Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

Why Managed Service Providers Should Embrace Container Technology

1,559 views

Published on

This talk will demonstrate the importance and value for Managed Service Providers (MSPs) and cloud providers of building their business models around the management of containers. It will also explore the various container technologies being used today and why one might be utilized over another. The object is not to give a technical discussion on the subject, but rather to cover the benefits of Linux containers and how their use can be incorporated into strategies for future business planning and development.

Published in: Internet
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

Why Managed Service Providers Should Embrace Container Technology

  1. 1. 1 Sagi Brody, CTO @WebairSagi sagi@webair.com sagi@webair.com sagi@webair.com Why Managed Service Providers Should Embrace Container Technology
  2. 2. 2 What’s a Managed Service Provider Anyways? • Outsourced DevOps • Not many folks doing it • Difficult to scale
  3. 3. 3 Why do folks use MSPs/CSPs? • Small IT teams who’d rather focus on AppDev • Common in non-tech industries who prefer to outsource • Cost • Liability & Responsibility • Unicorns are hard to find • MSP != IaaS • Not just for web • Ride the wave of new technologies
  4. 4. 4 What’s it look like? LAMP at scale, redis, memcache, nginx.. LAMP at scale, redis, memcache, nginx.. Linux, FreeBSD, Agents/AutomationLinux, FreeBSD, Agents/Automation HAProxy + keepalived, nginx, csyncHAProxy + keepalived, nginx, csync MikroTik, PaloAlto, JuniperMikroTik, PaloAlto, Juniper FlowSpec, SDN hooksFlowSpec, SDN hooks L7 mitigation + automated /24 swingsL7 mitigation + automated /24 swings Redirects to CDN in App or via HTTP rewriteRedirects to CDN in App or via HTTP rewrite Applicatio n Serve r Load Balancers Firewal l Networ k DDo S CDN/Proxie s BareMetal, VM (Hybrid SAN, Flash,Xen/Vmware), or IaaS Infrastructur e
  5. 5. 5 Full Stack Management - how? • Need standardized platform, yet customizable as required • Client/Staff web portals to automate common tasks • Templated OS deployments w/ management scripts/monitoring • OSS/BSS + SPOT • FreeBSD - C daemon w/ SSL transport + custom API • Linux - Ansible - Py scripts • SPOT injects into 3rd party services • Custom layered monitoring • Docs/Diagrams • Social Monitoring • TaaS LinuxLinux ServiceService SSL SSH App routerApp router CLI Scripts CLI Scripts PortalPortal AppsApps OSSOSS MonitoringMonitoring FbsdFbsd
  6. 6. 6 Full Stack Management - how? usage: manageserver mysql [-h] [-v] [-a <newdbname> <newuser> <newpassword>] [-d <newdbname>] [--remove-db <dbname>] [-l] [-u <dbname> <newuser> <newpassword>] [--remove-user <username>] [--list-user] [-e <dest-file> [<dbname> ...]] [--list-backup] [-b {on,off,status,run,restore}] [-c] [-f <filepath>] [-r <root password>] optional arguments: -h, --help show this help message and exit -v, --verbose set verbosity level -a <newdbname> <newuser> <newpassword>, --add <newdbname> <newuser> <newpassword> Add a MySQL db and a user with all privileges on that db -d <newdbname>, --add-db <newdbname> Add a MySQL db --remove-db <dbname> Delete MySQL db -l, --list-db List all MySQL databases -u <dbname> <newuser> <newpassword>, --add-user <dbname> <newuser> <newpassword> Add a new MySQL user with all privileges on an existing db --remove-user <username> Delete MySQL user from all hosts --list-user List all MySQL users -e <dest-file> [<dbname> ...], --export <dest-file> [<dbname> ...] Dump DB to file. use .gz/.bz2 in file name to compress. blank dbname to dump all DBs. --list-backup List all MySQL backups -b {on,off,status,run,restore}, --backup {on,off,status,run,restore} Check status/run/restore and turn on/off Mysql Backups cron job -c, --cleanup Optional argument used with '--backup run' to remove backups older than 5 days -f <filepath>, --file <filepath> Argument used with '--backup restore' to pass the .tar.gz backup file path -r <root password>, --root <root password> Optional argument used with Mysql related commands to pass the root password
  7. 7. 7 MSP Pain Points • Guilty until proven innocent • Not always involved or notified of code updates and changes • Not aware of 3rd party integrations • Legacy apps (“bring us your tired your poor..”) • Backup/Restore • Application security • Not involved in design • Multi-tenancy systems (vendor nightmare) • Per client customization • Keeping OS/Software current Containers to the rescue?
