SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 28
ANALYTICAL METHOD VALIDATION
By Ch.Sandhya
Validation is defined as the process of establishing a
documented evidence that a specific process will consistently
produce a product meeting its predetermined specifications
and quality attributes.
The analytical procedure refers to the way of performing
the analysis. It should describe in detail the steps necessary to
perform each analytical test. This may include but is not
limited to the sample, the reference standard and the reagents
preparations, use of the apparatus, generation of the
calibration curve, use of the formulae for the calculation etc.
1. SPECIFICITY
SPECIFICITY is the ability to assess unequivocally the analyte in
presence of components which may be expected to be present.
An investigation of specificity should be conducted during the validation of
identification tests, the determination of impurities and the assay. The
procedures used to demonstrate specificity will depend on the intended
objective of the analytical procedure.
1.1. Identification
Suitable identification tests should be able to discriminate between
compounds of closely related structures which are likely to be present. The
discrimination of a procedure may be confirmed by obtaining positive
results (perhaps by comparison with a known reference material) from
samples containing the analyte, coupled with negative results from samples
which do not contain the analyte
In addition, the identification test may be applied to materials structurally
similar to or closely related to the analyte to confirm that a positive
response is not obtained. The choice of such potentially interfering
materials should be based on sound scientific judgement with a
consideration of the interferences that could occur.
1.2. Assay and Impurity Test(s)
For chromatographic procedures, representative chromatograms should be
used to demonstrate specificity and individual components should be
appropriately labelled. Similar considerations should be given to other
separation techniques.
Critical separations in chromatography should be investigated at an
appropriate level. For critical separations, specificity can be demonstrated
by the resolution of the two components which elute closest to each other.
In cases where a non-specific assay is used, other supporting analytical
procedures should be used to demonstrate overall specificity. For example,
where a titration is adopted to assay the drug substance for release, the
combination of the assay and a suitable test for impurities can be used.
The approach is similar for both assay and impurity tests:
1.2.1 Impurities are available
For the assay , this should involve demonstration of the discrimination of
the analyte in the presence of impurities and/or excipients; practically, this
can be done by spiking pure substances (drug substance or drug product)
with appropriate levels of impurities and/or excipients and demonstrating
that the assay result is unaffected by the presence of these materials (by
comparison with the assay result obtained on unspiked samples).
1.2.2 Impurities are not available
If impurity or degradation product standards are unavailable, specificity
may be demonstrated by comparing the test results of samples containing
impurities or degradation products to a second well-characterized
procedure e.g.: pharmacopoeial method or other validated analytical
procedure (independent procedure). As appropriate, this should include
samples stored under relevant stress conditions: light, heat, humidity,
acid/base hydrolysis and oxidation.
-for the assay, the two results should be compared;
- for the impurity tests, the impurity profiles should be compared.
- Peak purity tests may be useful to show that the analyte chromatographic
peak is not attributable to more than one component (e.g., diode array,
mass spectrometry).
2. LINEARITY
LINEARITY of an analytical procedure is its ability (within a given range)
to obtain test results which are directly proportional to the concentration
(amount) of analyte in the sample.
A linear relationship should be evaluated across the range (see section 3) of
the analytical procedure. It may be demonstrated directly on the drug
substance (by dilution of a standard stock solution) and/or separate
weighings of synthetic mixtures of the drug product components, using the
proposed procedure. The latter aspect can be studied during investigation
of the range.
Linearity should be evaluated by visual inspection of a plot of signals as a
function of analyte concentration or content.
If there is a linear relationship, test results should be
evaluated by appropriate statistical methods, for example, by
calculation of a regression line by the method of least squares.
The correlation coefficient, y-intercept, slope of the
regression line and residual sum of squares should be
submitted. A plot of the data should be included. In addition,
an analysis of the deviation of the actual data points from the
regression line may also be helpful for evaluating linearity.
For the establishment of linearity, a minimum of 5
concentrations is recommended. Other approaches should be
justified.
3. RANGE
RANGE of an analytical procedure is the interval between the upper and
lower concentration (amounts) of analyte in the sample (including these
concentrations) for which it has been demonstrated that the analytical
procedure has a suitable level of precision, accuracy and linearity
The specified range is normally derived from linearity studies and depends
on the intended application of the procedure. It is established by
confirming that the analytical procedure provides an acceptable degree of
linearity, accuracy and precision when applied to samples containing
amounts of analyte within or at the extremes of the specified range of the
analytical procedure.
The following minimum specified ranges should be considered:
- for the assay of a drug substance or a finished (drug) product: normally
from 80 to 120 percent of the test concentration;
- for content uniformity, covering a minimum of 70 to 130 percent of the
test concentration, unless a wider more appropriate range, based on the
nature of the dosage form (e.g., metered dose inhalers), is justified;
- for dissolution testing: +/-20 % over the specified range;
4. ACCURACY
ACCURACY of an analytical method is the closeness of test results
obtained by that method to the true value.
Accuracy should be established across the specified range of the analytical
procedure.
4.1. Assay
4.1.1 Drug Substance
Several methods of determining accuracy are available:
a) application of an analytical procedure to an analyte of known purity
b) comparison of the results of the proposed analytical procedure with
those of a second well-characterized procedure, the accuracy of which is
stated and/or defined
c) accuracy may be inferred once precision, linearity and specificity have
been established.
4.1.2 Drug Product
Several methods for determining accuracy are available:
a) application of the analytical procedure to synthetic mixtures of the drug
product components to which known quantities of the drug substance to be
analysed have been added;
b) in cases where it is impossible to obtain samples of all drug product
components , it may be acceptable either to add known quantities of the
analyte to the drug product or to compare the results obtained from a
second, well characterized procedure, the accuracy of which is stated
and/or defined
c) accuracy may be inferred once precision, linearity and specificity have
been established.
4.2. Impurities (Quantitation)
Accuracy should be assessed on samples (drug substance/drug product)
spiked with known amounts of impurities.
In cases where it is impossible to obtain samples of certain impurities
and/or degradation products, it is considered acceptable to compare results
obtained by an independent procedure. The response factor of the drug
substance can be used.
It should be clear how the individual or total impurities are to be
determined e.g., weight/weight or area percent, in all cases with respect to
the major analyte.
4.3. Recommended Data
Accuracy should be assessed using a minimum of 9 determinations over a
minimum of 3 concentration levels covering the specified range (e.g., 3
concentrations/3 replicates each of the total analytical procedure).
Accuracy should be reported as percent recovery by the assay of known
added amount of analyte in the sample or as the difference between the
mean and the accepted true value together with the confidence intervals.
5. PRECISION
PRECISION of an analytical method is the degree of agreement among
