
you and they’ll be thinking, oh, I might like to
do that. So, you’re influencing others as much
as you’re building up on yourself.
[Self-advocate, rural England]
“
”
12. Dimensions of Practice
(Wenger, 2008)
Common cause aligned with disability advocacy
Sense of belonging and shared commitment
Joint
Enterprise
Mutual
Engagement
Shared
Repertoire
Opportunities for co-production
Roles and responsibilities: models of influence, motivation and
competitiveness
Co-creation and shaping of tools and methods (e.g. inclusive meeting
procedures and ‘easy read’ documentation)