Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.
Focus Group Findings :
Three Design Comparison
Company Y, Location S
RESEARCH OBJECTIVES

   Comparison of three proposed design concepts
      Aspects of overall design
      Elicit react...
RESPONDENT PROFILE
   Common Characteristics
      SEC A, Age 30-40, Senior Managers OR Businessmen
            Disclos...
CONCEPTS
   A total of six concepts shown
      3 of Leading Architect (Concept A, Concept B, Concept C)
      3 Compan...
Key Findings
INDIVIDUAL RATING: AVERAGE SCORE

                        GROUP 1           GROUP 2
                     (Average Score)  ...
OVERALL RANKING OF CONCEPTS

1.   Concept A
2.   Concept E : Two Tower
3.   Concept F: Connected Two Towers
4.   Concept C...
REACTIONS TO CONCEPT A
   Only positives, no negatives
      Beautiful design
      Unique
      Less monotonous lines...
REACTIONS TO CONCEPT E (2 TOWER)
   Positives
      Modern design
      Round building …breaks monotony of straight lin...
REACTIONS TO CONCEPT F
               (CONNECTED 2 TOWERS)
   Positives
      Round building looking nice…breaks monoton...
REACTIONS TO CONCEPT C
   Positives
      Spacious
      Greenery, Pool, Fountain…..




    Negative
     Too many fl...
REACTIONS TO CONCEPT D
   Positives
      Modern looking
      All flats getting a good view




   Negatives
      L...
REACTIONS TO CONCEPT B
   Hardly any positives



   Negatives
      Very common
      Old fashioned design
      Lob...
CONCEPT E PREFERRED OVER
     THE OTHER Company Y DESIGNS

   This concept was liked best out of all three.
   It was co...
Reactions to Individual Elements
REACTIONS TO ELEMENTS
   Balconies
      Prefer covered ones; for security; for prevention from dust etc.
      Open ba...
PREMIUM ASSOCIATED WITH DUPLEX
            FLATS
   Duplex Flats
      Top Floor Duplex preferred to Ground Floor Duplex...
REACTIONS TO VIEWS
   Overall reaction to views was great
      “like Lonavala..”
      “You don’t get this kind of vie...
THE VIEWS

                                          Rehab View




Approach Road                                         ...
PREMIUMS ASSOCIATED WITH VIEWS

                    Rehab View
                   Rate : 6,500 +



Approach Road         ...
Appendix:
RESEARCH CONCEPTS USED
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in …5
×