individual test results when the method is applied repeatedly to multiple
samplings of a homogenous sample.
Validation of tests for assay and for quantitative determination of
impurities includes an investigation of precision.
5.1. Repeatability It refers to the results of the method operating over a
short time interval under the same conditions.
Repeatability should be assessed using:
a) a minimum of 9 determinations covering the specified range for the
procedure (e.g., 3 concentrations/3 replicates each); or
b) a minimum of 6 determinations at 100% of the test concentration.
5.2. Intermediate Precision
It refers to the results from within lab variations due to random events
such as differences in experimental periods, analysts, equipment.
The extent to which intermediate precision should be established
depends on the circumstances under which the procedure is intended to be
used. The applicant should establish the effects of random events on the
precision of the analytical procedure.
Typical variations to be studied include days, analysts, equipment, etc. It
is not considered necessary to study these effects individually. The use of an
experimental design (matrix) is encouraged.
5.3. Reproducibility
It refers to the results of collaborative studies among laboratories.
Reproducibility is assessed by means of an inter-laboratory trial.
Reproducibility should be considered in case of the standardization of an
analytical procedure, for instance, for inclusion of procedures in
pharmacopoeias. These data are not part of the marketing authorization
dossier.
5.4. Recommended Data
The standard deviation, relative standard deviation (coefficient of
variation) and confidence interval should be reported for each type of
precision investigated.
6. DETECTION LIMIT
DETECTION LIMIT of an individual analytical procedure is the lowest
amount of analyte in a sample which can be detected but not necessarily
quantitated, under the stated experimental conditions.
Several approaches for determining the detection limit are possible,
depending on whether the procedure is a non-instrumental or
instrumental. Approaches other than those listed below may be acceptable.
6.1. Based on Visual Evaluation
Visual evaluation may be used for non-instrumental methods but may also
be used with instrumental methods.
The detection limit is determined by the analysis of samples with known
concentrations of analyte and by establishing the minimum level at which
the analyte can be reliably detected.
6.2. Based on Signal-to-Noise
This approach can only be applied to analytical procedures which exhibit
baseline noise.
Determination of the signal-to-noise ratio is performed by comparing
measured signals from samples with known low concentrations of analyte
with those of blank samples and establishing the minimum concentration
at which the analyte can be reliably detected. A signal-to-noise ratio
between 3 or 2:1 is generally considered acceptable for estimating the
detection limit.
6.3 Based on the Standard Deviation of the Response and the
Slope
The detection limit (DL) may be expressed as: DL = 3.3 σ/ S
where σ = the standard deviation of the response
S = the slope of the calibration curve
The slope S may be estimated from the calibration curve of the analyte. The
estimate of σ may be carried out in a variety of ways, for example:
6.3.1 Based on the Standard Deviation of the Blank
Measurement of the magnitude of analytical background response is
performed by analyzing an appropriate number of blank samples and
calculating the standard deviation of these responses.
6.3.2 Based on the Calibration Curve
A specific calibration curve should be studied using samples containing an
analyte in the range of DL. The residual standard deviation of a regression
line or the standard deviation of y-intercepts of regression lines may be
used as the standard deviation.
6.4 Recommended Data
The detection limit and the method used for determining the detection limit
should be presented. If DL is determined based on visual evaluation or
based on signal to noise ratio, the presentation of the relevant
chromatograms is considered acceptable for justification.
7. QUANTITATION LIMIT
QUANTITATION LIMIT of an individual analytical procedure is the
lowest amount of analyte in a sample which can be quantitatively
determined with suitable precision and accuracy
Several approaches for determining the quantitation limit are possible,
depending on whether the procedure is a non-instrumental or
instrumental. Approaches other than those listed below may be acceptable.
7.1. Based on Visual Evaluation
Visual evaluation may be used for non-instrumental methods but may also
be used with instrumental methods.
The quantitation limit is generally determined by the analysis of samples
with known concentrations of analyte and by establishing the minimum
level at which the analyte can be quantified with acceptable accuracy and
precision.
7.2. Based on Signal-to-Noise Approach
This approach can only be applied to analytical procedures that exhibit
baseline noise.
Determination of the signal-to-noise ratio is performed by comparing
measured signals from samples with known low concentrations of analyte
with those of blank samples and by establishing the minimum
concentration at which the analyte can be reliably quantified. A typical
signal-to-noise ratio is 10:1.
7.3. Based on the Standard Deviation of the Response and the
Slope
The quantitation limit (QL) may be expressed as: QL = 10 σ /S
where σ = the standard deviation of the response
S = the slope of the calibration curve
The slope S may be estimated from the calibration curve of the analyte.
The estimate of σ may be carried out in a variety of ways for example:
7.3.1 Based on Standard Deviation of the Blank
Measurement of the magnitude of analytical background response is
performed by analyzing an appropriate number of blank samples and
calculating the standard deviation of these responses.
7.3.2 Based on the Calibration Curve
A specific calibration curve should be studied using samples, containing an
analyte in the range of QL. The residual standard deviation of a regression
line or the standard deviation of y-intercepts of regression lines may be
used as the standard deviation.
7.4 Recommended Data
The QL and the method used for determining the QL should be presented.
The limit should be subsequently validated by the analysis of a suitable
number of samples known to be near or prepared at the quantitation limit.
8. ROBUSTNESS
ROBUSTNESS of an analytical procedure is a measure of its capacity to
remain unaffected by small, but deliberate variations in method parameters
and provides an indication of its reliability during normal usage.
The evaluation of robustness should be considered during the development
phase and depends on the type of procedure under study. It should show
the reliability of an analysis with respect to deliberate variations in method
parameters.
If measurements are susceptible to variations in analytical conditions, the
analytical conditions should be suitably controlled or a precautionary
statement should be included in the procedure. One consequence of the
evaluation of robustness should be that a series of system suitability
parameters (e.g., resolution test) is established to ensure that the validity of
the analytical procedure is maintained whenever used.
Examples of typical variations are:
- stability of analytical solutions;
- extraction time.
In the case of liquid chromatography, examples of typical variations are:
- influence of variations of pH in a mobile phase;
- influence of variations in mobile phase composition;
- different columns (different lots and/or suppliers);
- temperature;
- flow rate.
In the case of gas-chromatography, examples of typical variations are:
- different columns (different lots and/or suppliers);
- temperature;
- flow rate.
9. SYSTEM SUITABILITY TESTING
System suitability testing is an integral part of many analytical procedures.
The tests are based on the concept that the equipment, electronics,
analytical operations and samples to be analyzed constitute an integral
system that can be evaluated as such. System suitability test parameters to
be established for a particular procedure depend on the type of procedure
being validated. See Pharmacopoeias for additional information.
RUGGEDNESS of an analytical method is the degree of reproducibility of
test results obtained by the analysis of the same samples under a variety of
conditions, such as different laboratories different analyst, different
instruments, different lots of reagent, different elapsed assay times,
different assay temperatures, different days, etc.
It is included in USP but not included in ICH

