1.
Managing in an XML
environment
Sarah O’Keefe, Scriptorium Publishing
background image
flickr: thelastminute
Thursday, November 4, 2010
2.
Twitter
❖ @sarahokeefe
❖ #tekom is the conference hashtag
Thursday, November 4, 2010
3.
About Sarah O’Keefe
❖ Founder and President, Scriptorium
Publishing, based in North Carolina, USA
❖ Content strategy for technical
communication
❖ Undergraduate degree in Comparative
Area Studies and German, Duke
University
Thursday, November 4, 2010
4.
This session is not about
XML implementation.
flickr: thelastminute
Thursday, November 4, 2010
5.
It’s about what happens
after the transition to XML.
flickr: soschilds
Thursday, November 4, 2010
6.
Technical communication
is evolving.
flickr: leafbug
Thursday, November 4, 2010
7.
Artisan to manufacturer
❖ Replace inefficient processes
❖ Automate formatting
❖ Increase speed of delivery
❖ Reduce quality of formatting?
❖ Reduce total cost of creating work
product
Thursday, November 4, 2010
8.
XML is the foundation
❖ Significant change resistance
❖ Not everyone needs XML today
❖ With XML, you can integrate
documentation into product development
❖ No longer is documentation separate in
its own proprietary world
❖ Engineers understand XML
Thursday, November 4, 2010
9.
Automation requires
compromises.
flickr: rtpeat
Thursday, November 4, 2010
10.
The unpleasant reality
❖ Automation makes content production
less expensive.
❖ “Lovingly handcrafted” documentation
can be more attractive. It will definitely
be more expensive.
Thursday, November 4, 2010
11.
Traditional quality
measurement: appearance
❖ Attractive HTML pages
❖ Copyfitting
❖ Production editing
❖ Line breaks
❖ Balanced headings
❖ Formatting tricks to make pages look nicer
Thursday, November 4, 2010
12.
An inconvenient truth
❖ Your readers probably don’t notice
advanced production, like copyfitting.
❖ XML does not equal ugly.
❖ Poor implementation of XML does equal
ugly.
❖ Currently, the poor PDF implementations
seem to outnumber the good
implementations.
Thursday, November 4, 2010
13.
XML changes tech comm
management.
❖ Transparency
❖ Accountability
❖ Metrics
❖ Skill sets
❖ Collaboration
Thursday, November 4, 2010
14.
XML increases transparency.
flickr: groundzero
Thursday, November 4, 2010
15.
Transparency factors
❖ No hiding behind formatting tasks
❖ Easy to review content; nightly builds,
can see progress
❖ Lots and lots of metrics available
Thursday, November 4, 2010
16.
A flood of data
❖ More data than we can reasonably
evaluate
❖ “Is this document a good document?”
❖ Transparency a threat to less skilled
writers
Thursday, November 4, 2010
17.
The problem with data
❖ Easy to measure:
❖ Page count
❖ Hard to measure:
❖ Document quality
❖ Significant temptation to measure the
wrong things.
❖ Transparency is a double-edged sword.
Thursday, November 4, 2010
18.
How do you measure
high-quality content?
❖ Writing: clear, concise, audience-
appropriate, accurate (!), up-to-date
❖ Formatting: Attractive, consistent,
well-executed
❖ Searchable, findable, discoverable
Thursday, November 4, 2010
20.
Up-to-date content
❖ Faster publishing
❖ Incremental publishing
❖ More current content
Thursday, November 4, 2010
21.
Formatting
❖ Automation
❖ Cheaper than hand-coding each
document
❖ Better consistency
Thursday, November 4, 2010
22.
Searchable
❖ Management must decide whether to
make documents available to search
engines
❖ Not a technical question
❖ A matter of policy
Thursday, November 4, 2010
23.
Findable
❖ Performs well in search results
❖ Affected by metadata
❖ Search engine optimization work
Thursday, November 4, 2010
24.
Discoverable
❖ Content that has in-bound links from
related stuff
❖ Content that is found by browsing
❖ Affected by your site’s reputation (better
reputation = more links)
❖ Social media strategy
Thursday, November 4, 2010
25.