Architecture Design Feedback: A Customer Perspective

1,474 views

Published on

Published in: Real Estate
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

Architecture Design Feedback: A Customer Perspective

  1. 1. Focus Group Findings : Three Design Comparison Company Y, Location S
  2. 2. RESEARCH OBJECTIVES  Comparison of three proposed design concepts  Aspects of overall design  Elicit reactions to features like views, balcony, terrace design, ventilation etc.  Comparison of the proposed design concept vis-à-vis other designs
  3. 3. RESPONDENT PROFILE  Common Characteristics  SEC A, Age 30-40, Senior Managers OR Businessmen  Disclosed Salaries between 1-2 lac per month  Couples since the decision is usually a joint one  Each focus group will have 3 couples  Budget for new house : 1 Crore & Above  Current Residential Location  Group 1 : Residing in Location S  Group 2 : Residing in Bandra to Mahim
  4. 4. CONCEPTS  A total of six concepts shown  3 of Leading Architect (Concept A, Concept B, Concept C)  3 Company Y concepts (Concept D, Concept E, Concept F )  Concept D : Single Tower  Concept E : Two Towers  Concept F : Two Towers Connected  Concept Showing Process  Individual rating of all six. Company Y concepts (coded D,E,F) discussed in-depth  Sequence rotation for the second group  P.S. : Leading Architectconcepts were fully fleshed out , with a lot of detail. On the other hand Company Y concepts were partially fleshed out, and a lot of detail pertaining to residential living was absent
  5. 5. Key Findings
  6. 6. INDIVIDUAL RATING: AVERAGE SCORE GROUP 1 GROUP 2 (Average Score) (Average Score) Concept A 8.5 8.5 Concept B 5 6.5 Concept C 6 7 Concept D 6.5 6.5 Single Tower Concept E 7.5 7.5 2 Towers Concept F 7 6.5 Connected 2 Towers
  7. 7. OVERALL RANKING OF CONCEPTS 1. Concept A 2. Concept E : Two Tower 3. Concept F: Connected Two Towers 4. Concept C 5. Concept D : Single Tower 6. Concept B
  8. 8. REACTIONS TO CONCEPT A  Only positives, no negatives  Beautiful design  Unique  Less monotonous lines  Looks residential  Everybody has their own view  Full access to light/ air  Not too many flats per floor – no cluttered/ congested feel  “Like Eiffel Tower”
  9. 9. REACTIONS TO CONCEPT E (2 TOWER)  Positives  Modern design  Round building …breaks monotony of straight lines in building design  Nice complex…garden, pool etc.  Seems to have all modern amenities  Better than concept D which has only straight lines  Better than concept F – less cluttered feel  Negatives  Since the concept is not fully fleshed out and details pertaining to residential living are not prominent, the concept looks like a commercial complex to some respondents although lesser than concept D and F
  10. 10. REACTIONS TO CONCEPT F (CONNECTED 2 TOWERS)  Positives  Round building looking nice…breaks monotony of straight lines  Modern Design  Negatives  Connected buildings not liked – gives a cluttered and congested feel  Lots of closely spaced flats , often overlooking each other  Makes it look more like a commercial building.Like a modern call centre example : Mindspace, Malad
  11. 11. REACTIONS TO CONCEPT C  Positives  Spacious  Greenery, Pool, Fountain….. Negative  Too many flats on the same floor, might get congested  Too many wings in the complex During some building/ complex celebration people will step on each other’s toes.  Building design common- only straight lines
  12. 12. REACTIONS TO CONCEPT D  Positives  Modern looking  All flats getting a good view  Negatives  Looks like a commercial complex  Monotonous design
  13. 13. REACTIONS TO CONCEPT B  Hardly any positives  Negatives  Very common  Old fashioned design  Lobby might be huge but small flats
  14. 14. CONCEPT E PREFERRED OVER THE OTHER Company Y DESIGNS  This concept was liked best out of all three.  It was considered modern  It was considered more unique than concept D and less congested than F  Balconies picked up spontaneously  Glass seemed to add to the design and merge seamlessly with it
  15. 15. Reactions to Individual Elements
  16. 16. REACTIONS TO ELEMENTS  Balconies  Prefer covered ones; for security; for prevention from dust etc.  Open balconies used for drying clothes etc; spoil the look of the building  Two options for the terrace  Terrace should be partially covered  Terrace should be covered to prevent rain, but allow light  Cross ventilation  Was not an issue even when the flat plan shown  “with such a lot of open space and greenery around, it will not be a problem”  Perception that towers do not ventilation issue
  17. 17. PREMIUM ASSOCIATED WITH DUPLEX FLATS  Duplex Flats  Top Floor Duplex preferred to Ground Floor Duplex  One can have ones privacy on terrace but not so for ground floor garden (people from other floors can see)  Ground Floor duplex with private gardens  20-25 % premium over normal flat rate  Top floor duplex with private terraces  30-35 % premium over normal flat rates  Some respondents gave it the same premium as ground floor (20%)
  18. 18. REACTIONS TO VIEWS  Overall reaction to views was great  “like Lonavala..”  “You don’t get this kind of view in Mumbai city”  “Very open….and green”  Reactions to Refinery  Some were indulgent….it is far…so not a problem  Some cautious…..’this can lead to diseases in the future’  Reactions to Rehab :Generally Negative  Most felt that “No, but nobody would want to look out…cant live overlooking this”  Some respondents felt that “Will not matter from 6th floor”
  19. 19. THE VIEWS Rehab View Approach Road Hill Building Complex View View Playground View Facing West – good in view of Vastu* *vastu /vas·tu/ (vahs´too) [Sanskrit] a traditional Hindu system of space design whose purpose is to promote well-being by constructing buildings in harmony with natural forces
  20. 20. PREMIUMS ASSOCIATED WITH VIEWS Rehab View Rate : 6,500 + Approach Road Hill View View Building Complex Rate : 9,500 + Rate : 9,500 + Playground View Rate : 10,000 +
  21. 21. Appendix: RESEARCH CONCEPTS USED

×