More Related Content

What's hot

Calibaration and validation of hplc
Calibaration and validation of hplcCalibaration and validation of hplc
Calibaration and validation of hplcANANT NAG
 
Stability testing protocols
Stability testing protocolsStability testing protocols
Stability testing protocolsMehulJain143
 
Calibration of uv vissible spectroscopy
Calibration of uv vissible spectroscopyCalibration of uv vissible spectroscopy
Calibration of uv vissible spectroscopyPoornima Santhosh
 
Analytical method transfer
Analytical method transferAnalytical method transfer
Analytical method transferRamedanHasen
 
Ich guideline for stability testing
Ich guideline for stability testingIch guideline for stability testing
Ich guideline for stability testingShubham Gore
 
USFDA guidelines for bioanalytical method validation
USFDA guidelines for bioanalytical method validationUSFDA guidelines for bioanalytical method validation
USFDA guidelines for bioanalytical method validationbhatiaji123
 
To perform Analytical method validation of Paracetamol and Ibuprofen in pure ...
To perform Analytical method validation of Paracetamol and Ibuprofen in pure ...To perform Analytical method validation of Paracetamol and Ibuprofen in pure ...
To perform Analytical method validation of Paracetamol and Ibuprofen in pure ...Aakashdeep Raval
 
Qualification of UV VISIBLE SPECTROPHOTOMETER
Qualification of UV VISIBLE SPECTROPHOTOMETERQualification of UV VISIBLE SPECTROPHOTOMETER
Qualification of UV VISIBLE SPECTROPHOTOMETERDr.K.Venkateswara raju
 
QUALIFICATION OF UV-VISIBLE SPECTROPHOTOMETER, FTIR, DSC, HPLC
QUALIFICATION OF UV-VISIBLE SPECTROPHOTOMETER, FTIR, DSC, HPLCQUALIFICATION OF UV-VISIBLE SPECTROPHOTOMETER, FTIR, DSC, HPLC
QUALIFICATION OF UV-VISIBLE SPECTROPHOTOMETER, FTIR, DSC, HPLCAnupriyaNR
 
validation and calibration of HPLC
validation and calibration of HPLCvalidation and calibration of HPLC
validation and calibration of HPLCSakshi Garg
 
Ich guidelines for stability studies 1
Ich guidelines for stability studies 1Ich guidelines for stability studies 1
Ich guidelines for stability studies 1priyanka odela
 
Analytical method validation
Analytical method validationAnalytical method validation
Analytical method validationSUBHASISH DAS
 
IPQC of dosage form in pharmaceutical industry
IPQC of dosage form in pharmaceutical industryIPQC of dosage form in pharmaceutical industry
IPQC of dosage form in pharmaceutical industryKay kay shain marma
 
Calibration and Qualification of Analytical Instruments
Calibration and Qualification of Analytical InstrumentsCalibration and Qualification of Analytical Instruments
Calibration and Qualification of Analytical InstrumentsISF COLLEGE OF PHARMACY MOGA
 
PHARMACEUTICAL VALIDATION
 PHARMACEUTICAL  VALIDATION PHARMACEUTICAL  VALIDATION
PHARMACEUTICAL VALIDATIONSACHIN C P
 

What's hot (20)

Calibaration and validation of hplc
Calibaration and validation of hplcCalibaration and validation of hplc
Calibaration and validation of hplc
 
Stability testing protocols
Stability testing protocolsStability testing protocols
Stability testing protocols
 
Calibration of uv vissible spectroscopy
Calibration of uv vissible spectroscopyCalibration of uv vissible spectroscopy
Calibration of uv vissible spectroscopy
 
Analytical method transfer
Analytical method transferAnalytical method transfer
Analytical method transfer
 
Ich guideline for stability testing
Ich guideline for stability testingIch guideline for stability testing
Ich guideline for stability testing
 
USFDA guidelines for bioanalytical method validation
USFDA guidelines for bioanalytical method validationUSFDA guidelines for bioanalytical method validation
USFDA guidelines for bioanalytical method validation
 
To perform Analytical method validation of Paracetamol and Ibuprofen in pure ...
To perform Analytical method validation of Paracetamol and Ibuprofen in pure ...To perform Analytical method validation of Paracetamol and Ibuprofen in pure ...
To perform Analytical method validation of Paracetamol and Ibuprofen in pure ...
 
Qualification of UV VISIBLE SPECTROPHOTOMETER
Qualification of UV VISIBLE SPECTROPHOTOMETERQualification of UV VISIBLE SPECTROPHOTOMETER
Qualification of UV VISIBLE SPECTROPHOTOMETER
 
QUALIFICATION OF UV-VISIBLE SPECTROPHOTOMETER, FTIR, DSC, HPLC
QUALIFICATION OF UV-VISIBLE SPECTROPHOTOMETER, FTIR, DSC, HPLCQUALIFICATION OF UV-VISIBLE SPECTROPHOTOMETER, FTIR, DSC, HPLC
QUALIFICATION OF UV-VISIBLE SPECTROPHOTOMETER, FTIR, DSC, HPLC
 
validation and calibration of HPLC
validation and calibration of HPLCvalidation and calibration of HPLC
validation and calibration of HPLC
 
Ich guidelines for stability studies 1
Ich guidelines for stability studies 1Ich guidelines for stability studies 1
Ich guidelines for stability studies 1
 
Analytical method validation
Analytical method validationAnalytical method validation
Analytical method validation
 
ICH QSEM Guidelines
ICH QSEM GuidelinesICH QSEM Guidelines
ICH QSEM Guidelines
 
IPQC of dosage form in pharmaceutical industry
IPQC of dosage form in pharmaceutical industryIPQC of dosage form in pharmaceutical industry
IPQC of dosage form in pharmaceutical industry
 
Stability studies
Stability studies Stability studies
Stability studies
 
Calibration and Qualification of Analytical Instruments
Calibration and Qualification of Analytical InstrumentsCalibration and Qualification of Analytical Instruments
Calibration and Qualification of Analytical Instruments
 
ICH Guidelines
ICH GuidelinesICH Guidelines
ICH Guidelines
 
Out of specification (oos)1
Out of specification (oos)1Out of specification (oos)1
Out of specification (oos)1
 
Ipqc for tablets
Ipqc for tablets Ipqc for tablets
Ipqc for tablets
 
PHARMACEUTICAL VALIDATION
 PHARMACEUTICAL  VALIDATION PHARMACEUTICAL  VALIDATION
PHARMACEUTICAL VALIDATION
 

Viewers also liked

Analytical mehod validation explained sadasiva
Analytical mehod validation explained sadasivaAnalytical mehod validation explained sadasiva
Analytical mehod validation explained sadasivaSada Siva Rao Maddiguntla
 
Analytical method validation
Analytical method validationAnalytical method validation
Analytical method validationShivalingam Anugu
 
Analytical method validation workshop
Analytical method validation workshopAnalytical method validation workshop
Analytical method validation workshopSiham Abdallaha
 