  8. 8. 8 Containerizing Multi-Tenant Shared Infrastructure Usage: lbmanager <LB_ID> OPTIONS <LB_ID> A friendly name for identification. OPTIONS Consists of one or more of the following switchs. Each switch could be repeated as many times as needed. -v <IP> Add the IP to the VIPs (Will not serve untill at least 1 VIP exist) -V <IP> Remove the IP from the VIPs (Will stop serving if there isn't any VIP) -r <IP> Add the IP to the RIPs -R <IP> Remove the IP from the RIPs -p <PORT> Add the PORT to the listening ports (Will not serve until at least 1 port exist) -P <PORT> Remove the PORT from the listening ports (Will stop serving if there isn't any port) -u <USER> User name for the stats section (Default:lbstats) -s <PASS> Password for the stats section ( Default: md5(<LB_ID>-<shared_secret>) ) -1 Make the LB_ID active on 1st LB and standby on 2nd LB (Default) -2 Make the LB_ID active on 2nd LB and standby on 1st LB -c Add comment to a LB_ID (Enclose in "") -e Enable LB_ID. HAProxy will start to serving LB_ID -d Disable LB_ID. HAProxy will stop to serving LB_ID -o Enable SSL offloading with the certificates in the /etc/haproxy/lb_sets/LB_ID/certs/ directory -X Destroy & Backup the LB_ID -L Locks the LB_ID against further modifications.DON'T USE WITH OTHER OPTIONS, they will be ignored -O Disable SSL offloading -U Reset client stats username to default one (Default:lbstats) -S Reset client stats password to default hash with shared secret ( md5(<LB_ID>-<shared_secret>) ) -b <METHOD> Balancing method on the backend servers, is one of: leastconn Sends requests to the server with least connections (Default) roundrobin static-rr first source rdp-cookie NOTE: When satisfied with all the changes run "lbmanager reload" to make the changes live. LB Service: Ansible, CentOS, HAProxy, keepalived, csync, git, automation interface
  9. 9. 9 Containerizing Multi-Tenant Shared Infrastructure LB Service: Ansible, CentOS, HAProxy, keepalived, csync, git, automation interface Issues: • Multiple customer configs merged into master file • Resources shared across customers • Limit of customization per customer forces standalones • Standalones can add up quickly, also need HA • Manual configuration rollbacks • Version control of deployed app Containerize: • Container per customer deployment • Customization w/o standing up additional resources • Finer resource monitoring per customer == potential for new chargeback methods • Create ELB like service using stateless containers + autoscale scheduler (Exhibitor+Zookeeper)
  10. 10. 10 Containerizing Multi-Tenant Shared Infrastructure Shared Hosting Environments # ls -al total 10 drwx--x--x 4 clifico-www clifico 512 Aug 8 2008 . drwx--x--x 88 root wheel 3584 Jul 30 13:09 .. lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 15 Aug 8 2008 bin -> /www/apache/bin drwxr-xr-x 3 root wheel 512 Aug 19 00:07 conf lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 17 Aug 8 2008 icons -> /www/apache/icons lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 19 Aug 8 2008 libexec -> /www/apache/libexec drwxr-xr-x 2 clifico-www clifico 512 Aug 19 00:05 logs lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 19 Aug 8 2008 modules -> /www/apache/modules zsmgcontrol-www 47227 0.0 0.0 54096 0 ?? IW - 0:00.00 /www/vapache/smgcontrol/bin/httpd -f /www/vapache/smgcontrol/conf/httpd.conf -DPHP5 revsinn 49687 0.0 0.8 82332 34604 ?? I 2:13AM 0:01.13 /www/vapache/revsinn/bin/httpd -f /www/vapache/revsinn/conf/httpd.conf -DPHP5 laphta-www 51439 0.0 0.2 55944 6352 ?? I 2:14AM 0:02.20 /www/vapache/laphta/bin/httpd -f /www/vapache/laphta/conf/httpd.conf -DPHP5 laphta-www 53163 0.0 0.8 79604 33180 ?? I 2:15AM 0:02.53 /www/vapache/laphta/bin/httpd -f /www/vapache/laphta/conf/httpd.conf -DPHP5 msdivamarie 54375 0.0 0.7 75108 29032 ?? I 2:15AM 0:02.63 /www/vapache/msdivamarie/bin/httpd -f /www/vapache/msdivamarie/conf/httpd.conf -DPHP5 woodswe-www 55193 0.0 0.0 75588 0 ?? IW - 0:00.00 /www/vapache/woodswe/bin/httpd -f /www/vapache/woodswe/conf/httpd.conf -DPHP5 frenchelite-www 55280 0.0 1.1 90392 44660 ?? I 2:16AM 0:00.73 /www/vapache/frenchelite/bin/httpd -f /www/vapache/frenchelite/conf/httpd.conf -DPHP5 woodswe-www 55289 0.0 0.0 75588 0 ?? IW - 0:00.00 /www/vapache/woodswe/bin/httpd -f /www/vapache/woodswe/conf/httpd.conf -DPHP5 woodswe-www 55290 0.0 0.0 75588 0 ?? IW - 0:00.00 /www/vapache/woodswe/bin/httpd -f /www/vapache/woodswe/conf/httpd.conf -DPHP5 apachectl.. if [ "x$user" = "x-" ]; then user=$(/usr/bin/find /www/vapache -maxdepth 1 -mindepth 1 -type d | xargs -n 1 basename) split=`expr $(echo $user | wc -w) / 4` fi for i in $user ; do apacheinit $i if [ $? -eq 1 ]; then echo "WARNING: No such user $i" continue fi • Custom apachectl + supporting scripts • Separate apache instance per user • ‘jail like’ separation via perms + ps mod • Scripts to standup/destroy new customer environments
  11. 11. 11 Containerizing Multi-Tenant Shared Infrastructure Shared Hosting Environments: Issues: • No per user resource limits, only application • No dependency separation • 0day local root exploits • Difficult to move users Containerize: • Don’t deploy user accounts, deploy applications • Cloudapps == deploy small Xen instance + application specific template • Already being done well in containers, tons of OSS in dockerhub • Easier to manage hosts • Potential for better security than user land
