Successfully reported this slideshow.
Your SlideShare is downloading. ×

Managing in an XML environment

Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Upcoming SlideShare
CyberCamp 2012
CyberCamp 2012
Loading in …3
×

Check these out next

1 of 43 Ad

More Related Content

Viewers also liked (14)

Advertisement

More from Scriptorium Publishing (20)

Recently uploaded (20)

Advertisement

Managing in an XML environment

  1. 1. Managing in an XML environment Sarah O’Keefe, Scriptorium Publishing background image flickr: thelastminute Thursday, November 4, 2010
  2. 2. Twitter ❖ @sarahokeefe ❖ #tekom is the conference hashtag Thursday, November 4, 2010
  3. 3. About Sarah O’Keefe ❖ Founder and President, Scriptorium Publishing, based in North Carolina, USA ❖ Content strategy for technical communication ❖ Undergraduate degree in Comparative Area Studies and German, Duke University Thursday, November 4, 2010
  4. 4. This session is not about XML implementation. flickr: thelastminute Thursday, November 4, 2010
  5. 5. It’s about what happens after the transition to XML. flickr: soschilds Thursday, November 4, 2010
  6. 6. Technical communication is evolving. flickr: leafbug Thursday, November 4, 2010
  7. 7. Artisan to manufacturer ❖ Replace inefficient processes ❖ Automate formatting ❖ Increase speed of delivery ❖ Reduce quality of formatting? ❖ Reduce total cost of creating work product Thursday, November 4, 2010
  8. 8. XML is the foundation ❖ Significant change resistance ❖ Not everyone needs XML today ❖ With XML, you can integrate documentation into product development ❖ No longer is documentation separate in its own proprietary world ❖ Engineers understand XML Thursday, November 4, 2010
  9. 9. Automation requires compromises. flickr: rtpeat Thursday, November 4, 2010
  10. 10. The unpleasant reality ❖ Automation makes content production less expensive. ❖ “Lovingly handcrafted” documentation can be more attractive. It will definitely be more expensive. Thursday, November 4, 2010
  11. 11. Traditional quality measurement: appearance ❖ Attractive HTML pages ❖ Copyfitting ❖ Production editing ❖ Line breaks ❖ Balanced headings ❖ Formatting tricks to make pages look nicer Thursday, November 4, 2010
  12. 12. An inconvenient truth ❖ Your readers probably don’t notice advanced production, like copyfitting. ❖ XML does not equal ugly. ❖ Poor implementation of XML does equal ugly. ❖ Currently, the poor PDF implementations seem to outnumber the good implementations. Thursday, November 4, 2010
  13. 13. XML changes tech comm management. ❖ Transparency ❖ Accountability ❖ Metrics ❖ Skill sets ❖ Collaboration Thursday, November 4, 2010
  14. 14. XML increases transparency. flickr: groundzero Thursday, November 4, 2010
  15. 15. Transparency factors ❖ No hiding behind formatting tasks ❖ Easy to review content; nightly builds, can see progress ❖ Lots and lots of metrics available Thursday, November 4, 2010
  16. 16. A flood of data ❖ More data than we can reasonably evaluate ❖ “Is this document a good document?” ❖ Transparency a threat to less skilled writers Thursday, November 4, 2010
  17. 17. The problem with data ❖ Easy to measure: ❖ Page count ❖ Hard to measure: ❖ Document quality ❖ Significant temptation to measure the wrong things. ❖ Transparency is a double-edged sword. Thursday, November 4, 2010
  18. 18. How do you measure high-quality content? ❖ Writing: clear, concise, audience- appropriate, accurate (!), up-to-date ❖ Formatting: Attractive, consistent, well-executed ❖ Searchable, findable, discoverable Thursday, November 4, 2010
  19. 19. High-quality content ❖ Writing: clear, concise, audience- appropriate, accurate (!), up-to-date ❖ Formatting: Attractive, consistent, well-executed ❖ Searchable, findable, discoverable Thursday, November 4, 2010
  20. 20. Up-to-date content ❖ Faster publishing ❖ Incremental publishing ❖ More current content Thursday, November 4, 2010
  21. 21. Formatting ❖ Automation ❖ Cheaper than hand-coding each document ❖ Better consistency Thursday, November 4, 2010