Transparency means
accountability.
flickr: leafbug
Thursday, November 4, 2010
26.
Accountability
❖ Formatting responsibilities eliminated
❖ Metrics can show average topic creation time
❖ Person A takes twice the time of Person B
❖ Person A’s topics are more expensive in
localization
❖ Does management choose good metrics?
❖ Must go beyond perceived efficiency.
Thursday, November 4, 2010
27.
Seductive metrics
flickr: oriananash
Thursday, November 4, 2010
28.
Obvious = terrible
❖ Pages per hour
❖ Topics per day
❖ Percentage of reuse
Thursday, November 4, 2010
29.
Useful metrics
flickr: garryknight
Thursday, November 4, 2010
30.
What are useful metrics?
❖ Usage numbers/web analytics
❖ Search patterns
❖ What information do people search for?
❖ Which searches are successful or
unsuccesful?
❖ How do you measure content quality?
Thursday, November 4, 2010
31.
The writing quality
equation: QUACK
flickr: law_keven
Thursday, November 4, 2010
32.
If it looks like a duck…
Quality + Usability + Accuracy + Completeness + Conciseness
Cost
Thursday, November 4, 2010
33.
Quality
❖ Quality of content
❖ Grammar, mechanics, usage, reading
level (equivalent factors for visuals)
❖ More important for low literacy users,
non-native language users, and picky
users (language teachers!!)
❖ Less important for technical audiences?
Thursday, November 4, 2010
34.
Usability
❖ Critical for products where motivation is
low—products that people choose to use
❖ How attractive is the content
presentation?
❖ How good is the navigation?
❖ Does the content use the appropriate
medium (text, video, graphics)?
Thursday, November 4, 2010
35.
Accuracy
❖ Is the information correct?
❖ Extra-important for nuclear weapons
documentation and other products that
affect health and/or safety
❖ Less important for casual games
Thursday, November 4, 2010
36.
Completeness
❖ Are all features described?
❖ Are there hidden, undocumented
features?
❖ Games might leave out features on
purpose
❖ Medical device documentation should
not leave out information
Thursday, November 4, 2010
37.
Conciseness
❖ Is the content verbose, repetitive, or
redundant?
❖ Increases localization expenses
❖ Increases print expenses
❖ Causes comprehension problems
Thursday, November 4, 2010
38.
Build your own QUACK
model
Regulated Consumer
Metric documentation documentation
Quality 9 30
Usability 10 30
Accuracy 40 10
Completeness 40 10
Conciseness 1 20
Total 100 100
Thursday, November 4, 2010
39.
Writing in XML changes
the mix of skills needed.
Writing ability (W)
Tools (T)
Domain (D)
People skills (P)
P W P W
D
D
T T
Traditional XML
Thursday, November 4, 2010
40.
The biggest hurdle:
Collaboration
❖ Shift to topic focus rather than
deliverable focus
❖ Looking for excuses to avoid reuse
❖ Need trust
❖ High-functionining team
Thursday, November 4, 2010
41.
Final notes
❖ White paper version: scriptorium.com/
resources/white-papers/managing-
technical-communicators-in-an-xml-
environment
❖ scriptorium.com/resources for white
papers and webcast recordings
❖ scriptorium.com/events for upcoming
events
Thursday, November 4, 2010
42.
Thank you.
❖ Questions?
Thursday, November 4, 2010
43.
Contact information
❖ Sarah O’Keefe
❖ www.scriptorium.com
❖ okeefe@scriptorium.com
❖ Twitter: @sarahokeefe
Thursday, November 4, 2010
It appears that you have an ad-blocker running. By whitelisting SlideShare on your ad-blocker, you are supporting our community of content creators.
Hate ads?
We've updated our privacy policy.
We’ve updated our privacy policy so that we are compliant with changing global privacy regulations and to provide you with insight into the limited ways in which we use your data.
You can read the details below. By accepting, you agree to the updated privacy policy.