  12. 12. 12 OS & Software Updates • Common issue among MSPs • We upgrade based on Stability, Security, Feature requests, and opportunistically • Feature requests most common (latest ffmpeg..) • Manual updates for older OS versions • Who knows if something broke post update? • Safer for us to standup new VMs and move workloads, but time consuming New functionality: • CoreOS FastPatch • Atomic rpm-ostree • RancherOS - per service container rollbacks • Why upgrade the OS if you can redeploy workload onto already upgraded host
  13. 13. 13 Platform Customization Issues: • Standardized platforms handle 80-90% of common use cases.. • More Flexibility needed - as close to internal DevOps teams as possible (our heroes) • Automation exists today, but still deploying VMs to solve problems • VMs deployed ‘at will’ based on templates or snapshots • Difficult to keep up w/ various tweaks & changes • Many multi-purpose VMs exist (web/db/cdn-origin/memcache) Containerize: • docker-compose customer’s environment • Less time to update update compose file then alternative work • Auto-scale • Already using abstracted LB & shared storage for configs and data • Unionfs no longer the only storage option • RDS type services already exist on perm
  14. 14. 14 SaaS Platform Segmentation & Scale • SaaS platforms with X customers, each with their own VH directive, subdir, or subdomain • Each customer gets their own container • App can identify customer baed on URL string or HOST • Allows per customer changes without affecting others • Fork and customize codebase per customer • Easier to align multiple platform flavors per customer/container • Adding container monitoring (sysdig, prometheus) allows instant resource utilization per platform customer - quickly find noisy neighbors and ability to up charge for resources • Single customer load spikes may not affect other customers • Shard customer across zones/regions
  15. 15. 15 Site Segmentation • Typical to see single servers or clusters with 50-5,000 micro sites on same Apache/nginx daemons • Hard to track intermittent slowness or downtime • Poor security - 1 Hacked site has potential to effect entire cluster/server • Containerize each site: • Decoupling app from code makes break/fix easier for MSP to fix or redeploy • Per site resource utilization • Secure
  16. 16. 16 Pipeline • Rollbacks very difficult today on customer + MSP • Most development happens offsite • MSP should help in CI/CD pipeline building process and provide dev resources • Build new pipelines on-demand to help customers w/ various workflows • Free up existing enterprise test resources so multiple devs can test concurrently and w/o interference Pipeline:
  17. 17. 17 VPCC & PPCC • Virtual Private Container Clouds & Physical Private Container Clouds • Hybrid - containers, private clouds, bare metal, xconnects • Proven & trusted enterprise feature sets: high availability, distributed resource schedulers, multi-tenant segmentation, DraaS, redundant networking, enterprise support • Private repositories • Isolated for compliance (PCI, HIPAA) • Existing stable and easy to use workload portability platforms and hyper-converged infrastructure • Overlay networks for interconnects • Not CaaS
  18. 18. 18 VPCC & PPCC CoreOS, Fleet, etcd, cloud-init, weave, cAdvisor
  19. 19. 19 Ecosystem software • Tectonic (by CoreOS) - Enterprise support - Kubernetes, etcd, flannel, docker/rkt, coreOS, beautiful GUI, A/B updates • Atomic (RedHat) - Enterprise support, subscription-manager, A/B updates, use any fedora based distro, Selinux • DockerSwarm • RancherOS - Lightweight, containerizes all system processes, A/B updates, simple rollback • Triton - Abstracted single docker host across clustered compute/network environment • Vmware Photon,Snappy Ubuntu Core, Mesosphere DCOS • Match Ecosystem to use case, workloads and skills
  20. 20. 20 Internal • Convert to micro-services based architecture for internal use cases (like us..) • Development of services spread across teams and infrastructures • Better customer provisioning and segmentation on shared resource platforms such as load balancers, mail servers, elasticsearch • Standup training environments • “Drink your own Kool-Aid” • Ability to help customers containerize Apps as a value add
  21. 21. 21 Where we started… • Started w/ BareMetal (wasteful) • 2007 -VMs in production (20-50 per host) • Hit Storage Bottleneck • Storage Innovation • Hit Network bottleneck • Network Innovation • Containers -> Full circle • Cycle will continue….
  22. 22. 22 THANK YOU! Sagi Brody, CTO @WebairSagi sagi@webair.com

×