Method Development and Method Validation for the estimation of Valganciclovir...
Method Development and Method Validation for the estimation of Valganciclovir...Method Development and Method Validation for the estimation of Valganciclovir...
Method Development and Method Validation for the estimation of Valganciclovir...google
 
analytical method validation
analytical method validationanalytical method validation
analytical method validationDr. Raja Abhilash
 
Assay-Method validation-PPT _slide
Assay-Method validation-PPT _slideAssay-Method validation-PPT _slide
Assay-Method validation-PPT _slideBhanu Prakash N
 
Related Substances-Method Validation-PPT_slide
Related Substances-Method Validation-PPT_slideRelated Substances-Method Validation-PPT_slide
Related Substances-Method Validation-PPT_slideBhanu Prakash N
 
Analytical Method Validation as per ICH vs USP
Analytical Method Validation as per ICH vs USPAnalytical Method Validation as per ICH vs USP
Analytical Method Validation as per ICH vs USPKushal Shah
 
ICH Q2 Analytical Method Validation
ICH Q2  Analytical Method ValidationICH Q2  Analytical Method Validation
ICH Q2 Analytical Method ValidationNaila Kanwal
 
Calibration and validation of analytical instruments
Calibration and validation of analytical instrumentsCalibration and validation of analytical instruments
Calibration and validation of analytical instrumentsSolairajan A
 
Analytical method validation by manoj ingale(best ppts)
Analytical method validation by manoj ingale(best ppts)Analytical method validation by manoj ingale(best ppts)
Analytical method validation by manoj ingale(best ppts)Indus Biotech Pvt.Ltd.
 
analytical method validation and validation of hplc
analytical method validation and validation of hplcanalytical method validation and validation of hplc
analytical method validation and validation of hplcvenkatesh thota
 
Analytical Method Validation
Analytical Method ValidationAnalytical Method Validation
Analytical Method ValidationStefan Holt
 
ANALYTICAL METHOD VALIDATION BY P.RAVISANKAR
ANALYTICAL METHOD VALIDATION BY P.RAVISANKAR ANALYTICAL METHOD VALIDATION BY P.RAVISANKAR
ANALYTICAL METHOD VALIDATION BY P.RAVISANKAR Dr. Ravi Sankar
 

Viewers also liked (17)

Analytical mehod validation explained sadasiva
Analytical mehod validation explained sadasivaAnalytical mehod validation explained sadasiva
Analytical mehod validation explained sadasiva
 
Analytical method validation
Analytical method validationAnalytical method validation
Analytical method validation
 
validation
validationvalidation
validation
 
Analytical method validation workshop
Analytical method validation workshopAnalytical method validation workshop
Analytical method validation workshop
 
Method Development and Method Validation for the estimation of Valganciclovir...
Method Development and Method Validation for the estimation of Valganciclovir...Method Development and Method Validation for the estimation of Valganciclovir...
Method Development and Method Validation for the estimation of Valganciclovir...
 
analytical method validation
analytical method validationanalytical method validation
analytical method validation
 
Analytical method validation
Analytical method validation Analytical method validation
Analytical method validation
 
Assay-Method validation-PPT _slide
Assay-Method validation-PPT _slideAssay-Method validation-PPT _slide
Assay-Method validation-PPT _slide
 
Analytical Method Validation
Analytical Method ValidationAnalytical Method Validation
Analytical Method Validation
 
Related Substances-Method Validation-PPT_slide
Related Substances-Method Validation-PPT_slideRelated Substances-Method Validation-PPT_slide
Related Substances-Method Validation-PPT_slide
 
Analytical Method Validation as per ICH vs USP
Analytical Method Validation as per ICH vs USPAnalytical Method Validation as per ICH vs USP
Analytical Method Validation as per ICH vs USP
 
ICH Q2 Analytical Method Validation
ICH Q2  Analytical Method ValidationICH Q2  Analytical Method Validation
ICH Q2 Analytical Method Validation
 
Calibration and validation of analytical instruments
Calibration and validation of analytical instrumentsCalibration and validation of analytical instruments
Calibration and validation of analytical instruments
 
Analytical method validation by manoj ingale(best ppts)
Analytical method validation by manoj ingale(best ppts)Analytical method validation by manoj ingale(best ppts)
Analytical method validation by manoj ingale(best ppts)
 
analytical method validation and validation of hplc
analytical method validation and validation of hplcanalytical method validation and validation of hplc
analytical method validation and validation of hplc
 
Analytical Method Validation
Analytical Method ValidationAnalytical Method Validation
Analytical Method Validation
 
ANALYTICAL METHOD VALIDATION BY P.RAVISANKAR
ANALYTICAL METHOD VALIDATION BY P.RAVISANKAR ANALYTICAL METHOD VALIDATION BY P.RAVISANKAR
ANALYTICAL METHOD VALIDATION BY P.RAVISANKAR
 

Similar to ANALYTICAL METHOD VALIDATION GUIDE

Analytical method validation 2020
Analytical method validation 2020Analytical method validation 2020
Analytical method validation 2020PRANJAY PATIL
 
ICH & WHO GUIDELINES ON validation
ICH & WHO GUIDELINES ON validationICH & WHO GUIDELINES ON validation
ICH & WHO GUIDELINES ON validationSACHIN C P
 
Validation of Analytical Procedures.pdf
Validation of Analytical Procedures.pdfValidation of Analytical Procedures.pdf
Validation of Analytical Procedures.pdfpharma344
 
To perform Analytical method validation of Paracetamol Tablets by UV-spectrop...
To perform Analytical method validation of Paracetamol Tablets by UV-spectrop...To perform Analytical method validation of Paracetamol Tablets by UV-spectrop...
To perform Analytical method validation of Paracetamol Tablets by UV-spectrop...Aakashdeep Raval
 
International conference on harmonisation validation of analytical procedures
International conference on harmonisation validation of analytical proceduresInternational conference on harmonisation validation of analytical procedures
International conference on harmonisation validation of analytical proceduresnoushin javidvand
 
Analytical method validation
Analytical method validationAnalytical method validation
Analytical method validationAJAYKUMAR4872
 
analytical method validation.pptx
analytical method validation.pptxanalytical method validation.pptx
analytical method validation.pptxLaxmidharSahoo11
 
Analytical Method Validation.pdf
Analytical Method Validation.pdfAnalytical Method Validation.pdf
Analytical Method Validation.pdfHiteshGajjar7
 
All you know About Analytical method validation
All you  know About Analytical method validation All you  know About Analytical method validation
All you know About Analytical method validation CynthiaCynthiaPLegro
 
Analytical Methods Validation| PV M Pharmacy QA
Analytical Methods Validation| PV M Pharmacy QAAnalytical Methods Validation| PV M Pharmacy QA
Analytical Methods Validation| PV M Pharmacy QAGhanshyam Nawale
 
Analytical method validation
Analytical method validationAnalytical method validation
Analytical method validationSai Praveen Reddy
 