  22. 22. Searchable ❖ Management must decide whether to make documents available to search engines ❖ Not a technical question ❖ A matter of policy Thursday, November 4, 2010
  23. 23. Findable ❖ Performs well in search results ❖ Affected by metadata ❖ Search engine optimization work Thursday, November 4, 2010
  24. 24. Discoverable ❖ Content that has in-bound links from related stuff ❖ Content that is found by browsing ❖ Affected by your site’s reputation (better reputation = more links) ❖ Social media strategy Thursday, November 4, 2010
  25. 25. Transparency means accountability. flickr: leafbug Thursday, November 4, 2010
  26. 26. Accountability ❖ Formatting responsibilities eliminated ❖ Metrics can show average topic creation time ❖ Person A takes twice the time of Person B ❖ Person A’s topics are more expensive in localization ❖ Does management choose good metrics? ❖ Must go beyond perceived efficiency. Thursday, November 4, 2010
  27. 27. Seductive metrics flickr: oriananash Thursday, November 4, 2010
  28. 28. Obvious = terrible ❖ Pages per hour ❖ Topics per day ❖ Percentage of reuse Thursday, November 4, 2010
  29. 29. Useful metrics flickr: garryknight Thursday, November 4, 2010
  30. 30. What are useful metrics? ❖ Usage numbers/web analytics ❖ Search patterns ❖ What information do people search for? ❖ Which searches are successful or unsuccesful? ❖ How do you measure content quality? Thursday, November 4, 2010
  31. 31. The writing quality equation: QUACK flickr: law_keven Thursday, November 4, 2010
  32. 32. If it looks like a duck… Quality + Usability + Accuracy + Completeness + Conciseness Cost Thursday, November 4, 2010
  33. 33. Quality ❖ Quality of content ❖ Grammar, mechanics, usage, reading level (equivalent factors for visuals) ❖ More important for low literacy users, non-native language users, and picky users (language teachers!!) ❖ Less important for technical audiences? Thursday, November 4, 2010
  34. 34. Usability ❖ Critical for products where motivation is low—products that people choose to use ❖ How attractive is the content presentation? ❖ How good is the navigation? ❖ Does the content use the appropriate medium (text, video, graphics)? Thursday, November 4, 2010
  35. 35. Accuracy ❖ Is the information correct? ❖ Extra-important for nuclear weapons documentation and other products that affect health and/or safety ❖ Less important for casual games Thursday, November 4, 2010
  36. 36. Completeness ❖ Are all features described? ❖ Are there hidden, undocumented features? ❖ Games might leave out features on purpose ❖ Medical device documentation should not leave out information Thursday, November 4, 2010
  37. 37. Conciseness ❖ Is the content verbose, repetitive, or redundant? ❖ Increases localization expenses ❖ Increases print expenses ❖ Causes comprehension problems Thursday, November 4, 2010
  38. 38. Build your own QUACK model Regulated Consumer Metric documentation documentation Quality 9 30 Usability 10 30 Accuracy 40 10 Completeness 40 10 Conciseness 1 20 Total 100 100 Thursday, November 4, 2010
  39. 39. Writing in XML changes the mix of skills needed. Writing ability (W) Tools (T) Domain (D) People skills (P) P W P W D D T T Traditional XML Thursday, November 4, 2010
  40. 40. The biggest hurdle: Collaboration ❖ Shift to topic focus rather than deliverable focus ❖ Looking for excuses to avoid reuse ❖ Need trust ❖ High-functionining team Thursday, November 4, 2010
  41. 41. Final notes ❖ White paper version: scriptorium.com/ resources/white-papers/managing- technical-communicators-in-an-xml- environment ❖ scriptorium.com/resources for white papers and webcast recordings ❖ scriptorium.com/events for upcoming events Thursday, November 4, 2010
  42. 42. Thank you. ❖ Questions? Thursday, November 4, 2010
  43. 43. Contact information ❖ Sarah O’Keefe ❖ www.scriptorium.com ❖ okeefe@scriptorium.com ❖ Twitter: @sarahokeefe Thursday, November 4, 2010

×