Successfully reported this slideshow.
Your SlideShare is downloading. ×

Understanding and tackling resistances to structural change for gender equality in higher education

Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Loading in …3
×

Check these out next

1 of 38 Ad

More Related Content

Slideshows for you (20)

Similar to Understanding and tackling resistances to structural change for gender equality in higher education (20)

Advertisement

More from SUPERA project (20)

Recently uploaded (20)

Advertisement

Understanding and tackling resistances to structural change for gender equality in higher education

  1. 1. Understanding and Tackling Resistances to Structural Change for Gender Equality in Higher Education 10th February 2022
  2. 2. Presenter and Authors Lucy Ferguson, Yellow Window (presenter and co-author) Lucy Fe Lut Mergaert, Yellow Window (co-author)
  3. 3. Questions for self-reflection throughout the presentation ➔What kinds of resistances to structural change for gender equality have you experienced? ➔How do you currently deal with resistances? ➔How could you deal with resistances differently? ➔What role do resistances play in the structural change process?
  4. 4. Quotation for Discussion “We should celebrate as a success cases where the status quo has to start to work hard to reproduce itself and has to invest resources and energy in resisting gender change. The need for visible resistance to positive change is a success. It is evidence of the chipping away of patriarchy; it might be chipping away really slowly, but it is changing.” (Fiona Mackay, quoted in Aruna Rao, Joanne Sandler, David Kelleher, Carol Miller, Gender at Work: Theory and Practice for 21st Century Organizations, Routledge 2016)
  5. 5. Do you agree with this quotation? Please answer in the chat
  6. 6. Presentation draws on SUPERA Resistances Toolkit
  7. 7. The SUPERA partners:
  8. 8. Background to Resistances Toolkit ● Collaborative efforts – SUPERA, GE Academy, Gender-SMART and GEARING-Roles ● Three in-person and two online workshops ● SUPERA project webinar which followed up on the resistances toolkits developed
  9. 9. Outcomes of participation in resistances workshops ● Participants reframed their thinking by acknowledging that resistances are a normal and necessary part of change. ● Resistances something which can be managed ● Encouraged to be subversive and strategic
  10. 10. Content of Toolkit and Presentation ● PART 1 - Categorising and theorising resistances ● PART 2 - Common guidelines for dealing with resistances ● PART 3 - Resistances Action Plan
  11. 11. PART 1 CATEGORISING RESISTANCES - WHY, HOW, WHO?
  12. 12. Why? ● Specifically about gender equality, or other issues altogether? ● Limited resources – both human and financial resources ● Conflicting interests and priorities for funding ● Growth of the discrimination/diversity agenda
  13. 13. Why? ● Lack of capability ● Gender blindness ● Gender fatigue ● Assumptions regarding what is behind resistances may at times be arbitrary
  14. 14. Can you identify any of these reasons for resistances in your context?
  15. 15. How? Active or explicit resistances ● Hostility, sexist humour, devaluation and disparaging women’s accomplishments or professional commitment, interrupting, denial of access to resources, etc. ● “Essentialist” discourses about gender inequalities ● Depoliticising and marginalising gender inequality arguments and data as a matter of contrasting opinions, rather than “facts”.
  16. 16. How? Passive or implicit resistances ● Negative body language, foot dragging, inertia, chilly climate, making the procedures more difficult, giving less attention, uncomfortable social atmosphere ● Giving less access to institutional resources, discomfort, inappropriate treatment, providing mere lip-service support but nothing else, etc.
  17. 17. Can you identify any of these forms of resistances in your context?
  18. 18. Who? ● Individual resistances come from a single person, more often from men, although not exclusively. ● A group resistance emerges from a collection of individuals ● Institutional resistances are more difficult to address, as they tend to be a product of institutional culture or an institution’s legal or administrative procedures.
  19. 19. Who? ● The superficial or preliminary manifestation of resistances may be seen differently as the project develops. ● It should be noted that in some workshops, participants found it more difficult to identify institutional resistances compared to individual
  20. 20. Can you identify any of these forms of resistances in your context? Do you find this a useful categorisation?
  21. 21. PART 2 Common guidelines for dealing with resistances
  22. 22. Caring for the “core team”  Lack of recognition of “academic care work”.  While core teams of change agents work hard to implement GEPs, this is often not acknowledged in any formal manner or reflected in workloads or promotion opportunities.
  23. 23. Caring for the core team  Demotivation, exhaustion and burnout  The work is hard and the battles are fierce, as well as expectations around presenting gender equality in a “friendly, non-threatening manner”  Sometimes, structural change is being promoted by one person or small group
  24. 24. Four Ss (for us) ➔Success – celebrate small wins to help motivation ➔Sanity – use energies where they can have most impact ➔Self-care – look after each other’s well-being ➔Sustainability – bear in mind this is a long-term process
  25. 25. APR Within the ‘For Us’ approach, participants developed the Anticipate – Prepare – Rehearse strategy. Rehearsal involves practising arguments and counter-arguments and learning to communicate politically - for example, use of role plays has been particularly useful.
  26. 26. Role Play Scenarios Can you think of a specific example of a scenario which you often face that could be helped with the use of role play with your team? Please share an example in the chat
  27. 27. Tackling resistances to implementation
  28. 28. Acting politically  Develop tactics and strategies  Networks and alliances  Dealing with bureaucracy  Improving arguments and communication
  29. 29. Do you have any examples or experiences to share? Please do so in the chat.
  30. 30. PART 3 Resistances Action Plan
  31. 31. Stage 1 – Identify Resistances Identify a resistance Categorise the resistance Acknowledge alternative reactions to this resistance Identify the techniques and strategies required to deal with this resistance
  32. 32. Stage 2 – Prioritise How easy/difficult is each example of resistance to address? How important is this example of resistance toto the overall implementation of the gender equality plan? Prioritise which resistances are to be addressed and in what order
  33. 33. Stage 3 – Follow up Session How has the toolkit been applied? Share initiatives and actions undertaken to address the resistances prioritised Identify persistent and emerging resistances
  34. 34. Stage 4 – Revision of Action Plans Revise Action Plans, taking into account the feedback from peers Share initiatives and actions undertaken to address the resistances prioritised Identify persistent and emerging resistances Action Plans become living documents which respond to the changing circumstances of institutions
  35. 35. Would you be interested in developing an Action Plan for your team/institution?
  36. 36. Thank you for your attention! Any questions?
  37. 37. Please read and share the SUPERA Resistances Toolkit https://www.superaproj ect.eu/resistances-to- structural-change-in- gender-equality/

×