Validation of Analytical Methods.pdf
Validation of Analytical Methods.pdfValidation of Analytical Methods.pdf
Validation of Analytical Methods.pdfanjaneyulu49
 
General Principles of Analytical Method of Validation.pdf
General Principles of Analytical Method of Validation.pdfGeneral Principles of Analytical Method of Validation.pdf
General Principles of Analytical Method of Validation.pdfTamannaKumari8
 
validation of analytical procedure USFDA Guidline
validation of analytical procedure USFDA Guidlinevalidation of analytical procedure USFDA Guidline
validation of analytical procedure USFDA GuidlineArchana Chavhan
 
Ich guidelines for validation final
Ich guidelines for validation finalIch guidelines for validation final
Ich guidelines for validation finalsumel ashique
 

Similar to ANALYTICAL METHOD VALIDATION GUIDE (20)

Validation
Validation Validation
Validation
 
Analytical method validation 2020
Analytical method validation 2020Analytical method validation 2020
Analytical method validation 2020
 
ICH & WHO GUIDELINES ON validation
ICH & WHO GUIDELINES ON validationICH & WHO GUIDELINES ON validation
ICH & WHO GUIDELINES ON validation
 
Validation of Analytical Procedures.pdf
Validation of Analytical Procedures.pdfValidation of Analytical Procedures.pdf
Validation of Analytical Procedures.pdf
 
To perform Analytical method validation of Paracetamol Tablets by UV-spectrop...
To perform Analytical method validation of Paracetamol Tablets by UV-spectrop...To perform Analytical method validation of Paracetamol Tablets by UV-spectrop...
To perform Analytical method validation of Paracetamol Tablets by UV-spectrop...
 
International conference on harmonisation validation of analytical procedures
International conference on harmonisation validation of analytical proceduresInternational conference on harmonisation validation of analytical procedures
International conference on harmonisation validation of analytical procedures
 
Analytical Method Validation
Analytical Method ValidationAnalytical Method Validation
Analytical Method Validation
 
Analytical method validation
Analytical method validationAnalytical method validation
Analytical method validation
 
Validation methods.pptx
Validation methods.pptxValidation methods.pptx
Validation methods.pptx
 
Analytical validation
Analytical validationAnalytical validation
Analytical validation
 
analytical method validation.pptx
analytical method validation.pptxanalytical method validation.pptx
analytical method validation.pptx
 
Analytical Method Validation.pdf
Analytical Method Validation.pdfAnalytical Method Validation.pdf
Analytical Method Validation.pdf
 
All you know About Analytical method validation
All you  know About Analytical method validation All you  know About Analytical method validation
All you know About Analytical method validation
 
Analytical Methods Validation| PV M Pharmacy QA
Analytical Methods Validation| PV M Pharmacy QAAnalytical Methods Validation| PV M Pharmacy QA
Analytical Methods Validation| PV M Pharmacy QA
 
Analytical method validation
Analytical method validationAnalytical method validation
Analytical method validation
 
Validation of Analytical Methods.pdf
Validation of Analytical Methods.pdfValidation of Analytical Methods.pdf
Validation of Analytical Methods.pdf
 
General Principles of Analytical Method of Validation.pdf
General Principles of Analytical Method of Validation.pdfGeneral Principles of Analytical Method of Validation.pdf
General Principles of Analytical Method of Validation.pdf
 
validation of analytical procedure USFDA Guidline
validation of analytical procedure USFDA Guidlinevalidation of analytical procedure USFDA Guidline
validation of analytical procedure USFDA Guidline
 
Q2 r1 guidelines
Q2 r1 guidelinesQ2 r1 guidelines
Q2 r1 guidelines
 
Ich guidelines for validation final
Ich guidelines for validation finalIch guidelines for validation final
Ich guidelines for validation final
 

Recently uploaded

User Guide: Capricorn FLX™ Weather Station
User Guide: Capricorn FLX™ Weather StationUser Guide: Capricorn FLX™ Weather Station
User Guide: Capricorn FLX™ Weather StationColumbia Weather Systems
 
well logging & petrophysical analysis.pptx
well logging & petrophysical analysis.pptxwell logging & petrophysical analysis.pptx
well logging & petrophysical analysis.pptxzaydmeerab121
 
projectile motion, impulse and moment
projectile  motion, impulse  and  momentprojectile  motion, impulse  and  moment
projectile motion, impulse and momentdonamiaquintan2
 
PPT Measures of protein quality.pptx in monogastric
PPT Measures of protein quality.pptx in monogastricPPT Measures of protein quality.pptx in monogastric
PPT Measures of protein quality.pptx in monogastricSonaliNamdeo1
 
GENERAL PHYSICS 2 REFRACTION OF LIGHT SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL GENPHYS2.pptx
GENERAL PHYSICS 2 REFRACTION OF LIGHT SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL GENPHYS2.pptxGENERAL PHYSICS 2 REFRACTION OF LIGHT SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL GENPHYS2.pptx
GENERAL PHYSICS 2 REFRACTION OF LIGHT SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL GENPHYS2.pptxRitchAndruAgustin
 
GenAI talk for Young at Wageningen University & Research (WUR) March 2024
GenAI talk for Young at Wageningen University & Research (WUR) March 2024GenAI talk for Young at Wageningen University & Research (WUR) March 2024
GenAI talk for Young at Wageningen University & Research (WUR) March 2024Jene van der Heide
 
Davis plaque method.pptx recombinant DNA technology
Davis plaque method.pptx recombinant DNA technologyDavis plaque method.pptx recombinant DNA technology
Davis plaque method.pptx recombinant DNA technologycaarthichand2003
 
Charateristics of the Angara-A5 spacecraft launched from the Vostochny Cosmod...
Charateristics of the Angara-A5 spacecraft launched from the Vostochny Cosmod...Charateristics of the Angara-A5 spacecraft launched from the Vostochny Cosmod...
Charateristics of the Angara-A5 spacecraft launched from the Vostochny Cosmod...Christina Parmionova
 
Gas-ExchangeS-in-Plants-and-Animals.pptx
Gas-ExchangeS-in-Plants-and-Animals.pptxGas-ExchangeS-in-Plants-and-Animals.pptx
Gas-ExchangeS-in-Plants-and-Animals.pptxGiovaniTrinidad
 
Servosystem Theory / Cybernetic Theory by Petrovic
Servosystem Theory / Cybernetic Theory by PetrovicServosystem Theory / Cybernetic Theory by Petrovic
Servosystem Theory / Cybernetic Theory by PetrovicAditi Jain
 
Citronella presentation SlideShare mani upadhyay
Citronella presentation SlideShare mani upadhyayCitronella presentation SlideShare mani upadhyay
Citronella presentation SlideShare mani upadhyayupadhyaymani499
 
Base editing, prime editing, Cas13 & RNA editing and organelle base editing
Base editing, prime editing, Cas13 & RNA editing and organelle base editingBase editing, prime editing, Cas13 & RNA editing and organelle base editing
Base editing, prime editing, Cas13 & RNA editing and organelle base editingNetHelix
 
REVISTA DE BIOLOGIA E CIÊNCIAS DA TERRA ISSN 1519-5228 - Artigo_Bioterra_V24_...
REVISTA DE BIOLOGIA E CIÊNCIAS DA TERRA ISSN 1519-5228 - Artigo_Bioterra_V24_...REVISTA DE BIOLOGIA E CIÊNCIAS DA TERRA ISSN 1519-5228 - Artigo_Bioterra_V24_...
REVISTA DE BIOLOGIA E CIÊNCIAS DA TERRA ISSN 1519-5228 - Artigo_Bioterra_V24_...Universidade Federal de Sergipe - UFS
 
CHROMATOGRAPHY PALLAVI RAWAT.pptx
CHROMATOGRAPHY  PALLAVI RAWAT.pptxCHROMATOGRAPHY  PALLAVI RAWAT.pptx
CHROMATOGRAPHY PALLAVI RAWAT.pptxpallavirawat456
 
《Queensland毕业文凭-昆士兰大学毕业证成绩单》
《Queensland毕业文凭-昆士兰大学毕业证成绩单》《Queensland毕业文凭-昆士兰大学毕业证成绩单》
《Queensland毕业文凭-昆士兰大学毕业证成绩单》rnrncn29
 
Introduction of Human Body & Structure of cell.pptx
Introduction of Human Body & Structure of cell.pptxIntroduction of Human Body & Structure of cell.pptx
Introduction of Human Body & Structure of cell.pptxMedical College
 
trihybrid cross , test cross chi squares
trihybrid cross , test cross chi squarestrihybrid cross , test cross chi squares
trihybrid cross , test cross chi squaresusmanzain586
 
Four Spheres of the Earth Presentation.ppt
Four Spheres of the Earth Presentation.pptFour Spheres of the Earth Presentation.ppt
Four Spheres of the Earth Presentation.pptJoemSTuliba
 
User Guide: Magellan MX™ Weather Station
User Guide: Magellan MX™ Weather StationUser Guide: Magellan MX™ Weather Station
User Guide: Magellan MX™ Weather StationColumbia Weather Systems
 

Recently uploaded (20)

User Guide: Capricorn FLX™ Weather Station
User Guide: Capricorn FLX™ Weather StationUser Guide: Capricorn FLX™ Weather Station
User Guide: Capricorn FLX™ Weather Station
 
well logging & petrophysical analysis.pptx
well logging & petrophysical analysis.pptxwell logging & petrophysical analysis.pptx
well logging & petrophysical analysis.pptx
 
projectile motion, impulse and moment
projectile  motion, impulse  and  momentprojectile  motion, impulse  and  moment
projectile motion, impulse and moment
 
PPT Measures of protein quality.pptx in monogastric
PPT Measures of protein quality.pptx in monogastricPPT Measures of protein quality.pptx in monogastric
PPT Measures of protein quality.pptx in monogastric
 
GENERAL PHYSICS 2 REFRACTION OF LIGHT SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL GENPHYS2.pptx
GENERAL PHYSICS 2 REFRACTION OF LIGHT SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL GENPHYS2.pptxGENERAL PHYSICS 2 REFRACTION OF LIGHT SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL GENPHYS2.pptx
GENERAL PHYSICS 2 REFRACTION OF LIGHT SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL GENPHYS2.pptx
 
GenAI talk for Young at Wageningen University & Research (WUR) March 2024
GenAI talk for Young at Wageningen University & Research (WUR) March 2024GenAI talk for Young at Wageningen University & Research (WUR) March 2024
GenAI talk for Young at Wageningen University & Research (WUR) March 2024
 
Interferons.pptx.
Interferons.pptx.Interferons.pptx.
Interferons.pptx.
 
Davis plaque method.pptx recombinant DNA technology
Davis plaque method.pptx recombinant DNA technologyDavis plaque method.pptx recombinant DNA technology
Davis plaque method.pptx recombinant DNA technology
 
Charateristics of the Angara-A5 spacecraft launched from the Vostochny Cosmod...
Charateristics of the Angara-A5 spacecraft launched from the Vostochny Cosmod...Charateristics of the Angara-A5 spacecraft launched from the Vostochny Cosmod...
Charateristics of the Angara-A5 spacecraft launched from the Vostochny Cosmod...
 
Gas-ExchangeS-in-Plants-and-Animals.pptx
Gas-ExchangeS-in-Plants-and-Animals.pptxGas-ExchangeS-in-Plants-and-Animals.pptx
Gas-ExchangeS-in-Plants-and-Animals.pptx
 
Servosystem Theory / Cybernetic Theory by Petrovic
Servosystem Theory / Cybernetic Theory by PetrovicServosystem Theory / Cybernetic Theory by Petrovic
Servosystem Theory / Cybernetic Theory by Petrovic
 
Citronella presentation SlideShare mani upadhyay
Citronella presentation SlideShare mani upadhyayCitronella presentation SlideShare mani upadhyay
Citronella presentation SlideShare mani upadhyay
 
Base editing, prime editing, Cas13 & RNA editing and organelle base editing
Base editing, prime editing, Cas13 & RNA editing and organelle base editingBase editing, prime editing, Cas13 & RNA editing and organelle base editing
Base editing, prime editing, Cas13 & RNA editing and organelle base editing
 
REVISTA DE BIOLOGIA E CIÊNCIAS DA TERRA ISSN 1519-5228 - Artigo_Bioterra_V24_...
REVISTA DE BIOLOGIA E CIÊNCIAS DA TERRA ISSN 1519-5228 - Artigo_Bioterra_V24_...REVISTA DE BIOLOGIA E CIÊNCIAS DA TERRA ISSN 1519-5228 - Artigo_Bioterra_V24_...
REVISTA DE BIOLOGIA E CIÊNCIAS DA TERRA ISSN 1519-5228 - Artigo_Bioterra_V24_...
 
CHROMATOGRAPHY PALLAVI RAWAT.pptx
CHROMATOGRAPHY  PALLAVI RAWAT.pptxCHROMATOGRAPHY  PALLAVI RAWAT.pptx
CHROMATOGRAPHY PALLAVI RAWAT.pptx
 
《Queensland毕业文凭-昆士兰大学毕业证成绩单》
《Queensland毕业文凭-昆士兰大学毕业证成绩单》《Queensland毕业文凭-昆士兰大学毕业证成绩单》
《Queensland毕业文凭-昆士兰大学毕业证成绩单》
 
Introduction of Human Body & Structure of cell.pptx
Introduction of Human Body & Structure of cell.pptxIntroduction of Human Body & Structure of cell.pptx
Introduction of Human Body & Structure of cell.pptx
 
trihybrid cross , test cross chi squares
trihybrid cross , test cross chi squarestrihybrid cross , test cross chi squares
trihybrid cross , test cross chi squares
 
Four Spheres of the Earth Presentation.ppt
Four Spheres of the Earth Presentation.pptFour Spheres of the Earth Presentation.ppt
Four Spheres of the Earth Presentation.ppt
 
User Guide: Magellan MX™ Weather Station
User Guide: Magellan MX™ Weather StationUser Guide: Magellan MX™ Weather Station
User Guide: Magellan MX™ Weather Station
 

ANALYTICAL METHOD VALIDATION GUIDE

  • 2. Validation is defined as the process of establishing a documented evidence that a specific process will consistently produce a product meeting its predetermined specifications and quality attributes. The analytical procedure refers to the way of performing the analysis. It should describe in detail the steps necessary to perform each analytical test. This may include but is not limited to the sample, the reference standard and the reagents preparations, use of the apparatus, generation of the calibration curve, use of the formulae for the calculation etc.
  • 3. 1. SPECIFICITY SPECIFICITY is the ability to assess unequivocally the analyte in presence of components which may be expected to be present. An investigation of specificity should be conducted during the validation of identification tests, the determination of impurities and the assay. The procedures used to demonstrate specificity will depend on the intended objective of the analytical procedure. 1.1. Identification Suitable identification tests should be able to discriminate between compounds of closely related structures which are likely to be present. The discrimination of a procedure may be confirmed by obtaining positive results (perhaps by comparison with a known reference material) from samples containing the analyte, coupled with negative results from samples which do not contain the analyte
  • 4. In addition, the identification test may be applied to materials structurally similar to or closely related to the analyte to confirm that a positive response is not obtained. The choice of such potentially interfering materials should be based on sound scientific judgement with a consideration of the interferences that could occur. 1.2. Assay and Impurity Test(s) For chromatographic procedures, representative chromatograms should be used to demonstrate specificity and individual components should be appropriately labelled. Similar considerations should be given to other separation techniques. Critical separations in chromatography should be investigated at an appropriate level. For critical separations, specificity can be demonstrated by the resolution of the two components which elute closest to each other.
  • 5. In cases where a non-specific assay is used, other supporting analytical procedures should be used to demonstrate overall specificity. For example, where a titration is adopted to assay the drug substance for release, the combination of the assay and a suitable test for impurities can be used. The approach is similar for both assay and impurity tests: 1.2.1 Impurities are available For the assay , this should involve demonstration of the discrimination of the analyte in the presence of impurities and/or excipients; practically, this can be done by spiking pure substances (drug substance or drug product) with appropriate levels of impurities and/or excipients and demonstrating that the assay result is unaffected by the presence of these materials (by comparison with the assay result obtained on unspiked samples).
  • 6. 1.2.2 Impurities are not available If impurity or degradation product standards are unavailable, specificity may be demonstrated by comparing the test results of samples containing impurities or degradation products to a second well-characterized procedure e.g.: pharmacopoeial method or other validated analytical procedure (independent procedure). As appropriate, this should include samples stored under relevant stress conditions: light, heat, humidity, acid/base hydrolysis and oxidation. -for the assay, the two results should be compared; - for the impurity tests, the impurity profiles should be compared. - Peak purity tests may be useful to show that the analyte chromatographic peak is not attributable to more than one component (e.g., diode array, mass spectrometry).
  • 7. 2. LINEARITY LINEARITY of an analytical procedure is its ability (within a given range) to obtain test results which are directly proportional to the concentration (amount) of analyte in the sample. A linear relationship should be evaluated across the range (see section 3) of the analytical procedure. It may be demonstrated directly on the drug substance (by dilution of a standard stock solution) and/or separate weighings of synthetic mixtures of the drug product components, using the proposed procedure. The latter aspect can be studied during investigation of the range. Linearity should be evaluated by visual inspection of a plot of signals as a function of analyte concentration or content.
  • 8. If there is a linear relationship, test results should be evaluated by appropriate statistical methods, for example, by calculation of a regression line by the method of least squares. The correlation coefficient, y-intercept, slope of the regression line and residual sum of squares should be submitted. A plot of the data should be included. In addition, an analysis of the deviation of the actual data points from the regression line may also be helpful for evaluating linearity. For the establishment of linearity, a minimum of 5 concentrations is recommended. Other approaches should be justified.
  • 9. 3. RANGE RANGE of an analytical procedure is the interval between the upper and lower concentration (amounts) of analyte in the sample (including these concentrations) for which it has been demonstrated that the analytical procedure has a suitable level of precision, accuracy and linearity The specified range is normally derived from linearity studies and depends on the intended application of the procedure. It is established by confirming that the analytical procedure provides an acceptable degree of linearity, accuracy and precision when applied to samples containing amounts of analyte within or at the extremes of the specified range of the analytical procedure.
  • 10. The following minimum specified ranges should be considered: - for the assay of a drug substance or a finished (drug) product: normally from 80 to 120 percent of the test concentration; - for content uniformity, covering a minimum of 70 to 130 percent of the test concentration, unless a wider more appropriate range, based on the nature of the dosage form (e.g., metered dose inhalers), is justified; - for dissolution testing: +/-20 % over the specified range;
  • 11. 4. ACCURACY ACCURACY of an analytical method is the closeness of test results obtained by that method to the true value. Accuracy should be established across the specified range of the analytical procedure. 4.1. Assay 4.1.1 Drug Substance Several methods of determining accuracy are available: a) application of an analytical procedure to an analyte of known purity b) comparison of the results of the proposed analytical procedure with those of a second well-characterized procedure, the accuracy of which is stated and/or defined c) accuracy may be inferred once precision, linearity and specificity have been established.
  • 12. 4.1.2 Drug Product Several methods for determining accuracy are available: a) application of the analytical procedure to synthetic mixtures of the drug product components to which known quantities of the drug substance to be analysed have been added; b) in cases where it is impossible to obtain samples of all drug product components , it may be acceptable either to add known quantities of the analyte to the drug product or to compare the results obtained from a second, well characterized procedure, the accuracy of which is stated and/or defined c) accuracy may be inferred once precision, linearity and specificity have been established.
  • 13. 4.2. Impurities (Quantitation) Accuracy should be assessed on samples (drug substance/drug product) spiked with known amounts of impurities. In cases where it is impossible to obtain samples of certain impurities and/or degradation products, it is considered acceptable to compare results obtained by an independent procedure. The response factor of the drug substance can be used. It should be clear how the individual or total impurities are to be determined e.g., weight/weight or area percent, in all cases with respect to the major analyte.
  • 14. 4.3. Recommended Data Accuracy should be assessed using a minimum of 9 determinations over a minimum of 3 concentration levels covering the specified range (e.g., 3 concentrations/3 replicates each of the total analytical procedure). Accuracy should be reported as percent recovery by the assay of known added amount of analyte in the sample or as the difference between the mean and the accepted true value together with the confidence intervals.
  • 15. 5. PRECISION PRECISION of an analytical method is the degree of agreement among individual test results when the method is applied repeatedly to multiple samplings of a homogenous sample. Validation of tests for assay and for quantitative determination of impurities includes an investigation of precision. 5.1. Repeatability It refers to the results of the method operating over a short time interval under the same conditions. Repeatability should be assessed using: a) a minimum of 9 determinations covering the specified range for the procedure (e.g., 3 concentrations/3 replicates each); or b) a minimum of 6 determinations at 100% of the test concentration.
  • 16. 5.2. Intermediate Precision It refers to the results from within lab variations due to random events such as differences in experimental periods, analysts, equipment. The extent to which intermediate precision should be established depends on the circumstances under which the procedure is intended to be used. The applicant should establish the effects of random events on the precision of the analytical procedure. Typical variations to be studied include days, analysts, equipment, etc. It is not considered necessary to study these effects individually. The use of an experimental design (matrix) is encouraged.
  • 17. 5.3. Reproducibility It refers to the results of collaborative studies among laboratories. Reproducibility is assessed by means of an inter-laboratory trial. Reproducibility should be considered in case of the standardization of an analytical procedure, for instance, for inclusion of procedures in pharmacopoeias. These data are not part of the marketing authorization dossier. 5.4. Recommended Data The standard deviation, relative standard deviation (coefficient of variation) and confidence interval should be reported for each type of precision investigated.
  • 18. 6. DETECTION LIMIT DETECTION LIMIT of an individual analytical procedure is the lowest amount of analyte in a sample which can be detected but not necessarily quantitated, under the stated experimental conditions. Several approaches for determining the detection limit are possible, depending on whether the procedure is a non-instrumental or instrumental. Approaches other than those listed below may be acceptable. 6.1. Based on Visual Evaluation Visual evaluation may be used for non-instrumental methods but may also be used with instrumental methods. The detection limit is determined by the analysis of samples with known concentrations of analyte and by establishing the minimum level at which the analyte can be reliably detected.
  • 19. 6.2. Based on Signal-to-Noise This approach can only be applied to analytical procedures which exhibit baseline noise. Determination of the signal-to-noise ratio is performed by comparing measured signals from samples with known low concentrations of analyte with those of blank samples and establishing the minimum concentration at which the analyte can be reliably detected. A signal-to-noise ratio between 3 or 2:1 is generally considered acceptable for estimating the detection limit.
  • 20. 6.3 Based on the Standard Deviation of the Response and the Slope The detection limit (DL) may be expressed as: DL = 3.3 σ/ S where σ = the standard deviation of the response S = the slope of the calibration curve The slope S may be estimated from the calibration curve of the analyte. The estimate of σ may be carried out in a variety of ways, for example: 6.3.1 Based on the Standard Deviation of the Blank Measurement of the magnitude of analytical background response is performed by analyzing an appropriate number of blank samples and calculating the standard deviation of these responses.
  • 21. 6.3.2 Based on the Calibration Curve A specific calibration curve should be studied using samples containing an analyte in the range of DL. The residual standard deviation of a regression line or the standard deviation of y-intercepts of regression lines may be used as the standard deviation. 6.4 Recommended Data The detection limit and the method used for determining the detection limit should be presented. If DL is determined based on visual evaluation or based on signal to noise ratio, the presentation of the relevant chromatograms is considered acceptable for justification.
  • 22. 7. QUANTITATION LIMIT QUANTITATION LIMIT of an individual analytical procedure is the lowest amount of analyte in a sample which can be quantitatively determined with suitable precision and accuracy Several approaches for determining the quantitation limit are possible, depending on whether the procedure is a non-instrumental or instrumental. Approaches other than those listed below may be acceptable. 7.1. Based on Visual Evaluation Visual evaluation may be used for non-instrumental methods but may also be used with instrumental methods. The quantitation limit is generally determined by the analysis of samples with known concentrations of analyte and by establishing the minimum level at which the analyte can be quantified with acceptable accuracy and precision.
  • 23. 7.2. Based on Signal-to-Noise Approach This approach can only be applied to analytical procedures that exhibit baseline noise. Determination of the signal-to-noise ratio is performed by comparing measured signals from samples with known low concentrations of analyte with those of blank samples and by establishing the minimum concentration at which the analyte can be reliably quantified. A typical signal-to-noise ratio is 10:1. 7.3. Based on the Standard Deviation of the Response and the Slope The quantitation limit (QL) may be expressed as: QL = 10 σ /S where σ = the standard deviation of the response S = the slope of the calibration curve The slope S may be estimated from the calibration curve of the analyte.
  • 24. The estimate of σ may be carried out in a variety of ways for example: 7.3.1 Based on Standard Deviation of the Blank Measurement of the magnitude of analytical background response is performed by analyzing an appropriate number of blank samples and calculating the standard deviation of these responses. 7.3.2 Based on the Calibration Curve A specific calibration curve should be studied using samples, containing an analyte in the range of QL. The residual standard deviation of a regression line or the standard deviation of y-intercepts of regression lines may be used as the standard deviation. 7.4 Recommended Data The QL and the method used for determining the QL should be presented. The limit should be subsequently validated by the analysis of a suitable number of samples known to be near or prepared at the quantitation limit.
  • 25. 8. ROBUSTNESS ROBUSTNESS of an analytical procedure is a measure of its capacity to remain unaffected by small, but deliberate variations in method parameters and provides an indication of its reliability during normal usage. The evaluation of robustness should be considered during the development phase and depends on the type of procedure under study. It should show the reliability of an analysis with respect to deliberate variations in method parameters. If measurements are susceptible to variations in analytical conditions, the analytical conditions should be suitably controlled or a precautionary statement should be included in the procedure. One consequence of the evaluation of robustness should be that a series of system suitability parameters (e.g., resolution test) is established to ensure that the validity of the analytical procedure is maintained whenever used.
  • 26. Examples of typical variations are: - stability of analytical solutions; - extraction time. In the case of liquid chromatography, examples of typical variations are: - influence of variations of pH in a mobile phase; - influence of variations in mobile phase composition; - different columns (different lots and/or suppliers); - temperature; - flow rate. In the case of gas-chromatography, examples of typical variations are: - different columns (different lots and/or suppliers); - temperature; - flow rate.
  • 27. 9. SYSTEM SUITABILITY TESTING System suitability testing is an integral part of many analytical procedures. The tests are based on the concept that the equipment, electronics, analytical operations and samples to be analyzed constitute an integral system that can be evaluated as such. System suitability test parameters to be established for a particular procedure depend on the type of procedure being validated. See Pharmacopoeias for additional information.
  • 28. RUGGEDNESS of an analytical method is the degree of reproducibility of test results obtained by the analysis of the same samples under a variety of conditions, such as different laboratories different analyst, different instruments, different lots of reagent, different elapsed assay times, different assay temperatures, different days, etc. It is included in USP but not included in ICH